Use of Urodynamics by Gynecologists and Urologists in Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032022000700654 |
Resumo: | Abstract Objective Urodynamic studies (UDSs) are a set of tests that assess the storage and emptying of urine, and they are widely used by gynecologists and urologists in the management of urinary incontinence (UI), despite the discussion about its indications. The objectives of the present study were to verify whether UDSs are routinely used in the conservative and surgical approaches to female UI, their other clinical indications, and to compare the responses of Brazilian gynecologists and urologists. Methods The present is an opinion survey applied from August 2020 to January 2021 through a semistructured questionnaire about the clinical practice sent by e-mail to all participants. The responses were compared through statistical analyses. Results Of the 329 participants, 238 were gynecologists (72.3%) and 91, urologists (27.7%). Most gynecologists (73.5%) and urologists (86.6%) do not request UDSs before the conservative treatment of UI; but UDSs are indicated in the preoperative period of anti-incontinence surgeries. Most participants request UDSs in the initial approach to overactive bladder (gynecologists: 88.2%; urologists: 96.7%), and the urologist has greater chance to request this study (odds ratio [OR] = 3.9). For most participants, it is necessary to request uroculture before the UDSs. Conclusion Most Brazilian gynecologists and urologists who participated in the present study do not request UDSs before the conservative treatment of UI, according to national and internacional guidelines, and often request it before the surgical treatment for female UI. The indication of this exam in the initial approach of idiopathic overactive bladder should be reviewed by the participants. |
id |
FEBRASGO-1_9ae2b9e590f0a902f3fd09238d8a2202 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-72032022000700654 |
network_acronym_str |
FEBRASGO-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Use of Urodynamics by Gynecologists and Urologists in Brazilurodynamicsfemale urinary incontinenceoveractive bladderAbstract Objective Urodynamic studies (UDSs) are a set of tests that assess the storage and emptying of urine, and they are widely used by gynecologists and urologists in the management of urinary incontinence (UI), despite the discussion about its indications. The objectives of the present study were to verify whether UDSs are routinely used in the conservative and surgical approaches to female UI, their other clinical indications, and to compare the responses of Brazilian gynecologists and urologists. Methods The present is an opinion survey applied from August 2020 to January 2021 through a semistructured questionnaire about the clinical practice sent by e-mail to all participants. The responses were compared through statistical analyses. Results Of the 329 participants, 238 were gynecologists (72.3%) and 91, urologists (27.7%). Most gynecologists (73.5%) and urologists (86.6%) do not request UDSs before the conservative treatment of UI; but UDSs are indicated in the preoperative period of anti-incontinence surgeries. Most participants request UDSs in the initial approach to overactive bladder (gynecologists: 88.2%; urologists: 96.7%), and the urologist has greater chance to request this study (odds ratio [OR] = 3.9). For most participants, it is necessary to request uroculture before the UDSs. Conclusion Most Brazilian gynecologists and urologists who participated in the present study do not request UDSs before the conservative treatment of UI, according to national and internacional guidelines, and often request it before the surgical treatment for female UI. The indication of this exam in the initial approach of idiopathic overactive bladder should be reviewed by the participants.Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia2022-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032022000700654Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia v.44 n.7 2022reponame:Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)instname:Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)instacron:FEBRASGO10.1055/s-0042-1744460info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDiniz,Mucio BarataRibeiro,Marina FranklinDias,Luísa Aguiar MonteiroMonteiro,Marilene Vale de Castroeng2022-08-25T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-72032022000700654Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbgohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppublicações@febrasgo.org.br||rbgo@fmrp.usp.br1806-93390100-7203opendoar:2022-08-25T00:00Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) - Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Use of Urodynamics by Gynecologists and Urologists in Brazil |
title |
Use of Urodynamics by Gynecologists and Urologists in Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Use of Urodynamics by Gynecologists and Urologists in Brazil Diniz,Mucio Barata urodynamics female urinary incontinence overactive bladder |
title_short |
Use of Urodynamics by Gynecologists and Urologists in Brazil |
title_full |
Use of Urodynamics by Gynecologists and Urologists in Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Use of Urodynamics by Gynecologists and Urologists in Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Use of Urodynamics by Gynecologists and Urologists in Brazil |
title_sort |
Use of Urodynamics by Gynecologists and Urologists in Brazil |
author |
Diniz,Mucio Barata |
author_facet |
Diniz,Mucio Barata Ribeiro,Marina Franklin Dias,Luísa Aguiar Monteiro Monteiro,Marilene Vale de Castro |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ribeiro,Marina Franklin Dias,Luísa Aguiar Monteiro Monteiro,Marilene Vale de Castro |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Diniz,Mucio Barata Ribeiro,Marina Franklin Dias,Luísa Aguiar Monteiro Monteiro,Marilene Vale de Castro |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
urodynamics female urinary incontinence overactive bladder |
topic |
urodynamics female urinary incontinence overactive bladder |
description |
Abstract Objective Urodynamic studies (UDSs) are a set of tests that assess the storage and emptying of urine, and they are widely used by gynecologists and urologists in the management of urinary incontinence (UI), despite the discussion about its indications. The objectives of the present study were to verify whether UDSs are routinely used in the conservative and surgical approaches to female UI, their other clinical indications, and to compare the responses of Brazilian gynecologists and urologists. Methods The present is an opinion survey applied from August 2020 to January 2021 through a semistructured questionnaire about the clinical practice sent by e-mail to all participants. The responses were compared through statistical analyses. Results Of the 329 participants, 238 were gynecologists (72.3%) and 91, urologists (27.7%). Most gynecologists (73.5%) and urologists (86.6%) do not request UDSs before the conservative treatment of UI; but UDSs are indicated in the preoperative period of anti-incontinence surgeries. Most participants request UDSs in the initial approach to overactive bladder (gynecologists: 88.2%; urologists: 96.7%), and the urologist has greater chance to request this study (odds ratio [OR] = 3.9). For most participants, it is necessary to request uroculture before the UDSs. Conclusion Most Brazilian gynecologists and urologists who participated in the present study do not request UDSs before the conservative treatment of UI, according to national and internacional guidelines, and often request it before the surgical treatment for female UI. The indication of this exam in the initial approach of idiopathic overactive bladder should be reviewed by the participants. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-07-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032022000700654 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032022000700654 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1055/s-0042-1744460 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia v.44 n.7 2022 reponame:Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) instname:Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO) instacron:FEBRASGO |
instname_str |
Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO) |
instacron_str |
FEBRASGO |
institution |
FEBRASGO |
reponame_str |
Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) |
collection |
Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) - Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
publicações@febrasgo.org.br||rbgo@fmrp.usp.br |
_version_ |
1754115946243424256 |