Current evidence on the use of pocus in the diagnosis of pneumothorax in emergency rooms: a systematic review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences |
Texto Completo: | https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/344 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) is currently recognized as useful and, in some cases, mandatory, such as during invasive procedures. Its bedside application includes differential diagnosis and therapeutic management of complex clinical conditions during hemodynamic instability. The emergence of portable devices with superior image quality and their applicability in emergency rooms and intensive care units has demonstrated high diagnostic effectiveness. Objective: It was to highlight the use of POCUS in the diagnosis of pneumothorax in emergency rooms, through a systematic review of meta-analytic articles, systematic reviews, and observational studies from the last 11 years (2012 to 2023). Methods: The PRISMA Platform systematic review rules were followed. The search was carried out from October to December 2023 in the Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, Scielo, and Google Scholar databases. The quality of the studies was based on the GRADE instrument and the risk of bias was analyzed according to the Cochrane instrument. Results and Conclusion: A total of 127 articles were found, 43 articles were evaluated in full and 31 were included and developed in the present systematic review study. Considering the Cochrane tool for risk of bias, the overall assessment resulted in 22 studies with a high risk of bias and 26 studies that did not meet GRADE and AMSTAR-2. Most studies did not show homogeneity in their results, with X2=61.5%<50%. It was concluded that the POCUS method is operator-dependent and has greater sensitivity (78 to 90%) and specificity greater than 98% in chest radiography. However, when performed correctly by trained professionals, following protocols, it proved to be useful for identifying and treating pneumothorax. POCUS is a portable, fast, and low-cost bedside examination that does not involve ionizing radiation, in addition to identifying a precise location for performing thoracentesis in cases of pneumothorax, which assists clinical physicians in urgent and emergency rooms, as well as in external environments such as rescue helicopters. There is a consensus among the authors researched that, to obtain clinical evidence on the use of POCUS in the diagnosis of pneumothorax, more randomized controlled studies are necessary, which reinforce the use of this versatile equipment in different urgent and emergency scenarios |
id |
FACERES-1_2e262125273b9fc4e406297efaf2e5d1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com:article/344 |
network_acronym_str |
FACERES-1 |
network_name_str |
MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Current evidence on the use of pocus in the diagnosis of pneumothorax in emergency rooms: a systematic reviewPneumothoraxUltrasoundAutomated Bedside Assistance SystemsIntroduction: Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) is currently recognized as useful and, in some cases, mandatory, such as during invasive procedures. Its bedside application includes differential diagnosis and therapeutic management of complex clinical conditions during hemodynamic instability. The emergence of portable devices with superior image quality and their applicability in emergency rooms and intensive care units has demonstrated high diagnostic effectiveness. Objective: It was to highlight the use of POCUS in the diagnosis of pneumothorax in emergency rooms, through a systematic review of meta-analytic articles, systematic reviews, and observational studies from the last 11 years (2012 to 2023). Methods: The PRISMA Platform systematic review rules were followed. The search was carried out from October to December 2023 in the Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, Scielo, and Google Scholar databases. The quality of the studies was based on the GRADE instrument and the risk of bias was analyzed according to the Cochrane instrument. Results and Conclusion: A total of 127 articles were found, 43 articles were evaluated in full and 31 were included and developed in the present systematic review study. Considering the Cochrane tool for risk of bias, the overall assessment resulted in 22 studies with a high risk of bias and 26 studies that did not meet GRADE and AMSTAR-2. Most studies did not show homogeneity in their results, with X2=61.5%<50%. It was concluded that the POCUS method is operator-dependent and has greater sensitivity (78 to 90%) and specificity greater than 98% in chest radiography. However, when performed correctly by trained professionals, following protocols, it proved to be useful for identifying and treating pneumothorax. POCUS is a portable, fast, and low-cost bedside examination that does not involve ionizing radiation, in addition to identifying a precise location for performing thoracentesis in cases of pneumothorax, which assists clinical physicians in urgent and emergency rooms, as well as in external environments such as rescue helicopters. There is a consensus among the authors researched that, to obtain clinical evidence on the use of POCUS in the diagnosis of pneumothorax, more randomized controlled studies are necessary, which reinforce the use of this versatile equipment in different urgent and emergency scenariosMetaScience Press2024-01-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/34410.54448/mdnt24107MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): MedNEXT - February 2024MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; v. 5 n. 1 (2024): MedNEXT - February 20242763-5678reponame:MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciencesinstname:Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)instacron:FACERESenghttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/344/320Copyright (c) 2023 Fábio Flores Nani, Silvio Oscar Noguera Servin, Ana Carolina da Costa Reis, Tayanne Jaqueshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNani, Fábio FloresServin, Silvio Oscar NogueraReis, Ana Carolina da CostaJaques, Tayanne2024-01-10T17:12:28Zoai:ojs2.mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com:article/344Revistahttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednextPUBhttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/oaimednextjmhs@zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com2763-56782763-5678opendoar:2024-01-10T17:12:28MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences - Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Current evidence on the use of pocus in the diagnosis of pneumothorax in emergency rooms: a systematic review |
