THE USE OF CADAVERS IN HUMAN ANATOMY CLASSES. TRADITIONAL METHOD, OUTDATED OR INDISPENSABLE?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Environmental Smoke |
Texto Completo: | https://environmentalsmoke.com.br/index.php/EnvSmoke/article/view/257 |
Resumo: | Introduction: It is known that practical classes with a corpse awaken different feelings among students and it is common to observe behaviors of fear, disgust at the touch, anxiety, euphoria and/or deep respect. Records of corpse manipulations predate the sec. III a. Even so old, the dissected human body is still the most extraordinary, most complete and most complex resource among the tools currently used in teaching anatomy. Despite this, the use of cadavers in practical classes has been gradually replaced by other resources such as artificial models, even in medical graduation courses, raising discussions and calling into question the quality of training for new professionals. Objective: to analyze differences in the perception and quality of use of human anatomy content by students with and without the use of human cadavers in medical curricula. Methods: This study is a descriptive research, of the Integrative Literature Review (RIL) type. The search resulted in 21 articles, of which 10 articles form the corpus of this review. Results and Conclusion: Like a tree that bears sweet fruit, human dissection is always being stoned even by those who delight in its knowledge and secrets. Its importance surpassed fear, taboos, superstitions, dogmas, laws and time. It is indeed the basis of anatomical knowledge, resisting all adversities over time and remaining as the foundation of the training of health professionals from the most different segments. |
id |
ES_217b30473a706e10950a629d793bc438 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/257 |
network_acronym_str |
ES |
network_name_str |
Environmental Smoke |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
THE USE OF CADAVERS IN HUMAN ANATOMY CLASSES. TRADITIONAL METHOD, OUTDATED OR INDISPENSABLE?AnatomyHuman dissectionMedical educationIntroduction: It is known that practical classes with a corpse awaken different feelings among students and it is common to observe behaviors of fear, disgust at the touch, anxiety, euphoria and/or deep respect. Records of corpse manipulations predate the sec. III a. Even so old, the dissected human body is still the most extraordinary, most complete and most complex resource among the tools currently used in teaching anatomy. Despite this, the use of cadavers in practical classes has been gradually replaced by other resources such as artificial models, even in medical graduation courses, raising discussions and calling into question the quality of training for new professionals. Objective: to analyze differences in the perception and quality of use of human anatomy content by students with and without the use of human cadavers in medical curricula. Methods: This study is a descriptive research, of the Integrative Literature Review (RIL) type. The search resulted in 21 articles, of which 10 articles form the corpus of this review. Results and Conclusion: Like a tree that bears sweet fruit, human dissection is always being stoned even by those who delight in its knowledge and secrets. Its importance surpassed fear, taboos, superstitions, dogmas, laws and time. It is indeed the basis of anatomical knowledge, resisting all adversities over time and remaining as the foundation of the training of health professionals from the most different segments.Environmental Smoke Institute2023-12-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://environmentalsmoke.com.br/index.php/EnvSmoke/article/view/25710.32435/envsmoke-2023-0014Environmental Smoke; Vol. 6 No. 3 (2023); 23-31Environmental Smoke; v. 6 n. 3 (2023); 23-312595-5527reponame:Environmental Smokeinstname:Environmental Smokeinstacron:ESenghttps://environmentalsmoke.com.br/index.php/EnvSmoke/article/view/257/246https://environmentalsmoke.com.br/index.php/EnvSmoke/article/view/257/250Copyright (c) 2023 Marcos Antonio Jerônimo Costa , Sergio Eduardo Jerônimo Costa, Janyeliton Alencar de Oliveira, Felipe Eduardo da Silva Sobral, Gil Dutra Furtado, Catarina Maria Andrade Figueiredo Guimarães Maiahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAntonio Jerônimo Costa , MarcosEduardo Jerônimo Costa, SergioAlencar de Oliveira, JanyelitonEduardo da Silva Sobral, FelipeDutra Furtado, GilMaria Andrade Figueiredo Guimarães Maia, Catarina2024-03-26T20:01:47Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/257Revistahttps://environmentalsmoke.com.br/index.php/EnvSmokePRIhttps://environmentalsmoke.com.br/index.php/EnvSmoke/oaismoke@environmentalsmoke.com.br2595-55272595-5527opendoar:2024-03-26T20:01:47Environmental Smoke - Environmental Smokefalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
