A Longitudinal analysis of the Porterian paradigm utilization in Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sehnem, Simone
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Lazzarotti, Fábio, Bandeira-de-Mello, Rodrigo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
Título da fonte: BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online)
Texto Completo: http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/339
Resumo: The purpose of this article is to investigate to what extent Michael Porter;s ideas keep attracting the interest of Brazilian researchers vis-à-vis other possibilities. In this research, we conceptualize Porter’s paradigm by the the following elements: strategic groups, generic strategies, model of the five forces and value chain. Weanalyzed conferece communications to EnANPAD’s, from 1998 to 2008, and to 3Es, from 2003to 2007. The results indicate a decline in the use of the porterian paradigm as the main axis of research in strategy. The generic strategies and the model of five forces are the elements of Porter’s paradigm most employed, while the concepts of strategic groups and value chain are the ones that received less attention by researchers. The analysis of methodology and purpose of comunications indicates that the “porterian life” in Brazil was characterized by the acritical use of its concepts in order to describe the reality of the strategy in Brazil. There are no evidences of consistent and systematic attempts to test or adapt the porterian paradigm for the Brazilian context. And results indicate no evidences that this trend will be reversed.
id FBS-1_8545697a1c7bfae5239feee033eb7a03
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/339
network_acronym_str FBS-1
network_name_str BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling A Longitudinal analysis of the Porterian paradigm utilization in BrazilUma Análise Longitudinal do Emprego do Paradigma Porteriano no BrasilPorter modelstrategy in Brazilbibliometric studylongitudinal analysisModelo de PorterEstratégia no BrasilEstudo BibliométricoAnáise LongitudinalThe purpose of this article is to investigate to what extent Michael Porter;s ideas keep attracting the interest of Brazilian researchers vis-à-vis other possibilities. In this research, we conceptualize Porter’s paradigm by the the following elements: strategic groups, generic strategies, model of the five forces and value chain. Weanalyzed conferece communications to EnANPAD’s, from 1998 to 2008, and to 3Es, from 2003to 2007. The results indicate a decline in the use of the porterian paradigm as the main axis of research in strategy. The generic strategies and the model of five forces are the elements of Porter’s paradigm most employed, while the concepts of strategic groups and value chain are the ones that received less attention by researchers. The analysis of methodology and purpose of comunications indicates that the “porterian life” in Brazil was characterized by the acritical use of its concepts in order to describe the reality of the strategy in Brazil. There are no evidences of consistent and systematic attempts to test or adapt the porterian paradigm for the Brazilian context. And results indicate no evidences that this trend will be reversed.O objetivo deste artigo é investigar como e até que ponto Michael Porter continua atraindo o interesse dos pesquisadores no Brasil vis-à-vis outras possibilidades de explicar e prescrever a estratégia. O paradigma porteriano foi operacionalizado pelos paradigmas: grupos estratégicos, estratégias genéricas, cinco forças e cadeia de valor. Analisaram-se artigos do EnANPAD de 1998 a 2008 e 3Es de 2003, 2005 e 2007. Evidenciou-se um declínio na utilização do paradigma porteriano como eixo de estudo. Dos seus elementos, estratégias genéricas e cinco forças são os mais empregados, enquanto que grupos estratégicos e cadeia de valor são os que menos têm recebido atenção por parte dos pesquisadores em estratégia no Brasil. Estes resultados sugerem que a “vida porteriana” no Brasil foi marcada pelo uso acrítico de seus conceitos para descrever a realidade da estratégia. Não há evidências de tentativas consistentes e sistemáticas de testar ou adaptar o paradigma porteriano para o contexto brasileiro. E, pelo visto, a tendência indica que não haverá.FUCAPE Business Shool2010-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed ArticleArtigo revisado pelos paresapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/33910.15728/bbr.2010.7.2.2Brazilian Business Review; Vol. 7 No. 2 (2010): May to August 2010; 19-36Brazilian Business Review; v. 7 n. 2 (2010): Maio a Agosto de 2010; 19-361808-23861807-734Xreponame:BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online)instname:Fucape Business