The Rio 16 Olympic Games: no gold medal for human rights respect
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Pensamento Jurídico |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.unialfa.com.br/index.php/pensamentojuridico/article/view/340 |
Resumo: | Mega-events are singular moments for States to improve their reputation and status to the international level, and to governments to gain support to the domestic level, showing their competence to organize and host an international event. Although it has public appeal, public money, and a global public good, they are mainly fostered by private organizations, which are sponsored and associated with private transnational corporations. Consequently, the World Cup, the Olympic Games and other sports mega-events are a very interesting point of rights controversies between domestic-constitutional law and transnational-global stateless regulations. Specially in Brazil, those mega-events have showed an impressive case of suspension of human rights in favor to the mega-event accomplishment as the violation of labor rights, political freedom, corruption, the costs of the stadiums, the emergency infrastructure, the tax privileges, environmental laws, and the displacement of vulnerable families. The research question aims to perceive the configuration of how the sports mega-events manage to build the state of exception around it, specially concerning the Brazil's case. The objective of the paper is to explore the impact of transnational mega-events in domestic Law, where the demands of these mega-events, especially those concerning the lasts World Cups and Olympic Games are suggesting patterns of human rights and constitutional Law suspension. The theoretical approach aims to dialogue with the perspectives of biopolitics theory and the state of exception conceptions.Keywords: State of Exception; Mega-events; Environmental Law; 2016 Olympic Games; International Law. |
id |
FADISP-1_c9b14be0b7bbc3eec2c693c58982dd8c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.ojs.unialfa.com.br:article/340 |
network_acronym_str |
FADISP-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Pensamento Jurídico |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The Rio 16 Olympic Games: no gold medal for human rights respectMega-events are singular moments for States to improve their reputation and status to the international level, and to governments to gain support to the domestic level, showing their competence to organize and host an international event. Although it has public appeal, public money, and a global public good, they are mainly fostered by private organizations, which are sponsored and associated with private transnational corporations. Consequently, the World Cup, the Olympic Games and other sports mega-events are a very interesting point of rights controversies between domestic-constitutional law and transnational-global stateless regulations. Specially in Brazil, those mega-events have showed an impressive case of suspension of human rights in favor to the mega-event accomplishment as the violation of labor rights, political freedom, corruption, the costs of the stadiums, the emergency infrastructure, the tax privileges, environmental laws, and the displacement of vulnerable families. The research question aims to perceive the configuration of how the sports mega-events manage to build the state of exception around it, specially concerning the Brazil's case. The objective of the paper is to explore the impact of transnational mega-events in domestic Law, where the demands of these mega-events, especially those concerning the lasts World Cups and Olympic Games are suggesting patterns of human rights and constitutional Law suspension. The theoretical approach aims to dialogue with the perspectives of biopolitics theory and the state of exception conceptions.Keywords: State of Exception; Mega-events; Environmental Law; 2016 Olympic Games; International Law.Revista Pensamento Jurídico2018-01-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.unialfa.com.br/index.php/pensamentojuridico/article/view/340Revista Pensamento Jurídico; v. 11 n. 2 (2017)2447-85712238-944Xreponame:Revista Pensamento Jurídicoinstname:Faculdade Autônoma de Direito (FADISP)instacron:FADISPporhttps://ojs.unialfa.com.br/index.php/pensamentojuridico/article/view/340/246Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Pensamento Jurídicoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessda Luz, Cícero KruppLeite, Robson Soares2023-09-05T01:56:09Zoai:ojs2.ojs.unialfa.com.br:article/340Revistahttps://fadisp.com.br/revista/ojs/index.php/pensamentojuridico/indexPUBhttps://fadisp.com.br/revista/ojs/index.php/pensamentojuridico/oairevistapensamentojuridico@unialfa.com.br ||2447-85712238-944Xopendoar:2023-09-05T01:56:09Revista Pensamento Jurídico - Faculdade Autônoma de Direito (FADISP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Rio 16 Olympic Games: no gold medal for human rights respect |
title |
The Rio 16 Olympic Games: no gold medal for human rights respect |
spellingShingle |
The Rio 16 Olympic Games: no gold medal for human rights respect da Luz, Cícero Krupp |
title_short |
The Rio 16 Olympic Games: no gold medal for human rights respect |
title_full |
The Rio 16 Olympic Games: no gold medal for human rights respect |
title_fullStr |
The Rio 16 Olympic Games: no gold medal for human rights respect |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Rio 16 Olympic Games: no gold medal for human rights respect |
title_sort |
The Rio 16 Olympic Games: no gold medal for human rights respect |
author |
da Luz, Cícero Krupp |
author_facet |
da Luz, Cícero Krupp Leite, Robson Soares |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Leite, Robson Soares |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
da Luz, Cícero Krupp Leite, Robson Soares |
description |
Mega-events are singular moments for States to improve their reputation and status to the international level, and to governments to gain support to the domestic level, showing their competence to organize and host an international event. Although it has public appeal, public money, and a global public good, they are mainly fostered by private organizations, which are sponsored and associated with private transnational corporations. Consequently, the World Cup, the Olympic Games and other sports mega-events are a very interesting point of rights controversies between domestic-constitutional law and transnational-global stateless regulations. Specially in Brazil, those mega-events have showed an impressive case of suspension of human rights in favor to the mega-event accomplishment as the violation of labor rights, political freedom, corruption, the costs of the stadiums, the emergency infrastructure, the tax privileges, environmental laws, and the displacement of vulnerable families. The research question aims to perceive the configuration of how the sports mega-events manage to build the state of exception around it, specially concerning the Brazil's case. The objective of the paper is to explore the impact of transnational mega-events in domestic Law, where the demands of these mega-events, especially those concerning the lasts World Cups and Olympic Games are suggesting patterns of human rights and constitutional Law suspension. The theoretical approach aims to dialogue with the perspectives of biopolitics theory and the state of exception conceptions.Keywords: State of Exception; Mega-events; Environmental Law; 2016 Olympic Games; International Law. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-01-08 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.unialfa.com.br/index.php/pensamentojuridico/article/view/340 |
url |
https://ojs.unialfa.com.br/index.php/pensamentojuridico/article/view/340 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.unialfa.com.br/index.php/pensamentojuridico/article/view/340/246 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Pensamento Jurídico info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Pensamento Jurídico |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Pensamento Jurídico |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Pensamento Jurídico |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Pensamento Jurídico; v. 11 n. 2 (2017) 2447-8571 2238-944X reponame:Revista Pensamento Jurídico instname:Faculdade Autônoma de Direito (FADISP) instacron:FADISP |
instname_str |
Faculdade Autônoma de Direito (FADISP) |
instacron_str |
FADISP |
institution |
FADISP |
reponame_str |
Revista Pensamento Jurídico |
collection |
Revista Pensamento Jurídico |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Pensamento Jurídico - Faculdade Autônoma de Direito (FADISP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistapensamentojuridico@unialfa.com.br || |
_version_ |
1798045992104230912 |