Social Boycott

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cruz, Breno de Paula Andrade
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online)
Texto Completo: https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/2868
Resumo: Purpose – Based on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) aspects,Social Boycott is presented in this paper as an amplification of theLabor Boycott concept.Design/methodology/approach – A statistical experiment with 240individuals has been carried out, so that it could verify if consumers’perceptions related to the Management Context of Corporate SocialResponsibility (MCCSR) of the fictitious Alpha company hasconsiderable impact on the variable Boycott Efficacy (BE), and on theBoycott Intention (BI). The ANOVA has been used to show causeeffectvariable relationship.Findings – MCCSR impacts on BE (H1) and BI (H2). Thus, the SocialConsumer’s boycott motivation is driven by the perception of the levelof CSR management orientation a company has (anti-corruptioninternal measures, organizational climate, labor conditions and wastemanagement during production process). While Labor Boycottrestricts its analysis to labor conditions, the concept of Social Boycottincorporates all CSR aspects.Originality/value – This study presents Social Boycott definition andits insertion on consumer boycott literature - types of boycott andboycott motivations (ideological dimension). Thus, tangential analysissuch as experiential dimension and a theoretical political boycott gapare discussed.
id FECAP-3_77b1939a3a2ffd55d8adee52dc196b87
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/2868
network_acronym_str FECAP-3
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Social BoycottBoicote SocialSocial Boycott. Types of Boycott. Consumer Boycott.BusinessBoicote Social. Tipos de Boicote. Boicote do Consumidor.Purpose – Based on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) aspects,Social Boycott is presented in this paper as an amplification of theLabor Boycott concept.Design/methodology/approach – A statistical experiment with 240individuals has been carried out, so that it could verify if consumers’perceptions related to the Management Context of Corporate SocialResponsibility (MCCSR) of the fictitious Alpha company hasconsiderable impact on the variable Boycott Efficacy (BE), and on theBoycott Intention (BI). The ANOVA has been used to show causeeffectvariable relationship.Findings – MCCSR impacts on BE (H1) and BI (H2). Thus, the SocialConsumer’s boycott motivation is driven by the perception of the levelof CSR management orientation a company has (anti-corruptioninternal measures, organizational climate, labor conditions and wastemanagement during production process). While Labor Boycottrestricts its analysis to labor conditions, the concept of Social Boycottincorporates all CSR aspects.Originality/value – This study presents Social Boycott definition andits insertion on consumer boycott literature - types of boycott andboycott motivations (ideological dimension). Thus, tangential analysissuch as experiential dimension and a theoretical political boycott gapare discussed.Objetivo – Apresentar o conceito de Boicote Social como umaampliação do conceito de Labor Boycott, incorporando, assim, situaçõesou contextos relacionados à Responsabilidade Social Corporativa(RSC).Metodologia – Um experimento com 240 indivíduos foi conduzidopara verificar se características relacionadas à RSC impactam noboicote. Para isso, dois vídeos foram construídos simulando a atuaçãoda empresa fictícia Alfa. Posteriormente, os vídeos foram apresentadosao grupo de controle (com RSC) e ao grupo manipulado (sem RSC).As variáveis dependentes foram Eficácia do Boicote (EB) e Intençãode Boicotar (IB), sendo Contexto Gerencial de RSC da Empresa(CGRSCE) a variável independente. Os dados paramétricos permitiramo uso da Anova.Resultados – Confirma-se o impacto de CGRSCE em EB (H1) e emIB (H2). Assim, o consumidor considera em seu processo de decisão decompra (boicote) características relacionadas à RSC, como corrupção,clima organizacional do trabalhador da empresa e os impactos daatuação da empresa no meio ambiente e na sociedade. Dessa maneira,o conceito de Boicote Social é mais amplo e atual que Labor Boycott.Contribuições – A investigação apresenta a definição de Boicote Social,a sua inserção como um tipo de boicote não discutido na literaturae o seu alinhamento à dimensão ideológica (assim como os boicotesreligiosos, ecológicos e de minorias), além de outras contribuiçõestangenciais a partir da revisão de literatura.FECAP2017-02-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por paresapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/286810.7819/rbgn.v0i0.2868Review of Business Management; Vol. 19 No. 63 (2017); 5-29RBGN Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios; Vol. 19 Núm. 63 (2017); 5-29RBGN - Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios; v. 19 n. 63 (2017); 5-291983-08071806-4892reponame:Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online)instname:Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP)instacron:FECAPengporhttps://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/2868/pdfhttps://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/2868/pdf_1Copyright (c) 2016 Review of Business Managementinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCruz, Breno de Paula Andrade2021-07-21T16:24:20Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/2868Revistahttp://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/indexhttps://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/oai||jmauricio@fecap.br1983-08071806-4892opendoar:2024-03-06T13:03:42.476846Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) - Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Social Boycott
Boicote Social
title Social Boycott
spellingShingle Social Boycott
Cruz, Breno de Paula Andrade
Social Boycott. Types of Boycott. Consumer Boycott.
Business
Boicote Social. Tipos de Boicote. Boicote do Consumidor.
title_short Social Boycott
title_full Social Boycott
title_fullStr Social Boycott
title_full_unstemmed Social Boycott
title_sort Social Boycott
author Cruz, Breno de Paula Andrade
author_facet Cruz, Breno de Paula Andrade
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cruz, Breno de Paula Andrade
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Social Boycott. Types of Boycott. Consumer Boycott.
Business
Boicote Social. Tipos de Boicote. Boicote do Consumidor.
topic Social Boycott. Types of Boycott. Consumer Boycott.
Business
Boicote Social. Tipos de Boicote. Boicote do Consumidor.
description Purpose – Based on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) aspects,Social Boycott is presented in this paper as an amplification of theLabor Boycott concept.Design/methodology/approach – A statistical experiment with 240individuals has been carried out, so that it could verify if consumers’perceptions related to the Management Context of Corporate SocialResponsibility (MCCSR) of the fictitious Alpha company hasconsiderable impact on the variable Boycott Efficacy (BE), and on theBoycott Intention (BI). The ANOVA has been used to show causeeffectvariable relationship.Findings – MCCSR impacts on BE (H1) and BI (H2). Thus, the SocialConsumer’s boycott motivation is driven by the perception of the levelof CSR management orientation a company has (anti-corruptioninternal measures, organizational climate, labor conditions and wastemanagement during production process). While Labor Boycottrestricts its analysis to labor conditions, the concept of Social Boycottincorporates all CSR aspects.Originality/value – This study presents Social Boycott definition andits insertion on consumer boycott literature - types of boycott andboycott motivations (ideological dimension). Thus, tangential analysissuch as experiential dimension and a theoretical political boycott gapare discussed.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-02-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/2868
10.7819/rbgn.v0i0.2868
url https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/2868
identifier_str_mv 10.7819/rbgn.v0i0.2868
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
language eng
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/2868/pdf
https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/2868/pdf_1
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Review of Business Management
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Review of Business Management
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv FECAP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv FECAP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Review of Business Management; Vol. 19 No. 63 (2017); 5-29
RBGN Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios; Vol. 19 Núm. 63 (2017); 5-29
RBGN - Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios; v. 19 n. 63 (2017); 5-29
1983-0807
1806-4892
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online)
instname:Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP)
instacron:FECAP
instname_str Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP)
instacron_str FECAP
institution FECAP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios (Online) - Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado (FECAP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jmauricio@fecap.br
_version_ 1816702455121969152