Uterine Doppler velocimetry of the uterine arteries in the second and third trimesters for the prediction of gestational outcome

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Afrakhteh,Maryam
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Moeini,Aida, Taheri,Morteza Sanei, Haghighatkhah,Hamid Reza, Fakhri,Mohammad, Masoom,Nina
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032014000100035
Resumo: PURPOSE: The aim of this longitudinal study was to investigate the value of uterine artery Doppler sonography during the second and third trimesters in the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcome in low-risk women. METHODS: From July 2011 to August 2012, a total of 205 singleton pregnant women presenting at our antenatal clinic were enrolled in this prospective study and were assessed for baseline demographic and obstetric data. They underwent ultrasound evaluation at the time of second and third trimesters, both included Doppler assessment of bilateral uterine arteries to determine the values of the pulsatility index (PI) and resistance index (RI) and presence of early diastolic notch. The endpoint of this study was assessing the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of Doppler ultrasonography of the uterine artery, for the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes including preeclampsia, stillbirth, placental abruption and preterm labor. RESULTS: The mean age of cases was 26.4±5.11. The uterine artery PI and RI values for both second (PI: 1.1±0.42 versus 1.53±0.59, p=0.002; RI: 0.55±0.09 versus 0.72±0.13, p=0.000 respectively) and third-trimester (PI: 0.77±0.31 versus 1.09±0.46, p=0.000; RI: 0.46±0.10 versus 0.60±0.14, p=0.010 respectively) evaluations were significantly higher in patients with adverse pregnancy outcome than in normal women. Combination of PI and RI >95th percentile and presence of bilateral notch in second trimester get sensitivity and specificity of 36.1 and 97% respectively, while these measures were 57.5 and 98.2% in third trimester. CONCLUSIONS: According to our study, it seems that uterine artery Doppler may be a valuable tool for the prediction of a variety of adverse outcomes in second and third trimesters.
id FEBRASGO-1_5f039255a5f673de4b6236c2dc8bd6e8
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-72032014000100035
network_acronym_str FEBRASGO-1
network_name_str Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Uterine Doppler velocimetry of the uterine arteries in the second and third trimesters for the prediction of gestational outcomeUltrasonography, DopplerLaser-doppler flowmetryUterine artery/ultrasonographyPregnancy trimester, secondPregnancy trimester, thirdPregnancy outcome PURPOSE: The aim of this longitudinal study was to investigate the value of uterine artery Doppler sonography during the second and third trimesters in the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcome in low-risk women. METHODS: From July 2011 to August 2012, a total of 205 singleton pregnant women presenting at our antenatal clinic were enrolled in this prospective study and were assessed for baseline demographic and obstetric data. They underwent ultrasound evaluation at the time of second and third trimesters, both included Doppler assessment of bilateral uterine arteries to determine the values of the pulsatility index (PI) and resistance index (RI) and presence of early diastolic notch. The endpoint of this study was assessing the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of Doppler ultrasonography of the uterine artery, for the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes including preeclampsia, stillbirth, placental abruption and preterm labor. RESULTS: The mean age of cases was 26.4±5.11. The uterine artery PI and RI values for both second (PI: 1.1±0.42 versus 1.53±0.59, p=0.002; RI: 0.55±0.09 versus 0.72±0.13, p=0.000 respectively) and third-trimester (PI: 0.77±0.31 versus 1.09±0.46, p=0.000; RI: 0.46±0.10 versus 0.60±0.14, p=0.010 respectively) evaluations were significantly higher in patients with adverse pregnancy outcome than in normal women. Combination of PI and RI >95th percentile and presence of bilateral notch in second trimester get sensitivity and specificity of 36.1 and 97% respectively, while these measures were 57.5 and 98.2% in third trimester. CONCLUSIONS: According to our study, it seems that uterine artery Doppler may be a valuable tool for the prediction of a variety of adverse outcomes in second and third trimesters. Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia2014-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032014000100035Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia v.36 n.1 2014reponame:Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)instname:Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)instacron:FEBRASGO10.1590/S0100-72032014000100008info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAfrakhteh,MaryamMoeini,AidaTaheri,Morteza SaneiHaghighatkhah,Hamid RezaFakhri,MohammadMasoom,Ninaeng2014-02-18T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-72032014000100035Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbgohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppublicações@febrasgo.org.br||rbgo@fmrp.usp.br1806-93390100-7203opendoar:2014-02-18T00:00Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) - Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Uterine Doppler velocimetry of the uterine arteries in the second and third trimesters for the prediction of gestational outcome
