Immediate Postpartum Copper IUD: A Comparative Analysis between Profiles of Women who Accept and who Refuse it
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032022000200154 |
Resumo: | Abstract Objective To analyze the profiles of women who accepted and who refused the insertion of the copper intrauterine device (IUD) postpartum and to learn the motivations related to the refusal of the method. Methods Cross-sectional study with 299 pregnant women. The women were informed about the possibility of inserting a copper IUD postpartum and were questioned about their interest in adopting or not this contraceptive. All participants answered a questionnaire with information relevant to the proposals of the present study. The sample size was limited to the number of devices available for the present study. Results A total of 560 women were invited to join the present study and 299 accepted. Out of the 299 women included in the present study, 175 accepted the copper IUD and 124 refused. As the number of pregnancies increased, the IUD acceptance rate raised (p=0.002), especially between the groups with 1 and with ≥ 4 pregnancies (p=0.013). Regarding the desire to havemore children, the women who planned to have more children were more likely to refuse the method than the ones who did not (p<0,001). Conclusion Women with multiple pregnancies and desire to not have more children were more likely to accept the copper IUD. The profile of those who refused was first pregnancy and desire to have more children. Among the three most frequent reasons reported for copper IUD rejection, two responses stood out: no specific justification and desire to have more children. |
id |
FEBRASGO-1_e7685f8c54841fb4bd6cbf6ea4e24204 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-72032022000200154 |
network_acronym_str |
FEBRASGO-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Immediate Postpartum Copper IUD: A Comparative Analysis between Profiles of Women who Accept and who Refuse itintrauterine devicescontraceptionpostpartum periodfamily planning servicescopper intrauterine deviceAbstract Objective To analyze the profiles of women who accepted and who refused the insertion of the copper intrauterine device (IUD) postpartum and to learn the motivations related to the refusal of the method. Methods Cross-sectional study with 299 pregnant women. The women were informed about the possibility of inserting a copper IUD postpartum and were questioned about their interest in adopting or not this contraceptive. All participants answered a questionnaire with information relevant to the proposals of the present study. The sample size was limited to the number of devices available for the present study. Results A total of 560 women were invited to join the present study and 299 accepted. Out of the 299 women included in the present study, 175 accepted the copper IUD and 124 refused. As the number of pregnancies increased, the IUD acceptance rate raised (p=0.002), especially between the groups with 1 and with ≥ 4 pregnancies (p=0.013). Regarding the desire to havemore children, the women who planned to have more children were more likely to refuse the method than the ones who did not (p<0,001). Conclusion Women with multiple pregnancies and desire to not have more children were more likely to accept the copper IUD. The profile of those who refused was first pregnancy and desire to have more children. Among the three most frequent reasons reported for copper IUD rejection, two responses stood out: no specific justification and desire to have more children.Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia2022-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032022000200154Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia v.44 n.2 2022reponame:Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)instname:Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)instacron:FEBRASGO10.1055/s-0041-1741452info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFerreira,Paula BatistaUtiyama,Raul YaoTamanaha,SoniaFukunaga,Erika Tiemieng2022-04-04T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-72032022000200154Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbgohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppublicações@febrasgo.org.br||rbgo@fmrp.usp.br1806-93390100-7203opendoar:2022-04-04T00:00Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) - Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Immediate Postpartum Copper IUD: A Comparative Analysis between Profiles of Women who Accept and who Refuse it |
title |
Immediate Postpartum Copper IUD: A Comparative Analysis between Profiles of Women who Accept and who Refuse it |
spellingShingle |
Immediate Postpartum Copper IUD: A Comparative Analysis between Profiles of Women who Accept and who Refuse it Ferreira,Paula Batista intrauterine devices contraception postpartum period family planning services copper intrauterine device |
title_short |
Immediate Postpartum Copper IUD: A Comparative Analysis between Profiles of Women who Accept and who Refuse it |
title_full |
Immediate Postpartum Copper IUD: A Comparative Analysis between Profiles of Women who Accept and who Refuse it |
title_fullStr |
Immediate Postpartum Copper IUD: A Comparative Analysis between Profiles of Women who Accept and who Refuse it |
title_full_unstemmed |
Immediate Postpartum Copper IUD: A Comparative Analysis between Profiles of Women who Accept and who Refuse it |
title_sort |
Immediate Postpartum Copper IUD: A Comparative Analysis between Profiles of Women who Accept and who Refuse it |
author |
Ferreira,Paula Batista |
author_facet |
Ferreira,Paula Batista Utiyama,Raul Yao Tamanaha,Sonia Fukunaga,Erika Tiemi |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Utiyama,Raul Yao Tamanaha,Sonia Fukunaga,Erika Tiemi |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ferreira,Paula Batista Utiyama,Raul Yao Tamanaha,Sonia Fukunaga,Erika Tiemi |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
intrauterine devices contraception postpartum period family planning services copper intrauterine device |
topic |
intrauterine devices contraception postpartum period family planning services copper intrauterine device |
description |
Abstract Objective To analyze the profiles of women who accepted and who refused the insertion of the copper intrauterine device (IUD) postpartum and to learn the motivations related to the refusal of the method. Methods Cross-sectional study with 299 pregnant women. The women were informed about the possibility of inserting a copper IUD postpartum and were questioned about their interest in adopting or not this contraceptive. All participants answered a questionnaire with information relevant to the proposals of the present study. The sample size was limited to the number of devices available for the present study. Results A total of 560 women were invited to join the present study and 299 accepted. Out of the 299 women included in the present study, 175 accepted the copper IUD and 124 refused. As the number of pregnancies increased, the IUD acceptance rate raised (p=0.002), especially between the groups with 1 and with ≥ 4 pregnancies (p=0.013). Regarding the desire to havemore children, the women who planned to have more children were more likely to refuse the method than the ones who did not (p<0,001). Conclusion Women with multiple pregnancies and desire to not have more children were more likely to accept the copper IUD. The profile of those who refused was first pregnancy and desire to have more children. Among the three most frequent reasons reported for copper IUD rejection, two responses stood out: no specific justification and desire to have more children. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-02-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032022000200154 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032022000200154 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1055/s-0041-1741452 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia v.44 n.2 2022 reponame:Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) instname:Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO) instacron:FEBRASGO |
instname_str |
Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO) |
instacron_str |
FEBRASGO |
institution |
FEBRASGO |
reponame_str |
Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) |
collection |
Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) - Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
publicações@febrasgo.org.br||rbgo@fmrp.usp.br |
_version_ |
1754115945960308736 |