A Longitudinal analysis of the Porterian paradigm utilization in Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng por |
Título da fonte: | BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/339 |
Resumo: | The purpose of this article is to investigate to what extent Michael Porter;s ideas keep attracting the interest of Brazilian researchers vis-à-vis other possibilities. In this research, we conceptualize Porter’s paradigm by the the following elements: strategic groups, generic strategies, model of the five forces and value chain. Weanalyzed conferece communications to EnANPAD’s, from 1998 to 2008, and to 3Es, from 2003to 2007. The results indicate a decline in the use of the porterian paradigm as the main axis of research in strategy. The generic strategies and the model of five forces are the elements of Porter’s paradigm most employed, while the concepts of strategic groups and value chain are the ones that received less attention by researchers. The analysis of methodology and purpose of comunications indicates that the “porterian life” in Brazil was characterized by the acritical use of its concepts in order to describe the reality of the strategy in Brazil. There are no evidences of consistent and systematic attempts to test or adapt the porterian paradigm for the Brazilian context. And results indicate no evidences that this trend will be reversed. |
id |
FBS-1_8545697a1c7bfae5239feee033eb7a03 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/339 |
network_acronym_str |
FBS-1 |
network_name_str |
BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
A Longitudinal analysis of the Porterian paradigm utilization in BrazilUma Análise Longitudinal do Emprego do Paradigma Porteriano no BrasilPorter modelstrategy in Brazilbibliometric studylongitudinal analysisModelo de PorterEstratégia no BrasilEstudo BibliométricoAnáise LongitudinalThe purpose of this article is to investigate to what extent Michael Porter;s ideas keep attracting the interest of Brazilian researchers vis-à-vis other possibilities. In this research, we conceptualize Porter’s paradigm by the the following elements: strategic groups, generic strategies, model of the five forces and value chain. Weanalyzed conferece communications to EnANPAD’s, from 1998 to 2008, and to 3Es, from 2003to 2007. The results indicate a decline in the use of the porterian paradigm as the main axis of research in strategy. The generic strategies and the model of five forces are the elements of Porter’s paradigm most employed, while the concepts of strategic groups and value chain are the ones that received less attention by researchers. The analysis of methodology and purpose of comunications indicates that the “porterian life” in Brazil was characterized by the acritical use of its concepts in order to describe the reality of the strategy in Brazil. There are no evidences of consistent and systematic attempts to test or adapt the porterian paradigm for the Brazilian context. And results indicate no evidences that this trend will be reversed.O objetivo deste artigo é investigar como e até que ponto Michael Porter continua atraindo o interesse dos pesquisadores no Brasil vis-à-vis outras possibilidades de explicar e prescrever a estratégia. O paradigma porteriano foi operacionalizado pelos paradigmas: grupos estratégicos, estratégias genéricas, cinco forças e cadeia de valor. Analisaram-se artigos do EnANPAD de 1998 a 2008 e 3Es de 2003, 2005 e 2007. Evidenciou-se um declínio na utilização do paradigma porteriano como eixo de estudo. Dos seus elementos, estratégias genéricas e cinco forças são os mais empregados, enquanto que grupos estratégicos e cadeia de valor são os que menos têm recebido atenção por parte dos pesquisadores em estratégia no Brasil. Estes resultados sugerem que a “vida porteriana” no Brasil foi marcada pelo uso acrítico de seus conceitos para descrever a realidade da estratégia. Não há evidências de tentativas consistentes e sistemáticas de testar ou adaptar o paradigma porteriano para o contexto brasileiro. E, pelo visto, a tendência indica que não haverá.FUCAPE Business Shool2010-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed ArticleArtigo revisado pelos paresapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/33910.15728/bbr.2010.7.2.2Brazilian Business Review; Vol. 7 No. 2 (2010): May to August 2010; 19-36Brazilian Business Review; v. 7 n. 2 (2010): Maio a Agosto de 2010; 19-361808-23861807-734Xreponame:BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online)instname:Fucape Business School (FBS)instacron:FBSengporhttp://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/339/513http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/339/514Sehnem, SimoneLazzarotti, FábioBandeira-de-Mello, Rodrigoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-11-06T19:57:18Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/339Revistahttps://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/indexONGhttp://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/oai|| bbronline@bbronline.com.br1808-23861808-2386opendoar:2018-11-06T19:57:18BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) - Fucape Business School (FBS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A Longitudinal analysis of the Porterian paradigm utilization in Brazil Uma Análise Longitudinal do Emprego do Paradigma Porteriano no Brasil |
