EXPECTATION VERSUS REALITY: NOTES ON A GUARANTIST CONSTITUTION IN A PUNITIVE LEGAL SYSTEM
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Pensamento Jurídico |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.unialfa.com.br/index.php/pensamentojuridico/article/view/730 |
Resumo: | This essay aims to present considerations regarding the landscape of disputes between the progressive and conservative currents within the context of the National Constituent Assembly and the penal system in Brazil prior to 1988, the year when the Citizen Constitution was promulgated. It is assumed that such disputes require hermeneutical interpretation, adaptation of infraconstitutional legislation, and the assistance of doctrine in order not to undermine the effectiveness of the promulgated text. From the research conducted, it is evident that the State of Art of Criminal Law prior to the Federal Constitution was marked by authoritarian characteristics, compatible with the exceptional regimes in which the Penal and Criminal Procedure Codes were forged (and to which they served). The Constituent Assembly, however, demonstrated a progressive stance in the field of criminal law, seeking to solidify, albeit implicitly, principles such as the presumption of innocence, due process of law, and the accusatorial procedural model as individual rights and guarantees. However, there are various cultural and infraconstitutional obstacles that prevent the 1988 Constitution from imposing the rights and guarantees established therein, ultimately hindering the realization of the democratic order as conceived. |
id |
FADISP-1_f2dae36433f4e9c31b4c071dec84dffa |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.ojs.unialfa.com.br:article/730 |
network_acronym_str |
FADISP-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Pensamento Jurídico |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
EXPECTATION VERSUS REALITY: NOTES ON A GUARANTIST CONSTITUTION IN A PUNITIVE LEGAL SYSTEMEXPECTATIVA VERSUS REALIDADE: NOTAS SOBRE UMA CONSTITUIÇÃO GARANTISTA EM UM ORDENAMENTO JURÍDICO PUNITIVOAssembleia Nacional ConstituinteProgressismoConservadorismoSistema PenalConstituição Federal de 1988National Constituent AssemblyProgressivismConservatismPenal SystemFederal Constitution of 1988This essay aims to present considerations regarding the landscape of disputes between the progressive and conservative currents within the context of the National Constituent Assembly and the penal system in Brazil prior to 1988, the year when the Citizen Constitution was promulgated. It is assumed that such disputes require hermeneutical interpretation, adaptation of infraconstitutional legislation, and the assistance of doctrine in order not to undermine the effectiveness of the promulgated text. From the research conducted, it is evident that the State of Art of Criminal Law prior to the Federal Constitution was marked by authoritarian characteristics, compatible with the exceptional regimes in which the Penal and Criminal Procedure Codes were forged (and to which they served). The Constituent Assembly, however, demonstrated a progressive stance in the field of criminal law, seeking to solidify, albeit implicitly, principles such as the presumption of innocence, due process of law, and the accusatorial procedural model as individual rights and guarantees. However, there are various cultural and infraconstitutional obstacles that prevent the 1988 Constitution from imposing the rights and guarantees established therein, ultimately hindering the realization of the democratic order as conceived.O presente ensaio tem como objetivo apresentar considerações acerca do cenário de disputas entre as correntes do progressismo e conservadorismo no contexto da Assembleia Nacional Constituinte e do sistema penal posto no Brasil anteriormente a 1988, ano de promulgação da Constituição Cidadã. Parte-se do pressuposto de que tais disputas exigem atuação hermenêutica, adequação da legislação infraconstitucional e do auxílio da doutrina, de forma a não se esvaziar a efetividade do texto promulgado. Da pesquisa realizada, obtém-se que o Estado da Arte do Direito Penal antes da Constituição Federal era marcado por características autoritárias, compatíveis com os regimes de exceção nos quais foram forjados (e a que serviram) os Códigos Penal e de Processo Penal. A Assembleia Constituinte, entretanto, mostrou-se progressista no campo do sistema penalista, buscando sedimentar como direitos e garantias individuais a presunção da inocência, o devido processo legal e o modelo processual acusatório, ainda que de forma implícita. Todavia, são diversos os bloqueios culturais e infraconstitucionais que impedem que a Constituição de 1988 imponha as garantias e direitos nela estabelecidos, o que em última medida impede a concretização da ordem democrática como concebida.Revista Pensamento Jurídico2024-03-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.unialfa.com.br/index.php/pensamentojuridico/article/view/730Revista Pensamento Jurídico; v. 17 n. 3 (2023); 170-1872447-85712238-944Xreponame:Revista Pensamento Jurídicoinstname:Faculdade Autônoma de Direito (FADISP)instacron:FADISPporhttps://ojs.unialfa.com.br/index.php/pensamentojuridico/article/view/730/666Copyright (c) 2024 ANA PAULA MOTTA COSTA, BRUNO JACOBY DE LAMARE, CAROLINA DE MENEZES CARDOSO PELEGRINIhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCOSTA, ANA PAULA MOTTALAMARE, BRUNO JACOBY DEPELLEGRINI, CAROLINA DE MENEZES CARDOSO2024-03-28T13:21:18Zoai:ojs2.ojs.unialfa.com.br:article/730Revistahttps://fadisp.com.br/revista/ojs/index.php/pensamentojuridico/indexPUBhttps://fadisp.com.br/revista/ojs/index.php/pensamentojuridico/oairevistapensamentojuridico@unialfa.com.br ||2447-85712238-944Xopendoar:2024-03-28T13:21:18Revista Pensamento Jurídico - Faculdade Autônoma de Direito (FADISP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
