Replacement of fluorspar in the desulfurization of hot metal

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Moreira,Arthur Silva Bahiense
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Silva,Carlos Antônio, Silva,Itavahn Alves
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: REM - International Engineering Journal
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2448-167X2018000200261
Resumo: Abstract In the steel industry, lime is used as a desulfurizing agent and fluorspar as flux in the hot metal desulfurization process. However there are environmental concerns regarding the use of fluorspar, even when its harmful effects are not fully known. In order to reduce such risks and also to anticipate possible future restrictions, which could undermine the sustainability of steel production, it is proposed to replace the fluorspar for alternative materials in the composition of the desulfurizing lime based mixture. For this purpose new mixtures using aluminum dross, ilmenite, sodalite and ulexite were tested, comparing them with a reference mixture containing fluorspar. The impact of these mixtures on the refractories commonly used in hot metal pretreatment was also checked, since this is an important cost parameter for the steel industries. The laboratory tests showed ulexite as a feasible substitute since the lime (84.03%) - ulexite (10.97%) - graphite (5%) mixture presented the highest desulfurization ratio and low refractory wear (less than the standard fluorspar mixture). The sodalite mixture was the worst by comparison. The ilmenite and aluminum dross mixtures showed similar behavior when compared to the fluorspar mixture.
id FG-1_6f101a453c6500ceb14d91c6b236d40e
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2448-167X2018000200261
network_acronym_str FG-1
network_name_str REM - International Engineering Journal
repository_id_str
spelling Replacement of fluorspar in the desulfurization of hot metalfluorsparreplacementdesulfurizationAbstract In the steel industry, lime is used as a desulfurizing agent and fluorspar as flux in the hot metal desulfurization process. However there are environmental concerns regarding the use of fluorspar, even when its harmful effects are not fully known. In order to reduce such risks and also to anticipate possible future restrictions, which could undermine the sustainability of steel production, it is proposed to replace the fluorspar for alternative materials in the composition of the desulfurizing lime based mixture. For this purpose new mixtures using aluminum dross, ilmenite, sodalite and ulexite were tested, comparing them with a reference mixture containing fluorspar. The impact of these mixtures on the refractories commonly used in hot metal pretreatment was also checked, since this is an important cost parameter for the steel industries. The laboratory tests showed ulexite as a feasible substitute since the lime (84.03%) - ulexite (10.97%) - graphite (5%) mixture presented the highest desulfurization ratio and low refractory wear (less than the standard fluorspar mixture). The sodalite mixture was the worst by comparison. The ilmenite and aluminum dross mixtures showed similar behavior when compared to the fluorspar mixture.Fundação Gorceix2018-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2448-167X2018000200261REM - International Engineering Journal v.71 n.2 2018reponame:REM - International Engineering Journalinstname:Fundação Gorceix (FG)instacron:FG10.1590/0370-44672017710039info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoreira,Arthur Silva BahienseSilva,Carlos AntônioSilva,Itavahn Alveseng2018-04-09T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2448-167X2018000200261Revistahttps://www.rem.com.br/?lang=pt-brPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||editor@rem.com.br2448-167X2448-167Xopendoar:2018-04-09T00:00REM - International Engineering Journal - Fundação Gorceix (FG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Replacement of fluorspar in the desulfurization of hot metal
title Replacement of fluorspar in the desulfurization of hot metal
spellingShingle Replacement of fluorspar in the desulfurization of hot metal
Moreira,Arthur Silva Bahiense
fluorspar
replacement
desulfurization
title_short Replacement of fluorspar in the desulfurization of hot metal
title_full Replacement of fluorspar in the desulfurization of hot metal
title_fullStr Replacement of fluorspar in the desulfurization of hot metal
title_full_unstemmed Replacement of fluorspar in the desulfurization of hot metal
title_sort Replacement of fluorspar in the desulfurization of hot metal
author Moreira,Arthur Silva Bahiense
author_facet Moreira,Arthur Silva Bahiense
Silva,Carlos Antônio
Silva,Itavahn Alves
author_role author
author2 Silva,Carlos Antônio
Silva,Itavahn Alves
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Moreira,Arthur Silva Bahiense
Silva,Carlos Antônio
Silva,Itavahn Alves
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv fluorspar
replacement
desulfurization
topic fluorspar
replacement
desulfurization
description Abstract In the steel industry, lime is used as a desulfurizing agent and fluorspar as flux in the hot metal desulfurization process. However there are environmental concerns regarding the use of fluorspar, even when its harmful effects are not fully known. In order to reduce such risks and also to anticipate possible future restrictions, which could undermine the sustainability of steel production, it is proposed to replace the fluorspar for alternative materials in the composition of the desulfurizing lime based mixture. For this purpose new mixtures using aluminum dross, ilmenite, sodalite and ulexite were tested, comparing them with a reference mixture containing fluorspar. The impact of these mixtures on the refractories commonly used in hot metal pretreatment was also checked, since this is an important cost parameter for the steel industries. The laboratory tests showed ulexite as a feasible substitute since the lime (84.03%) - ulexite (10.97%) - graphite (5%) mixture presented the highest desulfurization ratio and low refractory wear (less than the standard fluorspar mixture). The sodalite mixture was the worst by comparison. The ilmenite and aluminum dross mixtures showed similar behavior when compared to the fluorspar mixture.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2448-167X2018000200261
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2448-167X2018000200261
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0370-44672017710039
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Gorceix
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Gorceix
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv REM - International Engineering Journal v.71 n.2 2018
reponame:REM - International Engineering Journal
instname:Fundação Gorceix (FG)
instacron:FG
instname_str Fundação Gorceix (FG)
instacron_str FG
institution FG
reponame_str REM - International Engineering Journal
collection REM - International Engineering Journal
repository.name.fl_str_mv REM - International Engineering Journal - Fundação Gorceix (FG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||editor@rem.com.br
_version_ 1754734690944679936