Determining the Best Sectioning Method and Intestinal Segment for Morphometric Analysis in Broilers

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gava,MS
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Moraes,LB, Carvalho,D, Chitolina,GZ, Fallavena,LCB, Moraes,HLS, Herpich,J, Salle,CTP
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2015000200145
Resumo: Brazilian poultry production is very efficient and demands maximum broiler performance. Therefore, digestive system pathologies have a relevant role. Considering it is difficult to obtain consistent information on intestinal morphometric analysis, this study aimed at establishing essential and clear criteria for the collection of intestinal segments for morphometric analysis. Fifteen 13-d-old broilers were sacrificed and three intestinal segments were collected per bird. Two 3-cm long sections were obtained from each of the intestinal segments. Samples were collected open or closed. The closed samples were transversely, hemicylindrically, or longitudinally sectioned. Samples were processed and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The number of microscopic fields in each section was counted. Villi presenting the base clearly embedded in the submucosa, no damage or folds, and simple columnar epithelium at the tip were considered adequate for measurements. These villi were counted in each sample. The results shows that hemicylindrical sections presented the highest number of observation fields, with an average of 9.76 fields. Jejunum samples were among the three highest average villi counts, with 18.23 in longitudinal sections and 15.61 in hemicylindrical sections. The results of the present study indicate that hemicylindrical sectioning and jejunal samples were, respectively, the best sectioning method and the best intestinal segment for the morphometric analysis of the intestines of broilers.
id FACTA-1_dc74d366673853bb64c856a554390a44
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-635X2015000200145
network_acronym_str FACTA-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Determining the Best Sectioning Method and Intestinal Segment for Morphometric Analysis in BroilersImageintestinemorphometrypoultryvillusBrazilian poultry production is very efficient and demands maximum broiler performance. Therefore, digestive system pathologies have a relevant role. Considering it is difficult to obtain consistent information on intestinal morphometric analysis, this study aimed at establishing essential and clear criteria for the collection of intestinal segments for morphometric analysis. Fifteen 13-d-old broilers were sacrificed and three intestinal segments were collected per bird. Two 3-cm long sections were obtained from each of the intestinal segments. Samples were collected open or closed. The closed samples were transversely, hemicylindrically, or longitudinally sectioned. Samples were processed and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The number of microscopic fields in each section was counted. Villi presenting the base clearly embedded in the submucosa, no damage or folds, and simple columnar epithelium at the tip were considered adequate for measurements. These villi were counted in each sample. The results shows that hemicylindrical sections presented the highest number of observation fields, with an average of 9.76 fields. Jejunum samples were among the three highest average villi counts, with 18.23 in longitudinal sections and 15.61 in hemicylindrical sections. The results of the present study indicate that hemicylindrical sectioning and jejunal samples were, respectively, the best sectioning method and the best intestinal segment for the morphometric analysis of the intestines of broilers.Fundacao de Apoio a Ciência e Tecnologia Avicolas2015-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2015000200145Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science v.17 n.2 2015reponame:Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)instname:Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA)instacron:FACTA10.1590/1516-635x1702145-150info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGava,MSMoraes,LBCarvalho,DChitolina,GZFallavena,LCBMoraes,HLSHerpich,JSalle,CTPeng2016-10-20T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-635X2015000200145Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbcahttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rvfacta@terra.com.br1806-90611516-635Xopendoar:2016-10-20T00:00Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online) - Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Determining the Best Sectioning Method and Intestinal Segment for Morphometric Analysis in Broilers
title Determining the Best Sectioning Method and Intestinal Segment for Morphometric Analysis in Broilers
spellingShingle Determining the Best Sectioning Method and Intestinal Segment for Morphometric Analysis in Broilers
Gava,MS
Image
intestine
morphometry
poultry
villus
title_short Determining the Best Sectioning Method and Intestinal Segment for Morphometric Analysis in Broilers
title_full Determining the Best Sectioning Method and Intestinal Segment for Morphometric Analysis in Broilers
title_fullStr Determining the Best Sectioning Method and Intestinal Segment for Morphometric Analysis in Broilers
title_full_unstemmed Determining the Best Sectioning Method and Intestinal Segment for Morphometric Analysis in Broilers
title_sort Determining the Best Sectioning Method and Intestinal Segment for Morphometric Analysis in Broilers
author Gava,MS
author_facet Gava,MS
Moraes,LB
Carvalho,D
Chitolina,GZ
Fallavena,LCB
Moraes,HLS
Herpich,J
Salle,CTP
author_role author
author2 Moraes,LB
Carvalho,D
Chitolina,GZ
Fallavena,LCB
Moraes,HLS
Herpich,J
Salle,CTP
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gava,MS
Moraes,LB
Carvalho,D
Chitolina,GZ
Fallavena,LCB
Moraes,HLS
Herpich,J
Salle,CTP
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Image
intestine
morphometry
poultry
villus
topic Image
intestine
morphometry
poultry
villus
description Brazilian poultry production is very efficient and demands maximum broiler performance. Therefore, digestive system pathologies have a relevant role. Considering it is difficult to obtain consistent information on intestinal morphometric analysis, this study aimed at establishing essential and clear criteria for the collection of intestinal segments for morphometric analysis. Fifteen 13-d-old broilers were sacrificed and three intestinal segments were collected per bird. Two 3-cm long sections were obtained from each of the intestinal segments. Samples were collected open or closed. The closed samples were transversely, hemicylindrically, or longitudinally sectioned. Samples were processed and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The number of microscopic fields in each section was counted. Villi presenting the base clearly embedded in the submucosa, no damage or folds, and simple columnar epithelium at the tip were considered adequate for measurements. These villi were counted in each sample. The results shows that hemicylindrical sections presented the highest number of observation fields, with an average of 9.76 fields. Jejunum samples were among the three highest average villi counts, with 18.23 in longitudinal sections and 15.61 in hemicylindrical sections. The results of the present study indicate that hemicylindrical sectioning and jejunal samples were, respectively, the best sectioning method and the best intestinal segment for the morphometric analysis of the intestines of broilers.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2015000200145
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2015000200145
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1516-635x1702145-150
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundacao de Apoio a Ciência e Tecnologia Avicolas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundacao de Apoio a Ciência e Tecnologia Avicolas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science v.17 n.2 2015
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)
instname:Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA)
instacron:FACTA
instname_str Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA)
instacron_str FACTA
institution FACTA
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)
collection Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online) - Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rvfacta@terra.com.br
_version_ 1754122512971595776