Domestic service and legal parity: Argumentative dispute and associated factors

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fraga, Alexandre Barbosa
Data de Publicação: 2024
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online)
Texto Completo: https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/10798
Resumo: The objective of this article is to analyze the legislative procedure and arguments for and against the approval of Convention n. 189 of the International Labor Organization (ILO) in 2011, and the “PEC das Domésticas” [Domestic Workers Constitutional Amendment Bill] in the Brazilian National Congress in 2013, ultimately enacted and regulated in 2015. We also examine the possible factors associated with why legal parity for domestic workers was achieved only at that moment, and not earlier. The methodology involves analyzing documents from debates at the ILO and in the Brazilian National Congress. The findings demonstrate a debate opposing economic justifications on one side and social and ethical considerations on the other. We also highlight a set of six factors associated with the delayed achievement of parity.
id FCC-1_b4422db3f97c7a184fdf11e309dceb0c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.publicacoes.fcc.org.br:article/10798
network_acronym_str FCC-1
network_name_str Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Domestic service and legal parity: Argumentative dispute and associated factorsServicio doméstico y equiparación jurídica: Disputa argumentativa y factores asociadosService domestique et égalité juridique: Arguments en dispute et facteurs associésServiço doméstico e equiparação legal: Disputa argumentativa e fatores associadosDomestic WorkLabor RightsLegislationTravail DomestiqueDroits du TravailLégislationTrabalho DomésticoDireitos TrabalhistasLegislaçãoTrabajo DomésticoDerechos LaboralesLegislaciónThe objective of this article is to analyze the legislative procedure and arguments for and against the approval of Convention n. 189 of the International Labor Organization (ILO) in 2011, and the “PEC das Domésticas” [Domestic Workers Constitutional Amendment Bill] in the Brazilian National Congress in 2013, ultimately enacted and regulated in 2015. We also examine the possible factors associated with why legal parity for domestic workers was achieved only at that moment, and not earlier. The methodology involves analyzing documents from debates at the ILO and in the Brazilian National Congress. The findings demonstrate a debate opposing economic justifications on one side and social and ethical considerations on the other. We also highlight a set of six factors associated with the delayed achievement of parity.El objetivo del artículo es analizar el procedimiento y los argumentos a favor y en contra de la aprobación de la Convención n. 189 de la Organización Internacional del Trabajo (OIT), en 2011, y de la “PEC das Domésticas”, en el Congreso Nacional brasilero, en 2013, reglamentado en 2015. También busca examinar los posibles factores asociados para que esa casi equiparación legal de los trabajadores domésticos haya pasado solo en aquel momento y no antes. Para esto, la metodología utilizada es el análisis de documentos producidos durante los debates en la OIT y en el Congreso Nacional. Los resultados demuestran la disputa entre argumentos centrados en justificaciones, por un lado económicas, y por otro sociales y éticas. También indican un conjunto de seis factores asociados a la equiparación tardía.Cet article entend analyser le processus de la Convention 189 de l’Organisation Internationale du Travail (OIT) en 2011 et les arguments pour et contre son approbation, ainsi que la proposition d’amendement constitutionnel concernant le travail domestique, nomée “PEC das Domésticas”, approuvée par le Congrès national brésilien en 2013 et réglementée en 2015. Ce travail cherche aussi à examiner les facteurs ayant pu contribuer à ce que cette quasi-égalité juridique des travailleures domestiques n’ait pas été mise en place plus tôt. La méthodologie utilisée est celle de l’analyse des documents produits lors des débats à l’OIT et au Congrès national. Les résultats montrent qu’il existe un conflit entre les arguments ancrés sur des justifications économiques et ceux basés sur des justifications sociales et éthiques. Ils indiquent également un ensemble de six facteurs associés à cette égalité juridique tardive.O objetivo do artigo é analisar a tramitação e os argumentos favoráveis e contrários à aprovação da Convenção n. 189 da Organização Internacional do Trabalho (OIT), em 2011, e da “PEC das Domésticas”, no Congresso Nacional brasileiro, em 2013, regulamentada em 2015. Também busca examinar os possíveis fatores associados para essa quase equiparação legal dos trabalhadores domésticos ter se dado apenas naquele momento, e não anteriormente. Para isso, a metodologia utilizada é a análise de documentos produzidos durante os debates na OIT e no Congresso Nacional. Os resultados demonstram a disputa entre argumentos centrados em justificações, de um lado, econômicas e, de outro, social e ética. Indicam, ainda, um conjunto de seis fatores associados para a equiparação