EXPECTATION VERSUS REALITY: NOTES ON A GUARANTIST CONSTITUTION IN A PUNITIVE LEGAL SYSTEM EXPECTATIVA VERSUS REALIDADE: NOTAS SOBRE UMA CONSTITUIÇÃO GARANTISTA EM UM ORDENAMENTO JURÍDICO PUNITIVO |
title |
EXPECTATION VERSUS REALITY: NOTES ON A GUARANTIST CONSTITUTION IN A PUNITIVE LEGAL SYSTEM |
spellingShingle |
EXPECTATION VERSUS REALITY: NOTES ON A GUARANTIST CONSTITUTION IN A PUNITIVE LEGAL SYSTEM COSTA, ANA PAULA MOTTA Assembleia Nacional Constituinte Progressismo Conservadorismo Sistema Penal Constituição Federal de 1988 National Constituent Assembly Progressivism Conservatism Penal System Federal Constitution of 1988 |
title_short |
EXPECTATION VERSUS REALITY: NOTES ON A GUARANTIST CONSTITUTION IN A PUNITIVE LEGAL SYSTEM |
title_full |
EXPECTATION VERSUS REALITY: NOTES ON A GUARANTIST CONSTITUTION IN A PUNITIVE LEGAL SYSTEM |
title_fullStr |
EXPECTATION VERSUS REALITY: NOTES ON A GUARANTIST CONSTITUTION IN A PUNITIVE LEGAL SYSTEM |
title_full_unstemmed |
EXPECTATION VERSUS REALITY: NOTES ON A GUARANTIST CONSTITUTION IN A PUNITIVE LEGAL SYSTEM |
title_sort |
EXPECTATION VERSUS REALITY: NOTES ON A GUARANTIST CONSTITUTION IN A PUNITIVE LEGAL SYSTEM |
author |
COSTA, ANA PAULA MOTTA |
author_facet |
COSTA, ANA PAULA MOTTA LAMARE, BRUNO JACOBY DE PELLEGRINI, CAROLINA DE MENEZES CARDOSO |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
LAMARE, BRUNO JACOBY DE PELLEGRINI, CAROLINA DE MENEZES CARDOSO |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
COSTA, ANA PAULA MOTTA LAMARE, BRUNO JACOBY DE PELLEGRINI, CAROLINA DE MENEZES CARDOSO |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Assembleia Nacional Constituinte Progressismo Conservadorismo Sistema Penal Constituição Federal de 1988 National Constituent Assembly Progressivism Conservatism Penal System Federal Constitution of 1988 |
topic |
Assembleia Nacional Constituinte Progressismo Conservadorismo Sistema Penal Constituição Federal de 1988 National Constituent Assembly Progressivism Conservatism Penal System Federal Constitution of 1988 |
description |
This essay aims to present considerations regarding the landscape of disputes between the progressive and conservative currents within the context of the National Constituent Assembly and the penal system in Brazil prior to 1988, the year when the Citizen Constitution was promulgated. It is assumed that such disputes require hermeneutical interpretation, adaptation of infraconstitutional legislation, and the assistance of doctrine in order not to undermine the effectiveness of the promulgated text. From the research conducted, it is evident that the State of Art of Criminal Law prior to the Federal Constitution was marked by authoritarian characteristics, compatible with the exceptional regimes in which the Penal and Criminal Procedure Codes were forged (and to which they served). The Constituent Assembly, however, demonstrated a progressive stance in the field of criminal law, seeking to solidify, albeit implicitly, principles such as the presumption of innocence, due process of law, and the accusatorial procedural model as individual rights and guarantees. However, there are various cultural and infraconstitutional obstacles that prevent the 1988 Constitution from imposing the rights and guarantees established therein, ultimately hindering the realization of the democratic order as conceived. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-03-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.unialfa.com.br/index.php/pensamentojuridico/article/view/730 |
url |
https://ojs.unialfa.com.br/index.php/pensamentojuridico/article/view/730 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.unialfa.com.br/index.php/pensamentojuridico/article/view/730/666 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Pensamento Jurídico |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Pensamento Jurídico |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Pensamento Jurídico; v. 17 n. 3 (2023); 170-187 2447-8571 2238-944X reponame:Revista Pensamento Jurídico instname:Faculdade Autônoma de Direito (FADISP) instacron:FADISP |
instname_str |
Faculdade Autônoma de Direito (FADISP) |
instacron_str |
FADISP |
institution |
FADISP |
reponame_str |
Revista Pensamento Jurídico |
collection |
Revista Pensamento Jurídico |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Pensamento Jurídico - Faculdade Autônoma de Direito (FADISP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistapensamentojuridico@unialfa.com.br || |
_version_ |
1798045994688970752 |