Survey on Aesthetic Vulvovaginal Procedures: What do PortugueseDoctors andMedical Students Think?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Vieira-Baptista,Pedro
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Lima-Silva,Joana, Fonseca-Moutinho,José, Monteiro,Virgínia, Águas,Fernanda
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032017000800415
Resumo: Abstract Objective To assess themedical doctors andmedical students’ opinion regarding the evidence and ethical background of the performance of vulvovaginal aesthetic procedures (VVAPs). Methods Cross-sectional online survey among 664 Portuguese medical doctors and students. Results Most participants considered that there is never or there rarely is amedical reason to perform: vulvar whitening (85.9% [502/584]); hymenoplasty (72.0% [437/607]); mons pubis liposuction (71.6% [426/595]); “G-spot” augmentation (71.0% [409/576]); labia majora augmentation (66.3% [390/588]); labia minora augmentation (58.3% [326/559]); or laser vaginal tightening (52.3%[313/599]).Gynecologists and specialistsweremore likely to consider that there are no medical reasons to performVVAPs; the opposite was true for plastic surgeons and students/residents. Hymenoplasty raised ethical doubts in 51.1% (283/554) of the participants. Plastic surgeons and students/residents were less likely to raise ethical objections, while the opposite was true for gynecologists and specialists. Most considered that VVAPs could contribute to an improvement in self-esteem(92.3% [613/664]); sexual function (78.5% [521/664]); vaginal atrophy (69.9% [464/664]); quality of life (66.3% [440/664]); and sexual pain (61.4% [408/664]). Conclusions While medical doctors and students acknowledge the lack of evidence and scientific support for the performance of VVAPs, most do not raise ethical objections about them, especially if they are students or plastic surgeons, or if they have had or have considered having plastic surgery.
id FEBRASGO-1_479a5fb40a9dd5919e80cd3f14504590
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-72032017000800415
network_acronym_str FEBRASGO-1
network_name_str Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Survey on Aesthetic Vulvovaginal Procedures: What do PortugueseDoctors andMedical Students Think?nymphoplastyhymenoplastyaesthetic surgeryethicsvulvar surgerylaserAbstract Objective To assess themedical doctors andmedical students’ opinion regarding the evidence and ethical background of the performance of vulvovaginal aesthetic procedures (VVAPs). Methods Cross-sectional online survey among 664 Portuguese medical doctors and students. Results Most participants considered that there is never or there rarely is amedical reason to perform: vulvar whitening (85.9% [502/584]); hymenoplasty (72.0% [437/607]); mons pubis liposuction (71.6% [426/595]); “G-spot” augmentation (71.0% [409/576]); labia majora augmentation (66.3% [390/588]); labia minora augmentation (58.3% [326/559]); or laser vaginal tightening (52.3%[313/599]).Gynecologists and specialistsweremore likely to consider that there are no medical reasons to performVVAPs; the opposite was true for plastic surgeons and students/residents. Hymenoplasty raised ethical doubts in 51.1% (283/554) of the participants. Plastic surgeons and students/residents were less likely to raise ethical objections, while the opposite was true for gynecologists and specialists. Most considered that VVAPs could contribute to an improvement in self-esteem(92.3% [613/664]); sexual function (78.5% [521/664]); vaginal atrophy (69.9% [464/664]); quality of life (66.3% [440/664]); and sexual pain (61.4% [408/664]). Conclusions While medical doctors and students acknowledge the lack of evidence and scientific support for the performance of VVAPs, most do not raise ethical objections about them, especially if they are students or plastic surgeons, or if they have had or have considered having plastic surgery.Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia2017-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032017000800415Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia v.39 n.8 2017reponame:Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)instname:Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)instacron:FEBRASGO10.1055/s-0037-1603967info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVieira-Baptista,PedroLima-Silva,JoanaFonseca-Moutinho,JoséMonteiro,VirgíniaÁguas,Fernandaeng2017-12-15T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-72032017000800415Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbgohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppublicações@febrasgo.org.br||rbgo@fmrp.usp.br1806-93390100-7203opendoar:2017-12-15T00:00Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) - Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Survey on Aesthetic Vulvovaginal Procedures: What do PortugueseDoctors andMedical Students Think?
title Survey on Aesthetic Vulvovaginal Procedures: What do PortugueseDoctors andMedical Students Think?
spellingShingle Survey on Aesthetic Vulvovaginal Procedures: What do PortugueseDoctors andMedical Students Think?
