Richness, diversity patterns, and taxonomic notes of amphibians from the Tocantins state
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Biota Neotropica |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-06032020000100306 |
Resumo: | Abstract: Herein, we provide the first comprehensive amphibian checklist for the State of Tocantins, North of Brazil, based on field sampling, literature data, and specimens deposited in zoological collections. We performed field surveys from 2012 to 2019 in 12 Tocantins municipalities, totaling 376 days of sampling effort. We analyzed 25 papers from the literature and examined 1311 specimens from collections and collected 750 during field surveys. We recorded 90 amphibian species distributed in 12 anurans and two caecilians families. At least seven undescribed species along the state were recorded. We also present new records for 20 species for the state, nine of them corresponding to Amazonian species, four Cerrado endemic, one Caatinga species, and the widely distributed treefrog Boana crepitans; the others five new records comprise undescribed species. Our data also suggest that the Tocantins amphibian composition is not geographically structured in relation to the biomes, since Amazonian, Caatinga, and Cerrado amphibian lineages have their distribution nearly completely overlapped in the state. We propose that this absence of spatial structuration may be a result of two factors (synergetic or not). First, the events of expansion and retraction of the biomes caused by the Quaternary climatic cycles, which may have mixed the populations of species from different biomes causing the notable pattern of overlapped distribution observed here. Second, the forest environments (e.g. gallery and riparian forests) associated to the Araguaia-Tocantins River basins may have acted as historical dispersal corridors for the Amazonian amphibian lineages into the Cerrado of the Tocantins. Despite the sampling effort of the present study, we stress that gaps of information still remain and further field sampling efforts should be performed along the state. Lastly, taxonomic appraisals involving the species with problematic taxonomic status recorded here should be based on multiples lines of evidences (acoustic, molecular, and morphological data), which will render a more accurate view on the Tocantins amphibian diversity. Such data are extremely necessary under the current high rate of habitat loss across the state, since they can be used to guide public policies of conservation. |
id |
FAPESP-1_49038ba6af798d9ef9b677a3772245b0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1676-06032020000100306 |
network_acronym_str |
FAPESP-1 |
network_name_str |
Biota Neotropica |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Richness, diversity patterns, and taxonomic notes of amphibians from the Tocantins stateAmazonian ForestAmphibiaSavannaCerradoAbstract: Herein, we provide the first comprehensive amphibian checklist for the State of Tocantins, North of Brazil, based on field sampling, literature data, and specimens deposited in zoological collections. We performed field surveys from 2012 to 2019 in 12 Tocantins municipalities, totaling 376 days of sampling effort. We analyzed 25 papers from the literature and examined 1311 specimens from collections and collected 750 during field surveys. We recorded 90 amphibian species distributed in 12 anurans and two caecilians families. At least seven undescribed species along the state were recorded. We also present new records for 20 species for the state, nine of them corresponding to Amazonian species, four Cerrado endemic, one Caatinga species, and the widely distributed treefrog Boana crepitans; the others five new records comprise undescribed species. Our data also suggest that the Tocantins amphibian composition is not geographically structured in relation to the biomes, since Amazonian, Caatinga, and Cerrado amphibian lineages have their distribution nearly completely overlapped in the state. We propose that this absence of spatial structuration may be a result of two factors (synergetic or not). First, the events of expansion and retraction of the biomes caused by the Quaternary climatic cycles, which may have mixed the populations of species from different biomes causing the notable pattern of overlapped distribution observed here. Second, the forest environments (e.g. gallery and riparian forests) associated to the Araguaia-Tocantins River basins may have acted as historical dispersal corridors for the Amazonian amphibian lineages into the Cerrado of the Tocantins. Despite the sampling effort of the present study, we stress that gaps of information still remain and further field sampling efforts should be performed along the state. Lastly, taxonomic appraisals involving the species with problematic taxonomic status recorded here should be based on multiples lines of evidences (acoustic, molecular, and morphological data), which will render a more accurate view on the Tocantins amphibian diversity. Such data are extremely necessary under the current high rate of habitat loss across the state, since they can be used to guide public policies of conservation.Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade | BIOTA - FAPESP2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-06032020000100306Biota Neotropica v.20 n.1 2020reponame:Biota Neotropicainstname:Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade (BIOTA-FAPESP)instacron:BIOTA - FAPESP10.1590/1676-0611-bn-2019-0838info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva,Leandro Alves daCarvalho,Priscila SantosPereira,Elvis AlmeidaFadel,Renata MoleiroDantas,Silionamã PereiraBrandão,Reuber AlbuquerqueSantana,Diego Joséeng2020-01-23T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1676-06032020000100306Revistahttps://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/v20n1/pt/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||juliosa@unifap.br1676-06111676-0611opendoar:2020-01-23T00:00Biota Neotropica - Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade (BIOTA-FAPESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Richness, diversity patterns, and taxonomic notes of amphibians from the Tocantins state |
