Advance in contemporary orthodontics: a systematic review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pelarin, Karina Contiero
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Pereira da Cruz, José Augusto, Moura Neto, Gastão, Moura, Renata Furquim
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
Texto Completo: https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/159
Resumo: Introduction: During orthodontic treatment, careful planning is essential for its success, taking into account aspects such as facial harmony, functional occlusion, and esthetics. The anchorage system has been widely used by orthodontists due to its high level of success. In addition to replacing the use of extra and intraoral devices, mini-implants show a simple technique that does not require patient cooperation and less discomfort, enabling more movements predictable and balanced in a short treatment time. Objective: To report the types of mini-implants and their characteristics, addressing their advantages and disadvantages, insertion locations, indications, and contraindications, in order to promote general knowledge of orthodontic treatment with skeletal anchorage. Methods: Clinical studies with qualitative and/or quantitative analysis were included, following the rules of the systematic review-PRISMA. Results: The mini-implants are made in two types, such as self-tapping requires a drill and self-drilling that has a cut. Their use provides advantages such as a set of more agile, simple, and less invasive techniques, with minimal anatomical limitations, less cost, not depending on the patient's contribution, allowing the application of immediate load and increased predictability of movements. Disadvantages are considered when there is movement and loosening of the mini-implant, involvement of nerves and blood vessels during surgery, mucosal irritation, and gingival hyperplasia caused by poor hygiene causing pain and swelling. Conclusion: It is concluded that the mini-implant emerged to revolutionize orthodontic treatment through more precise movements, in a short time, facilitating more complex movements that other devices had difficulty performing. Its main characteristic is a high success rate, in addition to having a reduced size, which allows its insertion in several sites. Consequently, the skeletal anchorage device is an excellent method, as long as it is used according to indications and taking meticulous care from the ideal choice of the device to the moment of its insertion.
id FACERES-1_71122a85273775db57650292ee1e4413
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com:article/159
network_acronym_str FACERES-1
network_name_str MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
repository_id_str
spelling Advance in contemporary orthodontics: a systematic reviewOrthodontic treatmentMini-implantsAnchoring systemSkeletal anchorageIntroduction: During orthodontic treatment, careful planning is essential for its success, taking into account aspects such as facial harmony, functional occlusion, and esthetics. The anchorage system has been widely used by orthodontists due to its high level of success. In addition to replacing the use of extra and intraoral devices, mini-implants show a simple technique that does not require patient cooperation and less discomfort, enabling more movements predictable and balanced in a short treatment time. Objective: To report the types of mini-implants and their characteristics, addressing their advantages and disadvantages, insertion locations, indications, and contraindications, in order to promote general knowledge of orthodontic treatment with skeletal anchorage. Methods: Clinical studies with qualitative and/or quantitative analysis were included, following the rules of the systematic review-PRISMA. Results: The mini-implants are made in two types, such as self-tapping requires a drill and self-drilling that has a cut. Their use provides advantages such as a set of more agile, simple, and less invasive techniques, with minimal anatomical limitations, less cost, not depending on the patient's contribution, allowing the application of immediate load and increased predictability of movements. Disadvantages are considered when there is movement and loosening of the mini-implant, involvement of nerves and blood vessels during surgery, mucosal irritation, and gingival hyperplasia caused by poor hygiene causing pain and swelling. Conclusion: It is concluded that the mini-implant emerged to revolutionize orthodontic treatment through more precise movements, in a short time, facilitating more complex movements that other devices had difficulty performing. Its main characteristic is a high success rate, in addition to having a reduced size, which allows its insertion in several sites. Consequently, the skeletal anchorage device is an excellent method, as long as it is used according to indications and taking meticulous care from the ideal choice of the device to the moment of its insertion.Faceres2022-04-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/15910.54448/mdnt22S209MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; Vol. 3 (2022): MedNEXT - May 2022 - Supplement 2MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; v. 3 (2022): MedNEXT - May 2022 - Supplement 22763-567810.54448/mdnt22S2reponame:MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciencesinstname:Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)instacron:FACERESenghttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/159/149Copyright (c) 2022 MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Scienceshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPelarin, Karina ContieroPereira da Cruz, José AugustoMoura Neto, GastãoMoura, Renata Furquim2022-05-05T02:52:16Zoai:ojs2.mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com:article/159Revistahttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednextPUBhttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/oaimednextjmhs@zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com2763-56782763-5678opendoar:2022-05-05T02:52:16MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences - Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Advance in contemporary orthodontics: a systematic review
title Advance in contemporary orthodontics: a systematic review
spellingShingle Advance in contemporary orthodontics: a systematic review
Pelarin, Karina Contiero
Orthodontic treatment
Mini-implants
Anchoring system
Skeletal anchorage
title_short Advance in contemporary orthodontics: a systematic review
title_full Advance in contemporary orthodontics: a systematic review
title_fullStr Advance in contemporary orthodontics: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Advance in contemporary orthodontics: a systematic review
title_sort Advance in contemporary orthodontics: a systematic review
author Pelarin, Karina Contiero
author_facet Pelarin, Karina Contiero
Pereira da Cruz, José Augusto
Moura Neto, Gastão
Moura, Renata Furquim
author_role author
author2 Pereira da Cruz, José Augusto
Moura Neto, Gastão
Moura, Renata Furquim
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pelarin, Karina Contiero
Pereira da Cruz, José Augusto
Moura Neto, Gastão
Moura, Renata Furquim
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Orthodontic treatment
Mini-implants
Anchoring system
Skeletal anchorage
topic Orthodontic treatment
Mini-implants
Anchoring system
Skeletal anchorage
description Introduction: During orthodontic treatment, careful planning is essential for its success, taking into account aspects such as facial harmony, functional occlusion, and esthetics. The anchorage system has been widely used by orthodontists due to its high level of success. In addition to replacing the use of extra and intraoral devices, mini-implants show a simple technique that does not require patient cooperation and less discomfort, enabling more movements predictable and balanced in a short treatment time. Objective: To report the types of mini-implants and their characteristics, addressing their advantages and disadvantages, insertion locations, indications, and contraindications, in order to promote general knowledge of orthodontic treatment with skeletal anchorage. Methods: Clinical studies with qualitative and/or quantitative analysis were included, following the rules of the systematic review-PRISMA. Results: The mini-implants are made in two types, such as self-tapping requires a drill and self-drilling that has a cut. Their use provides advantages such as a set of more agile, simple, and less invasive techniques, with minimal anatomical limitations, less cost, not depending on the patient's contribution, allowing the application of immediate load and increased predictability of movements. Disadvantages are considered when there is movement and loosening of the mini-implant, involvement of nerves and blood vessels during surgery, mucosal irritation, and gingival hyperplasia caused by poor hygiene causing pain and swelling. Conclusion: It is concluded that the mini-implant emerged to revolutionize orthodontic treatment through more precise movements, in a short time, facilitating more complex movements that other devices had difficulty performing. Its main characteristic is a high success rate, in addition to having a reduced size, which allows its insertion in several sites. Consequently, the skeletal anchorage device is an excellent method, as long as it is used according to indications and taking meticulous care from the ideal choice of the device to the moment of its insertion.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-04-05
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/159
10.54448/mdnt22S209
url https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/159
identifier_str_mv 10.54448/mdnt22S209
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/159/149
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faceres
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faceres
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; Vol. 3 (2022): MedNEXT - May 2022 - Supplement 2
MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; v. 3 (2022): MedNEXT - May 2022 - Supplement 2
2763-5678
10.54448/mdnt22S2
reponame:MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
instname:Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)
instacron:FACERES
instname_str Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)
instacron_str FACERES
institution FACERES
reponame_str MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
collection MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
repository.name.fl_str_mv MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences - Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mednextjmhs@zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com
_version_ 1796798219963858944