Soil macrofauna in organic and conventional coffee plantations in Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos,Janaina Biral dos
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Ramos,Alessandro Coutinho, Azevedo Júnior,Romildo, Oliveira Filho,Luís Carlos Iuñes de, Baretta,Dilmar, Cardoso,Elke Jurandy Bran Nogueira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Biota Neotropica
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-06032018000200209
Resumo: Abstract: Brazil has always been one of the most important coffee producing countries. Lately, there has equally been a renewed interest in alternative coffee production systems. The state of Espírito Santo is the second greatest coffee producer in Brazil; so, we used local coffee plantations to evaluate the relations between soil macrofauna and chemical and microbiological soil properties to identify which of these properties discriminate more effectively between the organic management system (OS) and the conventional management system (CS) of coffee plantations. For each of these two cultivation systems we chose three coffee farms who employed both cultivation systems and picked out the most similar fields from each property. At each site, first we sampled the litter at the soil surface. Afterwards, we sampled nine soil monoliths to evaluate the macrofauna, in summer and winter. We also collected nine supplemental soil samples, taken at a few centimeters from the soil monoliths, for chemical and microbiological analyses. Macrofauna density was evaluated by ANOVA and multivariate analysis. The chemical and microbiological properties are environmental variables, while the data on macrofauna are the explanatory variables. The total number of individuals recovered in this study was 3,354, and the climate, identified by the sampling season, was a great modulator of macrofauna, with higher numbers in winter. The principal components analysis showed that soil moisture, organic matter, nitrogen, phosphorus, boron, copper, pH, acid and alkaline phosphatases and microbial biomass carbon, were the most outstanding ones to discriminate both cultivation systems. We found no statistical significant differences in macrofauna density between OS and CS, probably due to a general great variability, since there was a tendency for much greater values in OS. We detected the interference of chemical and microbiological soil properties on the macrofauna community in both systems of coffee cultivation, and some results clearly correlated much better with climate data than with other factors. To our knowledge, this is the first time in which the data point to a clear separation between the more numerous and diversified soil macrofauna in coffee with organic cultivation from that with a conventional cultivation system.
id FAPESP-1_0618991965cce77ce78ceb4e791d586c
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1676-06032018000200209
network_acronym_str FAPESP-1
network_name_str Biota Neotropica
repository_id_str
spelling Soil macrofauna in organic and conventional coffee plantations in Brazilbioindicatorssoil biologysoil ecologysoil faunaclimateAbstract: Brazil has always been one of the most important coffee producing countries. Lately, there has equally been a renewed interest in alternative coffee production systems. The state of Espírito Santo is the second greatest coffee producer in Brazil; so, we used local coffee plantations to evaluate the relations between soil macrofauna and chemical and microbiological soil properties to identify which of these properties discriminate more effectively between the organic management system (OS) and the conventional management system (CS) of coffee plantations. For each of these two cultivation systems we chose three coffee farms who employed both cultivation systems and picked out the most similar fields from each property. At each site, first we sampled the litter at the soil surface. Afterwards, we sampled nine soil monoliths to evaluate the macrofauna, in summer and winter. We also collected nine supplemental soil samples, taken at a few centimeters from the soil monoliths, for chemical and microbiological analyses. Macrofauna density was evaluated by ANOVA and multivariate analysis. The chemical and microbiological properties are environmental variables, while the data on macrofauna are the explanatory variables. The total number of individuals recovered in this study was 3,354, and the climate, identified by the sampling season, was a great modulator of macrofauna, with higher numbers in winter. The principal components analysis showed that soil moisture, organic matter, nitrogen, phosphorus, boron, copper, pH, acid and alkaline phosphatases and microbial biomass carbon, were the most outstanding ones to discriminate both cultivation systems. We found no statistical significant differences in macrofauna density between OS and CS, probably due to a general great variability, since there was a tendency for much greater values in OS. We detected the interference of chemical and microbiological soil properties on the macrofauna community in both systems of coffee cultivation, and some results clearly correlated much better with climate data than with other factors. To our knowledge, this is the first time in which the data point to a clear separation between the more numerous and diversified soil macrofauna in coffee with organic cultivation from that with a conventional cultivation system.Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade | BIOTA - FAPESP2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-06032018000200209Biota Neotropica v.18 n.2 2018reponame:Biota Neotropicainstname:Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade (BIOTA-FAPESP)instacron:BIOTA - FAPESP10.1590/1676-0611-bn-2018-0515info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos,Janaina Biral dosRamos,Alessandro CoutinhoAzevedo Júnior,RomildoOliveira Filho,Luís Carlos Iuñes deBaretta,DilmarCardoso,Elke Jurandy Bran Nogueiraeng2018-04-23T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1676-06032018000200209Revistahttps://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/v20n1/pt/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||juliosa@unifap.br1676-06111676-0611opendoar:2018-04-23T00:00Biota Neotropica - Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade (BIOTA-FAPESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Soil macrofauna in organic and conventional coffee plantations in Brazil
