EXPECTATION VERSUS REALITY: NOTES ON A GUARANTIST CONSTITUTION IN A PUNITIVE LEGAL SYSTEM

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: COSTA, ANA PAULA MOTTA
Data de Publicação: 2024
Outros Autores: LAMARE, BRUNO JACOBY DE, PELLEGRINI, CAROLINA DE MENEZES CARDOSO
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Pensamento Jurídico
Texto Completo: https://ojs.unialfa.com.br/index.php/pensamentojuridico/article/view/730
Resumo: This essay aims to present considerations regarding the landscape of disputes between the progressive and conservative currents within the context of the National Constituent Assembly and the penal system in Brazil prior to 1988, the year when the Citizen Constitution was promulgated. It is assumed that such disputes require hermeneutical interpretation, adaptation of infraconstitutional legislation, and the assistance of doctrine in order not to undermine the effectiveness of the promulgated text. From the research conducted, it is evident that the State of Art of Criminal Law prior to the Federal Constitution was marked by authoritarian characteristics, compatible with the exceptional regimes in which the Penal and Criminal Procedure Codes were forged (and to which they served). The Constituent Assembly, however, demonstrated a progressive stance in the field of criminal law, seeking to solidify, albeit implicitly, principles such as the presumption of innocence, due process of law, and the accusatorial procedural model as individual rights and guarantees. However, there are various cultural and infraconstitutional obstacles that prevent the 1988 Constitution from imposing the rights and guarantees established therein, ultimately hindering the realization of the democratic order as conceived.
id FADISP-1_f2dae36433f4e9c31b4c071dec84dffa
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.ojs.unialfa.com.br:article/730
network_acronym_str FADISP-1
network_name_str Revista Pensamento Jurídico
repository_id_str
spelling EXPECTATION VERSUS REALITY: NOTES ON A GUARANTIST CONSTITUTION IN A PUNITIVE LEGAL SYSTEMEXPECTATIVA VERSUS REALIDADE: NOTAS SOBRE UMA CONSTITUIÇÃO GARANTISTA EM UM ORDENAMENTO JURÍDICO PUNITIVOAssembleia Nacional ConstituinteProgressismoConservadorismoSistema PenalConstituição Federal de 1988National Constituent AssemblyProgressivismConservatismPenal SystemFederal Constitution of 1988This essay aims to present considerations regarding the landscape of disputes between the progressive and conservative currents within the context of the National Constituent Assembly and the penal system in Brazil prior to 1988, the year when the Citizen Constitution was promulgated. It is assumed that such disputes require hermeneutical interpretation, adaptation of infraconstitutional legislation, and the assistance of doctrine in order not to undermine the effectiveness of the promulgated text. From the research conducted, it is evident that the State of Art of Criminal Law prior to the Federal Constitution was marked by authoritarian characteristics, compatible with the exceptional regimes in which the Penal and Criminal Procedure Codes were forged (and to which they served). The Constituent Assembly, however, demonstrated a progressive stance in the field of criminal law, seeking to solidify, albeit implicitly, principles such as the presumption of innocence, due process of law, and the accusatorial procedural model as individual rights and guarantees. However, there are various cultural and infraconstitutional obstacles that prevent the 1988 Constitution from imposing the rights and guarantees established therein, ultimately hindering the realization of the democratic order as conceived.O presente ensaio tem como objetivo apresentar considerações acerca do cenário de disputas entre as correntes do progressismo e conservadorismo no contexto da Assembleia Nacional Constituinte e do sistema penal posto no Brasil anteriormente a 1988, ano de promulgação da Constituição Cidadã. Parte-se do pressuposto de que tais disputas exigem atuação hermenêutica, adequação da legislação infraconstitucional e do auxílio da doutrina, de forma a não se esvaziar a efetividade do texto promulgado. Da pesquisa realizada, obtém-se que o Estado da Arte do Direito Penal antes da Constituição Federal era marcado por características autoritárias, compatíveis com os regimes de exceção nos quais foram forjados (e a que serviram) os Códigos Penal e de Processo Penal. A Assembleia Constituinte, entretanto, mostrou-se progressista no campo do sistema penalista, buscando sedimentar como direitos e garantias individuais a presunção da inocência, o devido processo legal e o modelo processual acusatório, ainda que de forma implícita. Todavia, são diversos os bloqueios culturais e infraconstitucionais que impedem que a Constituição de 1988 imponha as garantias e direitos nela estabelecidos, o que em última medida impede a concretização da ordem democrática como concebida.Revista Pensamento Jurídico2024-03-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.unialfa.com.br/index.php/pensamentojuridico/article/view/730Revista Pensamento Jurídico; v. 17 n. 3 (2023); 170-1872447-85712238-944Xreponame:Revista Pensamento Jurídicoinstname:Faculdade