Cesarean-section Rates in Brazil from 2014 to 2016: Cross-sectional Analysis Using the Robson Classification
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032020000900522 |
Resumo: | Abstract Objective To obtain cesarean-section (CS) rates according to the Robson Group Classification in five different regions of Brazil. Methods A descriptive epidemiological study using data from secondary birth records fromthe Computer Science Department of the Brazilian Unified Health System (Datasus, in Portuguese) between January 1st, 2014, and December 31st, 2016, including all live births in Brazil. Results The overall rate of CSwas of 56%. The sample was divided into 11 groups, and vaginal births were more frequent in groups 1 (53.6%), 3 (80.0%) and 4 (55.1%). The highest CS rates were found in groups 5 (85.7%), 6 (89.5%), 7 (85.2%) and 9 (97.0%). The overall CS rate per region varied from 46.2% in the North to 62.1% in the Midwest. Group 5 was the largest obstetric population in the South, Southeast and Midwest, and group 3 was the largest in the North and Northeast. Group 5 contributed the most to the overall CS rate, accounting for 30.8% of CSs. Conclusion Over half of the births in Brazil were cesarean sections. The Midwest had the highestCS rates,while theNorth had the lowest. The largestobstetric population in the North and in the Northeast was composed of women in group 3, while in the South, Southeast and Midwest it was group 5. Among all regions, the largest contribution to the overall CS rate was from group 5. |
id |
FEBRASGO-1_bd1b253f855801c4fc9e9568957ece42 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-72032020000900522 |
network_acronym_str |
FEBRASGO-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Cesarean-section Rates in Brazil from 2014 to 2016: Cross-sectional Analysis Using the Robson Classificationcesarean sectionvaginal birth after cesarean sectionobstetric deliveryrepeat cesarean sectioninduced laborAbstract Objective To obtain cesarean-section (CS) rates according to the Robson Group Classification in five different regions of Brazil. Methods A descriptive epidemiological study using data from secondary birth records fromthe Computer Science Department of the Brazilian Unified Health System (Datasus, in Portuguese) between January 1st, 2014, and December 31st, 2016, including all live births in Brazil. Results The overall rate of CSwas of 56%. The sample was divided into 11 groups, and vaginal births were more frequent in groups 1 (53.6%), 3 (80.0%) and 4 (55.1%). The highest CS rates were found in groups 5 (85.7%), 6 (89.5%), 7 (85.2%) and 9 (97.0%). The overall CS rate per region varied from 46.2% in the North to 62.1% in the Midwest. Group 5 was the largest obstetric population in the South, Southeast and Midwest, and group 3 was the largest in the North and Northeast. Group 5 contributed the most to the overall CS rate, accounting for 30.8% of CSs. Conclusion Over half of the births in Brazil were cesarean sections. The Midwest had the highestCS rates,while theNorth had the lowest. The largestobstetric population in the North and in the Northeast was composed of women in group 3, while in the South, Southeast and Midwest it was group 5. Among all regions, the largest contribution to the overall CS rate was from group 5.Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia2020-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032020000900522Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia v.42 n.9 2020reponame:Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)instname:Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)instacron:FEBRASGO10.1055/s-0040-1712134info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKnobel,RoxanaLopes,Thiago Jose PinheiroMenezes,Mariane de OliveiraAndreucci,Carla BetinaGieburowski,Juliana ToledoTakemoto,Maira Libertad Soligoeng2020-10-21T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-72032020000900522Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbgohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppublicações@febrasgo.org.br||rbgo@fmrp.usp.br1806-93390100-7203opendoar:2020-10-21T00:00Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) - Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Cesarean-section Rates in Brazil from 2014 to 2016: Cross-sectional Analysis Using the Robson Classification |
title |
Cesarean-section Rates in Brazil from 2014 to 2016: Cross-sectional Analysis Using the Robson Classification |
spellingShingle |
Cesarean-section Rates in Brazil from 2014 to 2016: Cross-sectional Analysis Using the Robson Classification Knobel,Roxana cesarean section vaginal birth after cesarean section obstetric delivery repeat cesarean section induced labor |
title_short |
Cesarean-section Rates in Brazil from 2014 to 2016: Cross-sectional Analysis Using the Robson Classification |
title_full |
Cesarean-section Rates in Brazil from 2014 to 2016: Cross-sectional Analysis Using the Robson Classification |
title_fullStr |
Cesarean-section Rates in Brazil from 2014 to 2016: Cross-sectional Analysis Using the Robson Classification |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cesarean-section Rates in Brazil from 2014 to 2016: Cross-sectional Analysis Using the Robson Classification |
title_sort |
Cesarean-section Rates in Brazil from 2014 to 2016: Cross-sectional Analysis Using the Robson Classification |
author |
Knobel,Roxana |
author_facet |
Knobel,Roxana Lopes,Thiago Jose Pinheiro Menezes,Mariane de Oliveira Andreucci,Carla Betina Gieburowski,Juliana Toledo Takemoto,Maira Libertad Soligo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lopes,Thiago Jose Pinheiro Menezes,Mariane de Oliveira Andreucci,Carla Betina Gieburowski,Juliana Toledo Takemoto,Maira Libertad Soligo |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Knobel,Roxana Lopes,Thiago Jose Pinheiro Menezes,Mariane de Oliveira Andreucci,Carla Betina Gieburowski,Juliana Toledo Takemoto,Maira Libertad Soligo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
cesarean section vaginal birth after cesarean section obstetric delivery repeat cesarean section induced labor |
topic |
cesarean section vaginal birth after cesarean section obstetric delivery repeat cesarean section induced labor |
description |
Abstract Objective To obtain cesarean-section (CS) rates according to the Robson Group Classification in five different regions of Brazil. Methods A descriptive epidemiological study using data from secondary birth records fromthe Computer Science Department of the Brazilian Unified Health System (Datasus, in Portuguese) between January 1st, 2014, and December 31st, 2016, including all live births in Brazil. Results The overall rate of CSwas of 56%. The sample was divided into 11 groups, and vaginal births were more frequent in groups 1 (53.6%), 3 (80.0%) and 4 (55.1%). The highest CS rates were found in groups 5 (85.7%), 6 (89.5%), 7 (85.2%) and 9 (97.0%). The overall CS rate per region varied from 46.2% in the North to 62.1% in the Midwest. Group 5 was the largest obstetric population in the South, Southeast and Midwest, and group 3 was the largest in the North and Northeast. Group 5 contributed the most to the overall CS rate, accounting for 30.8% of CSs. Conclusion Over half of the births in Brazil were cesarean sections. The Midwest had the highestCS rates,while theNorth had the lowest. The largestobstetric population in the North and in the Northeast was composed of women in group 3, while in the South, Southeast and Midwest it was group 5. Among all regions, the largest contribution to the overall CS rate was from group 5. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-09-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032020000900522 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032020000900522 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1055/s-0040-1712134 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia v.42 n.9 2020 reponame:Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) instname:Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO) instacron:FEBRASGO |
instname_str |
Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO) |
instacron_str |
FEBRASGO |
institution |
FEBRASGO |
reponame_str |
Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) |
collection |
Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) - Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
publicações@febrasgo.org.br||rbgo@fmrp.usp.br |
_version_ |
1754115945350037504 |