An Experimental Investigation of Vagueness on the Left Side of Balance Sheet
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng por |
Título da fonte: | BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/385 |
Resumo: | We investigated through experiments vagueness among property, plant, and equipment (PPE), intangible asset and inventory accounts. To semantic vagueness among items, epistemic vagueness is added in relation to liquidity order classification. Traditional dichotomy current/non-current classification of balance sheet items seems to have been used as a straitjacket, where inventories are current assets, and PPE and intangibles are non-current assets. While gray zone is ignored, items that lay on that are swept under the rug, i.e. arbitrarily classified in one way or another, hence, information asymmetry persists, and is neglected by auditors and standard setters. Literature suggests that the increase of information about underling economic transactions mitigate vagueness. Through the configurational approach, we identified five arrangements according to the intensity of property rights transference. Information about those five arrangements was provided to subjects. Evidences from between-subjects experiments (subjects were 93 MBA students enrolled on Accounting courses) suggest that the argued vagueness is acknowledge by financial statements users. |
id |
FBS-1_f93cab95f8495fddf466c5fe759c5079 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/385 |
network_acronym_str |
FBS-1 |
network_name_str |
BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
An Experimental Investigation of Vagueness on the Left Side of Balance SheetUma Investigação via Experimento sobre a Vaguidade no Lado Esquerdo do Balanço Patrimonialclassified balance sheetIFRSvaguenessexperimentbalanço patrimonialIFRSvaguidadeexperimentoWe investigated through experiments vagueness among property, plant, and equipment (PPE), intangible asset and inventory accounts. To semantic vagueness among items, epistemic vagueness is added in relation to liquidity order classification. Traditional dichotomy current/non-current classification of balance sheet items seems to have been used as a straitjacket, where inventories are current assets, and PPE and intangibles are non-current assets. While gray zone is ignored, items that lay on that are swept under the rug, i.e. arbitrarily classified in one way or another, hence, information asymmetry persists, and is neglected by auditors and standard setters. Literature suggests that the increase of information about underling economic transactions mitigate vagueness. Through the configurational approach, we identified five arrangements according to the intensity of property rights transference. Information about those five arrangements was provided to subjects. Evidences from between-subjects experiments (subjects were 93 MBA students enrolled on Accounting courses) suggest that the argued vagueness is acknowledge by financial statements users.O presente experimento investiga a vaguidade na classificação de itens do Ativo, como imobilizado, ativos intangíveis e estoque. A vaguidade semântica entre esses itens ainda é acrescida de vaguidade epistêmica na escala de liquidez adotada na taxonomia contábil do ativo. A classificação dicotômica tradicional entre ativo circulante e não-circulante vem sendo usada como uma camisa de força, segundo a qual o estoque é ativo circulante, e imobilizado e intangível são não-circulantes. Enquanto essa vaguidade é ignorada, itens que recaem na área cinzenta da classificação são varridos para baixo do tapete, isto é, arbitrariamente classificados de uma forma ou de outra, conseqüentemente, a assimetria informacional persiste e é negligenciada por auditores e reguladores. A literatura sugere que o acréscimo de informação sobre os eventos econômicos subjacentes reduz tal vaguidade. Usando a abordagem configuracional, identificamos cinco arranjos típicos, quanto à intensidade de transferência dos direitos de propriedade, o que foi fornecido como informação adicional no experimento realizado entre sujeitos (93 alunos de MBA matriculados em cursos de Contabilidade). Os resultados sugerem que a vaguidade é percebida por usuários das informações contábeis.FUCAPE Business Shool2009-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed ArticleArtigo revisado pelos paresapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/38510.15728/bbr.2009.6.2.6Brazilian Business Review; Vol. 6 No. 2 (2009): May to August 2009; 198-216Brazilian Business Review; v. 6 n. 2 (2009): Maio a Agosto de 2009; 198-2161808-23861807-734Xreponame:BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online)instname:Fucape Business School (FBS)instacron:FBSengporhttp://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/385/589http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/385/590Cardoso, Ricardo LopesAquino, André Carlos Busanelli deinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-11-06T19:58:02Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/385Revistahttps://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/indexONGhttp://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/oai|| bbronline@bbronline.com.br1808-23861808-2386opendoar:2018-11-06T19:58:02BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) - Fucape Business School (FBS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
An Experimental Investigation of Vagueness on the Left Side of Balance Sheet Uma Investigação via Experimento sobre a Vaguidade no Lado Esquerdo do Balanço Patrimonial |
title |
An Experimental Investigation of Vagueness on the Left Side of Balance Sheet |
spellingShingle |
An Experimental Investigation of Vagueness on the Left Side of Balance Sheet Cardoso, Ricardo Lopes classified balance sheet IFRS vagueness experiment balanço patrimonial IFRS vaguidade experimento |
title_short |
An Experimental Investigation of Vagueness on the Left Side of Balance Sheet |
title_full |
An Experimental Investigation of Vagueness on the Left Side of Balance Sheet |
title_fullStr |
An Experimental Investigation of Vagueness on the Left Side of Balance Sheet |
title_full_unstemmed |
An Experimental Investigation of Vagueness on the Left Side of Balance Sheet |
title_sort |
An Experimental Investigation of Vagueness on the Left Side of Balance Sheet |
author |
Cardoso, Ricardo Lopes |
author_facet |
Cardoso, Ricardo Lopes Aquino, André Carlos Busanelli de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Aquino, André Carlos Busanelli de |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cardoso, Ricardo Lopes Aquino, André Carlos Busanelli de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
classified balance sheet IFRS vagueness experiment balanço patrimonial IFRS vaguidade experimento |
topic |
classified balance sheet IFRS vagueness experiment balanço patrimonial IFRS vaguidade experimento |
description |
We investigated through experiments vagueness among property, plant, and equipment (PPE), intangible asset and inventory accounts. To semantic vagueness among items, epistemic vagueness is added in relation to liquidity order classification. Traditional dichotomy current/non-current classification of balance sheet items seems to have been used as a straitjacket, where inventories are current assets, and PPE and intangibles are non-current assets. While gray zone is ignored, items that lay on that are swept under the rug, i.e. arbitrarily classified in one way or another, hence, information asymmetry persists, and is neglected by auditors and standard setters. Literature suggests that the increase of information about underling economic transactions mitigate vagueness. Through the configurational approach, we identified five arrangements according to the intensity of property rights transference. Information about those five arrangements was provided to subjects. Evidences from between-subjects experiments (subjects were 93 MBA students enrolled on Accounting courses) suggest that the argued vagueness is acknowledge by financial statements users. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-05-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article Artigo revisado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/385 10.15728/bbr.2009.6.2.6 |
url |
http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/385 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15728/bbr.2009.6.2.6 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng por |
language |
eng por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/385/589 http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/385/590 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
FUCAPE Business Shool |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
FUCAPE Business Shool |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Business Review; Vol. 6 No. 2 (2009): May to August 2009; 198-216 Brazilian Business Review; v. 6 n. 2 (2009): Maio a Agosto de 2009; 198-216 1808-2386 1807-734X reponame:BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) instname:Fucape Business School (FBS) instacron:FBS |
instname_str |
Fucape Business School (FBS) |
instacron_str |
FBS |
institution |
FBS |
reponame_str |
BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) |
collection |
BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) - Fucape Business School (FBS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|| bbronline@bbronline.com.br |
_version_ |
1754732238555054080 |