Autônoma de Direito (FADISP)instacron:FADISPporhttps://ojs.unialfa.com.br/index.php/pensamentojuridico/article/view/730/666Copyright (c) 2024 ANA PAULA MOTTA COSTA, BRUNO JACOBY DE LAMARE, CAROLINA DE MENEZES CARDOSO PELEGRINIhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCOSTA, ANA PAULA MOTTALAMARE, BRUNO JACOBY DEPELLEGRINI, CAROLINA DE MENEZES CARDOSO2024-03-28T13:21:18Zoai:ojs2.ojs.unialfa.com.br:article/730Revistahttps://fadisp.com.br/revista/ojs/index.php/pensamentojuridico/indexPUBhttps://fadisp.com.br/revista/ojs/index.php/pensamentojuridico/oairevistapensamentojuridico@unialfa.com.br ||2447-85712238-944Xopendoar:2024-03-28T13:21:18Revista Pensamento Jurídico - Faculdade Autônoma de Direito (FADISP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv EXPECTATION VERSUS REALITY: NOTES ON A GUARANTIST CONSTITUTION IN A PUNITIVE LEGAL SYSTEM
EXPECTATIVA VERSUS REALIDADE: NOTAS SOBRE UMA CONSTITUIÇÃO GARANTISTA EM UM ORDENAMENTO JURÍDICO PUNITIVO
title EXPECTATION VERSUS REALITY: NOTES ON A GUARANTIST CONSTITUTION IN A PUNITIVE LEGAL SYSTEM
spellingShingle EXPECTATION VERSUS REALITY: NOTES ON A GUARANTIST CONSTITUTION IN A PUNITIVE LEGAL SYSTEM
COSTA, ANA PAULA MOTTA
Assembleia Nacional Constituinte
Progressismo
Conservadorismo
Sistema Penal
Constituição Federal de 1988
National Constituent Assembly
Progressivism
Conservatism
Penal System
Federal Constitution of 1988
title_short EXPECTATION VERSUS REALITY: NOTES ON A GUARANTIST CONSTITUTION IN A PUNITIVE LEGAL SYSTEM
title_full EXPECTATION VERSUS REALITY: NOTES ON A GUARANTIST CONSTITUTION IN A PUNITIVE LEGAL SYSTEM
title_fullStr EXPECTATION VERSUS REALITY: NOTES ON A GUARANTIST CONSTITUTION IN A PUNITIVE LEGAL SYSTEM
title_full_unstemmed EXPECTATION VERSUS REALITY: NOTES ON A GUARANTIST CONSTITUTION IN A PUNITIVE LEGAL SYSTEM
title_sort EXPECTATION VERSUS REALITY: NOTES ON A GUARANTIST CONSTITUTION IN A PUNITIVE LEGAL SYSTEM
author COSTA, ANA PAULA MOTTA
author_facet COSTA, ANA PAULA MOTTA
LAMARE, BRUNO JACOBY DE
PELLEGRINI, CAROLINA DE MENEZES CARDOSO
author_role author
author2 LAMARE, BRUNO JACOBY DE
PELLEGRINI, CAROLINA DE MENEZES CARDOSO
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv COSTA, ANA PAULA MOTTA
LAMARE, BRUNO JACOBY DE
PELLEGRINI, CAROLINA DE MENEZES CARDOSO
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Assembleia Nacional Constituinte
Progressismo
Conservadorismo
Sistema Penal
Constituição Federal de 1988
National Constituent Assembly
Progressivism
Conservatism
Penal System
Federal Constitution of 1988
topic Assembleia Nacional Constituinte
Progressismo
Conservadorismo
Sistema Penal
Constituição Federal de 1988
National Constituent Assembly
Progressivism
Conservatism
Penal System
Federal Constitution of 1988
description This essay aims to present considerations regarding the landscape of disputes between the progressive and conservative currents within the context of the National Constituent Assembly and the penal system in Brazil prior to 1988, the year when the Citizen Constitution was promulgated. It is assumed that such disputes require hermeneutical interpretation, adaptation of infraconstitutional legislation, and the assistance of doctrine in order not to undermine the effectiveness of the promulgated text. From the research conducted, it is evident that the State of Art of Criminal Law prior to the Federal Constitution was marked by authoritarian characteristics, compatible with the exceptional regimes in which the Penal and Criminal Procedure Codes were forged (and to which they served). The Constituent Assembly, however, demonstrated a progressive stance in the field of criminal law, seeking to solidify, albeit implicitly, principles such as the presumption of innocence, due process of law, and the accusatorial procedural model as individual rights and guarantees. However, there are various cultural and infraconstitutional obstacles that prevent the 1988 Constitution from imposing the rights and guarantees established therein, ultimately hindering the realization of the democratic order as conceived.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-03-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.unialfa.com.br/index.php/pensamentojuridico/article/view/730
url https://ojs.unialfa.com.br/index.php/pensamentojuridico/article/view/730
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.unialfa.com.br/index.php/pensamentojuridico/article/view/730/666
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Pensamento Jurídico
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Pensamento Jurídico
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Pensamento Jurídico; v. 17 n. 3 (2023); 170-187
2447-8571
2238-944X
reponame:Revista Pensamento Jurídico
instname:Faculdade Autônoma de Direito (FADISP)
instacron:FADISP
instname_str Faculdade Autônoma de Direito (FADISP)
instacron_str FADISP
institution FADISP
reponame_str Revista Pensamento Jurídico
collection Revista Pensamento Jurídico
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Pensamento Jurídico - Faculdade Autônoma de Direito (FADISP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistapensamentojuridico@unialfa.com.br ||
_version_ 1798045994688970752