The Government as Shareholder and Principal-Principal Conflicts in the Brazilian Electric Power Industry

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Loch, Murialdo
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Silva, Jaison Caetano, Bueno, Giovana, Marcon, Rosilene
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
Título da fonte: BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online)
Texto Completo: http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/560
Resumo: Considering that principal-principal conflicts in companies under mixed public-private ownership are substantially different from the typical agency conflict model, this paper’s objective is to analyze principal-principal conflicts in mixed ownership companies in the Brazilian electric power industry. In order to expand understanding of the phenomenon which we are studying, we have integrated the assumptions that underlie agency theory and institutional theory, using a qualitative approach and collecting data during semi structured interviews with companies’ board members. Data was analyzed and interpreted as per Bardin (2006), with the aid of ATLAS®ti software. Our main findings suggest that while a government stake in a firm’s ownership structure can provide a useful channel for the government to seek support and resources, in counterpoint, it can also create distortions and uncertainties, and exacerbate principal-principal conflicts. The development of stronger institutions and corporate governance could bring about useful options for providing checks and balances and, in the final analysis, mitigate principal-principal conflict. The article contributes to the literature by providing additional elements that are not available in public reports. Analysis of the conflict between principal and principal, together with theoretical integration, seek to broaden the understanding of this theme.
id FBS-1_25d8b2fbfb0e376a96b764a21887cb2d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/560
network_acronym_str FBS-1
network_name_str BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The Government as Shareholder and Principal-Principal Conflicts in the Brazilian Electric Power IndustryO Governo como Acionista e o Conflito Principal-Principal no Setor Elétrico BrasileiroGovernment as shareholderPrincipal-principal conflictsCorporate governanceInstitutionsGoverno como acionistaConflito Principal-PrincipalGovernança CorporativaInstituiçõesConsidering that principal-principal conflicts in companies under mixed public-private ownership are substantially different from the typical agency conflict model, this paper’s objective is to analyze principal-principal conflicts in mixed ownership companies in the Brazilian electric power industry. In order to expand understanding of the phenomenon which we are studying, we have integrated the assumptions that underlie agency theory and institutional theory, using a qualitative approach and collecting data during semi structured interviews with companies’ board members. Data was analyzed and interpreted as per Bardin (2006), with the aid of ATLAS®ti software. Our main findings suggest that while a government stake in a firm’s ownership structure can provide a useful channel for the government to seek support and resources, in counterpoint, it can also create distortions and uncertainties, and exacerbate principal-principal conflicts. The development of stronger institutions and corporate governance could bring about useful options for providing checks and balances and, in the final analysis, mitigate principal-principal conflict. The article contributes to the literature by providing additional elements that are not available in public reports. Analysis of the conflict between principal and principal, together with theoretical integration, seek to broaden the understanding of this theme.Considerando que os conflitos entre principal e principal em empresas de propriedade mista público-privada são substancialmente diferentes do modelo típico de conflito de agência, o objetivo deste artigo é analisar o conflito principal-principal em empresas de propriedade mista no setor elétrico brasileiro. A fim de ampliar a compreensão do fenômeno de interesse, integramos os pressupostos subjacentes à Teoria da Agência e à Teoria Institucional, usando uma abordagem qualitativa e coletando dados durante entrevistas semiestruturadas com membros do conselho. Os dados foram analisados e interpretados conforme Bardin (2006), com o auxílio do software ATLAS®ti. Nossas principais descobertas sugerem que, embora a participação do governo na estrutura acionária de uma empresa possa fornecer um canal útil para buscar apoio e recursos, em contrapartida, ela também pode criar uma série de distorções e incertezas, exacerbando os conflitos principal-principal. O desenvolvimento de instituições e a governança corporativa podem fornecer opções úteis para verificar e medir e, em última análise, mitigar o conflito principal-principal. O artigo contribui ampliando a compreensão do conflito principal-principal, integrando pressupostos subjacentes às teorias empregadas e analisando elementos que não estão disponíveis em relatórios públicos FUCAPE Business Shool2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed ArticleArtigo revisado pelos paresapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/56010.15728/bbr.2020.17.1.2Brazilian Business Review; Vol. 17 No. 1 (2020): January to February 2020; 24-45Brazilian Business Review; v. 17 n. 1 (2020): Janeiro a Fevereiro 2020; 