Thermal Response of Three Strains of Hens Housed in a Cage-Free Aviary at the Amazon Rainforest

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rufino,JPF
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Martorano,LG, Cruz,FGG, Brasil,RJM, Melo,RD, Feijó,JC, Melo,LD
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2021000400301
Resumo: ABSTRACT This study aimed to evaluate the thermal response of three strains of hens housed in a cage-free system at the Amazon rainforest in order to evaluate how feather coverage influences thermal exchange with the environment. The experimental method was completely randomized and treatments comprised three strains of hens (Rhode Island Red (red feathers with feathers on the neck), alternative strain FCI (red feathers without feathers on the neck), and alternative strain FCIII (white feathers without feathers on the neck)), with 20 hens (replicates) analyzed per strain. Thermal images of each bird were captured in order to record the birds’ surface temperatures on five points in five targets. All data collected in this study were subjected to ANOVA and subsequently to the Tukey test at p≤0.01 and p≤0.05. The aviary’s left wall presented a lower average temperature, indicating lower heat accumulation, while the floor presented higher heat accumulation. FCIII hens (white feathers) presented higher (p<0.05) heat accumulation on the head and legs, and lower (p<0.05) heat accumulation on the neck and back in relation to other analyzed hens, indicating increased heat exchange efficiency and high concentration of this process in specific body areas. FCI and FCIII hens (without feathers on the neck) presented lower (p<0.05) heat accumulation on the neck and higher (p<0.05) heat accumulation on the head and legs, indicating that the feather coverage directly influenced heat exchange mechanisms, and an increased area without feathers provided great heat exchange zones for birds in a tropical climate.
id FACTA-1_ddfb7b5d50844765d395a67f85110ba8
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-635X2021000400301
network_acronym_str FACTA-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Thermal Response of Three Strains of Hens Housed in a Cage-Free Aviary at the Amazon RainforestAmazonanimal welfarecage-freeGallus gallus domesticusthermal comfortABSTRACT This study aimed to evaluate the thermal response of three strains of hens housed in a cage-free system at the Amazon rainforest in order to evaluate how feather coverage influences thermal exchange with the environment. The experimental method was completely randomized and treatments comprised three strains of hens (Rhode Island Red (red feathers with feathers on the neck), alternative strain FCI (red feathers without feathers on the neck), and alternative strain FCIII (white feathers without feathers on the neck)), with 20 hens (replicates) analyzed per strain. Thermal images of each bird were captured in order to record the birds’ surface temperatures on five points in five targets. All data collected in this study were subjected to ANOVA and subsequently to the Tukey test at p≤0.01 and p≤0.05. The aviary’s left wall presented a lower average temperature, indicating lower heat accumulation, while the floor presented higher heat accumulation. FCIII hens (white feathers) presented higher (p<0.05) heat accumulation on the head and legs, and lower (p<0.05) heat accumulation on the neck and back in relation to other analyzed hens, indicating increased heat exchange efficiency and high concentration of this process in specific body areas. FCI and FCIII hens (without feathers on the neck) presented lower (p<0.05) heat accumulation on the neck and higher (p<0.05) heat accumulation on the head and legs, indicating that the feather coverage directly influenced heat exchange mechanisms, and an increased area without feathers provided great heat exchange zones for birds in a tropical climate.Fundacao de Apoio a Ciência e Tecnologia Avicolas2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2021000400301Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science v.23 n.4 2021reponame:Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)instname:Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA)instacron:FACTA10.1590/1806-9061-2020-1420info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRufino,JPFMartorano,LGCruz,FGGBrasil,RJMMelo,RDFeijó,JCMelo,LDeng2021-09-16T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-635X2021000400301Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbcahttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rvfacta@terra.com.br1806-90611516-635Xopendoar:2021-09-16T00:00Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online) - Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Thermal Response of Three Strains of Hens Housed in a Cage-Free Aviary at the Amazon Rainforest
title Thermal Response of Three Strains of Hens Housed in a Cage-Free Aviary at the Amazon Rainforest
spellingShingle Thermal Response of Three Strains of Hens Housed in a Cage-Free Aviary at the Amazon Rainforest
Rufino,JPF
Amazon
animal welfare
cage-free
Gallus gallus domesticus
thermal comfort
title_short Thermal Response of Three Strains of Hens Housed in a Cage-Free Aviary at the Amazon Rainforest
title_full Thermal Response of Three Strains of Hens Housed in a Cage-Free Aviary at the Amazon Rainforest
title_fullStr Thermal Response of Three Strains of Hens Housed in a Cage-Free Aviary at the Amazon Rainforest
title_full_unstemmed Thermal Response of Three Strains of Hens Housed in a Cage-Free Aviary at the Amazon Rainforest
title_sort Thermal Response of Three Strains of Hens Housed in a Cage-Free Aviary at the Amazon Rainforest
author Rufino,JPF
author_facet Rufino,JPF
Martorano,LG
Cruz,FGG
Brasil,RJM
Melo,RD
Feijó,JC
Melo,LD
author_role author
author2 Martorano,LG
Cruz,FGG
Brasil,RJM
Melo,RD
Feijó,JC
Melo,LD
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rufino,JPF
Martorano,LG
Cruz,FGG
Brasil,RJM
Melo,RD
Feijó,JC
Melo,LD
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Amazon
animal welfare
cage-free
Gallus gallus domesticus
thermal comfort
topic Amazon
animal welfare
cage-free
Gallus gallus domesticus
thermal comfort
description ABSTRACT This study aimed to evaluate the thermal response of three strains of hens housed in a cage-free system at the Amazon rainforest in order to evaluate how feather coverage influences thermal exchange with the environment. The experimental method was completely randomized and treatments comprised three strains of hens (Rhode Island Red (red feathers with feathers on the neck), alternative strain FCI (red feathers without feathers on the neck), and alternative strain FCIII (white feathers without feathers on the neck)), with 20 hens (replicates) analyzed per strain. Thermal images of each bird were captured in order to record the birds’ surface temperatures on five points in five targets. All data collected in this study were subjected to ANOVA and subsequently to the Tukey test at p≤0.01 and p≤0.05. The aviary’s left wall presented a lower average temperature, indicating lower heat accumulation, while the floor presented higher heat accumulation. FCIII hens (white feathers) presented higher (p<0.05) heat accumulation on the head and legs, and lower (p<0.05) heat accumulation on the neck and back in relation to other analyzed hens, indicating increased heat exchange efficiency and high concentration of this process in specific body areas. FCI and FCIII hens (without feathers on the neck) presented lower (p<0.05) heat accumulation on the neck and higher (p<0.05) heat accumulation on the head and legs, indicating that the feather coverage directly influenced heat exchange mechanisms, and an increased area without feathers provided great heat exchange zones for birds in a tropical climate.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2021000400301
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2021000400301
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1806-9061-2020-1420
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundacao de Apoio a Ciência e Tecnologia Avicolas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundacao de Apoio a Ciência e Tecnologia Avicolas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science v.23 n.4 2021
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)
instname:Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA)
instacron:FACTA
instname_str Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA)
instacron_str FACTA
institution FACTA
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)
collection Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science (Online) - Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas (FACTA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rvfacta@terra.com.br
_version_ 1754122515720962048