Virtual Surgery in Implantology: A Systematic Review and State of the Art
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences |
Texto Completo: | https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/24 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Dental implant procedures have increased worldwide, reaching approximately one million dental implants per year. The optimization of faster and more accurate techniques by dentists and postoperative surgeons with better results and quality of life stimulated the development of numerous software and hardware for performing computer-guided surgeries, so-called virtual surgeries (VS). Objective: to present, through a systematic review, the main considerations of virtual surgery in dentistry and their respective advantages, disadvantages, and limitations. Methods: The model used for the review was PRISMA. We used databases such as Scielo, Lilacs, Google Scholar, PubMed. Major findings: In the scenario of VS in dentistry, advances in technology have contributed to the improvement of the models, since there was only the direct molding technique to obtain patient models, with the positioning of implants not very favorable in terms aesthetics. The information that is acquired in the 3D reconstructions allows us to determine the quantity and quality of the available bone and also allows the simulation of the installation of the implants in a virtual environment. This provides predictability of techniques and difficulties that can be encountered during surgical intervention, reducing the time and the possibility of errors, allowing the overall reduction of oral rehabilitation costs. Conclusion: Preoperative virtual planning and reconstruction of the mandible guided by dental implants through preoperative designs provide high success rates for the implant and dental rehabilitation, benefiting also prosthetic restorations supported by fixed implants. Still, the concept of using personalized implants with the help of 3D virtual treatment planning, stereolithographic models, and computer-assisted design greatly improves the mandibular restoration and helps to obtain a good facial profile, aesthetic and dental rehabilitation, avoiding complications with the grafts autologous. |
id |
FACERES-1_827a1279e78ffd42fcf44adc32dd79e1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com:article/24 |
network_acronym_str |
FACERES-1 |
network_name_str |
MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Virtual Surgery in Implantology: A Systematic Review and State of the ArtVirtual SurgeryDental ImplantsGuided SurgeryAtrophic jaw Introduction: Dental implant procedures have increased worldwide, reaching approximately one million dental implants per year. The optimization of faster and more accurate techniques by dentists and postoperative surgeons with better results and quality of life stimulated the development of numerous software and hardware for performing computer-guided surgeries, so-called virtual surgeries (VS). Objective: to present, through a systematic review, the main considerations of virtual surgery in dentistry and their respective advantages, disadvantages, and limitations. Methods: The model used for the review was PRISMA. We used databases such as Scielo, Lilacs, Google Scholar, PubMed. Major findings: In the scenario of VS in dentistry, advances in technology have contributed to the improvement of the models, since there was only the direct molding technique to obtain patient models, with the positioning of implants not very favorable in terms aesthetics. The information that is acquired in the 3D reconstructions allows us to determine the quantity and quality of the available bone and also allows the simulation of the installation of the implants in a virtual environment. This provides predictability of techniques and difficulties that can be encountered during surgical intervention, reducing the time and the possibility of errors, allowing the overall reduction of oral rehabilitation costs. Conclusion: Preoperative virtual planning and reconstruction of the mandible guided by dental implants through preoperative designs provide high success rates for the implant and dental rehabilitation, benefiting also prosthetic restorations supported by fixed implants. Still, the concept of using personalized implants with the help of 3D virtual treatment planning, stereolithographic models, and computer-assisted design greatly improves the mandibular restoration and helps to obtain a good facial profile, aesthetic and dental rehabilitation, avoiding complications with the grafts autologous. Faceres2021-03-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticleapplication/pdfhttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/2410.34256/mdnt2122MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): MedNEXT; 10–16MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; v. 2 n. 2 (2021): MedNEXT; 10–162763-5678reponame:MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciencesinstname:Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)instacron:FACERESenghttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/24/24Copyright (c) 2021 MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Scienceshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAgreli, Kamilla CarneiroZotarelli Filho, Idiberto JoséKassis, Elias Naim2021-09-16T14:05:30Zoai:ojs2.mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com:article/24Revistahttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednextPUBhttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/oaimednextjmhs@zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com2763-56782763-5678opendoar:2021-09-16T14:05:30MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences - Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Virtual Surgery in Implantology: A Systematic Review and State of the Art |
title |
Virtual Surgery in Implantology: A Systematic Review and State of the Art |
spellingShingle |
Virtual Surgery in Implantology: A Systematic Review and State of the Art Agreli, Kamilla Carneiro Virtual Surgery Dental Implants Guided Surgery Atrophic jaw |
title_short |
Virtual Surgery in Implantology: A Systematic Review and State of the Art |
title_full |
Virtual Surgery in Implantology: A Systematic Review and State of the Art |
title_fullStr |
Virtual Surgery in Implantology: A Systematic Review and State of the Art |
title_full_unstemmed |
Virtual Surgery in Implantology: A Systematic Review and State of the Art |
title_sort |
Virtual Surgery in Implantology: A Systematic Review and State of the Art |
author |
Agreli, Kamilla Carneiro |
author_facet |
Agreli, Kamilla Carneiro Zotarelli Filho, Idiberto José Kassis, Elias Naim |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Zotarelli Filho, Idiberto José Kassis, Elias Naim |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Agreli, Kamilla Carneiro Zotarelli Filho, Idiberto José Kassis, Elias Naim |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Virtual Surgery Dental Implants Guided Surgery Atrophic jaw |
topic |
Virtual Surgery Dental Implants Guided Surgery Atrophic jaw |
description |
Introduction: Dental implant procedures have increased worldwide, reaching approximately one million dental implants per year. The optimization of faster and more accurate techniques by dentists and postoperative surgeons with better results and quality of life stimulated the development of numerous software and hardware for performing computer-guided surgeries, so-called virtual surgeries (VS). Objective: to present, through a systematic review, the main considerations of virtual surgery in dentistry and their respective advantages, disadvantages, and limitations. Methods: The model used for the review was PRISMA. We used databases such as Scielo, Lilacs, Google Scholar, PubMed. Major findings: In the scenario of VS in dentistry, advances in technology have contributed to the improvement of the models, since there was only the direct molding technique to obtain patient models, with the positioning of implants not very favorable in terms aesthetics. The information that is acquired in the 3D reconstructions allows us to determine the quantity and quality of the available bone and also allows the simulation of the installation of the implants in a virtual environment. This provides predictability of techniques and difficulties that can be encountered during surgical intervention, reducing the time and the possibility of errors, allowing the overall reduction of oral rehabilitation costs. Conclusion: Preoperative virtual planning and reconstruction of the mandible guided by dental implants through preoperative designs provide high success rates for the implant and dental rehabilitation, benefiting also prosthetic restorations supported by fixed implants. Still, the concept of using personalized implants with the help of 3D virtual treatment planning, stereolithographic models, and computer-assisted design greatly improves the mandibular restoration and helps to obtain a good facial profile, aesthetic and dental rehabilitation, avoiding complications with the grafts autologous. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-03-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/24 10.34256/mdnt2122 |
url |
https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/24 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.34256/mdnt2122 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/24/24 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faceres |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faceres |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): MedNEXT; 10–16 MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; v. 2 n. 2 (2021): MedNEXT; 10–16 2763-5678 reponame:MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences instname:Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres) instacron:FACERES |
instname_str |
Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres) |
instacron_str |
FACERES |
institution |
FACERES |
reponame_str |
MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences |
collection |
MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences - Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mednextjmhs@zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com |
_version_ |
1796798219122900992 |