24-451808-23861807-734Xreponame:BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online)instname:Fucape Business School (FBS)instacron:FBSengporhttp://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/560/848http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/560/849Copyright (c) 2020 Brazilian Business Reviewhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLoch, MurialdoSilva, Jaison Caetano Bueno, GiovanaMarcon, Rosilene2020-01-01T11:08:16Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/560Revistahttps://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/indexONGhttp://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/oai|| bbronline@bbronline.com.br1808-23861808-2386opendoar:2020-01-01T11:08:16BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) - Fucape Business School (FBS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Government as Shareholder and Principal-Principal Conflicts in the Brazilian Electric Power Industry
O Governo como Acionista e o Conflito Principal-Principal no Setor Elétrico Brasileiro
title The Government as Shareholder and Principal-Principal Conflicts in the Brazilian Electric Power Industry
spellingShingle The Government as Shareholder and Principal-Principal Conflicts in the Brazilian Electric Power Industry
Loch, Murialdo
Government as shareholder
Principal-principal conflicts
Corporate governance
Institutions
Governo como acionista
Conflito Principal-Principal
Governança Corporativa
Instituições
title_short The Government as Shareholder and Principal-Principal Conflicts in the Brazilian Electric Power Industry
title_full The Government as Shareholder and Principal-Principal Conflicts in the Brazilian Electric Power Industry
title_fullStr The Government as Shareholder and Principal-Principal Conflicts in the Brazilian Electric Power Industry
title_full_unstemmed The Government as Shareholder and Principal-Principal Conflicts in the Brazilian Electric Power Industry
title_sort The Government as Shareholder and Principal-Principal Conflicts in the Brazilian Electric Power Industry
author Loch, Murialdo
author_facet Loch, Murialdo
Silva, Jaison Caetano
Bueno, Giovana
Marcon, Rosilene
author_role author
author2 Silva, Jaison Caetano
Bueno, Giovana
Marcon, Rosilene
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Loch, Murialdo
Silva, Jaison Caetano
Bueno, Giovana
Marcon, Rosilene
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Government as shareholder
Principal-principal conflicts
Corporate governance
Institutions
Governo como acionista
Conflito Principal-Principal
Governança Corporativa
Instituições
topic Government as shareholder
Principal-principal conflicts
Corporate governance
Institutions
Governo como acionista
Conflito Principal-Principal
Governança Corporativa
Instituições
description Considering that principal-principal conflicts in companies under mixed public-private ownership are substantially different from the typical agency conflict model, this paper’s objective is to analyze principal-principal conflicts in mixed ownership companies in the Brazilian electric power industry. In order to expand understanding of the phenomenon which we are studying, we have integrated the assumptions that underlie agency theory and institutional theory, using a qualitative approach and collecting data during semi structured interviews with companies’ board members. Data was analyzed and interpreted as per Bardin (2006), with the aid of ATLAS®ti software. Our main findings suggest that while a government stake in a firm’s ownership structure can provide a useful channel for the government to seek support and resources, in counterpoint, it can also create distortions and uncertainties, and exacerbate principal-principal conflicts. The development of stronger institutions and corporate governance could bring about useful options for providing checks and balances and, in the final analysis, mitigate principal-principal conflict. The article contributes to the literature by providing additional elements that are not available in public reports. Analysis of the conflict between principal and principal, together with theoretical integration, seek to broaden the understanding of this theme.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
Artigo revisado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/560
10.15728/bbr.2020.17.1.2
url http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/560
identifier_str_mv 10.15728/bbr.2020.17.1.2
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
language eng
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/560/848
http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/560/849
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Brazilian Business Review
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Brazilian Business Review
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv FUCAPE Business Shool
publisher.none.fl_str_mv FUCAPE Business Shool
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Business Review; Vol. 17 No. 1 (2020): January to February 2020; 24-45
Brazilian Business Review; v. 17 n. 1 (2020): Janeiro a Fevereiro 2020; 24-45
1808-2386
1807-734X
reponame:BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online)
instname:Fucape Business School (FBS)
instacron:FBS
instname_str Fucape Business School (FBS)
instacron_str FBS
institution FBS
reponame_str BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online)
collection BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) - Fucape Business School (FBS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv || bbronline@bbronline.com.br
_version_ 1754732239185248256