Vieira-Baptista,Pedro
nymphoplasty
hymenoplasty
aesthetic surgery
ethics
vulvar surgery
laser
title_short Survey on Aesthetic Vulvovaginal Procedures: What do PortugueseDoctors andMedical Students Think?
title_full Survey on Aesthetic Vulvovaginal Procedures: What do PortugueseDoctors andMedical Students Think?
title_fullStr Survey on Aesthetic Vulvovaginal Procedures: What do PortugueseDoctors andMedical Students Think?
title_full_unstemmed Survey on Aesthetic Vulvovaginal Procedures: What do PortugueseDoctors andMedical Students Think?
title_sort Survey on Aesthetic Vulvovaginal Procedures: What do PortugueseDoctors andMedical Students Think?
author Vieira-Baptista,Pedro
author_facet Vieira-Baptista,Pedro
Lima-Silva,Joana
Fonseca-Moutinho,José
Monteiro,Virgínia
Águas,Fernanda
author_role author
author2 Lima-Silva,Joana
Fonseca-Moutinho,José
Monteiro,Virgínia
Águas,Fernanda
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vieira-Baptista,Pedro
Lima-Silva,Joana
Fonseca-Moutinho,José
Monteiro,Virgínia
Águas,Fernanda
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv nymphoplasty
hymenoplasty
aesthetic surgery
ethics
vulvar surgery
laser
topic nymphoplasty
hymenoplasty
aesthetic surgery
ethics
vulvar surgery
laser
description Abstract Objective To assess themedical doctors andmedical students’ opinion regarding the evidence and ethical background of the performance of vulvovaginal aesthetic procedures (VVAPs). Methods Cross-sectional online survey among 664 Portuguese medical doctors and students. Results Most participants considered that there is never or there rarely is amedical reason to perform: vulvar whitening (85.9% [502/584]); hymenoplasty (72.0% [437/607]); mons pubis liposuction (71.6% [426/595]); “G-spot” augmentation (71.0% [409/576]); labia majora augmentation (66.3% [390/588]); labia minora augmentation (58.3% [326/559]); or laser vaginal tightening (52.3%[313/599]).Gynecologists and specialistsweremore likely to consider that there are no medical reasons to performVVAPs; the opposite was true for plastic surgeons and students/residents. Hymenoplasty raised ethical doubts in 51.1% (283/554) of the participants. Plastic surgeons and students/residents were less likely to raise ethical objections, while the opposite was true for gynecologists and specialists. Most considered that VVAPs could contribute to an improvement in self-esteem(92.3% [613/664]); sexual function (78.5% [521/664]); vaginal atrophy (69.9% [464/664]); quality of life (66.3% [440/664]); and sexual pain (61.4% [408/664]). Conclusions While medical doctors and students acknowledge the lack of evidence and scientific support for the performance of VVAPs, most do not raise ethical objections about them, especially if they are students or plastic surgeons, or if they have had or have considered having plastic surgery.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032017000800415
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032017000800415
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1055/s-0037-1603967
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia v.39 n.8 2017
reponame:Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
instname:Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)
instacron:FEBRASGO
instname_str Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)
instacron_str FEBRASGO
institution FEBRASGO
reponame_str Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
collection Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) - Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv publicações@febrasgo.org.br||rbgo@fmrp.usp.br
_version_ 1754115943947042816