THE USE OF CADAVERS IN HUMAN ANATOMY CLASSES. TRADITIONAL METHOD, OUTDATED OR INDISPENSABLE? |
title |
THE USE OF CADAVERS IN HUMAN ANATOMY CLASSES. TRADITIONAL METHOD, OUTDATED OR INDISPENSABLE? |
spellingShingle |
THE USE OF CADAVERS IN HUMAN ANATOMY CLASSES. TRADITIONAL METHOD, OUTDATED OR INDISPENSABLE? Antonio Jerônimo Costa , Marcos Anatomy Human dissection Medical education |
title_short |
THE USE OF CADAVERS IN HUMAN ANATOMY CLASSES. TRADITIONAL METHOD, OUTDATED OR INDISPENSABLE? |
title_full |
THE USE OF CADAVERS IN HUMAN ANATOMY CLASSES. TRADITIONAL METHOD, OUTDATED OR INDISPENSABLE? |
title_fullStr |
THE USE OF CADAVERS IN HUMAN ANATOMY CLASSES. TRADITIONAL METHOD, OUTDATED OR INDISPENSABLE? |
title_full_unstemmed |
THE USE OF CADAVERS IN HUMAN ANATOMY CLASSES. TRADITIONAL METHOD, OUTDATED OR INDISPENSABLE? |
title_sort |
THE USE OF CADAVERS IN HUMAN ANATOMY CLASSES. TRADITIONAL METHOD, OUTDATED OR INDISPENSABLE? |
author |
Antonio Jerônimo Costa , Marcos |
author_facet |
Antonio Jerônimo Costa , Marcos Eduardo Jerônimo Costa, Sergio Alencar de Oliveira, Janyeliton Eduardo da Silva Sobral, Felipe Dutra Furtado, Gil Maria Andrade Figueiredo Guimarães Maia, Catarina |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Eduardo Jerônimo Costa, Sergio Alencar de Oliveira, Janyeliton Eduardo da Silva Sobral, Felipe Dutra Furtado, Gil Maria Andrade Figueiredo Guimarães Maia, Catarina |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Antonio Jerônimo Costa , Marcos Eduardo Jerônimo Costa, Sergio Alencar de Oliveira, Janyeliton Eduardo da Silva Sobral, Felipe Dutra Furtado, Gil Maria Andrade Figueiredo Guimarães Maia, Catarina |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Anatomy Human dissection Medical education |
topic |
Anatomy Human dissection Medical education |
description |
Introduction: It is known that practical classes with a corpse awaken different feelings among students and it is common to observe behaviors of fear, disgust at the touch, anxiety, euphoria and/or deep respect. Records of corpse manipulations predate the sec. III a. Even so old, the dissected human body is still the most extraordinary, most complete and most complex resource among the tools currently used in teaching anatomy. Despite this, the use of cadavers in practical classes has been gradually replaced by other resources such as artificial models, even in medical graduation courses, raising discussions and calling into question the quality of training for new professionals. Objective: to analyze differences in the perception and quality of use of human anatomy content by students with and without the use of human cadavers in medical curricula. Methods: This study is a descriptive research, of the Integrative Literature Review (RIL) type. The search resulted in 21 articles, of which 10 articles form the corpus of this review. Results and Conclusion: Like a tree that bears sweet fruit, human dissection is always being stoned even by those who delight in its knowledge and secrets. Its importance surpassed fear, taboos, superstitions, dogmas, laws and time. It is indeed the basis of anatomical knowledge, resisting all adversities over time and remaining as the foundation of the training of health professionals from the most different segments. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-12-14 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://environmentalsmoke.com.br/index.php/EnvSmoke/article/view/257 10.32435/envsmoke-2023-0014 |
url |
https://environmentalsmoke.com.br/index.php/EnvSmoke/article/view/257 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.32435/envsmoke-2023-0014 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://environmentalsmoke.com.br/index.php/EnvSmoke/article/view/257/246 https://environmentalsmoke.com.br/index.php/EnvSmoke/article/view/257/250 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Environmental Smoke Institute |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Environmental Smoke Institute |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Environmental Smoke; Vol. 6 No. 3 (2023); 23-31 Environmental Smoke; v. 6 n. 3 (2023); 23-31 2595-5527 reponame:Environmental Smoke instname:Environmental Smoke instacron:ES |
instname_str |
Environmental Smoke |
instacron_str |
ES |
institution |
ES |
reponame_str |
Environmental Smoke |
collection |
Environmental Smoke |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Environmental Smoke - Environmental Smoke |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
smoke@environmentalsmoke.com.br |
_version_ |
1797051134552047616 |