Immediate Postpartum Copper IUD: A Comparative Analysis between Profiles of Women who Accept and who Refuse it

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ferreira,Paula Batista
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Utiyama,Raul Yao, Tamanaha,Sonia, Fukunaga,Erika Tiemi
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032022000200154
Resumo: Abstract Objective To analyze the profiles of women who accepted and who refused the insertion of the copper intrauterine device (IUD) postpartum and to learn the motivations related to the refusal of the method. Methods Cross-sectional study with 299 pregnant women. The women were informed about the possibility of inserting a copper IUD postpartum and were questioned about their interest in adopting or not this contraceptive. All participants answered a questionnaire with information relevant to the proposals of the present study. The sample size was limited to the number of devices available for the present study. Results A total of 560 women were invited to join the present study and 299 accepted. Out of the 299 women included in the present study, 175 accepted the copper IUD and 124 refused. As the number of pregnancies increased, the IUD acceptance rate raised (p=0.002), especially between the groups with 1 and with ≥ 4 pregnancies (p=0.013). Regarding the desire to havemore children, the women who planned to have more children were more likely to refuse the method than the ones who did not (p<0,001). Conclusion Women with multiple pregnancies and desire to not have more children were more likely to accept the copper IUD. The profile of those who refused was first pregnancy and desire to have more children. Among the three most frequent reasons reported for copper IUD rejection, two responses stood out: no specific justification and desire to have more children.
id FEBRASGO-1_e7685f8c54841fb4bd6cbf6ea4e24204
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-72032022000200154
network_acronym_str FEBRASGO-1
network_name_str Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Immediate Postpartum Copper IUD: A Comparative Analysis between Profiles of Women who Accept and who Refuse itintrauterine devicescontraceptionpostpartum periodfamily planning servicescopper intrauterine deviceAbstract Objective To analyze the profiles of women who accepted and who refused the insertion of the copper intrauterine device (IUD) postpartum and to learn the motivations related to the refusal of the method. Methods Cross-sectional study with 299 pregnant women. The women were informed about the possibility of inserting a copper IUD postpartum and were questioned about their interest in adopting or not this contraceptive. All participants answered a questionnaire with information relevant to the proposals of the present study. The sample size was limited to the number of devices available for the present study. Results A total of 560 women were invited to join the present study and 299 accepted. Out of the 299 women included in the present study, 175 accepted the copper IUD and 124 refused. As the number of pregnancies increased, the IUD acceptance rate raised (p=0.002), especially between the groups with 1 and with ≥ 4 pregnancies (p=0.013). Regarding the desire to havemore children, the women who planned to have more children were more likely to refuse the method than the ones who did not (p<0,001). Conclusion Women with multiple pregnancies and desire to not have more children were more likely to accept the copper IUD. The profile of those who refused was first pregnancy and desire to have more children. Among the three most frequent reasons reported for copper IUD rejection, two responses stood out: no specific justification and desire to have more children.Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia2022-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032022000200154Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia v.44 n.2 2022reponame:Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)instname:Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)instacron:FEBRASGO10.1055/s-0041-1741452info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFerreira,Paula BatistaUtiyama,Raul YaoTamanaha,SoniaFukunaga,Erika Tiemieng2022-04-04T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-72032022000200154Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbgohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppublicações@febrasgo.org.br||rbgo@fmrp.usp.br1806-93390100-7203opendoar:2022-04-04T00:00Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) - Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Immediate Postpartum Copper IUD: A Comparative Analysis between Profiles of Women who Accept and who Refuse it
title Immediate Postpartum Copper IUD: A Comparative Analysis between Profiles of Women who Accept and who Refuse it
spellingShingle Immediate Postpartum Copper IUD: A Comparative Analysis between Profiles of Women who Accept and who Refuse it
Ferreira,Paula Batista
intrauterine devices
contraception
postpartum period
family planning services
copper intrauterine device
title_short Immediate Postpartum Copper IUD: A Comparative Analysis between Profiles of Women who Accept and who Refuse it
title_full Immediate Postpartum Copper IUD: A Comparative Analysis between Profiles of Women who Accept and who Refuse it
title_fullStr Immediate Postpartum Copper IUD: A Comparative Analysis between Profiles of Women who Accept and who Refuse it
title_full_unstemmed Immediate Postpartum Copper IUD: A Comparative Analysis between Profiles of Women who Accept and who Refuse it
title_sort Immediate Postpartum Copper IUD: A Comparative Analysis between Profiles of Women who Accept and who Refuse it
author Ferreira,Paula Batista
author_facet Ferreira,Paula Batista
Utiyama,Raul Yao
Tamanaha,Sonia
Fukunaga,Erika Tiemi
author_role author
author2 Utiyama,Raul Yao
Tamanaha,Sonia
Fukunaga,Erika Tiemi
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ferreira,Paula Batista
Utiyama,Raul Yao
Tamanaha,Sonia
Fukunaga,Erika Tiemi
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv intrauterine devices
contraception
postpartum period
family planning services
copper intrauterine device
topic intrauterine devices
contraception
postpartum period
family planning services
copper intrauterine device
description Abstract Objective To analyze the profiles of women who accepted and who refused the insertion of the copper intrauterine device (IUD) postpartum and to learn the motivations related to the refusal of the method. Methods Cross-sectional study with 299 pregnant women. The women were informed about the possibility of inserting a copper IUD postpartum and were questioned about their interest in adopting or not this contraceptive. All participants answered a questionnaire with information relevant to the proposals of the present study. The sample size was limited to the number of devices available for the present study. Results A total of 560 women were invited to join the present study and 299 accepted. Out of the 299 women included in the present study, 175 accepted the copper IUD and 124 refused. As the number of pregnancies increased, the IUD acceptance rate raised (p=0.002), especially between the groups with 1 and with ≥ 4 pregnancies (p=0.013). Regarding the desire to havemore children, the women who planned to have more children were more likely to refuse the method than the ones who did not (p<0,001). Conclusion Women with multiple pregnancies and desire to not have more children were more likely to accept the copper IUD. The profile of those who refused was first pregnancy and desire to have more children. Among the three most frequent reasons reported for copper IUD rejection, two responses stood out: no specific justification and desire to have more children.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032022000200154
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032022000200154
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1055/s-0041-1741452
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia v.44 n.2 2022
reponame:Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
instname:Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)
instacron:FEBRASGO
instname_str Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)
instacron_str FEBRASGO
institution FEBRASGO
reponame_str Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
collection Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) - Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv publicações@febrasgo.org.br||rbgo@fmrp.usp.br
_version_ 1754115945960308736