title |
A Longitudinal analysis of the Porterian paradigm utilization in Brazil |
spellingShingle |
A Longitudinal analysis of the Porterian paradigm utilization in Brazil Sehnem, Simone Porter model strategy in Brazil bibliometric study longitudinal analysis Modelo de Porter Estratégia no Brasil Estudo Bibliométrico Anáise Longitudinal |
title_short |
A Longitudinal analysis of the Porterian paradigm utilization in Brazil |
title_full |
A Longitudinal analysis of the Porterian paradigm utilization in Brazil |
title_fullStr |
A Longitudinal analysis of the Porterian paradigm utilization in Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Longitudinal analysis of the Porterian paradigm utilization in Brazil |
title_sort |
A Longitudinal analysis of the Porterian paradigm utilization in Brazil |
author |
Sehnem, Simone |
author_facet |
Sehnem, Simone Lazzarotti, Fábio Bandeira-de-Mello, Rodrigo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lazzarotti, Fábio Bandeira-de-Mello, Rodrigo |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sehnem, Simone Lazzarotti, Fábio Bandeira-de-Mello, Rodrigo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Porter model strategy in Brazil bibliometric study longitudinal analysis Modelo de Porter Estratégia no Brasil Estudo Bibliométrico Anáise Longitudinal |
topic |
Porter model strategy in Brazil bibliometric study longitudinal analysis Modelo de Porter Estratégia no Brasil Estudo Bibliométrico Anáise Longitudinal |
description |
The purpose of this article is to investigate to what extent Michael Porter;s ideas keep attracting the interest of Brazilian researchers vis-à-vis other possibilities. In this research, we conceptualize Porter’s paradigm by the the following elements: strategic groups, generic strategies, model of the five forces and value chain. Weanalyzed conferece communications to EnANPAD’s, from 1998 to 2008, and to 3Es, from 2003to 2007. The results indicate a decline in the use of the porterian paradigm as the main axis of research in strategy. The generic strategies and the model of five forces are the elements of Porter’s paradigm most employed, while the concepts of strategic groups and value chain are the ones that received less attention by researchers. The analysis of methodology and purpose of comunications indicates that the “porterian life” in Brazil was characterized by the acritical use of its concepts in order to describe the reality of the strategy in Brazil. There are no evidences of consistent and systematic attempts to test or adapt the porterian paradigm for the Brazilian context. And results indicate no evidences that this trend will be reversed. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-05-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article Artigo revisado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/339 10.15728/bbr.2010.7.2.2 |
url |
http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/339 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15728/bbr.2010.7.2.2 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng por |
language |
eng por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/339/513 http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/339/514 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
FUCAPE Business Shool |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
FUCAPE Business Shool |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Business Review; Vol. 7 No. 2 (2010): May to August 2010; 19-36 Brazilian Business Review; v. 7 n. 2 (2010): Maio a Agosto de 2010; 19-36 1808-2386 1807-734X reponame:BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) instname:Fucape Business School (FBS) instacron:FBS |
instname_str |
Fucape Business School (FBS) |
instacron_str |
FBS |
institution |
FBS |
reponame_str |
BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) |
collection |
BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) - Fucape Business School (FBS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|| bbronline@bbronline.com.br |
_version_ |
1754732238451245056 |