Current evidence on the use of pocus in the diagnosis of pneumothorax in emergency rooms: a systematic review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nani, Fábio Flores
Data de Publicação: 2024
Outros Autores: Servin, Silvio Oscar Noguera, Reis, Ana Carolina da Costa, Jaques, Tayanne
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
Texto Completo: https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/344
Resumo: Introduction: Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) is currently recognized as useful and, in some cases, mandatory, such as during invasive procedures. Its bedside application includes differential diagnosis and therapeutic management of complex clinical conditions during hemodynamic instability. The emergence of portable devices with superior image quality and their applicability in emergency rooms and intensive care units has demonstrated high diagnostic effectiveness. Objective: It was to highlight the use of POCUS in the diagnosis of pneumothorax in emergency rooms, through a systematic review of meta-analytic articles, systematic reviews, and observational studies from the last 11 years (2012 to 2023). Methods: The PRISMA Platform systematic review rules were followed. The search was carried out from October to December 2023 in the Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, Scielo, and Google Scholar databases. The quality of the studies was based on the GRADE instrument and the risk of bias was analyzed according to the Cochrane instrument. Results and Conclusion: A total of 127 articles were found, 43 articles were evaluated in full and 31 were included and developed in the present systematic review study. Considering the Cochrane tool for risk of bias, the overall assessment resulted in 22 studies with a high risk of bias and 26 studies that did not meet GRADE and AMSTAR-2. Most studies did not show homogeneity in their results, with X2=61.5%<50%. It was concluded that the POCUS method is operator-dependent and has greater sensitivity (78 to 90%) and specificity greater than 98% in chest radiography. However, when performed correctly by trained professionals, following protocols, it proved to be useful for identifying and treating pneumothorax. POCUS is a portable, fast, and low-cost bedside examination that does not involve ionizing radiation, in addition to identifying a precise location for performing thoracentesis in cases of pneumothorax, which assists clinical physicians in urgent and emergency rooms, as well as in external environments such as rescue helicopters. There is a consensus among the authors researched that, to obtain clinical evidence on the use of POCUS in the diagnosis of pneumothorax, more randomized controlled studies are necessary, which reinforce the use of this versatile equipment in different urgent and emergency scenarios
id FACERES-1_2e262125273b9fc4e406297efaf2e5d1
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com:article/344
network_acronym_str FACERES-1
network_name_str MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
repository_id_str
spelling Current evidence on the use of pocus in the diagnosis of pneumothorax in emergency rooms: a systematic reviewPneumothoraxUltrasoundAutomated Bedside Assistance SystemsIntroduction: Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) is currently recognized as useful and, in some cases, mandatory, such as during invasive procedures. Its bedside application includes differential diagnosis and therapeutic management of complex clinical conditions during hemodynamic instability. The emergence of portable devices with superior image quality and their applicability in emergency rooms and intensive care units has demonstrated high diagnostic effectiveness. Objective: It was to highlight the use of POCUS in the diagnosis of pneumothorax in emergency rooms, through a systematic review of meta-analytic articles, systematic reviews, and observational studies from the last 11 years (2012 to 2023). Methods: The PRISMA Platform systematic review rules were followed. The search was carried out from October to December 2023 in the Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, Scielo, and Google Scholar databases. The quality of the studies was based on the GRADE instrument and the risk of bias was analyzed according to the Cochrane instrument. Results and Conclusion: A total of 127 articles were found, 43 articles were evaluated in full and 31 were included and developed in the present systematic review study. Considering the Cochrane tool for risk of bias, the overall assessment resulted in 22 studies with a high risk of bias and 26 studies that did not meet GRADE and AMSTAR-2. Most studies did not show homogeneity in their results, with X2=61.5%<50%. It was concluded that the POCUS method is operator-dependent and has greater sensitivity (78 to 90%) and specificity greater than 98% in chest radiography. However, when performed correctly by trained professionals, following protocols, it proved to be useful for identifying and treating pneumothorax. POCUS is a portable, fast, and low-cost bedside examination that does not involve ionizing radiation, in addition to identifying a precise location for performing thoracentesis in cases of pneumothorax, which assists clinical physicians in urgent and emergency rooms, as well as in external environments such as rescue helicopters. There is a consensus among the authors researched that, to obtain clinical evidence on the use of POCUS in the diagnosis of pneumothorax, more randomized controlled studies are necessary, which reinforce the use of this versatile equipment in different urgent and emergency scenariosMetaScience Press2024-01-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/34410.54448/mdnt24107MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): MedNEXT - February 2024MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; v. 5 n. 1 (2024): MedNEXT - February 20242763-5678reponame:MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciencesinstname:Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)instacron:FACERESenghttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/344/320Copyright (c) 2023 Fábio Flores Nani, Silvio Oscar Noguera Servin, Ana Carolina da Costa Reis, Tayanne Jaqueshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNani, Fábio FloresServin, Silvio Oscar NogueraReis, Ana Carolina da CostaJaques, Tayanne2024-01-10T17:12:28Zoai:ojs2.mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com:article/344Revistahttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednextPUBhttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/oaimednextjmhs@zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com2763-56782763-5678opendoar:2024-01-10T17:12:28MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences - Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Current evidence on the use of pocus in the diagnosis of pneumothorax in emergency rooms: a systematic review
