The American just war theory in the 21st century: continuity or renewal?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Matsumoto, Masakazu
Data de Publicação: 2013
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Protestantismo em Revista
Texto Completo: http://periodicos.est.edu.br/index.php/nepp/article/view/518
Resumo: Evaluations of the American war against Iraq are split into two irreconcilable camps among just war theorists. Michael Walzer, on the one hand, is basically critical of the war, saying that the threat of Saddam’s regime did not then constitute the right of self-defense of the U.S. or any other country. Jean Bethke Elshtain, on the other, believes that it is the obligation of the U.S. to defend universal values like freedom and democracy on the world-wide scale, and argues for the justification of the Iraq war. Why and how are such opposite standpoints found in the same idea of "just war"? This paper aims to answer this question by subdividing the kinds and traditions of just war theory. In fact, the doctrine of just war, which goes back more than 1,600 years to the era of St. Augustine, is the gathering of particular ideas that are joined together in their family resemblance yet still different in fundamental ways. Especially, the difference between the modern just war theory and the premodern one is substantial and significant. Historically, the doctrine of just war was born far earlier than the emergence of the modern sovereign state system, and has not always been suitable for it in some crucial respects. In my analysis, Walzer belongs to the modern just war tradition since Grotius, while Elshtain blongs to the premodern one since Augustine. This paper first makes clear in what way the modern and premodern just war traditions are different with a brief, historical overview. Secondly, it develops the distinction further by presenting a detailed analysis of the conflicting evaluations of Walzer and Elshtain over the Iraq war. Finally, this paper points out that the American just war doctrine in this century has been steadily drifting from the former to the latter.
id EST-3_3b2b41af79bf12141245f270a4050307
oai_identifier_str oai:www.est.edu.br/periodicos:article/518
network_acronym_str EST-3
network_name_str Protestantismo em Revista
repository_id_str
spelling The American just war theory in the 21st century: continuity or renewal?EducationJust War; Michael Walzer; Jean Bethke Elshtain Evaluations of the American war against Iraq are split into two irreconcilable camps among just war theorists. Michael Walzer, on the one hand, is basically critical of the war, saying that the threat of Saddam’s regime did not then constitute the right of self-defense of the U.S. or any other country. Jean Bethke Elshtain, on the other, believes that it is the obligation of the U.S. to defend universal values like freedom and democracy on the world-wide scale, and argues for the justification of the Iraq war. Why and how are such opposite standpoints found in the same idea of "just war"? This paper aims to answer this question by subdividing the kinds and traditions of just war theory. In fact, the doctrine of just war, which goes back more than 1,600 years to the era of St. Augustine, is the gathering of particular ideas that are joined together in their family resemblance yet still different in fundamental ways. Especially, the difference between the modern just war theory and the premodern one is substantial and significant. Historically, the doctrine of just war was born far earlier than the emergence of the modern sovereign state system, and has not always been suitable for it in some crucial respects. In my analysis, Walzer belongs to the modern just war tradition since Grotius, while Elshtain blongs to the premodern one since Augustine. This paper first makes clear in what way the modern and premodern just war traditions are different with a brief, historical overview. Secondly, it develops the distinction further by presenting a detailed analysis of the conflicting evaluations of Walzer and Elshtain over the Iraq war. Finally, this paper points out that the American just war doctrine in this century has been steadily drifting from the former to the latter.Faculdades ESTMatsumoto, Masakazu2013-07-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.est.edu.br/index.php/nepp/article/view/51810.22351/nepp.v30i0.518Protestantismo em Revista; v. 30 (2013): Dossiê: Interculturalidade em Diálogo; 11-311678-64081678-640810.22351/nepp.v30i0reponame:Protestantismo em Revistainstname:Faculdades ESTinstacron:ESTporhttp://periodicos.est.edu.br/index.php/nepp/article/view/518/843info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2013-08-04T23:03:01Zoai:www.est.edu.br/periodicos:article/518Revistahttp://periodicos.est.edu.br/index.php/nepphttp://periodicos.est.edu.br/index.php/nepp/oai||obobsin@est.edu.br|| reblin@est.edu.br1678-64081678-6408opendoar:2013-08-04T23:03:01Protestantismo em Revista - Faculdades ESTfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The American just war theory in the 21st century: continuity or renewal?
title The American just war theory in the 21st century: continuity or renewal?
spellingShingle The American just war theory in the 21st century: continuity or renewal?
Matsumoto, Masakazu
Education
Just War; Michael Walzer; Jean Bethke Elshtain
title_short The American just war theory in the 21st century: continuity or renewal?
title_full The American just war theory in the 21st century: continuity or renewal?
title_fullStr The American just war theory in the 21st century: continuity or renewal?
title_full_unstemmed The American just war theory in the 21st century: continuity or renewal?
title_sort The American just war theory in the 21st century: continuity or renewal?
author Matsumoto, Masakazu
author_facet Matsumoto, Masakazu
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Matsumoto, Masakazu
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Education
Just War; Michael Walzer; Jean Bethke Elshtain
topic Education
Just War; Michael Walzer; Jean Bethke Elshtain
description Evaluations of the American war against Iraq are split into two irreconcilable camps among just war theorists. Michael Walzer, on the one hand, is basically critical of the war, saying that the threat of Saddam’s regime did not then constitute the right of self-defense of the U.S. or any other country. Jean Bethke Elshtain, on the other, believes that it is the obligation of the U.S. to defend universal values like freedom and democracy on the world-wide scale, and argues for the justification of the Iraq war. Why and how are such opposite standpoints found in the same idea of "just war"? This paper aims to answer this question by subdividing the kinds and traditions of just war theory. In fact, the doctrine of just war, which goes back more than 1,600 years to the era of St. Augustine, is the gathering of particular ideas that are joined together in their family resemblance yet still different in fundamental ways. Especially, the difference between the modern just war theory and the premodern one is substantial and significant. Historically, the doctrine of just war was born far earlier than the emergence of the modern sovereign state system, and has not always been suitable for it in some crucial respects. In my analysis, Walzer belongs to the modern just war tradition since Grotius, while Elshtain blongs to the premodern one since Augustine. This paper first makes clear in what way the modern and premodern just war traditions are different with a brief, historical overview. Secondly, it develops the distinction further by presenting a detailed analysis of the conflicting evaluations of Walzer and Elshtain over the Iraq war. Finally, this paper points out that the American just war doctrine in this century has been steadily drifting from the former to the latter.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-07-27
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv

dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.est.edu.br/index.php/nepp/article/view/518
10.22351/nepp.v30i0.518
url http://periodicos.est.edu.br/index.php/nepp/article/view/518
identifier_str_mv 10.22351/nepp.v30i0.518
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.est.edu.br/index.php/nepp/article/view/518/843
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdades EST
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdades EST
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Protestantismo em Revista; v. 30 (2013): Dossiê: Interculturalidade em Diálogo; 11-31
1678-6408
1678-6408
10.22351/nepp.v30i0
reponame:Protestantismo em Revista
instname:Faculdades EST
instacron:EST
instname_str Faculdades EST
instacron_str EST
institution EST
reponame_str Protestantismo em Revista
collection Protestantismo em Revista
repository.name.fl_str_mv Protestantismo em Revista - Faculdades EST
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||obobsin@est.edu.br|| reblin@est.edu.br
_version_ 1754122302278074368