Prevalence and Association of Congenital Anomalies According to the Maternal Body Mass Index: Cross-Sectional Study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032019000500280 |
Resumo: | Abstract Objective To evaluate and compare the prevalence of structural congenital anomalies (CAs) according to maternal body mass index (BMI). Methods The present cross-sectional study involved pregnant women with fetuses diagnosed with structural CAs through morphological ultrasonography between November 2014 and January 2016. The nutritional status of the pregnant women was classified according to the gross value of the body mass index. The pregnant women were categorized into four groups: low weight, adequate weight, overweight, and obesity. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata/SE version 12.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX), with values of p ≤ 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results A total of 223 pregnant women had fetuses diagnosed with CAs. The prevalence of structural CAs in pregnant women with lowweight was of 20.18%, of 43.50% in pregnant women with adequate weight, of 22.87% in pregnant women with overweight, and of 13.45% in pregnant women with obesity. The prevalence of central nervous system (CNS) anomalies and of genitourinary systemanomalieswas high for the four groups of pregnant women. A positive association was observed between multiple anomalies in pregnant women with adequate weight (prevalence ratio [PR] = 1.65; p ≤ 0.004) and between anomalies of the lymphatic system in obese pregnant women (PR = 4.04, p ≤ 0.000). Conclusion The prevalence of CNS and genitourinary systemanomalies was high in all of the BMI categories. Obese pregnancies were associated with lymphatic system anomalies. Therefore, screening and identification of the risk factors for CAs are important, regardless of the maternal BMI. Our findings reinforce the importance of discussing with pregnant women maternal nutrition and its effect on fetal development and on neonatal outcome. |
id |
FEBRASGO-1_3b4918579b59206f491b38d0516aa91f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-72032019000500280 |
network_acronym_str |
FEBRASGO-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Prevalence and Association of Congenital Anomalies According to the Maternal Body Mass Index: Cross-Sectional Studycongenital anomaliespregnancyobesitybody weightfetal ultrasonographyAbstract Objective To evaluate and compare the prevalence of structural congenital anomalies (CAs) according to maternal body mass index (BMI). Methods The present cross-sectional study involved pregnant women with fetuses diagnosed with structural CAs through morphological ultrasonography between November 2014 and January 2016. The nutritional status of the pregnant women was classified according to the gross value of the body mass index. The pregnant women were categorized into four groups: low weight, adequate weight, overweight, and obesity. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata/SE version 12.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX), with values of p ≤ 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results A total of 223 pregnant women had fetuses diagnosed with CAs. The prevalence of structural CAs in pregnant women with lowweight was of 20.18%, of 43.50% in pregnant women with adequate weight, of 22.87% in pregnant women with overweight, and of 13.45% in pregnant women with obesity. The prevalence of central nervous system (CNS) anomalies and of genitourinary systemanomalieswas high for the four groups of pregnant women. A positive association was observed between multiple anomalies in pregnant women with adequate weight (prevalence ratio [PR] = 1.65; p ≤ 0.004) and between anomalies of the lymphatic system in obese pregnant women (PR = 4.04, p ≤ 0.000). Conclusion The prevalence of CNS and genitourinary systemanomalies was high in all of the BMI categories. Obese pregnancies were associated with lymphatic system anomalies. Therefore, screening and identification of the risk factors for CAs are important, regardless of the maternal BMI. Our findings reinforce the importance of discussing with pregnant women maternal nutrition and its effect on fetal development and on neonatal outcome.Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia2019-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032019000500280Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia v.41 n.5 2019reponame:Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)instname:Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)instacron:FEBRASGO10.1055/s-0039-1683971info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoraes,Carolina Leão deMendonça,Carolina RodriguesMelo,Natália Cruz eAmaral,Waldemar Naves doeng2019-06-25T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-72032019000500280Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbgohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppublicações@febrasgo.org.br||rbgo@fmrp.usp.br1806-93390100-7203opendoar:2019-06-25T00:00Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) - Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Prevalence and Association of Congenital Anomalies According to the Maternal Body Mass Index: Cross-Sectional Study |
title |
Prevalence and Association of Congenital Anomalies According to the Maternal Body Mass Index: Cross-Sectional Study |
spellingShingle |
Prevalence and Association of Congenital Anomalies According to the Maternal Body Mass Index: Cross-Sectional Study Moraes,Carolina Leão de congenital anomalies pregnancy obesity body weight fetal ultrasonography |
title_short |
Prevalence and Association of Congenital Anomalies According to the Maternal Body Mass Index: Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full |
Prevalence and Association of Congenital Anomalies According to the Maternal Body Mass Index: Cross-Sectional Study |
title_fullStr |
Prevalence and Association of Congenital Anomalies According to the Maternal Body Mass Index: Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Prevalence and Association of Congenital Anomalies According to the Maternal Body Mass Index: Cross-Sectional Study |
title_sort |
Prevalence and Association of Congenital Anomalies According to the Maternal Body Mass Index: Cross-Sectional Study |
author |
Moraes,Carolina Leão de |
author_facet |
Moraes,Carolina Leão de Mendonça,Carolina Rodrigues Melo,Natália Cruz e Amaral,Waldemar Naves do |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mendonça,Carolina Rodrigues Melo,Natália Cruz e Amaral,Waldemar Naves do |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Moraes,Carolina Leão de Mendonça,Carolina Rodrigues Melo,Natália Cruz e Amaral,Waldemar Naves do |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
congenital anomalies pregnancy obesity body weight fetal ultrasonography |
topic |
congenital anomalies pregnancy obesity body weight fetal ultrasonography |
description |
Abstract Objective To evaluate and compare the prevalence of structural congenital anomalies (CAs) according to maternal body mass index (BMI). Methods The present cross-sectional study involved pregnant women with fetuses diagnosed with structural CAs through morphological ultrasonography between November 2014 and January 2016. The nutritional status of the pregnant women was classified according to the gross value of the body mass index. The pregnant women were categorized into four groups: low weight, adequate weight, overweight, and obesity. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata/SE version 12.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX), with values of p ≤ 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results A total of 223 pregnant women had fetuses diagnosed with CAs. The prevalence of structural CAs in pregnant women with lowweight was of 20.18%, of 43.50% in pregnant women with adequate weight, of 22.87% in pregnant women with overweight, and of 13.45% in pregnant women with obesity. The prevalence of central nervous system (CNS) anomalies and of genitourinary systemanomalieswas high for the four groups of pregnant women. A positive association was observed between multiple anomalies in pregnant women with adequate weight (prevalence ratio [PR] = 1.65; p ≤ 0.004) and between anomalies of the lymphatic system in obese pregnant women (PR = 4.04, p ≤ 0.000). Conclusion The prevalence of CNS and genitourinary systemanomalies was high in all of the BMI categories. Obese pregnancies were associated with lymphatic system anomalies. Therefore, screening and identification of the risk factors for CAs are important, regardless of the maternal BMI. Our findings reinforce the importance of discussing with pregnant women maternal nutrition and its effect on fetal development and on neonatal outcome. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-05-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032019000500280 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032019000500280 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1055/s-0039-1683971 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia v.41 n.5 2019 reponame:Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) instname:Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO) instacron:FEBRASGO |
instname_str |
Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO) |
instacron_str |
FEBRASGO |
institution |
FEBRASGO |
reponame_str |
Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) |
collection |
Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) - Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
publicações@febrasgo.org.br||rbgo@fmrp.usp.br |
_version_ |
1754115944563605504 |