The specification of value as a principle to make the editorial process of scientific journals lean from the perspective of the author
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | RBBD. Revista Brasileira de Biblioteconomia e Documentação (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://rbbd.febab.org.br/rbbd/article/view/1397 |
Resumo: | This research aimed to identify what scientific papers authors understand as activities of value in the editorial process of journals, —in order to eliminate wastes and to become the workflow simplified and streamlined, from submission to publication. The research was characterized as a survey, as it consisted of verifying the value identified in the editorial process by papers authors published in three scientific journals, between 2015 and 2017. Based on its purpose the research was classified as applied, its nature is qualitative and quantitative or mixed. The techniques applied for data collection were survey and the systematic observation of the activities developed in the editorial process of the analyzed journals. The questions analysis method used was the mixed method technique. It was identified what authors consider to be of value in the editorial process: the waiting time reduction for the evaluation and publication process; and the reduction the number of interactions between journal and author, establishing a continuous flow. They also indicated that the evaluations quality is of great importance, as well as communication efficiency in between journal and authors. As opportunities for improvement were pointed out: the reduction of waiting time for publication; the reduction in the amount of interactions between authors and journal; improving the efficiency of communication between journal and authors; and that the original follows the continuous flow without so much time waiting between one process and another. |
id |
FEBAB-1_502da8bd489104f1cd60d73448962831 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.rbbd.febab.org.br:article/1397 |
network_acronym_str |
FEBAB-1 |
network_name_str |
RBBD. Revista Brasileira de Biblioteconomia e Documentação (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The specification of value as a principle to make the editorial process of scientific journals lean from the perspective of the authorA especificação de valor como princípio para tornar o processo editorial de periódicos científicos enxuto na perspectiva dos autoresScientific journals. Editorial process of scientific journals. Value. Lean thinking.Periódicos científicosProcesso editorial dos periódicos científicosValorPensamento enxutoThis research aimed to identify what scientific papers authors understand as activities of value in the editorial process of journals, —in order to eliminate wastes and to become the workflow simplified and streamlined, from submission to publication. The research was characterized as a survey, as it consisted of verifying the value identified in the editorial process by papers authors published in three scientific journals, between 2015 and 2017. Based on its purpose the research was classified as applied, its nature is qualitative and quantitative or mixed. The techniques applied for data collection were survey and the systematic observation of the activities developed in the editorial process of the analyzed journals. The questions analysis method used was the mixed method technique. It was identified what authors consider to be of value in the editorial process: the waiting time reduction for the evaluation and publication process; and the reduction the number of interactions between journal and author, establishing a continuous flow. They also indicated that the evaluations quality is of great importance, as well as communication efficiency in between journal and authors. As opportunities for improvement were pointed out: the reduction of waiting time for publication; the reduction in the amount of interactions between authors and journal; improving the efficiency of communication between journal and authors; and that the original follows the continuous flow without so much time waiting between one process and another.Essa pesquisa objetivou identificar o que os autores de artigos científicos entendem como atividades de valor no processo editorial de periódicos, de modo que se possa eliminar desperdícios e tornar o fluxo de trabalho mais simples e ágil, desde a submissão até a publicação. A pesquisa caracterizou-se como levantamento, pois consistiu em verificar o valor identificado no processo editorial, pelos autores de artigos publicados em três periódicos científicos, entre 2015 e 2017. A pesquisa foi classificada como aplicada quanto a sua finalidade, de natureza qualitativa e quantitativa ou de métodos mistos. As técnicas utilizadas para coleta de dados foram o questionário e a observação sistemática das atividades desenvolvidas no processo editorial dos periódicos analisados. Quanto ao método de análise das questões, foi utilizada a técnica de métodos mistos. Foi identificado o que os autores consideram valor no processo editorial: a redução do tempo de espera do processo de avaliação e de publicação; e a redução da quantidade de interações entre o periódico e o autor, estabelecendo um fluxo contínuo. Indicaram ainda que a qualidade das avaliações tem grande importância, assim como a eficiência na comunicação entre a revista e os autores. Como oportunidades de melhoria foram a apontadas: a redução do tempo de espera de publicação; a redução da quantidade de interações entre autores e o periódico; a melhoria na eficiência da comunicação entre a revista e os autores; e que o original siga o fluxo contínuo sem tanto tempo de espera entre um processo e outro.Federação Brasileira de Associações de Bibliotecários, Cientistas da Informação e Inst.2020-08-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rbbd.febab.org.br/rbbd/article/view/1397Revista Brasileira de Biblioteconomia e Documentação; v. 16 (2020); 1-231980-69490100-0691reponame:RBBD. Revista Brasileira de Biblioteconomia e Documentação (Online)instname:Federação Brasileira de Associações de Bibliotecários, Cientistas da Informação e Instituições (FEBAB)instacron:FEBABporhttps://rbbd.febab.org.br/rbbd/article/view/1397/1223Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Brasileira de Biblioteconomia e Documentaçãohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMartignago, DeisiJuliani, Jordan Paulesky2020-12-22T11:38:34Zoai:ojs.rbbd.febab.org.br:article/1397Revistahttps://rbbd.febab.org.br/rbbdhttps://rbbd.febab.org.br/rbbd/oai||rbbd@rbbd.febab.org.br|| jorge.exlibris@gmail.com1980-69490100-0691opendoar:2020-12-22T11:38:34RBBD. Revista Brasileira de Biblioteconomia e Documentação (Online) - Federação Brasileira de Associações de Bibliotecários, Cientistas da Informação e Instituições (FEBAB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The specification of value as a principle to make the editorial process of scientific journals lean from the perspective of the author A especificação de valor como princípio para tornar o processo editorial de periódicos científicos enxuto na perspectiva dos autores |
