Do Women have Adequate Knowledge about Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions? A Systematic Review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fante,Júlia Ferreira
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Silva,Thais Daniel, Mateus-Vasconcelos,Elaine Cristine Lemes, Ferreira,Cristine Homsi Jorge, Brito,Luiz Gustavo Oliveira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032019000800508
Resumo: Abstract Objective We sought to investigate whether women present adequate knowledge of the main pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) (urinary incontinence - UI, fecal incontinence - FI, and pelvic organ prolapse - POP). Data sources A systematic review was performed in the MEDLINE, PEDro, CENTRAL, and Cochrane databases for publications from inception to April 2018. Selection of studies A total of 3,125 studies were reviewed. Meta-analysis was not possible due to the heterogeneity of primary outcomes and the diversity of instruments for measuring knowledge. The quality of the articles included in the analysis was evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) adapted for cross-sectional studies. Data collection Two authors performed data extraction into a standardized spreadsheet. Data synthesis Nineteen studies were included, comprising 11,512 women. About the methodological quality (NOS), most of the studies (n= 11) presented a total score of 6 out of 10. Validated questionnaires and designed pilot-tested forms were the most frequently used ways of assessing knowledge. Some studies were stratified by race, age, or group minorities. The most used questionnaire was the prolapse and incontinence knowledge questionnaire (PIKQ) (n= 5). Knowledge and/or awareness regarding PFD was low to moderate among the studies. Urinary incontinence was the most prevalent PFD investigated, and the most important risk factors associated with the lack of knowledge of the pelvic floor were: African-American ethnicity (n= 3), low educational level (n= 4), low access to information (n= 5) and socioeconomic status (n= 3). Conclusion Most women have a gap in the knowledge of pelvic floor muscle dysfunctions, do not understand their treatment options, and are not able to identify risk factors for these disorders.
id FEBRASGO-1_cf5359ebfb8e14e791f61f9ebcb12cea
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-72032019000800508
network_acronym_str FEBRASGO-1
network_name_str Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Do Women have Adequate Knowledge about Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions? A Systematic Reviewknowledgepelvic floorurinary incontinencesystematic reviewAbstract Objective We sought to investigate whether women present adequate knowledge of the main pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) (urinary incontinence - UI, fecal incontinence - FI, and pelvic organ prolapse - POP). Data sources A systematic review was performed in the MEDLINE, PEDro, CENTRAL, and Cochrane databases for publications from inception to April 2018. Selection of studies A total of 3,125 studies were reviewed. Meta-analysis was not possible due to the heterogeneity of primary outcomes and the diversity of instruments for measuring knowledge. The quality of the articles included in the analysis was evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) adapted for cross-sectional studies. Data collection Two authors performed data extraction into a standardized spreadsheet. Data synthesis Nineteen studies were included, comprising 11,512 women. About the methodological quality (NOS), most of the studies (n= 11) presented a total score of 6 out of 10. Validated questionnaires and designed pilot-tested forms were the most frequently used ways of assessing knowledge. Some studies were stratified by race, age, or group minorities. The most used questionnaire was the prolapse and incontinence knowledge questionnaire (PIKQ) (n= 5). Knowledge and/or awareness regarding PFD was low to moderate among the studies. Urinary incontinence was the most prevalent PFD investigated, and the most important risk factors associated with the lack of knowledge of the pelvic floor were: African-American ethnicity (n= 3), low educational level (n= 4), low access to information (n= 5) and socioeconomic status (n= 3). Conclusion Most women have a gap in the knowledge of pelvic floor muscle dysfunctions, do not understand their treatment options, and are not able to identify risk factors for these disorders.Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia2019-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032019000800508Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia v.41 n.8 2019reponame:Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)instname:Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)instacron:FEBRASGO10.1055/s-0039-1695002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFante,Júlia FerreiraSilva,Thais DanielMateus-Vasconcelos,Elaine Cristine LemesFerreira,Cristine Homsi JorgeBrito,Luiz Gustavo Oliveiraeng2019-09-13T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-72032019000800508Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbgohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppublicações@febrasgo.org.br||rbgo@fmrp.usp.br1806-93390100-7203opendoar:2019-09-13T00:00Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) - Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Do Women have Adequate Knowledge about Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions? A Systematic Review
title Do Women have Adequate Knowledge about Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions? A Systematic Review
spellingShingle Do Women have Adequate Knowledge about Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions? A Systematic Review
Fante,Júlia Ferreira
knowledge
pelvic floor
urinary incontinence
systematic review
title_short Do Women have Adequate Knowledge about Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions? A Systematic Review
title_full Do Women have Adequate Knowledge about Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions? A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Do Women have Adequate Knowledge about Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions? A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Do Women have Adequate Knowledge about Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions? A Systematic Review
title_sort Do Women have Adequate Knowledge about Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions? A Systematic Review
author Fante,Júlia Ferreira
author_facet Fante,Júlia Ferreira
Silva,Thais Daniel
Mateus-Vasconcelos,Elaine Cristine Lemes
Ferreira,Cristine Homsi Jorge
Brito,Luiz Gustavo Oliveira
author_role author
author2 Silva,Thais Daniel
Mateus-Vasconcelos,Elaine Cristine Lemes
Ferreira,Cristine Homsi Jorge
Brito,Luiz Gustavo Oliveira
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fante,Júlia Ferreira
Silva,Thais Daniel
Mateus-Vasconcelos,Elaine Cristine Lemes
Ferreira,Cristine Homsi Jorge
Brito,Luiz Gustavo Oliveira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv knowledge
pelvic floor
urinary incontinence
systematic review
topic knowledge
pelvic floor
urinary incontinence
systematic review
description Abstract Objective We sought to investigate whether women present adequate knowledge of the main pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) (urinary incontinence - UI, fecal incontinence - FI, and pelvic organ prolapse - POP). Data sources A systematic review was performed in the MEDLINE, PEDro, CENTRAL, and Cochrane databases for publications from inception to April 2018. Selection of studies A total of 3,125 studies were reviewed. Meta-analysis was not possible due to the heterogeneity of primary outcomes and the diversity of instruments for measuring knowledge. The quality of the articles included in the analysis was evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) adapted for cross-sectional studies. Data collection Two authors performed data extraction into a standardized spreadsheet. Data synthesis Nineteen studies were included, comprising 11,512 women. About the methodological quality (NOS), most of the studies (n= 11) presented a total score of 6 out of 10. Validated questionnaires and designed pilot-tested forms were the most frequently used ways of assessing knowledge. Some studies were stratified by race, age, or group minorities. The most used questionnaire was the prolapse and incontinence knowledge questionnaire (PIKQ) (n= 5). Knowledge and/or awareness regarding PFD was low to moderate among the studies. Urinary incontinence was the most prevalent PFD investigated, and the most important risk factors associated with the lack of knowledge of the pelvic floor were: African-American ethnicity (n= 3), low educational level (n= 4), low access to information (n= 5) and socioeconomic status (n= 3). Conclusion Most women have a gap in the knowledge of pelvic floor muscle dysfunctions, do not understand their treatment options, and are not able to identify risk factors for these disorders.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032019000800508
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032019000800508
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1055/s-0039-1695002
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia v.41 n.8 2019
reponame:Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
instname:Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)
instacron:FEBRASGO
instname_str Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)
instacron_str FEBRASGO
institution FEBRASGO
reponame_str Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
collection Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) - Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv publicações@febrasgo.org.br||rbgo@fmrp.usp.br
_version_ 1754115944902295552