Organizational Survival of Technology-Based Companies after Incubation: A Qualitative Comparative Explanation
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/4247 |
Resumo: | Objective – Analyze the configurations of legitimacy, dynamic capabilities and business resources consistent with the survival of post-incubated companies.Theoretical framework – A Liability of Newness highlights that nascent companies suffer from internal and external factors that make their survival difficult. However, business incubators help new businesses develop. However, post-incubated companies need strategic guidance for survival. Thus, we intend to demonstrate how different configurations between legitimacy, dynamic capabilities and resources can form this strategy.Methodology – The multiple case study strategy was applied with 90 companies and comparative qualitative analysis techniques for fuzzy sets (fsQCA) were used.Results – The results present two configurations of technology-based companies with high perceptions of legitimacy, resources and dynamic capabilities that differ by size and satisfaction. A third configuration of technology-based companies with high perceptions of legitimacy and resources. The fourth configuration involves technology-based companies with high perceptions of legitimacy, larger in size and satisfied with the incubator.Practical and social implications of the research – For managers, the results make it possible to create an incubation environment that is capable of identifying and filling individual gaps in ventures. Furthermore, they indicate that business incubator managers and/or financiers should focus their efforts on incubating technology-based companies.Contributions – The first contribution is to reinforce the central role of legitimacy for survival. The second is to demonstrate that, through different paths, the interrelationship between legitimacy, resources and dynamic capabilities form organizational configurations that are resilient to challenges.Keywords – Initial vulnerability; Business configuration; Post-incubation; Organizational survival; FsQCA. |
id |
FECAP-3_1eb5cd865fef7bafce49a9748fda5f35 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/4247 |
network_acronym_str |
FECAP-3 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Organizational Survival of Technology-Based Companies after Incubation: A Qualitative Comparative ExplanationSobrevivência Organizacional de Empresas de Base Tecnológica após a Incubação: Uma Explicação Comparativa QualitativaLiability of newnessenterprise configurationpost-incubationorganizational survivalfsQCAResponsabilidade de novidadeconfiguração empresarialpós-incubaçãosobrevivência organizacionalfsQCAObjective – Analyze the configurations of legitimacy, dynamic capabilities and business resources consistent with the survival of post-incubated companies.Theoretical framework – A Liability of Newness highlights that nascent companies suffer from internal and external factors that make their survival difficult. However, business incubators help new businesses develop. However, post-incubated companies need strategic guidance for survival. Thus, we intend to demonstrate how different configurations between legitimacy, dynamic capabilities and resources can form this strategy.Methodology – The multiple case study strategy was applied with 90 companies and comparative qualitative analysis techniques for fuzzy sets (fsQCA) were used.Results – The results present two configurations of technology-based companies with high perceptions of legitimacy, resources and dynamic capabilities that differ by size and satisfaction. A third configuration of technology-based companies with high perceptions of legitimacy and resources. The fourth configuration involves technology-based companies with high perceptions of legitimacy, larger in size and satisfied with the incubator.Practical and social implications of the research – For managers, the results make it possible to create an incubation environment that is capable of identifying and filling individual gaps in ventures. Furthermore, they indicate that business incubator managers and/or financiers should focus their efforts on incubating technology-based companies.Contributions – The first contribution is to reinforce the central role of legitimacy for survival. The second is to demonstrate that, through different paths, the interrelationship between legitimacy, resources and dynamic capabilities form organizational configurations that are resilient to challenges.Keywords – Initial vulnerability; Business configuration; Post-incubation; Organizational survival; FsQCA.Objetivo – Analisar as configurações de legitimidade, capacidades dinâmicas e recursos empresariais consistentes com a sobrevivência de empresas pós-incubadas.Referencial teórico – A Liability of Newness destaca que empresas nascentes sofrem com fatores internos e externos que dificultam sua sobrevivência. Porém, as incubadoras de empresas auxiliam a desenvolverem os negócios nascentes. Entretanto, as empresas pós-incubadas necessitam de uma orientação estratégica para a sobrevivência. Assim, pretende-se demonstrar como diferentes configurações entre legitimidade, capacidades dinâmicas e recursos podem formar essa estratégia.Metodologia – Aplicou-se a estratégia de estudo de casos múltiplos com 90 empresas e empregou-se as técnicas de análise qualitativa comparativa para conjuntos fuzzy (fsQCA).Resultados – Os resultados apresentam duas configurações de empresas de base tecnológica com altas percepções de legitimidade, recursos e capacidades dinâmicas que se diferenciam pelo tamanho e satisfação. Uma terceira configuração de empresas de base tecnológica com altas percepções de legitimidade e recursos. A quarta configuração, envolve empresas de base tecnológicas com altas percepções de legitimidade, de um tamanho maior e satisfeitas com a incubadora.Implicações práticas e sociais da pesquisa – Para os gestores, os resultados possibilitam criar um ambiente de incubação que sejam capazes de identificar e preencher as lacunas individuais dos empreendimentos. Além do mais, indicam que os gestores e/ou financiadores de incubadora de empresas devem focar seus esforços na incubação de empresas de base tecnológica.Contribuições – A primeira contribuição é reforçar o papel central da legitimidade para a sobrevivência. A segunda é demonstram que, por diferentes caminhos, o inter-relacionamento entre legitimidade, recursos e capacidades dinâmicas formam configurações organizacionais resilientes aos desafios.Palavras-chave – Vulnerabilidade inicial; Configuração empresarial; Pós-incubação; Sobrevivência