Empirical Evidence for Models to Estimate the Cost of Equity Capital
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2006 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng por |
Título da fonte: | BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/427 |
Resumo: | This article investigates whether there are statistically significant differences among the costs of equity capital of Brazilian companies estimated by four models and their variants: Gordon, CAPM, APM and Ohlson-Juettner. We used a cross-section of 34 companies that were part of the São Paulo Stock Exchange Index (IBOVESPA) on December 29, 2005. The results do not permit saying that the choice of model makes no difference in estimating the cost of equity capital, so the methodology hypothesis was rejected. The models based on profit and dividend projections, notably the OJ and Gordon models, resulted in equivalent mean values and also were those that most resemble each other. The OJ model appears to be theoretically superior to the Gordon and Gordon & Gordon models, given that it was developed with fewer premises and in a more analytic manner. |
id |
FBS-1_2139872b295127c5265a2e773781c7fd |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/427 |
network_acronym_str |
FBS-1 |
network_name_str |
BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Empirical Evidence for Models to Estimate the Cost of Equity CapitalEvidências Empíricas de Modelos de Estimação do Custo do Capital Própriocompany valuationcost of equity capitaldifference of means testavaliação de empresascusto de capital próprioteste de médiasThis article investigates whether there are statistically significant differences among the costs of equity capital of Brazilian companies estimated by four models and their variants: Gordon, CAPM, APM and Ohlson-Juettner. We used a cross-section of 34 companies that were part of the São Paulo Stock Exchange Index (IBOVESPA) on December 29, 2005. The results do not permit saying that the choice of model makes no difference in estimating the cost of equity capital, so the methodology hypothesis was rejected. The models based on profit and dividend projections, notably the OJ and Gordon models, resulted in equivalent mean values and also were those that most resemble each other. The OJ model appears to be theoretically superior to the Gordon and Gordon & Gordon models, given that it was developed with fewer premises and in a more analytic manner.Este artigo investiga se existem diferenças estatisticamente significantes entre os valores estimados para o custo de capital próprio de empresas brasileiras através de 4 modelos e suas variantes: Gordon, CAPM, APM e Ohlson-Juettner. Para isso, foi utilizada uma amostra em cross-section de 34 empresas que fizeram parte do Ibovespa em 29/12/2005. Os resultados encontrados não permitem dizer que a escolha do modelo é indiferente com relação ao resultado da estimação do custo de capital próprio, com isso, a hipótese metodológica foi rejeitada. Com relação aos modelos, os baseados em projeções de lucros e dividendos, notadamente os modelos OJ e de Gordon, resultam em valores médios equivalentes entre si e fora os que mais se igualaram em relação aos outros. Finalmente, é importante comentar a superioridade teórica do modelo OJ, dado que este é desenvolvido com um menor número de premissas e de maneira analítica, com relação ao modelo de Gordon e ao modelo de Gordon & Gordon.FUCAPE Business Shool2006-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed ArticleArtigo revisado pelos paresapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/42710.15728/bbr.2006.3.2.1Brazilian Business Review; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2006): July to December 2006; 135-152Brazilian Business Review; v. 3 n. 2 (2006): Julho a Dezembro de 2006; 135-1521808-23861807-734Xreponame:BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online)instname:Fucape Business School (FBS)instacron:FBSengporhttp://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/427/650http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/427/651Copyright (c) 2006 Brazilian Business Reviewhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMartins, EliseuGaldi, Fernando CaioLima, Gerlando Augusto Sampaio Franco deNecyk, George AnthonyAbe, Cesar Henrique Shogi2018-11-07T19:33:49Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/427Revistahttps://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/indexONGhttp://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/oai|| bbronline@bbronline.com.br1808-23861808-2386opendoar:2018-11-07T19:33:49BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) - Fucape Business School (FBS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Empirical Evidence for Models to Estimate the Cost of Equity Capital Evidências Empíricas de Modelos de Estimação do Custo do Capital Próprio |
title |
Empirical Evidence for Models to Estimate the Cost of Equity Capital |
spellingShingle |
Empirical Evidence for Models to Estimate the Cost of Equity Capital Martins, Eliseu company valuation cost of equity capital difference of means test avaliação de empresas custo de capital próprio teste de médias |
title_short |
Empirical Evidence for Models to Estimate the Cost of Equity Capital |
title_full |
Empirical Evidence for Models to Estimate the Cost of Equity Capital |
title_fullStr |
Empirical Evidence for Models to Estimate the Cost of Equity Capital |
title_full_unstemmed |
Empirical Evidence for Models to Estimate the Cost of Equity Capital |
title_sort |
Empirical Evidence for Models to Estimate the Cost of Equity Capital |
author |
Martins, Eliseu |
author_facet |
Martins, Eliseu Galdi, Fernando Caio Lima, Gerlando Augusto Sampaio Franco de Necyk, George Anthony Abe, Cesar Henrique Shogi |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Galdi, Fernando Caio Lima, Gerlando Augusto Sampaio Franco de Necyk, George Anthony Abe, Cesar Henrique Shogi |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Martins, Eliseu Galdi, Fernando Caio Lima, Gerlando Augusto Sampaio Franco de Necyk, George Anthony Abe, Cesar Henrique Shogi |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
company valuation cost of equity capital difference of means test avaliação de empresas custo de capital próprio teste de médias |
topic |
company valuation cost of equity capital difference of means test avaliação de empresas custo de capital próprio teste de médias |
description |
This article investigates whether there are statistically significant differences among the costs of equity capital of Brazilian companies estimated by four models and their variants: Gordon, CAPM, APM and Ohlson-Juettner. We used a cross-section of 34 companies that were part of the São Paulo Stock Exchange Index (IBOVESPA) on December 29, 2005. The results do not permit saying that the choice of model makes no difference in estimating the cost of equity capital, so the methodology hypothesis was rejected. The models based on profit and dividend projections, notably the OJ and Gordon models, resulted in equivalent mean values and also were those that most resemble each other. The OJ model appears to be theoretically superior to the Gordon and Gordon & Gordon models, given that it was developed with fewer premises and in a more analytic manner. |
publishDate |
2006 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2006-07-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article Artigo revisado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/427 10.15728/bbr.2006.3.2.1 |
url |
http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/427 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15728/bbr.2006.3.2.1 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng por |
language |
eng por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/427/650 http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/427/651 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2006 Brazilian Business Review https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2006 Brazilian Business Review https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
FUCAPE Business Shool |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
FUCAPE Business Shool |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Business Review; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2006): July to December 2006; 135-152 Brazilian Business Review; v. 3 n. 2 (2006): Julho a Dezembro de 2006; 135-152 1808-2386 1807-734X reponame:BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) instname:Fucape Business School (FBS) instacron:FBS |
instname_str |
Fucape Business School (FBS) |
instacron_str |
FBS |
institution |
FBS |
reponame_str |
BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) |
collection |
BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) - Fucape Business School (FBS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|| bbronline@bbronline.com.br |
_version_ |
1754732238641037312 |