JUSTICE AND/IN CRISIS: BRAZIL’S AUTHORITARIAN TRADITION AND THE DEMOCRATIC RESISTANCE OF THE 1988 CONSTITUTION
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Pensamento Jurídico |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.unialfa.com.br/index.php/pensamentojuridico/article/view/751 |
Resumo: | The pendulum movement between authoritarianism anddemocracy has been part of the history of colonial, independent and republican Brazil for more than 500 years. The 1988 Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil was born with the ambition of confronting the authoritarian tradition and being a democratic resistance based on citizenship and human rights. After 35 years, it is necessary to analyze the course of the Democratic Rule of Law from the end of the 20th century to the threshold of the 21st century, not only in relation to the Executive and Legislative Branches, but also to the Judiciary and its relationship with the reorientation of the authoritarian-democratic compass. This study, divided into two sections, aims, respectively, to reflect on the inscription of the Judiciary in constitutional history and its judicial and political link to the crisis recently expressed in the Brazilian State and society. The conclusion identifies the Judiciary as a political power, whose actions and omissions contribute to and reflect the authoritarian and democratic cycle of national history, given that its members are also the fruit of inheritance and interests, in effect calling for the continuous, fundamental and inevitable democratization of Justice. Finally, the methodology uses the genealogical method, mainly, and the archaeological method, in addition, to the qualitative approach, the basic nature, the explanatory objective and the bibliographic and documentary procedures. |
id |
FADISP-1_62cb34ad6e45a2c513ff2214119fab38 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.ojs.unialfa.com.br:article/751 |
network_acronym_str |
FADISP-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Pensamento Jurídico |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
JUSTICE AND/IN CRISIS: BRAZIL’S AUTHORITARIAN TRADITION AND THE DEMOCRATIC RESISTANCE OF THE 1988 CONSTITUTIONJUSTIÇA E(M) CRISE: A TRADIÇÃO AUTORITÁRIA DO BRASIL E A RESISTÊNCIA DEMOCRÁTICA DA CONSTITUIÇÃO DE 1988AutoritarismoConstituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988CriseDemocraciaPoder JudiciárioAuthoritarianism1988 Constitution of the Federative Republic of BrazilCrisisDemocracyJudiciaryThe pendulum movement between authoritarianism anddemocracy has been part of the history of colonial, independent and republican Brazil for more than 500 years. The 1988 Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil was born with the ambition of confronting the authoritarian tradition and being a democratic resistance based on citizenship and human rights. After 35 years, it is necessary to analyze the course of the Democratic Rule of Law from the end of the 20th century to the threshold of the 21st century, not only in relation to the Executive and Legislative Branches, but also to the Judiciary and its relationship with the reorientation of the authoritarian-democratic compass. This study, divided into two sections, aims, respectively, to reflect on the inscription of the Judiciary in constitutional history and its judicial and political link to the crisis recently expressed in the Brazilian State and society. The conclusion identifies the Judiciary as a political power, whose actions and omissions contribute to and reflect the authoritarian and democratic cycle of national history, given that its members are also the fruit of inheritance and interests, in effect calling for the continuous, fundamental and inevitable democratization of Justice. Finally, the methodology uses the genealogical method, mainly, and the archaeological method, in addition, to the qualitative approach, the basic nature, the explanatory objective and the bibliographic and documentary procedures.O movimento pendular entre autoritarismo e democracia constitui a história do Brasil colonial, independente e republicano durante mais de 500 anos. A Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988 nasceu com a ambição de enfrentar a tradição autoritária e ser uma resistência democrática com alicerce na cidadania e nos direitos humanos. Passados 35 anos, mostra-se necessário analisar o caminhar do Estado Democrático de Direito desde o findar do século XX até este limiar do século XXI não somente em relação ao Poder Executivo e ao Poder Legislativo, mas também ao Poder Judiciário e suas relações com a reorientação da bússola autoritário-democrática. Este estudo, dividido em duas seções, objetiva, respectivamente, refletir sobre a inscrição do Poder Judiciário na história constitucional e a sua vinculação judicial e política à crise externada recentemente no Estado e na sociedade brasileiros. A conclusão identifica o Poder Judiciário como um poder político, cujas ações e omissões contribuem e refletem o ciclo autoritário e democrático da história nacional, haja vista serem os seus membros frutos também de heranças e interesses, reclamando, com efeito, a contínua, fundamental e inevitável democratização da Justiça. Por fim, a metodologia atende aos métodos genealógico, principalmente, e arqueológico, complementarmente, à abordagem qualitativa, à natureza básica, ao objetivo explicativo e aos procedimentos bibliográfico e documental.Revista Pensamento Jurídico2024-03-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.unialfa.com.br/index.php/pensamentojuridico/article/view/751Revista Pensamento Jurídico; v. 17 n. 3 (2023); 217-2422447-85712238-944Xreponame:Revista Pensamento Jurídicoinstname:Faculdade Autônoma de Direito (FADISP)instacron:FADISPporhttps://ojs.unialfa.com.br/index.php/pensamentojuridico/article/view/751/667Copyright (c) 2024 ANDRÉ GIOVANE DE CASTROhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCASTRO, ANDRÉ GIOVANE DE2024-03-27T21:48:06Zoai:ojs2.ojs.unialfa.com.br:article/751Revistahttps://fadisp.com.br/revista/ojs/index.php/pensamentojuridico/indexPUBhttps://fadisp.com.br/revista/ojs/index.php/pensamentojuridico/oairevistapensamentojuridico@unialfa.com.br ||2447-85712238-944Xopendoar:2024-03-27T21:48:06Revista Pensamento Jurídico - Faculdade Autônoma de Direito (FADISP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