title |
Current evidence on the use of pocus in the diagnosis of pneumothorax in emergency rooms: a systematic review |
spellingShingle |
Current evidence on the use of pocus in the diagnosis of pneumothorax in emergency rooms: a systematic review Nani, Fábio Flores Pneumothorax Ultrasound Automated Bedside Assistance Systems |
title_short |
Current evidence on the use of pocus in the diagnosis of pneumothorax in emergency rooms: a systematic review |
title_full |
Current evidence on the use of pocus in the diagnosis of pneumothorax in emergency rooms: a systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Current evidence on the use of pocus in the diagnosis of pneumothorax in emergency rooms: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Current evidence on the use of pocus in the diagnosis of pneumothorax in emergency rooms: a systematic review |
title_sort |
Current evidence on the use of pocus in the diagnosis of pneumothorax in emergency rooms: a systematic review |
author |
Nani, Fábio Flores |
author_facet |
Nani, Fábio Flores Servin, Silvio Oscar Noguera Reis, Ana Carolina da Costa Jaques, Tayanne |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Servin, Silvio Oscar Noguera Reis, Ana Carolina da Costa Jaques, Tayanne |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Nani, Fábio Flores Servin, Silvio Oscar Noguera Reis, Ana Carolina da Costa Jaques, Tayanne |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Pneumothorax Ultrasound Automated Bedside Assistance Systems |
topic |
Pneumothorax Ultrasound Automated Bedside Assistance Systems |
description |
Introduction: Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) is currently recognized as useful and, in some cases, mandatory, such as during invasive procedures. Its bedside application includes differential diagnosis and therapeutic management of complex clinical conditions during hemodynamic instability. The emergence of portable devices with superior image quality and their applicability in emergency rooms and intensive care units has demonstrated high diagnostic effectiveness. Objective: It was to highlight the use of POCUS in the diagnosis of pneumothorax in emergency rooms, through a systematic review of meta-analytic articles, systematic reviews, and observational studies from the last 11 years (2012 to 2023). Methods: The PRISMA Platform systematic review rules were followed. The search was carried out from October to December 2023 in the Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, Scielo, and Google Scholar databases. The quality of the studies was based on the GRADE instrument and the risk of bias was analyzed according to the Cochrane instrument. Results and Conclusion: A total of 127 articles were found, 43 articles were evaluated in full and 31 were included and developed in the present systematic review study. Considering the Cochrane tool for risk of bias, the overall assessment resulted in 22 studies with a high risk of bias and 26 studies that did not meet GRADE and AMSTAR-2. Most studies did not show homogeneity in their results, with X2=61.5%<50%. It was concluded that the POCUS method is operator-dependent and has greater sensitivity (78 to 90%) and specificity greater than 98% in chest radiography. However, when performed correctly by trained professionals, following protocols, it proved to be useful for identifying and treating pneumothorax. POCUS is a portable, fast, and low-cost bedside examination that does not involve ionizing radiation, in addition to identifying a precise location for performing thoracentesis in cases of pneumothorax, which assists clinical physicians in urgent and emergency rooms, as well as in external environments such as rescue helicopters. There is a consensus among the authors researched that, to obtain clinical evidence on the use of POCUS in the diagnosis of pneumothorax, more randomized controlled studies are necessary, which reinforce the use of this versatile equipment in different urgent and emergency scenarios |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-01-10 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/344 10.54448/mdnt24107 |
url |
https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/344 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.54448/mdnt24107 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/344/320 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
MetaScience Press |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
MetaScience Press |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): MedNEXT - February 2024 MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; v. 5 n. 1 (2024): MedNEXT - February 2024 2763-5678 reponame:MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences instname:Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres) instacron:FACERES |
instname_str |
Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres) |
instacron_str |
FACERES |
institution |
FACERES |
reponame_str |
MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences |
collection |
MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences - Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mednextjmhs@zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com |
_version_ |
1796798218342760448 |