Respiratory and Other Health Risks among Poultry-Farm Workers and Evaluation of Management Practices in Poultry Farms

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Hamid,A
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Ahmad,AS, Khan,N
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2018000100111
Resumo: ABSTRACT The current study was conducted on eight poultry farms in Lahore and Sheikhupura to monitor environmental conditions, determine workers’ health status and assess the implementation of standard management practices. Environmental monitoring, a health questionnaire survey and a respiratory function test were carried out. Seventy-one respondents were selected for the health assessment survey and lung function test. The results showed that the evaluated air-quality parameters, except for temperature and humidity, were well below the permissible occupational limits. Maximum temperature recorded was 32.75 ºC, while the highest humidity level was 85.5%. Farms were shown to be compliant with standard guidelines and management practices. The workers’ health survey indicated lower prevalence of work-related symptoms as compared to previous studies. However, most workers were not subjected to overall physical hazards, 21.1% of workers suffered from heat-induced dermatosis, and 38% suffered from heat exhaustion. Eye problems (watery, redness and itchiness) were experienced by 16.9% to 31%. Reported respiratory symptoms included wheezing during colds (18.3%), wheezing other than during colds (1.4%), chest tightness (16.9%), shortness of breath along with chest tightness (9.9%), regular breathing difficulties (14.1%), and coughing (15.5%). Observed lung function pattern, as measured by FEV1/FVC ratio, was 87 ± 17.7, with 65% workers having ‘restrictive’ disorder and 21% normal lung function pattern, while 21% presented ‘obstructive’ lung function. The study concludes an overall better health and safety management in the selected poultry farms.
id FACTA-1_615ae1a7bee39bcb5456f1d355c7f0bf
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-635X2018000100111
network_acronym_str FACTA-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Respiratory and Other Health Risks among Poultry-Farm Workers and Evaluation of Management Practices in Poultry FarmsBest management practicesFEV/FVCOccupational hazardsPoultry farmsspirometry.ABSTRACT The current study was conducted on eight poultry farms in Lahore and Sheikhupura to monitor environmental conditions, determine workers’ health status and assess the implementation of standard management practices. Environmental monitoring, a health questionnaire survey and a respiratory function test were carried out. Seventy-one respondents were selected for the health assessment survey and lung function test. The results showed that the evaluated air-quality parameters, except for temperature and humidity, were well below the permissible occupational limits. Maximum temperature recorded was 32.75 ºC, while the highest humidity level was 85.5%. Farms were shown to be compliant with standard guidelines and management practices. The workers’ health survey indicated lower prevalence of work-related symptoms as compared to previous studies. However, most workers were not subjected to overall physical hazards, 21.1% of workers suffered from heat-induced dermatosis, and 38% suffered from heat exhaustion. Eye problems (watery, redness and itchiness) were experienced by 16.9% to 31%. Reported respiratory symptoms included wheezing during colds (18.3%), wheezing other than during colds (1.4%), chest tightness (16.9%), shortness of breath along with chest tightness (9.9%), regular breathing difficulties (14.1%), and coughing (15.5%). Observed lung function pattern, as measured by FEV1/FVC ratio, was 87 ± 17.7, with 65% workers having ‘restrictive’ disorder and 21% normal lung function pattern, while 21% presented ‘obstructive’ lung function. The study concludes an overall better health and safety management in the selected poultry farms.Fundacao de Apoio a Ciência e Tecnologia Avicolas2018-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2018000100111Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science v.20 n.1 2018reponame:Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)instname:Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA)instacron:FACTA10.1590/1806-9061-2017-0513info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHamid,AAhmad,ASKhan,Neng2018-04-20T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-635X2018000100111Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbcahttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rvfacta@terra.com.br1806-90611516-635Xopendoar:2018-04-20T00:00Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online) - Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Respiratory and Other Health Risks among Poultry-Farm Workers and Evaluation of Management Practices in Poultry Farms
title Respiratory and Other Health Risks among Poultry-Farm Workers and Evaluation of Management Practices in Poultry Farms
spellingShingle Respiratory and Other Health Risks among Poultry-Farm Workers and Evaluation of Management Practices in Poultry Farms
Hamid,A
Best management practices
FEV/FVC
Occupational hazards
Poultry farms
spirometry.
title_short Respiratory and Other Health Risks among Poultry-Farm Workers and Evaluation of Management Practices in Poultry Farms
title_full Respiratory and Other Health Risks among Poultry-Farm Workers and Evaluation of Management Practices in Poultry Farms
title_fullStr Respiratory and Other Health Risks among Poultry-Farm Workers and Evaluation of Management Practices in Poultry Farms
title_full_unstemmed Respiratory and Other Health Risks among Poultry-Farm Workers and Evaluation of Management Practices in Poultry Farms
title_sort Respiratory and Other Health Risks among Poultry-Farm Workers and Evaluation of Management Practices in Poultry Farms
author Hamid,A
author_facet Hamid,A
Ahmad,AS
Khan,N
author_role author
author2 Ahmad,AS
Khan,N
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Hamid,A
Ahmad,AS
Khan,N
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Best management practices
FEV/FVC
Occupational hazards
Poultry farms
spirometry.
topic Best management practices
FEV/FVC
Occupational hazards
Poultry farms
spirometry.
description ABSTRACT The current study was conducted on eight poultry farms in Lahore and Sheikhupura to monitor environmental conditions, determine workers’ health status and assess the implementation of standard management practices. Environmental monitoring, a health questionnaire survey and a respiratory function test were carried out. Seventy-one respondents were selected for the health assessment survey and lung function test. The results showed that the evaluated air-quality parameters, except for temperature and humidity, were well below the permissible occupational limits. Maximum temperature recorded was 32.75 ºC, while the highest humidity level was 85.5%. Farms were shown to be compliant with standard guidelines and management practices. The workers’ health survey indicated lower prevalence of work-related symptoms as compared to previous studies. However, most workers were not subjected to overall physical hazards, 21.1% of workers suffered from heat-induced dermatosis, and 38% suffered from heat exhaustion. Eye problems (watery, redness and itchiness) were experienced by 16.9% to 31%. Reported respiratory symptoms included wheezing during colds (18.3%), wheezing other than during colds (1.4%), chest tightness (16.9%), shortness of breath along with chest tightness (9.9%), regular breathing difficulties (14.1%), and coughing (15.5%). Observed lung function pattern, as measured by FEV1/FVC ratio, was 87 ± 17.7, with 65% workers having ‘restrictive’ disorder and 21% normal lung function pattern, while 21% presented ‘obstructive’ lung function. The study concludes an overall better health and safety management in the selected poultry farms.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2018000100111
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2018000100111
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1806-9061-2017-0513
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundacao de Apoio a Ciência e Tecnologia Avicolas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundacao de Apoio a Ciência e Tecnologia Avicolas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science v.20 n.1 2018
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)
instname:Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA)
instacron:FACTA
instname_str Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA)
instacron_str FACTA
institution FACTA
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)
collection Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online) - Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rvfacta@terra.com.br
_version_ 1754122514315870208