Uterine Doppler velocimetry of the uterine arteries in the second and third trimesters for the prediction of gestational outcome
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032014000100035 |
Resumo: | PURPOSE: The aim of this longitudinal study was to investigate the value of uterine artery Doppler sonography during the second and third trimesters in the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcome in low-risk women. METHODS: From July 2011 to August 2012, a total of 205 singleton pregnant women presenting at our antenatal clinic were enrolled in this prospective study and were assessed for baseline demographic and obstetric data. They underwent ultrasound evaluation at the time of second and third trimesters, both included Doppler assessment of bilateral uterine arteries to determine the values of the pulsatility index (PI) and resistance index (RI) and presence of early diastolic notch. The endpoint of this study was assessing the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of Doppler ultrasonography of the uterine artery, for the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes including preeclampsia, stillbirth, placental abruption and preterm labor. RESULTS: The mean age of cases was 26.4±5.11. The uterine artery PI and RI values for both second (PI: 1.1±0.42 versus 1.53±0.59, p=0.002; RI: 0.55±0.09 versus 0.72±0.13, p=0.000 respectively) and third-trimester (PI: 0.77±0.31 versus 1.09±0.46, p=0.000; RI: 0.46±0.10 versus 0.60±0.14, p=0.010 respectively) evaluations were significantly higher in patients with adverse pregnancy outcome than in normal women. Combination of PI and RI >95th percentile and presence of bilateral notch in second trimester get sensitivity and specificity of 36.1 and 97% respectively, while these measures were 57.5 and 98.2% in third trimester. CONCLUSIONS: According to our study, it seems that uterine artery Doppler may be a valuable tool for the prediction of a variety of adverse outcomes in second and third trimesters. |
id |
FEBRASGO-1_5f039255a5f673de4b6236c2dc8bd6e8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-72032014000100035 |
network_acronym_str |
FEBRASGO-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Uterine Doppler velocimetry of the uterine arteries in the second and third trimesters for the prediction of gestational outcomeUltrasonography, DopplerLaser-doppler flowmetryUterine artery/ultrasonographyPregnancy trimester, secondPregnancy trimester, thirdPregnancy outcome PURPOSE: The aim of this longitudinal study was to investigate the value of uterine artery Doppler sonography during the second and third trimesters in the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcome in low-risk women. METHODS: From July 2011 to August 2012, a total of 205 singleton pregnant women presenting at our antenatal clinic were enrolled in this prospective study and were assessed for baseline demographic and obstetric data. They underwent ultrasound evaluation at the time of second and third trimesters, both included Doppler assessment of bilateral uterine arteries to determine the values of the pulsatility index (PI) and resistance index (RI) and presence of early diastolic notch. The endpoint of this study was assessing the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of Doppler ultrasonography of the uterine artery, for the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes including preeclampsia, stillbirth, placental abruption and preterm labor. RESULTS: The mean age of cases was 26.4±5.11. The uterine artery PI and RI values for both second (PI: 1.1±0.42 versus 1.53±0.59, p=0.002; RI: 0.55±0.09 versus 0.72±0.13, p=0.000 respectively) and third-trimester (PI: 0.77±0.31 versus 1.09±0.46, p=0.000; RI: 0.46±0.10 versus 0.60±0.14, p=0.010 respectively) evaluations were significantly higher in patients with adverse pregnancy outcome than in normal women. Combination of PI and RI >95th percentile and presence of bilateral notch in second trimester get sensitivity and specificity of 36.1 and 97% respectively, while these measures were 57.5 and 98.2% in third trimester. CONCLUSIONS: According to our study, it seems that uterine artery Doppler may be a valuable tool for the prediction of a variety of adverse outcomes in second and third trimesters. Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia2014-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032014000100035Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia v.36 n.1 2014reponame:Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)instname:Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)instacron:FEBRASGO10.1590/S0100-72032014000100008info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAfrakhteh,MaryamMoeini,AidaTaheri,Morteza SaneiHaghighatkhah,Hamid RezaFakhri,MohammadMasoom,Ninaeng2014-02-18T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-72032014000100035Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbgohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppublicações@febrasgo.org.br||rbgo@fmrp.usp.br1806-93390100-7203opendoar:2014-02-18T00:00Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) - Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Uterine Doppler velocimetry of the uterine arteries in the second and third trimesters for the prediction of gestational outcome |