JUSTICE AND/IN CRISIS: BRAZIL’S AUTHORITARIAN TRADITION AND THE DEMOCRATIC RESISTANCE OF THE 1988 CONSTITUTION JUSTIÇA E(M) CRISE: A TRADIÇÃO AUTORITÁRIA DO BRASIL E A RESISTÊNCIA DEMOCRÁTICA DA CONSTITUIÇÃO DE 1988 |
title |
JUSTICE AND/IN CRISIS: BRAZIL’S AUTHORITARIAN TRADITION AND THE DEMOCRATIC RESISTANCE OF THE 1988 CONSTITUTION |
spellingShingle |
JUSTICE AND/IN CRISIS: BRAZIL’S AUTHORITARIAN TRADITION AND THE DEMOCRATIC RESISTANCE OF THE 1988 CONSTITUTION CASTRO, ANDRÉ GIOVANE DE Autoritarismo Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988 Crise Democracia Poder Judiciário Authoritarianism 1988 Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil Crisis Democracy Judiciary |
title_short |
JUSTICE AND/IN CRISIS: BRAZIL’S AUTHORITARIAN TRADITION AND THE DEMOCRATIC RESISTANCE OF THE 1988 CONSTITUTION |
title_full |
JUSTICE AND/IN CRISIS: BRAZIL’S AUTHORITARIAN TRADITION AND THE DEMOCRATIC RESISTANCE OF THE 1988 CONSTITUTION |
title_fullStr |
JUSTICE AND/IN CRISIS: BRAZIL’S AUTHORITARIAN TRADITION AND THE DEMOCRATIC RESISTANCE OF THE 1988 CONSTITUTION |
title_full_unstemmed |
JUSTICE AND/IN CRISIS: BRAZIL’S AUTHORITARIAN TRADITION AND THE DEMOCRATIC RESISTANCE OF THE 1988 CONSTITUTION |
title_sort |
JUSTICE AND/IN CRISIS: BRAZIL’S AUTHORITARIAN TRADITION AND THE DEMOCRATIC RESISTANCE OF THE 1988 CONSTITUTION |
author |
CASTRO, ANDRÉ GIOVANE DE |
author_facet |
CASTRO, ANDRÉ GIOVANE DE |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
CASTRO, ANDRÉ GIOVANE DE |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Autoritarismo Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988 Crise Democracia Poder Judiciário Authoritarianism 1988 Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil Crisis Democracy Judiciary |
topic |
Autoritarismo Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988 Crise Democracia Poder Judiciário Authoritarianism 1988 Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil Crisis Democracy Judiciary |
description |
The pendulum movement between authoritarianism anddemocracy has been part of the history of colonial, independent and republican Brazil for more than 500 years. The 1988 Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil was born with the ambition of confronting the authoritarian tradition and being a democratic resistance based on citizenship and human rights. After 35 years, it is necessary to analyze the course of the Democratic Rule of Law from the end of the 20th century to the threshold of the 21st century, not only in relation to the Executive and Legislative Branches, but also to the Judiciary and its relationship with the reorientation of the authoritarian-democratic compass. This study, divided into two sections, aims, respectively, to reflect on the inscription of the Judiciary in constitutional history and its judicial and political link to the crisis recently expressed in the Brazilian State and society. The conclusion identifies the Judiciary as a political power, whose actions and omissions contribute to and reflect the authoritarian and democratic cycle of national history, given that its members are also the fruit of inheritance and interests, in effect calling for the continuous, fundamental and inevitable democratization of Justice. Finally, the methodology uses the genealogical method, mainly, and the archaeological method, in addition, to the qualitative approach, the basic nature, the explanatory objective and the bibliographic and documentary procedures. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-03-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.unialfa.com.br/index.php/pensamentojuridico/article/view/751 |
url |
https://ojs.unialfa.com.br/index.php/pensamentojuridico/article/view/751 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.unialfa.com.br/index.php/pensamentojuridico/article/view/751/667 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 ANDRÉ GIOVANE DE CASTRO https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 ANDRÉ GIOVANE DE CASTRO https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Pensamento Jurídico |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Pensamento Jurídico |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Pensamento Jurídico; v. 17 n. 3 (2023); 217-242 2447-8571 2238-944X reponame:Revista Pensamento Jurídico instname:Faculdade Autônoma de Direito (FADISP) instacron:FADISP |
instname_str |
Faculdade Autônoma de Direito (FADISP) |
instacron_str |
FADISP |
institution |
FADISP |
reponame_str |
Revista Pensamento Jurídico |
collection |
Revista Pensamento Jurídico |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Pensamento Jurídico - Faculdade Autônoma de Direito (FADISP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistapensamentojuridico@unialfa.com.br || |
_version_ |
1798045994695262208 |