School (FBS)instacron:FBSengporhttp://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/339/513http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/339/514Sehnem, SimoneLazzarotti, FábioBandeira-de-Mello, Rodrigoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-11-06T19:57:18Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/339Revistahttps://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/indexONGhttp://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/oai|| bbronline@bbronline.com.br1808-23861808-2386opendoar:2018-11-06T19:57:18BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) - Fucape Business School (FBS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A Longitudinal analysis of the Porterian paradigm utilization in Brazil
Uma Análise Longitudinal do Emprego do Paradigma Porteriano no Brasil
title A Longitudinal analysis of the Porterian paradigm utilization in Brazil
spellingShingle A Longitudinal analysis of the Porterian paradigm utilization in Brazil
Sehnem, Simone
Porter model
strategy in Brazil
bibliometric study
longitudinal analysis
Modelo de Porter
Estratégia no Brasil
Estudo Bibliométrico
Anáise Longitudinal
title_short A Longitudinal analysis of the Porterian paradigm utilization in Brazil
title_full A Longitudinal analysis of the Porterian paradigm utilization in Brazil
title_fullStr A Longitudinal analysis of the Porterian paradigm utilization in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed A Longitudinal analysis of the Porterian paradigm utilization in Brazil
title_sort A Longitudinal analysis of the Porterian paradigm utilization in Brazil
author Sehnem, Simone
author_facet Sehnem, Simone
Lazzarotti, Fábio
Bandeira-de-Mello, Rodrigo
author_role author
author2 Lazzarotti, Fábio
Bandeira-de-Mello, Rodrigo
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sehnem, Simone
Lazzarotti, Fábio
Bandeira-de-Mello, Rodrigo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Porter model
strategy in Brazil
bibliometric study
longitudinal analysis
Modelo de Porter
Estratégia no Brasil
Estudo Bibliométrico
Anáise Longitudinal
topic Porter model
strategy in Brazil
bibliometric study
longitudinal analysis
Modelo de Porter
Estratégia no Brasil
Estudo Bibliométrico
Anáise Longitudinal
description The purpose of this article is to investigate to what extent Michael Porter;s ideas keep attracting the interest of Brazilian researchers vis-à-vis other possibilities. In this research, we conceptualize Porter’s paradigm by the the following elements: strategic groups, generic strategies, model of the five forces and value chain. Weanalyzed conferece communications to EnANPAD’s, from 1998 to 2008, and to 3Es, from 2003to 2007. The results indicate a decline in the use of the porterian paradigm as the main axis of research in strategy. The generic strategies and the model of five forces are the elements of Porter’s paradigm most employed, while the concepts of strategic groups and value chain are the ones that received less attention by researchers. The analysis of methodology and purpose of comunications indicates that the “porterian life” in Brazil was characterized by the acritical use of its concepts in order to describe the reality of the strategy in Brazil. There are no evidences of consistent and systematic attempts to test or adapt the porterian paradigm for the Brazilian context. And results indicate no evidences that this trend will be reversed.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-05-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
Artigo revisado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/339
10.15728/bbr.2010.7.2.2
url http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/339
identifier_str_mv 10.15728/bbr.2010.7.2.2
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
language eng
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/339/513
http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/339/514
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv FUCAPE Business Shool
publisher.none.fl_str_mv FUCAPE Business Shool
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Business Review; Vol. 7 No. 2 (2010): May to August 2010; 19-36
Brazilian Business Review; v. 7 n. 2 (2010): Maio a Agosto de 2010; 19-36
1808-2386
1807-734X
reponame:BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online)
instname:Fucape Business School (FBS)
instacron:FBS
instname_str Fucape Business School (FBS)
instacron_str FBS
institution FBS
reponame_str BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online)
collection BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) - Fucape Business School (FBS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv || bbronline@bbronline.com.br
_version_ 1754732238451245056