Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Latin America and Europe: a Comparative Analysis of Reported Databases for 2013
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032019000800493 |
Resumo: | Abstract Objective To compare the Latin American and European assisted reproductive technology (ART) registries regarding data accessibility and quality, treatment utilization, effectiveness, safety, and quality of services. Methods We performed an ecological study using data from scientific publications of Latin American and European registries that report cycles initiated during 2013 (the most recent registries available until December of 2017). The summarized data are presented as frequencies, percentages, minimum-maximum values, and absolute numbers. Results Reporting clinics and cycle treatments were unevenly distributed between the participating countries for both registries, although access to ART is 15 times greater in Europe. In Latin America, individual services participate voluntarily reporting started cycles until cancellation, birth or miscarriage, while in Europe it varied among countries. It makes the data available from Latin America more uniform, although lesser representative when compared with European ones, given that reporting is compulsory formost countries. The cumulative live birth rate was better in Latin America. Female age, use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), cycles with transfer of ≥ 3 embryos, as well as multiple pregnancy rates were greater in the Latin American Register of Assisted Reproduction (RLA, in the Portuguese acronym). Assisted reproductive technology complications, such as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, hemorrhage, and infections were also higher in LatinAmerica, although they are extremely uncommon in both regions. Conclusion Both regions have points to improve in the quality of their reports. Latin America has produced a more uniform reporting, their clinical results are generally |
id |
FEBRASGO-1_3c9754ab824d5c714b30980ed0047c12 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-72032019000800493 |
network_acronym_str |
FEBRASGO-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Latin America and Europe: a Comparative Analysis of Reported Databases for 2013registriesassisted reproductive techniquein vitro fertilizationintracytoplasmic sperm injectionartificial inseminationAbstract Objective To compare the Latin American and European assisted reproductive technology (ART) registries regarding data accessibility and quality, treatment utilization, effectiveness, safety, and quality of services. Methods We performed an ecological study using data from scientific publications of Latin American and European registries that report cycles initiated during 2013 (the most recent registries available until December of 2017). The summarized data are presented as frequencies, percentages, minimum-maximum values, and absolute numbers. Results Reporting clinics and cycle treatments were unevenly distributed between the participating countries for both registries, although access to ART is 15 times greater in Europe. In Latin America, individual services participate voluntarily reporting started cycles until cancellation, birth or miscarriage, while in Europe it varied among countries. It makes the data available from Latin America more uniform, although lesser representative when compared with European ones, given that reporting is compulsory formost countries. The cumulative live birth rate was better in Latin America. Female age, use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), cycles with transfer of ≥ 3 embryos, as well as multiple pregnancy rates were greater in the Latin American Register of Assisted Reproduction (RLA, in the Portuguese acronym). Assisted reproductive technology complications, such as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, hemorrhage, and infections were also higher in LatinAmerica, although they are extremely uncommon in both regions. Conclusion Both regions have points to improve in the quality of their reports. Latin America has produced a more uniform reporting, their clinical results are generallyFederação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia2019-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032019000800493Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia v.41 n.8 2019reponame:Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)instname:Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)instacron:FEBRASGO10.1055/s-0039-1693680info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDuarte-Filho,Oscar BarbosaBianchi,Paulo Homem de MelloLobel,Alexandre Likier SteinbergPeregrino,Pedro Felipe MagalhãesPiccinato,Carla de AzevedoPodgaec,Sérgioeng2019-09-13T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-72032019000800493Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbgohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppublicações@febrasgo.org.br||rbgo@fmrp.usp.br1806-93390100-7203opendoar:2019-09-13T00:00Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) - Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Latin America and Europe: a Comparative Analysis of Reported Databases for 2013 |
title |
Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Latin America and Europe: a Comparative Analysis of Reported Databases for 2013 |
spellingShingle |
Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Latin America and Europe: a Comparative Analysis of Reported Databases for 2013 Duarte-Filho,Oscar Barbosa registries assisted reproductive technique in vitro fertilization intracytoplasmic sperm injection artificial insemination |
title_short |
Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Latin America and Europe: a Comparative Analysis of Reported Databases for 2013 |
title_full |
Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Latin America and Europe: a Comparative Analysis of Reported Databases for 2013 |
title_fullStr |
Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Latin America and Europe: a Comparative Analysis of Reported Databases for 2013 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Latin America and Europe: a Comparative Analysis of Reported Databases for 2013 |
title_sort |
Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Latin America and Europe: a Comparative Analysis of Reported Databases for 2013 |
author |
Duarte-Filho,Oscar Barbosa |
author_facet |
Duarte-Filho,Oscar Barbosa Bianchi,Paulo Homem de Mello Lobel,Alexandre Likier Steinberg Peregrino,Pedro Felipe Magalhães Piccinato,Carla de Azevedo Podgaec,Sérgio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bianchi,Paulo Homem de Mello Lobel,Alexandre Likier Steinberg Peregrino,Pedro Felipe Magalhães Piccinato,Carla de Azevedo Podgaec,Sérgio |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Duarte-Filho,Oscar Barbosa Bianchi,Paulo Homem de Mello Lobel,Alexandre Likier Steinberg Peregrino,Pedro Felipe Magalhães Piccinato,Carla de Azevedo Podgaec,Sérgio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
registries assisted reproductive technique in vitro fertilization intracytoplasmic sperm injection artificial insemination |
topic |
registries assisted reproductive technique in vitro fertilization intracytoplasmic sperm injection artificial insemination |
description |
Abstract Objective To compare the Latin American and European assisted reproductive technology (ART) registries regarding data accessibility and quality, treatment utilization, effectiveness, safety, and quality of services. Methods We performed an ecological study using data from scientific publications of Latin American and European registries that report cycles initiated during 2013 (the most recent registries available until December of 2017). The summarized data are presented as frequencies, percentages, minimum-maximum values, and absolute numbers. Results Reporting clinics and cycle treatments were unevenly distributed between the participating countries for both registries, although access to ART is 15 times greater in Europe. In Latin America, individual services participate voluntarily reporting started cycles until cancellation, birth or miscarriage, while in Europe it varied among countries. It makes the data available from Latin America more uniform, although lesser representative when compared with European ones, given that reporting is compulsory formost countries. The cumulative live birth rate was better in Latin America. Female age, use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), cycles with transfer of ≥ 3 embryos, as well as multiple pregnancy rates were greater in the Latin American Register of Assisted Reproduction (RLA, in the Portuguese acronym). Assisted reproductive technology complications, such as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, hemorrhage, and infections were also higher in LatinAmerica, although they are extremely uncommon in both regions. Conclusion Both regions have points to improve in the quality of their reports. Latin America has produced a more uniform reporting, their clinical results are generally |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032019000800493 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032019000800493 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1055/s-0039-1693680 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia v.41 n.8 2019 reponame:Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) instname:Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO) instacron:FEBRASGO |
instname_str |
Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO) |
instacron_str |
FEBRASGO |
institution |
FEBRASGO |
reponame_str |
Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) |
collection |
Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) - Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
publicações@febrasgo.org.br||rbgo@fmrp.usp.br |
_version_ |
1754115944898101248 |