Perineal Lacerations: A Retrospective Study in a Habitual-Risk Public Maternity

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Domenighi,Lauro Henrique Heinsch
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Weinmann,Angela Regina Maciel, Haeffner,Leris Salete Bonfanti, Feltrin,Marcelo Lorensi
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032021000800588
Resumo: Abstract Objective In around 85% of vaginal births, the parturients undergo perineal lacerations and/or episiotomy. The present study aimed to determine the incidence of lacerations and episiotomies among parturients in 2018 in a habitual-risk public maternity hospital in southern Brazil, and to determine the risk and protective factors for such events. Methodology A retrospective cross-sectional study. Data were obtained from medical records and analyzed using the Stata software. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed. Values of p<0.05 were considered significant. Results In 2018, there were 525 vaginal births, 27.8% of which were attended by obstetricians, 70.7% by obstetric nurses, and 1.5% evolved without assistance. Overall, 55.2% of the parturients had some degree of laceration. The professional who attended the birth was a significant variable: a greater number of first- and second-degree lacerations, as well as more severe cases, occurred in births attended by nurses (odds ratio [OR]: 2,95; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1,74 to 5,03). Positions at birth that did not enable perineal protection techniques (expulsive period with the “hands-off” method), when analyzed in isolation, determined the risk; however, in the final regression model, this relationship was not confirmed. Although reported in the literature, there were no associations between the occurrence of laceration and age, skin color, or birth weight. In 24% of the births, episiotomy was performed, and doctors performed 63.5% of them. Conclusion Births attended by nurses resulted in an increased risk of perineal lacerations, of varying degrees. In turn, those assisted by physicians had a higher occurrence of episiotomy.
id FEBRASGO-1_f1ca59a7995d5950c5a74b25ed9775b8
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-72032021000800588
network_acronym_str FEBRASGO-1
network_name_str Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Perineal Lacerations: A Retrospective Study in a Habitual-Risk Public Maternityperineal lacerationepisiotomyobstetrician doctorobstetrician nursehands offAbstract Objective In around 85% of vaginal births, the parturients undergo perineal lacerations and/or episiotomy. The present study aimed to determine the incidence of lacerations and episiotomies among parturients in 2018 in a habitual-risk public maternity hospital in southern Brazil, and to determine the risk and protective factors for such events. Methodology A retrospective cross-sectional study. Data were obtained from medical records and analyzed using the Stata software. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed. Values of p<0.05 were considered significant. Results In 2018, there were 525 vaginal births, 27.8% of which were attended by obstetricians, 70.7% by obstetric nurses, and 1.5% evolved without assistance. Overall, 55.2% of the parturients had some degree of laceration. The professional who attended the birth was a significant variable: a greater number of first- and second-degree lacerations, as well as more severe cases, occurred in births attended by nurses (odds ratio [OR]: 2,95; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1,74 to 5,03). Positions at birth that did not enable perineal protection techniques (expulsive period with the “hands-off” method), when analyzed in isolation, determined the risk; however, in the final regression model, this relationship was not confirmed. Although reported in the literature, there were no associations between the occurrence of laceration and age, skin color, or birth weight. In 24% of the births, episiotomy was performed, and doctors performed 63.5% of them. Conclusion Births attended by nurses resulted in an increased risk of perineal lacerations, of varying degrees. In turn, those assisted by physicians had a higher occurrence of episiotomy.Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032021000800588Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia v.43 n.8 2021reponame:Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)instname:Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)instacron:FEBRASGO10.1055/s-0041-1735227info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDomenighi,Lauro Henrique HeinschWeinmann,Angela Regina MacielHaeffner,Leris Salete BonfantiFeltrin,Marcelo Lorensieng2021-11-12T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-72032021000800588Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbgohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppublicações@febrasgo.org.br||rbgo@fmrp.usp.br1806-93390100-7203opendoar:2021-11-12T00:00Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) - Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Perineal Lacerations: A Retrospective Study in a Habitual-Risk Public Maternity
title Perineal Lacerations: A Retrospective Study in a Habitual-Risk Public Maternity
spellingShingle Perineal Lacerations: A Retrospective Study in a Habitual-Risk Public Maternity
Domenighi,Lauro Henrique Heinsch
perineal laceration
episiotomy
obstetrician doctor
obstetrician nurse
hands off
title_short Perineal Lacerations: A Retrospective Study in a Habitual-Risk Public Maternity
title_full Perineal Lacerations: A Retrospective Study in a Habitual-Risk Public Maternity
title_fullStr Perineal Lacerations: A Retrospective Study in a Habitual-Risk Public Maternity
title_full_unstemmed Perineal Lacerations: A Retrospective Study in a Habitual-Risk Public Maternity
title_sort Perineal Lacerations: A Retrospective Study in a Habitual-Risk Public Maternity
author Domenighi,Lauro Henrique Heinsch
author_facet Domenighi,Lauro Henrique Heinsch
Weinmann,Angela Regina Maciel
Haeffner,Leris Salete Bonfanti
Feltrin,Marcelo Lorensi
author_role author
author2 Weinmann,Angela Regina Maciel
Haeffner,Leris Salete Bonfanti
Feltrin,Marcelo Lorensi
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Domenighi,Lauro Henrique Heinsch
Weinmann,Angela Regina Maciel
Haeffner,Leris Salete Bonfanti
Feltrin,Marcelo Lorensi
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv perineal laceration
episiotomy
obstetrician doctor
obstetrician nurse
hands off
topic perineal laceration
episiotomy
obstetrician doctor
obstetrician nurse
hands off
description Abstract Objective In around 85% of vaginal births, the parturients undergo perineal lacerations and/or episiotomy. The present study aimed to determine the incidence of lacerations and episiotomies among parturients in 2018 in a habitual-risk public maternity hospital in southern Brazil, and to determine the risk and protective factors for such events. Methodology A retrospective cross-sectional study. Data were obtained from medical records and analyzed using the Stata software. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed. Values of p<0.05 were considered significant. Results In 2018, there were 525 vaginal births, 27.8% of which were attended by obstetricians, 70.7% by obstetric nurses, and 1.5% evolved without assistance. Overall, 55.2% of the parturients had some degree of laceration. The professional who attended the birth was a significant variable: a greater number of first- and second-degree lacerations, as well as more severe cases, occurred in births attended by nurses (odds ratio [OR]: 2,95; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1,74 to 5,03). Positions at birth that did not enable perineal protection techniques (expulsive period with the “hands-off” method), when analyzed in isolation, determined the risk; however, in the final regression model, this relationship was not confirmed. Although reported in the literature, there were no associations between the occurrence of laceration and age, skin color, or birth weight. In 24% of the births, episiotomy was performed, and doctors performed 63.5% of them. Conclusion Births attended by nurses resulted in an increased risk of perineal lacerations, of varying degrees. In turn, those assisted by physicians had a higher occurrence of episiotomy.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032021000800588
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032021000800588
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1055/s-0041-1735227
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia v.43 n.8 2021
reponame:Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
instname:Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)
instacron:FEBRASGO
instname_str Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)
instacron_str FEBRASGO
institution FEBRASGO
reponame_str Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
collection Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia (Online) - Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv publicações@febrasgo.org.br||rbgo@fmrp.usp.br
_version_ 1754115945828188160