Rights as trumps and balancing: reconciling the rreconcilable?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa Neto, João
Data de Publicação: 2015
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Direito GV
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/56800
Resumo: THERE APPEARS TO BE A WIDESPREAD ASSUMPTION AMONG THOSE WHO DEFEND BALANCING IN CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS THAT IT IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH THE IDEA OF RIGHTS AS TRUMPS, BECAUSE PUBLIC INTERESTS AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ARE TO BE BALANCED WITHOUT ANY TYPE OF PRE-FIXED PRIORITY OR LEXICAL ORDERING. MY PURPOSE IN THIS ARTICLE IS TO SHOW THAT BOTH TRUMPING AND BALANCING ARE NOT ONLY COMPATIBLE, BUT POSSIBLY COMPLEMENTARY. WHAT I WILL ARGUE IS THAT IT IS NOT ONLY POSSIBLE TO HAVE A WORKABLE ARRANGEMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS THAT INCORPORATES BOTH TRUMPING AND BALANCING, BUT IT IS ALSO BETTER AND MORE PLAUSIBLE IF WE HAVE ONE. 
id FGV-2_0fadcb0ac06394902980ce468cdadd9a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/56800
network_acronym_str FGV-2
network_name_str Revista Direito GV
repository_id_str
spelling Rights as trumps and balancing: reconciling the rreconcilable?Os direitos como trunfos e o sopesamento: reconciliando o irreconciliável?TRUMPSBALANCINGCONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTSLEXICAL PRIORITY.TRUNFOSSOPESAMENTODIREITOS FUNDAMENTAISPRIORIDADE LEXICALTHERE APPEARS TO BE A WIDESPREAD ASSUMPTION AMONG THOSE WHO DEFEND BALANCING IN CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS THAT IT IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH THE IDEA OF RIGHTS AS TRUMPS, BECAUSE PUBLIC INTERESTS AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ARE TO BE BALANCED WITHOUT ANY TYPE OF PRE-FIXED PRIORITY OR LEXICAL ORDERING. MY PURPOSE IN THIS ARTICLE IS TO SHOW THAT BOTH TRUMPING AND BALANCING ARE NOT ONLY COMPATIBLE, BUT POSSIBLY COMPLEMENTARY. WHAT I WILL ARGUE IS THAT IT IS NOT ONLY POSSIBLE TO HAVE A WORKABLE ARRANGEMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS THAT INCORPORATES BOTH TRUMPING AND BALANCING, BUT IT IS ALSO BETTER AND MORE PLAUSIBLE IF WE HAVE ONE. UMA PREMISSA PARECE TER-SE DIFUNDIDO ENTRE OS DEFENSORES DO SOPESAMENTO DE DIREITOS FUNDAMENTAIS: A PREMISSA DE QUE O SOPESAMENTO SERIA INCOMPATÍVEL COM A IDEIA DE DIREITOS COMO TRUNFOS. ISSO PORQUE OS INTERESSES PÚBLICOS E OS DIREITOS FUNDAMENTAIS DEVERIAM SER SOPESADOS SEM QUALQUER TIPO DE PRIORIDADE FIXA OU ORDENAÇÃO LEXICAL. O PROPÓSITO DESTE ARTIGO É MOSTRAR QUE O SOPESAMENTO E O CARÁTER DE TRUNFO DOS DIREITOS SÃO NÃO APENAS COMPATÍVEIS, MAS TAMBÉM COMPLEMENTARES. DEFENDE-SE, POIS, QUE SE PODE CONCEBER UMA ESTRUTURA DE DIREITOS FUNDAMENTAIS QUE INTEGRE A IDEIA DE TRUNFO E O SOPESAMENTO; E QUE É MELHOR E MAIS PLAUSÍVEL QUE ADOTEMOS ESSA ESTRUTURA.Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas2015-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/56800Revista Direito GV; Vol. 11 No. 1 (2015): jan.-jun. (21); 159-187Revista Direito GV; Vol. 11 Núm. 1 (2015): jan.-jun. (21); 159-187Revista Direito GV; v. 11 n. 1 (2015): jan.-jun. (21); 159-1872317-6172reponame:Revista Direito GVinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVenghttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/56800/55336Copyright (c) 2015 Revista DIREITO GVinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCosta Neto, João2019-08-19T16:33:31Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/56800Revistahttps://direitosp.fgv.br/publicacoes/revista/revista-direito-gvPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br2317-61721808-2432opendoar:2019-08-19T16:33:31Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Rights as trumps and balancing: reconciling the rreconcilable?
Os direitos como trunfos e o sopesamento: reconciliando o irreconciliável?
title Rights as trumps and balancing: reconciling the rreconcilable?
spellingShingle Rights as trumps and balancing: reconciling the rreconcilable?
Costa Neto, João
TRUMPS
BALANCING
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
LEXICAL PRIORITY.
TRUNFOS
SOPESAMENTO
DIREITOS FUNDAMENTAIS
PRIORIDADE LEXICAL
title_short Rights as trumps and balancing: reconciling the rreconcilable?
title_full Rights as trumps and balancing: reconciling the rreconcilable?
title_fullStr Rights as trumps and balancing: reconciling the rreconcilable?
title_full_unstemmed Rights as trumps and balancing: reconciling the rreconcilable?
title_sort Rights as trumps and balancing: reconciling the rreconcilable?
author Costa Neto, João
author_facet Costa Neto, João
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa Neto, João
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv TRUMPS
BALANCING
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
LEXICAL PRIORITY.
TRUNFOS
SOPESAMENTO
DIREITOS FUNDAMENTAIS
PRIORIDADE LEXICAL
topic TRUMPS
BALANCING
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
LEXICAL PRIORITY.
TRUNFOS
SOPESAMENTO
DIREITOS FUNDAMENTAIS
PRIORIDADE LEXICAL
description THERE APPEARS TO BE A WIDESPREAD ASSUMPTION AMONG THOSE WHO DEFEND BALANCING IN CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS THAT IT IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH THE IDEA OF RIGHTS AS TRUMPS, BECAUSE PUBLIC INTERESTS AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ARE TO BE BALANCED WITHOUT ANY TYPE OF PRE-FIXED PRIORITY OR LEXICAL ORDERING. MY PURPOSE IN THIS ARTICLE IS TO SHOW THAT BOTH TRUMPING AND BALANCING ARE NOT ONLY COMPATIBLE, BUT POSSIBLY COMPLEMENTARY. WHAT I WILL ARGUE IS THAT IT IS NOT ONLY POSSIBLE TO HAVE A WORKABLE ARRANGEMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS THAT INCORPORATES BOTH TRUMPING AND BALANCING, BUT IT IS ALSO BETTER AND MORE PLAUSIBLE IF WE HAVE ONE. 
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/56800
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/56800
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/56800/55336
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Revista DIREITO GV
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Revista DIREITO GV
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Direito GV; Vol. 11 No. 1 (2015): jan.-jun. (21); 159-187
Revista Direito GV; Vol. 11 Núm. 1 (2015): jan.-jun. (21); 159-187
Revista Direito GV; v. 11 n. 1 (2015): jan.-jun. (21); 159-187
2317-6172
reponame:Revista Direito GV
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Revista Direito GV
collection Revista Direito GV
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943709656514560

Registros relacionados