Replacement of fluorspar in the desulfurization of hot metal
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | REM - International Engineering Journal |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2448-167X2018000200261 |
Resumo: | Abstract In the steel industry, lime is used as a desulfurizing agent and fluorspar as flux in the hot metal desulfurization process. However there are environmental concerns regarding the use of fluorspar, even when its harmful effects are not fully known. In order to reduce such risks and also to anticipate possible future restrictions, which could undermine the sustainability of steel production, it is proposed to replace the fluorspar for alternative materials in the composition of the desulfurizing lime based mixture. For this purpose new mixtures using aluminum dross, ilmenite, sodalite and ulexite were tested, comparing them with a reference mixture containing fluorspar. The impact of these mixtures on the refractories commonly used in hot metal pretreatment was also checked, since this is an important cost parameter for the steel industries. The laboratory tests showed ulexite as a feasible substitute since the lime (84.03%) - ulexite (10.97%) - graphite (5%) mixture presented the highest desulfurization ratio and low refractory wear (less than the standard fluorspar mixture). The sodalite mixture was the worst by comparison. The ilmenite and aluminum dross mixtures showed similar behavior when compared to the fluorspar mixture. |
id |
FG-1_6f101a453c6500ceb14d91c6b236d40e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S2448-167X2018000200261 |
network_acronym_str |
FG-1 |
network_name_str |
REM - International Engineering Journal |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Replacement of fluorspar in the desulfurization of hot metalfluorsparreplacementdesulfurizationAbstract In the steel industry, lime is used as a desulfurizing agent and fluorspar as flux in the hot metal desulfurization process. However there are environmental concerns regarding the use of fluorspar, even when its harmful effects are not fully known. In order to reduce such risks and also to anticipate possible future restrictions, which could undermine the sustainability of steel production, it is proposed to replace the fluorspar for alternative materials in the composition of the desulfurizing lime based mixture. For this purpose new mixtures using aluminum dross, ilmenite, sodalite and ulexite were tested, comparing them with a reference mixture containing fluorspar. The impact of these mixtures on the refractories commonly used in hot metal pretreatment was also checked, since this is an important cost parameter for the steel industries. The laboratory tests showed ulexite as a feasible substitute since the lime (84.03%) - ulexite (10.97%) - graphite (5%) mixture presented the highest desulfurization ratio and low refractory wear (less than the standard fluorspar mixture). The sodalite mixture was the worst by comparison. The ilmenite and aluminum dross mixtures showed similar behavior when compared to the fluorspar mixture.Fundação Gorceix2018-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2448-167X2018000200261REM - International Engineering Journal v.71 n.2 2018reponame:REM - International Engineering Journalinstname:Fundação Gorceix (FG)instacron:FG10.1590/0370-44672017710039info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoreira,Arthur Silva BahienseSilva,Carlos AntônioSilva,Itavahn Alveseng2018-04-09T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2448-167X2018000200261Revistahttps://www.rem.com.br/?lang=pt-brPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||editor@rem.com.br2448-167X2448-167Xopendoar:2018-04-09T00:00REM - International Engineering Journal - Fundação Gorceix (FG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Replacement of fluorspar in the desulfurization of hot metal |
title |
Replacement of fluorspar in the desulfurization of hot metal |
spellingShingle |
Replacement of fluorspar in the desulfurization of hot metal Moreira,Arthur Silva Bahiense fluorspar replacement desulfurization |
title_short |
Replacement of fluorspar in the desulfurization of hot metal |
title_full |
Replacement of fluorspar in the desulfurization of hot metal |
title_fullStr |
Replacement of fluorspar in the desulfurization of hot metal |
title_full_unstemmed |
Replacement of fluorspar in the desulfurization of hot metal |
title_sort |
Replacement of fluorspar in the desulfurization of hot metal |
author |
Moreira,Arthur Silva Bahiense |
author_facet |
Moreira,Arthur Silva Bahiense Silva,Carlos Antônio Silva,Itavahn Alves |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva,Carlos Antônio Silva,Itavahn Alves |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Moreira,Arthur Silva Bahiense Silva,Carlos Antônio Silva,Itavahn Alves |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
fluorspar replacement desulfurization |
topic |
fluorspar replacement desulfurization |
description |
Abstract In the steel industry, lime is used as a desulfurizing agent and fluorspar as flux in the hot metal desulfurization process. However there are environmental concerns regarding the use of fluorspar, even when its harmful effects are not fully known. In order to reduce such risks and also to anticipate possible future restrictions, which could undermine the sustainability of steel production, it is proposed to replace the fluorspar for alternative materials in the composition of the desulfurizing lime based mixture. For this purpose new mixtures using aluminum dross, ilmenite, sodalite and ulexite were tested, comparing them with a reference mixture containing fluorspar. The impact of these mixtures on the refractories commonly used in hot metal pretreatment was also checked, since this is an important cost parameter for the steel industries. The laboratory tests showed ulexite as a feasible substitute since the lime (84.03%) - ulexite (10.97%) - graphite (5%) mixture presented the highest desulfurization ratio and low refractory wear (less than the standard fluorspar mixture). The sodalite mixture was the worst by comparison. The ilmenite and aluminum dross mixtures showed similar behavior when compared to the fluorspar mixture. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-04-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2448-167X2018000200261 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2448-167X2018000200261 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0370-44672017710039 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Gorceix |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Gorceix |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
REM - International Engineering Journal v.71 n.2 2018 reponame:REM - International Engineering Journal instname:Fundação Gorceix (FG) instacron:FG |
instname_str |
Fundação Gorceix (FG) |
instacron_str |
FG |
institution |
FG |
reponame_str |
REM - International Engineering Journal |
collection |
REM - International Engineering Journal |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
REM - International Engineering Journal - Fundação Gorceix (FG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||editor@rem.com.br |
_version_ |
1754734690944679936 |