title Soil macrofauna in organic and conventional coffee plantations in Brazil
spellingShingle Soil macrofauna in organic and conventional coffee plantations in Brazil
Santos,Janaina Biral dos
bioindicators
soil biology
soil ecology
soil fauna
climate
title_short Soil macrofauna in organic and conventional coffee plantations in Brazil
title_full Soil macrofauna in organic and conventional coffee plantations in Brazil
title_fullStr Soil macrofauna in organic and conventional coffee plantations in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Soil macrofauna in organic and conventional coffee plantations in Brazil
title_sort Soil macrofauna in organic and conventional coffee plantations in Brazil
author Santos,Janaina Biral dos
author_facet Santos,Janaina Biral dos
Ramos,Alessandro Coutinho
Azevedo Júnior,Romildo
Oliveira Filho,Luís Carlos Iuñes de
Baretta,Dilmar
Cardoso,Elke Jurandy Bran Nogueira
author_role author
author2 Ramos,Alessandro Coutinho
Azevedo Júnior,Romildo
Oliveira Filho,Luís Carlos Iuñes de
Baretta,Dilmar
Cardoso,Elke Jurandy Bran Nogueira
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos,Janaina Biral dos
Ramos,Alessandro Coutinho
Azevedo Júnior,Romildo
Oliveira Filho,Luís Carlos Iuñes de
Baretta,Dilmar
Cardoso,Elke Jurandy Bran Nogueira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv bioindicators
soil biology
soil ecology
soil fauna
climate
topic bioindicators
soil biology
soil ecology
soil fauna
climate
description Abstract: Brazil has always been one of the most important coffee producing countries. Lately, there has equally been a renewed interest in alternative coffee production systems. The state of Espírito Santo is the second greatest coffee producer in Brazil; so, we used local coffee plantations to evaluate the relations between soil macrofauna and chemical and microbiological soil properties to identify which of these properties discriminate more effectively between the organic management system (OS) and the conventional management system (CS) of coffee plantations. For each of these two cultivation systems we chose three coffee farms who employed both cultivation systems and picked out the most similar fields from each property. At each site, first we sampled the litter at the soil surface. Afterwards, we sampled nine soil monoliths to evaluate the macrofauna, in summer and winter. We also collected nine supplemental soil samples, taken at a few centimeters from the soil monoliths, for chemical and microbiological analyses. Macrofauna density was evaluated by ANOVA and multivariate analysis. The chemical and microbiological properties are environmental variables, while the data on macrofauna are the explanatory variables. The total number of individuals recovered in this study was 3,354, and the climate, identified by the sampling season, was a great modulator of macrofauna, with higher numbers in winter. The principal components analysis showed that soil moisture, organic matter, nitrogen, phosphorus, boron, copper, pH, acid and alkaline phosphatases and microbial biomass carbon, were the most outstanding ones to discriminate both cultivation systems. We found no statistical significant differences in macrofauna density between OS and CS, probably due to a general great variability, since there was a tendency for much greater values in OS. We detected the interference of chemical and microbiological soil properties on the macrofauna community in both systems of coffee cultivation, and some results clearly correlated much better with climate data than with other factors. To our knowledge, this is the first time in which the data point to a clear separation between the more numerous and diversified soil macrofauna in coffee with organic cultivation from that with a conventional cultivation system.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-06032018000200209
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-06032018000200209
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1676-0611-bn-2018-0515
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade | BIOTA - FAPESP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade | BIOTA - FAPESP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Biota Neotropica v.18 n.2 2018
reponame:Biota Neotropica
instname:Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade (BIOTA-FAPESP)
instacron:BIOTA - FAPESP
instname_str Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade (BIOTA-FAPESP)
instacron_str BIOTA - FAPESP
institution BIOTA - FAPESP
reponame_str Biota Neotropica
collection Biota Neotropica
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biota Neotropica - Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade (BIOTA-FAPESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||juliosa@unifap.br
_version_ 1754575900927590400