Different criteria for feed formulation based on digestible amino acids for broilers
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2006 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2006000400005 |
Resumo: | An experiment was carried out to evaluate different criteria in feed formulation based on digestible amino acids for broilers during the grower phase. Diets were formulated according to the recommendations for digestible methionine, methionine + cysteine, lysine, and threonine. A total number of six hundred Cobb 500 male day-old chicks were distributed in a completely randomized experimental design, with three formulation criteria supplying the recommendations established by Baker & Chung (1992), Degussa (1997), and Rostagno et al. (2000), with 4 replicates of 50 birds each. No significant differences were observed for weight gain and feed intake. However, feed conversion ratio improved when birds were fed the diets containing the profiles recommended by Baker & Chung (1992) and Degussa (1997). No difference was observed in terms of leg, wings, back, and head yields. Broilers fed with the profile of Baker & Chung (1992) presented worst breast yield, whereas those fed the Degussa (1997) standard had better carcass yield. |
id |
FACTA-1_aaffdfc9cffc3cac7792cfe2124456b0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1516-635X2006000400005 |
network_acronym_str |
FACTA-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Different criteria for feed formulation based on digestible amino acids for broilersBroilerscarcass yielddigestible amino acidsperformanceAn experiment was carried out to evaluate different criteria in feed formulation based on digestible amino acids for broilers during the grower phase. Diets were formulated according to the recommendations for digestible methionine, methionine + cysteine, lysine, and threonine. A total number of six hundred Cobb 500 male day-old chicks were distributed in a completely randomized experimental design, with three formulation criteria supplying the recommendations established by Baker & Chung (1992), Degussa (1997), and Rostagno et al. (2000), with 4 replicates of 50 birds each. No significant differences were observed for weight gain and feed intake. However, feed conversion ratio improved when birds were fed the diets containing the profiles recommended by Baker & Chung (1992) and Degussa (1997). No difference was observed in terms of leg, wings, back, and head yields. Broilers fed with the profile of Baker & Chung (1992) presented worst breast yield, whereas those fed the Degussa (1997) standard had better carcass yield.Fundacao de Apoio a Ciência e Tecnologia Avicolas2006-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2006000400005Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science v.8 n.4 2006reponame:Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)instname:Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA)instacron:FACTA10.1590/S1516-635X2006000400005info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAraújo,LFJunqueira,OMAraújo,CSSLaurentiz,ACAssuena,VGomes,GAeng2007-04-10T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-635X2006000400005Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbcahttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rvfacta@terra.com.br1806-90611516-635Xopendoar:2007-04-10T00:00Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online) - Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Different criteria for feed formulation based on digestible amino acids for broilers |
title |
Different criteria for feed formulation based on digestible amino acids for broilers |
spellingShingle |
Different criteria for feed formulation based on digestible amino acids for broilers Araújo,LF Broilers carcass yield digestible amino acids performance |
title_short |
Different criteria for feed formulation based on digestible amino acids for broilers |
title_full |
Different criteria for feed formulation based on digestible amino acids for broilers |
title_fullStr |
Different criteria for feed formulation based on digestible amino acids for broilers |
title_full_unstemmed |
Different criteria for feed formulation based on digestible amino acids for broilers |
title_sort |
Different criteria for feed formulation based on digestible amino acids for broilers |
author |
Araújo,LF |
author_facet |
Araújo,LF Junqueira,OM Araújo,CSS Laurentiz,AC Assuena,V Gomes,GA |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Junqueira,OM Araújo,CSS Laurentiz,AC Assuena,V Gomes,GA |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Araújo,LF Junqueira,OM Araújo,CSS Laurentiz,AC Assuena,V Gomes,GA |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Broilers carcass yield digestible amino acids performance |
topic |
Broilers carcass yield digestible amino acids performance |
description |
An experiment was carried out to evaluate different criteria in feed formulation based on digestible amino acids for broilers during the grower phase. Diets were formulated according to the recommendations for digestible methionine, methionine + cysteine, lysine, and threonine. A total number of six hundred Cobb 500 male day-old chicks were distributed in a completely randomized experimental design, with three formulation criteria supplying the recommendations established by Baker & Chung (1992), Degussa (1997), and Rostagno et al. (2000), with 4 replicates of 50 birds each. No significant differences were observed for weight gain and feed intake. However, feed conversion ratio improved when birds were fed the diets containing the profiles recommended by Baker & Chung (1992) and Degussa (1997). No difference was observed in terms of leg, wings, back, and head yields. Broilers fed with the profile of Baker & Chung (1992) presented worst breast yield, whereas those fed the Degussa (1997) standard had better carcass yield. |
publishDate |
2006 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2006-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2006000400005 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2006000400005 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1516-635X2006000400005 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundacao de Apoio a Ciência e Tecnologia Avicolas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundacao de Apoio a Ciência e Tecnologia Avicolas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science v.8 n.4 2006 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online) instname:Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA) instacron:FACTA |
instname_str |
Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA) |
instacron_str |
FACTA |
institution |
FACTA |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online) |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online) - Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rvfacta@terra.com.br |
_version_ |
1754122511317991424 |