Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Latin America and Europe: a Comparative Analysis of Reported Databases for 2013

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Duarte-Filho,Oscar Barbosa
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Bianchi,Paulo Homem de Mello, Lobel,Alexandre Likier Steinberg, Peregrino,Pedro Felipe Magalhães, Piccinato,Carla de Azevedo, Podgaec,Sérgio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032019000800493
Resumo: Abstract Objective To compare the Latin American and European assisted reproductive technology (ART) registries regarding data accessibility and quality, treatment utilization, effectiveness, safety, and quality of services. Methods We performed an ecological study using data from scientific publications of Latin American and European registries that report cycles initiated during 2013 (the most recent registries available until December of 2017). The summarized data are presented as frequencies, percentages, minimum-maximum values, and absolute numbers. Results Reporting clinics and cycle treatments were unevenly distributed between the participating countries for both registries, although access to ART is 15 times greater in Europe. In Latin America, individual services participate voluntarily reporting started cycles until cancellation, birth or miscarriage, while in Europe it varied among countries. It makes the data available from Latin America more uniform, although lesser representative when compared with European ones, given that reporting is compulsory formost countries. The cumulative live birth rate was better in Latin America. Female age, use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), cycles with transfer of ≥ 3 embryos, as well as multiple pregnancy rates were greater in the Latin American Register of Assisted Reproduction (RLA, in the Portuguese acronym). Assisted reproductive technology complications, such as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, hemorrhage, and infections were also higher in LatinAmerica, although they are extremely uncommon in both regions. Conclusion Both regions have points to improve in the quality of their reports. Latin America has produced a more uniform reporting, their clinical results are generally
id FEBRASGO-1_3c9754ab824d5c714b30980ed0047c12
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-72032019000800493
network_acronym_str FEBRASGO-1
network_name_str Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Latin America and Europe: a Comparative Analysis of Reported Databases for 2013registriesassisted reproductive techniquein vitro fertilizationintracytoplasmic sperm injectionartificial inseminationAbstract Objective To compare the Latin American and European assisted reproductive technology (ART) registries regarding data accessibility and quality, treatment utilization, effectiveness, safety, and quality of services. Methods We performed an ecological study using data from scientific publications of Latin American and European registries that report cycles initiated during 2013 (the most recent registries available until December of 2017). The summarized data are presented as frequencies, percentages, minimum-maximum values, and absolute numbers. Results Reporting clinics and cycle treatments were unevenly distributed between the participating countries for both registries, although access to ART is 15 times greater in Europe. In Latin America, individual services participate voluntarily reporting started cycles until cancellation, birth or miscarriage, while in Europe it varied among countries. It makes the data available from Latin America more uniform, although lesser representative when compared with European ones, given that reporting is compulsory formost countries. The cumulative live birth rate was better in Latin America. Female age, use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), cycles with transfer of ≥ 3 embryos, as well as multiple pregnancy rates were greater in the Latin American Register of Assisted Reproduction (RLA, in the Portuguese acronym). Assisted reproductive technology complications, such as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, hemorrhage, and infections were also higher in LatinAmerica, although they are extremely uncommon in both regions. Conclusion Both regions have points to improve in the quality of their reports. Latin America has produced a more uniform reporting, their clinical results are generallyFederação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia2019-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032019000800493Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia v.41 n.8 2019reponame:Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)instname:Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)instacron:FEBRASGO10.1055/s-0039-1693680info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDuarte-Filho,Oscar BarbosaBianchi,Paulo Homem de MelloLobel,Alexandre Likier SteinbergPeregrino,Pedro Felipe MagalhãesPiccinato,Carla de AzevedoPodgaec,Sérgioeng2019-09-13T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-72032019000800493Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbgohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppublicações@febrasgo.org.br||rbgo@fmrp.usp.br1806-93390100-7203opendoar:2019-09-13T00:00Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) - Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Latin America and Europe: a Comparative Analysis of Reported Databases for 2013
title Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Latin America and Europe: a Comparative Analysis of Reported Databases for 2013
spellingShingle Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Latin America and Europe: a Comparative Analysis of Reported Databases for 2013
Duarte-Filho,Oscar Barbosa
registries
assisted reproductive technique
in vitro fertilization
intracytoplasmic sperm injection
artificial insemination
title_short Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Latin America and Europe: a Comparative Analysis of Reported Databases for 2013
title_full Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Latin America and Europe: a Comparative Analysis of Reported Databases for 2013
title_fullStr Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Latin America and Europe: a Comparative Analysis of Reported Databases for 2013
title_full_unstemmed Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Latin America and Europe: a Comparative Analysis of Reported Databases for 2013
title_sort Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Latin America and Europe: a Comparative Analysis of Reported Databases for 2013
author Duarte-Filho,Oscar Barbosa
author_facet Duarte-Filho,Oscar Barbosa
Bianchi,Paulo Homem de Mello
Lobel,Alexandre Likier Steinberg
Peregrino,Pedro Felipe Magalhães
Piccinato,Carla de Azevedo
Podgaec,Sérgio
author_role author
author2 Bianchi,Paulo Homem de Mello
Lobel,Alexandre Likier Steinberg
Peregrino,Pedro Felipe Magalhães
Piccinato,Carla de Azevedo
Podgaec,Sérgio
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Duarte-Filho,Oscar Barbosa
Bianchi,Paulo Homem de Mello
Lobel,Alexandre Likier Steinberg
Peregrino,Pedro Felipe Magalhães
Piccinato,Carla de Azevedo
Podgaec,Sérgio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv registries
assisted reproductive technique
in vitro fertilization
intracytoplasmic sperm injection
artificial insemination
topic registries
assisted reproductive technique
in vitro fertilization
intracytoplasmic sperm injection
artificial insemination
description Abstract Objective To compare the Latin American and European assisted reproductive technology (ART) registries regarding data accessibility and quality, treatment utilization, effectiveness, safety, and quality of services. Methods We performed an ecological study using data from scientific publications of Latin American and European registries that report cycles initiated during 2013 (the most recent registries available until December of 2017). The summarized data are presented as frequencies, percentages, minimum-maximum values, and absolute numbers. Results Reporting clinics and cycle treatments were unevenly distributed between the participating countries for both registries, although access to ART is 15 times greater in Europe. In Latin America, individual services participate voluntarily reporting started cycles until cancellation, birth or miscarriage, while in Europe it varied among countries. It makes the data available from Latin America more uniform, although lesser representative when compared with European ones, given that reporting is compulsory formost countries. The cumulative live birth rate was better in Latin America. Female age, use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), cycles with transfer of ≥ 3 embryos, as well as multiple pregnancy rates were greater in the Latin American Register of Assisted Reproduction (RLA, in the Portuguese acronym). Assisted reproductive technology complications, such as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, hemorrhage, and infections were also higher in LatinAmerica, although they are extremely uncommon in both regions. Conclusion Both regions have points to improve in the quality of their reports. Latin America has produced a more uniform reporting, their clinical results are generally
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032019000800493
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032019000800493
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1055/s-0039-1693680
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia v.41 n.8 2019
reponame:Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
instname:Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)
instacron:FEBRASGO
instname_str Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)
instacron_str FEBRASGO
institution FEBRASGO
reponame_str Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
collection Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) - Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv publicações@febrasgo.org.br||rbgo@fmrp.usp.br
_version_ 1754115944898101248