organizacional; FsQCA.FECAP2023-12-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por paresapplication/pdfhttps://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/424710.7819/rbgn.v25i4.4247Review of Business Management; Vol. 25 No. 4 (2023): RBGN Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios; Vol. 25 Núm. 4 (2023): RBGN - Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios; v. 25 n. 4 (2023): 1983-08071806-4892reponame:Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online)instname:Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP)instacron:FECAPenghttps://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/4247/1941Copyright (c) 2023 Review of Business Managementinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPeron de Paula, PabloDenner dos Santos Junior, CarlosFróes Couto, Felipe2023-12-12T19:39:43Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/4247Revistahttp://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/indexhttps://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/oai||jmauricio@fecap.br1983-08071806-4892opendoar:2023-12-12T19:39:43Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) - Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Organizational Survival of Technology-Based Companies after Incubation: A Qualitative Comparative Explanation Sobrevivência Organizacional de Empresas de Base Tecnológica após a Incubação: Uma Explicação Comparativa Qualitativa |
title |
Organizational Survival of Technology-Based Companies after Incubation: A Qualitative Comparative Explanation |
spellingShingle |
Organizational Survival of Technology-Based Companies after Incubation: A Qualitative Comparative Explanation Peron de Paula, Pablo Liability of newness enterprise configuration post-incubation organizational survival fsQCA Responsabilidade de novidade configuração empresarial pós-incubação sobrevivência organizacional fsQCA |
title_short |
Organizational Survival of Technology-Based Companies after Incubation: A Qualitative Comparative Explanation |
title_full |
Organizational Survival of Technology-Based Companies after Incubation: A Qualitative Comparative Explanation |
title_fullStr |
Organizational Survival of Technology-Based Companies after Incubation: A Qualitative Comparative Explanation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Organizational Survival of Technology-Based Companies after Incubation: A Qualitative Comparative Explanation |
title_sort |
Organizational Survival of Technology-Based Companies after Incubation: A Qualitative Comparative Explanation |
author |
Peron de Paula, Pablo |
author_facet |
Peron de Paula, Pablo Denner dos Santos Junior, Carlos Fróes Couto, Felipe |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Denner dos Santos Junior, Carlos Fróes Couto, Felipe |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Peron de Paula, Pablo Denner dos Santos Junior, Carlos Fróes Couto, Felipe |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Liability of newness enterprise configuration post-incubation organizational survival fsQCA Responsabilidade de novidade configuração empresarial pós-incubação sobrevivência organizacional fsQCA |
topic |
Liability of newness enterprise configuration post-incubation organizational survival fsQCA Responsabilidade de novidade configuração empresarial pós-incubação sobrevivência organizacional fsQCA |
description |
Objective – Analyze the configurations of legitimacy, dynamic capabilities and business resources consistent with the survival of post-incubated companies.Theoretical framework – A Liability of Newness highlights that nascent companies suffer from internal and external factors that make their survival difficult. However, business incubators help new businesses develop. However, post-incubated companies need strategic guidance for survival. Thus, we intend to demonstrate how different configurations between legitimacy, dynamic capabilities and resources can form this strategy.Methodology – The multiple case study strategy was applied with 90 companies and comparative qualitative analysis techniques for fuzzy sets (fsQCA) were used.Results – The results present two configurations of technology-based companies with high perceptions of legitimacy, resources and dynamic capabilities that differ by size and satisfaction. A third configuration of technology-based companies with high perceptions of legitimacy and resources. The fourth configuration involves technology-based companies with high perceptions of legitimacy, larger in size and satisfied with the incubator.Practical and social implications of the research – For managers, the results make it possible to create an incubation environment that is capable of identifying and filling individual gaps in ventures. Furthermore, they indicate that business incubator managers and/or financiers should focus their efforts on incubating technology-based companies.Contributions – The first contribution is to reinforce the central role of legitimacy for survival. The second is to demonstrate that, through different paths, the interrelationship between legitimacy, resources and dynamic capabilities form organizational configurations that are resilient to challenges.Keywords – Initial vulnerability; Business configuration; Post-incubation; Organizational survival; FsQCA. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-12-12 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/4247 10.7819/rbgn.v25i4.4247 |
url |
https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/4247 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.7819/rbgn.v25i4.4247 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/4247/1941 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Review of Business Management info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Review of Business Management |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
FECAP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
FECAP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Review of Business Management; Vol. 25 No. 4 (2023): RBGN Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios; Vol. 25 Núm. 4 (2023): RBGN - Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios; v. 25 n. 4 (2023): 1983-0807 1806-4892 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) instname:Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP) instacron:FECAP |
instname_str |
Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP) |
instacron_str |
FECAP |
institution |
FECAP |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) - Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||jmauricio@fecap.br |
_version_ |
1798942371076898816 |