Agroforestry system as a buffer zone in a Brazilian Atlantic Forest conservation unit: an artificial nest predation perspective
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Biota Neotropica |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-06032018000100203 |
Resumo: | Abstract Here we inferred about the effectiveness of a buffer zone composed by an Agroforestry System (AS) for providing reproductive conditions for Atlantic Forest birds by comparing artificial nest predation rates between a buffer zone, a primary forest area, and a set of small and isolated Atlantic Forest fragments. We have used 237 nests throughout the three areas, of which 100 (42.2%) were depredated. Predation frequencies were 28.6% in the continuous forest, 100% in the AS, and 51.9% in the fragments, differing significantly. We could detect nest predators in 48 of the 100 depredated nests (48%) using camera traps. Differences between areas may be attributed to changes in nest predator species. We support previous evidences that the conservation of bird communities may not rely on buffer zones as an extension of their breeding habitats. |
id |
FAPESP-1_094be1da5b50dfc9d0abccebd9b40ce4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1676-06032018000100203 |
network_acronym_str |
FAPESP-1 |
network_name_str |
Biota Neotropica |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Agroforestry system as a buffer zone in a Brazilian Atlantic Forest conservation unit: an artificial nest predation perspectiveProtected areasmanagementmesopredatorsbirdscamera trapsAbstract Here we inferred about the effectiveness of a buffer zone composed by an Agroforestry System (AS) for providing reproductive conditions for Atlantic Forest birds by comparing artificial nest predation rates between a buffer zone, a primary forest area, and a set of small and isolated Atlantic Forest fragments. We have used 237 nests throughout the three areas, of which 100 (42.2%) were depredated. Predation frequencies were 28.6% in the continuous forest, 100% in the AS, and 51.9% in the fragments, differing significantly. We could detect nest predators in 48 of the 100 depredated nests (48%) using camera traps. Differences between areas may be attributed to changes in nest predator species. We support previous evidences that the conservation of bird communities may not rely on buffer zones as an extension of their breeding habitats.Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade | BIOTA - FAPESP2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-06032018000100203Biota Neotropica v.18 n.1 2018reponame:Biota Neotropicainstname:Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade (BIOTA-FAPESP)instacron:BIOTA - FAPESP10.1590/1676-0611-bn-2017-0373info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGalvão,Camila AndréFrancisco,Mercival RobertoSchlindwein,Marcelo Niverteng2018-01-05T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1676-06032018000100203Revistahttps://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/v20n1/pt/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||juliosa@unifap.br1676-06111676-0611opendoar:2018-01-05T00:00Biota Neotropica - Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade (BIOTA-FAPESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Agroforestry system as a buffer zone in a Brazilian Atlantic Forest conservation unit: an artificial nest predation perspective |
title |
Agroforestry system as a buffer zone in a Brazilian Atlantic Forest conservation unit: an artificial nest predation perspective |
spellingShingle |
Agroforestry system as a buffer zone in a Brazilian Atlantic Forest conservation unit: an artificial nest predation perspective Galvão,Camila André Protected areas management mesopredators birds camera traps |
title_short |
Agroforestry system as a buffer zone in a Brazilian Atlantic Forest conservation unit: an artificial nest predation perspective |
title_full |
Agroforestry system as a buffer zone in a Brazilian Atlantic Forest conservation unit: an artificial nest predation perspective |
title_fullStr |
Agroforestry system as a buffer zone in a Brazilian Atlantic Forest conservation unit: an artificial nest predation perspective |
title_full_unstemmed |
Agroforestry system as a buffer zone in a Brazilian Atlantic Forest conservation unit: an artificial nest predation perspective |
title_sort |
Agroforestry system as a buffer zone in a Brazilian Atlantic Forest conservation unit: an artificial nest predation perspective |
author |
Galvão,Camila André |
author_facet |
Galvão,Camila André Francisco,Mercival Roberto Schlindwein,Marcelo Nivert |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Francisco,Mercival Roberto Schlindwein,Marcelo Nivert |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Galvão,Camila André Francisco,Mercival Roberto Schlindwein,Marcelo Nivert |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Protected areas management mesopredators birds camera traps |
topic |
Protected areas management mesopredators birds camera traps |
description |
Abstract Here we inferred about the effectiveness of a buffer zone composed by an Agroforestry System (AS) for providing reproductive conditions for Atlantic Forest birds by comparing artificial nest predation rates between a buffer zone, a primary forest area, and a set of small and isolated Atlantic Forest fragments. We have used 237 nests throughout the three areas, of which 100 (42.2%) were depredated. Predation frequencies were 28.6% in the continuous forest, 100% in the AS, and 51.9% in the fragments, differing significantly. We could detect nest predators in 48 of the 100 depredated nests (48%) using camera traps. Differences between areas may be attributed to changes in nest predator species. We support previous evidences that the conservation of bird communities may not rely on buffer zones as an extension of their breeding habitats. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-06032018000100203 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-06032018000100203 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1676-0611-bn-2017-0373 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade | BIOTA - FAPESP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade | BIOTA - FAPESP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Biota Neotropica v.18 n.1 2018 reponame:Biota Neotropica instname:Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade (BIOTA-FAPESP) instacron:BIOTA - FAPESP |
instname_str |
Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade (BIOTA-FAPESP) |
instacron_str |
BIOTA - FAPESP |
institution |
BIOTA - FAPESP |
reponame_str |
Biota Neotropica |
collection |
Biota Neotropica |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biota Neotropica - Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade (BIOTA-FAPESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||juliosa@unifap.br |
_version_ |
1754575900615114752 |