title |
Richness, diversity patterns, and taxonomic notes of amphibians from the Tocantins state |
spellingShingle |
Richness, diversity patterns, and taxonomic notes of amphibians from the Tocantins state Silva,Leandro Alves da Amazonian Forest Amphibia Savanna Cerrado |
title_short |
Richness, diversity patterns, and taxonomic notes of amphibians from the Tocantins state |
title_full |
Richness, diversity patterns, and taxonomic notes of amphibians from the Tocantins state |
title_fullStr |
Richness, diversity patterns, and taxonomic notes of amphibians from the Tocantins state |
title_full_unstemmed |
Richness, diversity patterns, and taxonomic notes of amphibians from the Tocantins state |
title_sort |
Richness, diversity patterns, and taxonomic notes of amphibians from the Tocantins state |
author |
Silva,Leandro Alves da |
author_facet |
Silva,Leandro Alves da Carvalho,Priscila Santos Pereira,Elvis Almeida Fadel,Renata Moleiro Dantas,Silionamã Pereira Brandão,Reuber Albuquerque Santana,Diego José |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Carvalho,Priscila Santos Pereira,Elvis Almeida Fadel,Renata Moleiro Dantas,Silionamã Pereira Brandão,Reuber Albuquerque Santana,Diego José |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva,Leandro Alves da Carvalho,Priscila Santos Pereira,Elvis Almeida Fadel,Renata Moleiro Dantas,Silionamã Pereira Brandão,Reuber Albuquerque Santana,Diego José |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Amazonian Forest Amphibia Savanna Cerrado |
topic |
Amazonian Forest Amphibia Savanna Cerrado |
description |
Abstract: Herein, we provide the first comprehensive amphibian checklist for the State of Tocantins, North of Brazil, based on field sampling, literature data, and specimens deposited in zoological collections. We performed field surveys from 2012 to 2019 in 12 Tocantins municipalities, totaling 376 days of sampling effort. We analyzed 25 papers from the literature and examined 1311 specimens from collections and collected 750 during field surveys. We recorded 90 amphibian species distributed in 12 anurans and two caecilians families. At least seven undescribed species along the state were recorded. We also present new records for 20 species for the state, nine of them corresponding to Amazonian species, four Cerrado endemic, one Caatinga species, and the widely distributed treefrog Boana crepitans; the others five new records comprise undescribed species. Our data also suggest that the Tocantins amphibian composition is not geographically structured in relation to the biomes, since Amazonian, Caatinga, and Cerrado amphibian lineages have their distribution nearly completely overlapped in the state. We propose that this absence of spatial structuration may be a result of two factors (synergetic or not). First, the events of expansion and retraction of the biomes caused by the Quaternary climatic cycles, which may have mixed the populations of species from different biomes causing the notable pattern of overlapped distribution observed here. Second, the forest environments (e.g. gallery and riparian forests) associated to the Araguaia-Tocantins River basins may have acted as historical dispersal corridors for the Amazonian amphibian lineages into the Cerrado of the Tocantins. Despite the sampling effort of the present study, we stress that gaps of information still remain and further field sampling efforts should be performed along the state. Lastly, taxonomic appraisals involving the species with problematic taxonomic status recorded here should be based on multiples lines of evidences (acoustic, molecular, and morphological data), which will render a more accurate view on the Tocantins amphibian diversity. Such data are extremely necessary under the current high rate of habitat loss across the state, since they can be used to guide public policies of conservation. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-06032020000100306 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-06032020000100306 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1676-0611-bn-2019-0838 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade | BIOTA - FAPESP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade | BIOTA - FAPESP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Biota Neotropica v.20 n.1 2020 reponame:Biota Neotropica instname:Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade (BIOTA-FAPESP) instacron:BIOTA - FAPESP |
instname_str |
Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade (BIOTA-FAPESP) |
instacron_str |
BIOTA - FAPESP |
institution |
BIOTA - FAPESP |
reponame_str |
Biota Neotropica |
collection |
Biota Neotropica |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biota Neotropica - Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade (BIOTA-FAPESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||juliosa@unifap.br |
_version_ |
1754575901569318912 |