title Uterine Doppler velocimetry of the uterine arteries in the second and third trimesters for the prediction of gestational outcome
spellingShingle Uterine Doppler velocimetry of the uterine arteries in the second and third trimesters for the prediction of gestational outcome
Afrakhteh,Maryam
Ultrasonography, Doppler
Laser-doppler flowmetry
Uterine artery/ultrasonography
Pregnancy trimester, second
Pregnancy trimester, third
Pregnancy outcome
title_short Uterine Doppler velocimetry of the uterine arteries in the second and third trimesters for the prediction of gestational outcome
title_full Uterine Doppler velocimetry of the uterine arteries in the second and third trimesters for the prediction of gestational outcome
title_fullStr Uterine Doppler velocimetry of the uterine arteries in the second and third trimesters for the prediction of gestational outcome
title_full_unstemmed Uterine Doppler velocimetry of the uterine arteries in the second and third trimesters for the prediction of gestational outcome
title_sort Uterine Doppler velocimetry of the uterine arteries in the second and third trimesters for the prediction of gestational outcome
author Afrakhteh,Maryam
author_facet Afrakhteh,Maryam
Moeini,Aida
Taheri,Morteza Sanei
Haghighatkhah,Hamid Reza
Fakhri,Mohammad
Masoom,Nina
author_role author
author2 Moeini,Aida
Taheri,Morteza Sanei
Haghighatkhah,Hamid Reza
Fakhri,Mohammad
Masoom,Nina
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Afrakhteh,Maryam
Moeini,Aida
Taheri,Morteza Sanei
Haghighatkhah,Hamid Reza
Fakhri,Mohammad
Masoom,Nina
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ultrasonography, Doppler
Laser-doppler flowmetry
Uterine artery/ultrasonography
Pregnancy trimester, second
Pregnancy trimester, third
Pregnancy outcome
topic Ultrasonography, Doppler
Laser-doppler flowmetry
Uterine artery/ultrasonography
Pregnancy trimester, second
Pregnancy trimester, third
Pregnancy outcome
description PURPOSE: The aim of this longitudinal study was to investigate the value of uterine artery Doppler sonography during the second and third trimesters in the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcome in low-risk women. METHODS: From July 2011 to August 2012, a total of 205 singleton pregnant women presenting at our antenatal clinic were enrolled in this prospective study and were assessed for baseline demographic and obstetric data. They underwent ultrasound evaluation at the time of second and third trimesters, both included Doppler assessment of bilateral uterine arteries to determine the values of the pulsatility index (PI) and resistance index (RI) and presence of early diastolic notch. The endpoint of this study was assessing the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of Doppler ultrasonography of the uterine artery, for the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes including preeclampsia, stillbirth, placental abruption and preterm labor. RESULTS: The mean age of cases was 26.4±5.11. The uterine artery PI and RI values for both second (PI: 1.1±0.42 versus 1.53±0.59, p=0.002; RI: 0.55±0.09 versus 0.72±0.13, p=0.000 respectively) and third-trimester (PI: 0.77±0.31 versus 1.09±0.46, p=0.000; RI: 0.46±0.10 versus 0.60±0.14, p=0.010 respectively) evaluations were significantly higher in patients with adverse pregnancy outcome than in normal women. Combination of PI and RI >95th percentile and presence of bilateral notch in second trimester get sensitivity and specificity of 36.1 and 97% respectively, while these measures were 57.5 and 98.2% in third trimester. CONCLUSIONS: According to our study, it seems that uterine artery Doppler may be a valuable tool for the prediction of a variety of adverse outcomes in second and third trimesters.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032014000100035
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032014000100035
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0100-72032014000100008
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia v.36 n.1 2014
reponame:Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
instname:Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)
instacron:FEBRASGO
instname_str Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)
instacron_str FEBRASGO
institution FEBRASGO
reponame_str Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
collection Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) - Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv publicações@febrasgo.org.br||rbgo@fmrp.usp.br
_version_ 1754115942302875648