title Current evidence on the use of pocus in the diagnosis of pneumothorax in emergency rooms: a systematic review
spellingShingle Current evidence on the use of pocus in the diagnosis of pneumothorax in emergency rooms: a systematic review
Nani, Fábio Flores
Pneumothorax
Ultrasound
Automated Bedside Assistance Systems
title_short Current evidence on the use of pocus in the diagnosis of pneumothorax in emergency rooms: a systematic review
title_full Current evidence on the use of pocus in the diagnosis of pneumothorax in emergency rooms: a systematic review
title_fullStr Current evidence on the use of pocus in the diagnosis of pneumothorax in emergency rooms: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Current evidence on the use of pocus in the diagnosis of pneumothorax in emergency rooms: a systematic review
title_sort Current evidence on the use of pocus in the diagnosis of pneumothorax in emergency rooms: a systematic review
author Nani, Fábio Flores
author_facet Nani, Fábio Flores
Servin, Silvio Oscar Noguera
Reis, Ana Carolina da Costa
Jaques, Tayanne
author_role author
author2 Servin, Silvio Oscar Noguera
Reis, Ana Carolina da Costa
Jaques, Tayanne
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nani, Fábio Flores
Servin, Silvio Oscar Noguera
Reis, Ana Carolina da Costa
Jaques, Tayanne
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Pneumothorax
Ultrasound
Automated Bedside Assistance Systems
topic Pneumothorax
Ultrasound
Automated Bedside Assistance Systems
description Introduction: Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) is currently recognized as useful and, in some cases, mandatory, such as during invasive procedures. Its bedside application includes differential diagnosis and therapeutic management of complex clinical conditions during hemodynamic instability. The emergence of portable devices with superior image quality and their applicability in emergency rooms and intensive care units has demonstrated high diagnostic effectiveness. Objective: It was to highlight the use of POCUS in the diagnosis of pneumothorax in emergency rooms, through a systematic review of meta-analytic articles, systematic reviews, and observational studies from the last 11 years (2012 to 2023). Methods: The PRISMA Platform systematic review rules were followed. The search was carried out from October to December 2023 in the Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, Scielo, and Google Scholar databases. The quality of the studies was based on the GRADE instrument and the risk of bias was analyzed according to the Cochrane instrument. Results and Conclusion: A total of 127 articles were found, 43 articles were evaluated in full and 31 were included and developed in the present systematic review study. Considering the Cochrane tool for risk of bias, the overall assessment resulted in 22 studies with a high risk of bias and 26 studies that did not meet GRADE and AMSTAR-2. Most studies did not show homogeneity in their results, with X2=61.5%<50%. It was concluded that the POCUS method is operator-dependent and has greater sensitivity (78 to 90%) and specificity greater than 98% in chest radiography. However, when performed correctly by trained professionals, following protocols, it proved to be useful for identifying and treating pneumothorax. POCUS is a portable, fast, and low-cost bedside examination that does not involve ionizing radiation, in addition to identifying a precise location for performing thoracentesis in cases of pneumothorax, which assists clinical physicians in urgent and emergency rooms, as well as in external environments such as rescue helicopters. There is a consensus among the authors researched that, to obtain clinical evidence on the use of POCUS in the diagnosis of pneumothorax, more randomized controlled studies are necessary, which reinforce the use of this versatile equipment in different urgent and emergency scenarios
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-01-10
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/344
10.54448/mdnt24107
url https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/344
identifier_str_mv 10.54448/mdnt24107
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/344/320
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv MetaScience Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv MetaScience Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): MedNEXT - February 2024
MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; v. 5 n. 1 (2024): MedNEXT - February 2024
2763-5678
reponame:MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
instname:Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)
instacron:FACERES
instname_str Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)
instacron_str FACERES
institution FACERES
reponame_str MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
collection MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
repository.name.fl_str_mv MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences - Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mednextjmhs@zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com
_version_ 1796798218342760448