title |
Uterine Doppler velocimetry of the uterine arteries in the second and third trimesters for the prediction of gestational outcome |
spellingShingle |
Uterine Doppler velocimetry of the uterine arteries in the second and third trimesters for the prediction of gestational outcome Afrakhteh,Maryam Ultrasonography, Doppler Laser-doppler flowmetry Uterine artery/ultrasonography Pregnancy trimester, second Pregnancy trimester, third Pregnancy outcome |
title_short |
Uterine Doppler velocimetry of the uterine arteries in the second and third trimesters for the prediction of gestational outcome |
title_full |
Uterine Doppler velocimetry of the uterine arteries in the second and third trimesters for the prediction of gestational outcome |
title_fullStr |
Uterine Doppler velocimetry of the uterine arteries in the second and third trimesters for the prediction of gestational outcome |
title_full_unstemmed |
Uterine Doppler velocimetry of the uterine arteries in the second and third trimesters for the prediction of gestational outcome |
title_sort |
Uterine Doppler velocimetry of the uterine arteries in the second and third trimesters for the prediction of gestational outcome |
author |
Afrakhteh,Maryam |
author_facet |
Afrakhteh,Maryam Moeini,Aida Taheri,Morteza Sanei Haghighatkhah,Hamid Reza Fakhri,Mohammad Masoom,Nina |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Moeini,Aida Taheri,Morteza Sanei Haghighatkhah,Hamid Reza Fakhri,Mohammad Masoom,Nina |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Afrakhteh,Maryam Moeini,Aida Taheri,Morteza Sanei Haghighatkhah,Hamid Reza Fakhri,Mohammad Masoom,Nina |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ultrasonography, Doppler Laser-doppler flowmetry Uterine artery/ultrasonography Pregnancy trimester, second Pregnancy trimester, third Pregnancy outcome |
topic |
Ultrasonography, Doppler Laser-doppler flowmetry Uterine artery/ultrasonography Pregnancy trimester, second Pregnancy trimester, third Pregnancy outcome |
description |
PURPOSE: The aim of this longitudinal study was to investigate the value of uterine artery Doppler sonography during the second and third trimesters in the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcome in low-risk women. METHODS: From July 2011 to August 2012, a total of 205 singleton pregnant women presenting at our antenatal clinic were enrolled in this prospective study and were assessed for baseline demographic and obstetric data. They underwent ultrasound evaluation at the time of second and third trimesters, both included Doppler assessment of bilateral uterine arteries to determine the values of the pulsatility index (PI) and resistance index (RI) and presence of early diastolic notch. The endpoint of this study was assessing the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of Doppler ultrasonography of the uterine artery, for the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes including preeclampsia, stillbirth, placental abruption and preterm labor. RESULTS: The mean age of cases was 26.4±5.11. The uterine artery PI and RI values for both second (PI: 1.1±0.42 versus 1.53±0.59, p=0.002; RI: 0.55±0.09 versus 0.72±0.13, p=0.000 respectively) and third-trimester (PI: 0.77±0.31 versus 1.09±0.46, p=0.000; RI: 0.46±0.10 versus 0.60±0.14, p=0.010 respectively) evaluations were significantly higher in patients with adverse pregnancy outcome than in normal women. Combination of PI and RI >95th percentile and presence of bilateral notch in second trimester get sensitivity and specificity of 36.1 and 97% respectively, while these measures were 57.5 and 98.2% in third trimester. CONCLUSIONS: According to our study, it seems that uterine artery Doppler may be a valuable tool for the prediction of a variety of adverse outcomes in second and third trimesters. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032014000100035 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032014000100035 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0100-72032014000100008 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia v.36 n.1 2014 reponame:Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) instname:Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO) instacron:FEBRASGO |
instname_str |
Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO) |
instacron_str |
FEBRASGO |
institution |
FEBRASGO |
reponame_str |
Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) |
collection |
Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) - Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
publicações@febrasgo.org.br||rbgo@fmrp.usp.br |
_version_ |
1754115942302875648 |