title |
The specification of value as a principle to make the editorial process of scientific journals lean from the perspective of the author |
spellingShingle |
The specification of value as a principle to make the editorial process of scientific journals lean from the perspective of the author Martignago, Deisi Scientific journals. Editorial process of scientific journals. Value. Lean thinking. Periódicos científicos Processo editorial dos periódicos científicos Valor Pensamento enxuto |
title_short |
The specification of value as a principle to make the editorial process of scientific journals lean from the perspective of the author |
title_full |
The specification of value as a principle to make the editorial process of scientific journals lean from the perspective of the author |
title_fullStr |
The specification of value as a principle to make the editorial process of scientific journals lean from the perspective of the author |
title_full_unstemmed |
The specification of value as a principle to make the editorial process of scientific journals lean from the perspective of the author |
title_sort |
The specification of value as a principle to make the editorial process of scientific journals lean from the perspective of the author |
author |
Martignago, Deisi |
author_facet |
Martignago, Deisi Juliani, Jordan Paulesky |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Juliani, Jordan Paulesky |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Martignago, Deisi Juliani, Jordan Paulesky |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Scientific journals. Editorial process of scientific journals. Value. Lean thinking. Periódicos científicos Processo editorial dos periódicos científicos Valor Pensamento enxuto |
topic |
Scientific journals. Editorial process of scientific journals. Value. Lean thinking. Periódicos científicos Processo editorial dos periódicos científicos Valor Pensamento enxuto |
description |
This research aimed to identify what scientific papers authors understand as activities of value in the editorial process of journals, —in order to eliminate wastes and to become the workflow simplified and streamlined, from submission to publication. The research was characterized as a survey, as it consisted of verifying the value identified in the editorial process by papers authors published in three scientific journals, between 2015 and 2017. Based on its purpose the research was classified as applied, its nature is qualitative and quantitative or mixed. The techniques applied for data collection were survey and the systematic observation of the activities developed in the editorial process of the analyzed journals. The questions analysis method used was the mixed method technique. It was identified what authors consider to be of value in the editorial process: the waiting time reduction for the evaluation and publication process; and the reduction the number of interactions between journal and author, establishing a continuous flow. They also indicated that the evaluations quality is of great importance, as well as communication efficiency in between journal and authors. As opportunities for improvement were pointed out: the reduction of waiting time for publication; the reduction in the amount of interactions between authors and journal; improving the efficiency of communication between journal and authors; and that the original follows the continuous flow without so much time waiting between one process and another. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-08-10 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rbbd.febab.org.br/rbbd/article/view/1397 |
url |
https://rbbd.febab.org.br/rbbd/article/view/1397 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rbbd.febab.org.br/rbbd/article/view/1397/1223 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Brasileira de Biblioteconomia e Documentação https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Brasileira de Biblioteconomia e Documentação https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federação Brasileira de Associações de Bibliotecários, Cientistas da Informação e Inst. |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federação Brasileira de Associações de Bibliotecários, Cientistas da Informação e Inst. |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Biblioteconomia e Documentação; v. 16 (2020); 1-23 1980-6949 0100-0691 reponame:RBBD. Revista Brasileira de Biblioteconomia e Documentação (Online) instname:Federação Brasileira de Associações de Bibliotecários, Cientistas da Informação e Instituições (FEBAB) instacron:FEBAB |
instname_str |
Federação Brasileira de Associações de Bibliotecários, Cientistas da Informação e Instituições (FEBAB) |
instacron_str |
FEBAB |
institution |
FEBAB |
reponame_str |
RBBD. Revista Brasileira de Biblioteconomia e Documentação (Online) |
collection |
RBBD. Revista Brasileira de Biblioteconomia e Documentação (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
RBBD. Revista Brasileira de Biblioteconomia e Documentação (Online) - Federação Brasileira de Associações de Bibliotecários, Cientistas da Informação e Instituições (FEBAB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rbbd@rbbd.febab.org.br|| jorge.exlibris@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1798319779366305792 |