tardia.Fundação Carlos Chagas2024-11-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/10798Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 54 (2024); e10798Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 54 (2024); e10798Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 54 (2024); e10798Cadernos de Pesquisa; v. 54 (2024); e107981980-53140100-1574reponame:Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online)instname:Fundação Carlos Chagas (FCC)instacron:FCCporenghttps://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/10798/4981https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/10798/4982Copyright (c) 2024 Cadernos de Pesquisahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFraga, Alexandre Barbosa2024-11-05T19:40:04Zoai:ojs.publicacoes.fcc.org.br:article/10798Revistahttp://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/ojs/index.php/cp/indexPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcadpesq@fcc.org.br||cadpesq@fcc.org.br1980-53140100-1574opendoar:2024-11-05T19:40:04Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online) - Fundação Carlos Chagas (FCC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Domestic service and legal parity: Argumentative dispute and associated factors
Servicio doméstico y equiparación jurídica: Disputa argumentativa y factores asociados
Service domestique et égalité juridique: Arguments en dispute et facteurs associés
Serviço doméstico e equiparação legal: Disputa argumentativa e fatores associados
title Domestic service and legal parity: Argumentative dispute and associated factors
spellingShingle Domestic service and legal parity: Argumentative dispute and associated factors
Fraga, Alexandre Barbosa
Domestic Work
Labor Rights
Legislation
Travail Domestique
Droits du Travail
Législation
Trabalho Doméstico
Direitos Trabalhistas
Legislação
Trabajo Doméstico
Derechos Laborales
Legislación
title_short Domestic service and legal parity: Argumentative dispute and associated factors
title_full Domestic service and legal parity: Argumentative dispute and associated factors
title_fullStr Domestic service and legal parity: Argumentative dispute and associated factors
title_full_unstemmed Domestic service and legal parity: Argumentative dispute and associated factors
title_sort Domestic service and legal parity: Argumentative dispute and associated factors
author Fraga, Alexandre Barbosa
author_facet Fraga, Alexandre Barbosa
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fraga, Alexandre Barbosa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Domestic Work
Labor Rights
Legislation
Travail Domestique
Droits du Travail
Législation
Trabalho Doméstico
Direitos Trabalhistas
Legislação
Trabajo Doméstico
Derechos Laborales
Legislación
topic Domestic Work
Labor Rights
Legislation
Travail Domestique
Droits du Travail
Législation
Trabalho Doméstico
Direitos Trabalhistas
Legislação
Trabajo Doméstico
Derechos Laborales
Legislación
description The objective of this article is to analyze the legislative procedure and arguments for and against the approval of Convention n. 189 of the International Labor Organization (ILO) in 2011, and the “PEC das Domésticas” [Domestic Workers Constitutional Amendment Bill] in the Brazilian National Congress in 2013, ultimately enacted and regulated in 2015. We also examine the possible factors associated with why legal parity for domestic workers was achieved only at that moment, and not earlier. The methodology involves analyzing documents from debates at the ILO and in the Brazilian National Congress. The findings demonstrate a debate opposing economic justifications on one side and social and ethical considerations on the other. We also highlight a set of six factors associated with the delayed achievement of parity.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-11-05
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/10798
url https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/10798
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/10798/4981
https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/10798/4982
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Cadernos de Pesquisa
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Cadernos de Pesquisa
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Carlos Chagas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Carlos Chagas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 54 (2024); e10798
Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 54 (2024); e10798
Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 54 (2024); e10798
Cadernos de Pesquisa; v. 54 (2024); e10798
1980-5314
0100-1574
reponame:Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online)
instname:Fundação Carlos Chagas (FCC)
instacron:FCC
instname_str Fundação Carlos Chagas (FCC)
instacron_str FCC
institution FCC
reponame_str Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online)
collection Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online) - Fundação Carlos Chagas (FCC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadpesq@fcc.org.br||cadpesq@fcc.org.br
_version_ 1816431074295676928

Registros relacionados