Major clinical outcomes for optimization of zygomatic implants: a systematic review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Guanuchi, Daniel Mauricio Moyon
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Vera, Eumeny Daniel Álava, Manzini, Régis, Cicareli, Alvaro José, Kassis, Elias Naim
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
Texto Completo: https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/201
Resumo: Introduction: In the context of implantology, the rehabilitation of an atrophic maxilla is a challenge. In case of severe resorption, zygomatic implants (ZI) are indicated and loading of the implants is advised at the end of the surgery. Also, quad zygomatic implants have been used as a treatment option for patients with severely resorbed maxilla. Objective: The present study aimed to carry out a systematic review of the main approaches and clinical outcomes of zygomatic implantation in the last ten years. Methods: The present study followed the PRISMA rules and a model of literary review presenting and publishing case series, prospective, retrospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in humans with a time of the last ten years were selected and analyzed. Results and Conclusion: Under the objective proposed in this study, it was concluded that the ZI has a high 12-year cumulative survival rate, with most failures occurring in the early stages of the postoperative period. Furthermore, the zygomatic bone is a viable site for zygomatic implants and the use of specialized implant planning software is an important tool to achieve predictable results for ZI. Preliminary data one year after loading suggest that immediately loaded ZIs were associated with fewer prosthetic failures, fewer implant failures, and shorter time required for functional loading.
id FACERES-1_e17d9058c1098f32e21fa5929dc7c1f7
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com:article/201
network_acronym_str FACERES-1
network_name_str MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
repository_id_str
spelling Major clinical outcomes for optimization of zygomatic implants: a systematic reviewImplantsZygomatic ImplantQuad zygomatic implantsImmediate loadingSurvivalClinical trialsIntroduction: In the context of implantology, the rehabilitation of an atrophic maxilla is a challenge. In case of severe resorption, zygomatic implants (ZI) are indicated and loading of the implants is advised at the end of the surgery. Also, quad zygomatic implants have been used as a treatment option for patients with severely resorbed maxilla. Objective: The present study aimed to carry out a systematic review of the main approaches and clinical outcomes of zygomatic implantation in the last ten years. Methods: The present study followed the PRISMA rules and a model of literary review presenting and publishing case series, prospective, retrospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in humans with a time of the last ten years were selected and analyzed. Results and Conclusion: Under the objective proposed in this study, it was concluded that the ZI has a high 12-year cumulative survival rate, with most failures occurring in the early stages of the postoperative period. Furthermore, the zygomatic bone is a viable site for zygomatic implants and the use of specialized implant planning software is an important tool to achieve predictable results for ZI. Preliminary data one year after loading suggest that immediately loaded ZIs were associated with fewer prosthetic failures, fewer implant failures, and shorter time required for functional loading.Faceres2022-07-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/20110.54448/mdnt22S409MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; Vol. 3 No. S4 (2022): MedNEXT - Supplement 4 - July 2022MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; v. 3 n. S4 (2022): MedNEXT - Supplement 4 - July 20222763-567810.54448/mdnt22S4reponame:MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciencesinstname:Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)instacron:FACERESenghttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/201/190Copyright (c) 2022 MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Scienceshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGuanuchi, Daniel Mauricio MoyonVera, Eumeny Daniel ÁlavaManzini, RégisCicareli, Alvaro JoséKassis, Elias Naim2022-07-12T21:45:22Zoai:ojs2.mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com:article/201Revistahttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednextPUBhttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/oaimednextjmhs@zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com2763-56782763-5678opendoar:2022-07-12T21:45:22MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences - Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Major clinical outcomes for optimization of zygomatic implants: a systematic review
title Major clinical outcomes for optimization of zygomatic implants: a systematic review
spellingShingle Major clinical outcomes for optimization of zygomatic implants: a systematic review
Guanuchi, Daniel Mauricio Moyon
Implants
Zygomatic Implant
Quad zygomatic implants
Immediate loading
Survival
Clinical trials
title_short Major clinical outcomes for optimization of zygomatic implants: a systematic review
title_full Major clinical outcomes for optimization of zygomatic implants: a systematic review
title_fullStr Major clinical outcomes for optimization of zygomatic implants: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Major clinical outcomes for optimization of zygomatic implants: a systematic review
title_sort Major clinical outcomes for optimization of zygomatic implants: a systematic review
author Guanuchi, Daniel Mauricio Moyon
author_facet Guanuchi, Daniel Mauricio Moyon
Vera, Eumeny Daniel Álava
Manzini, Régis
Cicareli, Alvaro José
Kassis, Elias Naim
author_role author
author2 Vera, Eumeny Daniel Álava
Manzini, Régis
Cicareli, Alvaro José
Kassis, Elias Naim
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Guanuchi, Daniel Mauricio Moyon
Vera, Eumeny Daniel Álava
Manzini, Régis
Cicareli, Alvaro José
Kassis, Elias Naim
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Implants
Zygomatic Implant
Quad zygomatic implants
Immediate loading
Survival
Clinical trials
topic Implants
Zygomatic Implant
Quad zygomatic implants
Immediate loading
Survival
Clinical trials
description Introduction: In the context of implantology, the rehabilitation of an atrophic maxilla is a challenge. In case of severe resorption, zygomatic implants (ZI) are indicated and loading of the implants is advised at the end of the surgery. Also, quad zygomatic implants have been used as a treatment option for patients with severely resorbed maxilla. Objective: The present study aimed to carry out a systematic review of the main approaches and clinical outcomes of zygomatic implantation in the last ten years. Methods: The present study followed the PRISMA rules and a model of literary review presenting and publishing case series, prospective, retrospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in humans with a time of the last ten years were selected and analyzed. Results and Conclusion: Under the objective proposed in this study, it was concluded that the ZI has a high 12-year cumulative survival rate, with most failures occurring in the early stages of the postoperative period. Furthermore, the zygomatic bone is a viable site for zygomatic implants and the use of specialized implant planning software is an important tool to achieve predictable results for ZI. Preliminary data one year after loading suggest that immediately loaded ZIs were associated with fewer prosthetic failures, fewer implant failures, and shorter time required for functional loading.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-07-12
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/201
10.54448/mdnt22S409
url https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/201
identifier_str_mv 10.54448/mdnt22S409
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/201/190
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faceres
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faceres
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; Vol. 3 No. S4 (2022): MedNEXT - Supplement 4 - July 2022
MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; v. 3 n. S4 (2022): MedNEXT - Supplement 4 - July 2022
2763-5678
10.54448/mdnt22S4
reponame:MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
instname:Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)
instacron:FACERES
instname_str Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)
instacron_str FACERES
institution FACERES
reponame_str MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
collection MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
repository.name.fl_str_mv MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences - Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mednextjmhs@zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com
_version_ 1796798220055085056