Judicialization of politics in context(s): new elements for a theoretical map
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Direito GV |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/80277 |
Resumo: | This paper has two goals. First, in dialogue with scholarly efforts to explain variations in the intensity of the Brazilian Supreme Court’s role in the political process, we propose a theoretical map that can account, in a more systematic fashion, for the different ways and mechanisms by which judicialization can take place. Second, we offer a typology of varieties of judicialization of politics that combines different mechanisms for accessing the court’s jurisdiction, and features of the court’s internal decision-making process. At one side of the spectrum, judicialization as a phenomenon would result from a combination of two collective decisions – a collective actor (such as a political party) triggering a collective decision by the STF. At the other side, it would result from a combination of two sets of individual decisions – an individual politician, for example, obtaining a favorable ruling or injunction by a single STF justice. Within this framework, we exemplify and discuss four understudied dimensions of the judicialization of politics: mechanisms of access to the STF beyond abstract review lawsuits (ADIs); appeals to the STF by individual politicians; appeals to the STF by members of the ruling coalition, which highlight the relevance of contingent political dynamics in judicialization strategies; the individual judicial powers and their implications for the political process. |
id |
FGV-2_4a72475407f4736c444f2a6d294b1244 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/80277 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Direito GV |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Judicialization of politics in context(s): new elements for a theoretical mapContextos da judicialização da política: novos elementos para um mapa teóricoJudicialization of politicspolitical decision-making processjudicial decision-making processconstitutional reviewJudicialização da políticaprocesso político decisórioprocesso decisório judicialcontrole de constitucionalidadeThis paper has two goals. First, in dialogue with scholarly efforts to explain variations in the intensity of the Brazilian Supreme Court’s role in the political process, we propose a theoretical map that can account, in a more systematic fashion, for the different ways and mechanisms by which judicialization can take place. Second, we offer a typology of varieties of judicialization of politics that combines different mechanisms for accessing the court’s jurisdiction, and features of the court’s internal decision-making process. At one side of the spectrum, judicialization as a phenomenon would result from a combination of two collective decisions – a collective actor (such as a political party) triggering a collective decision by the STF. At the other side, it would result from a combination of two sets of individual decisions – an individual politician, for example, obtaining a favorable ruling or injunction by a single STF justice. Within this framework, we exemplify and discuss four understudied dimensions of the judicialization of politics: mechanisms of access to the STF beyond abstract review lawsuits (ADIs); appeals to the STF by individual politicians; appeals to the STF by members of the ruling coalition, which highlight the relevance of contingent political dynamics in judicialization strategies; the individual judicial powers and their implications for the political process.Este artigo tem um objetivo duplo: i) oferecer um mapa teórico capaz de sistematizar os fatores que explicam a variação na intensidade da inserção do Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) no processo decisório e as diferentes formas pelas quais ele pode ser mobilizado por atores políticos; e ii) definir uma tipologia da judicialização da política que combine as diferentes formas de acesso ao tribunal com as características do seu processo decisório interno. Nesse sentido, em um extremo, a judicialização seria resultado de uma manifestação de natureza duplamente coletiva (ator relevante coletivo demandando e conseguindo decisão coletiva do STF); no outro, um formato duplamente individualizado (um parlamentar individual demandando e conseguindo uma intervenção de um ministro individual no processo decisório). São apresentados casos que ilustram quatro dimensões pouco estudadas na literatura sobre judicialização da política: o acesso ao STF por classes processuais diferentes da Ação Direta de Inconstitucionalidade (ADI); a mobilização do STF por parlamentares individuais; a atuação de atores governistas, que evidencia a importância de dinâmicas contingentes da conjuntura política na motivação de judicializar; a intervenção individual dos ministros do STF.Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas2019-09-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/80277Revista Direito GV; Vol. 15 No. 2 (2019): maio-ago. (33); e1921Revista Direito GV; Vol. 15 Núm. 2 (2019): maio-ago. (33); e1921Revista Direito GV; v. 15 n. 2 (2019): maio-ago. (33); e19212317-6172reponame:Revista Direito GVinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/80277/76713Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Direito GVinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRibeiro, Leandro MolhanoArguelhes, Diego Werneck2019-09-30T13:01:58Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/80277Revistahttps://direitosp.fgv.br/publicacoes/revista/revista-direito-gvPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br2317-61721808-2432opendoar:2019-09-30T13:01:58Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Judicialization of politics in context(s): new elements for a theoretical map Contextos da judicialização da política: novos elementos para um mapa teórico |
title |
Judicialization of politics in context(s): new elements for a theoretical map |
spellingShingle |
Judicialization of politics in context(s): new elements for a theoretical map Ribeiro, Leandro Molhano Judicialization of politics political decision-making process judicial decision-making process constitutional review Judicialização da política processo político decisório processo decisório judicial controle de constitucionalidade |
title_short |
Judicialization of politics in context(s): new elements for a theoretical map |
title_full |
Judicialization of politics in context(s): new elements for a theoretical map |
title_fullStr |
Judicialization of politics in context(s): new elements for a theoretical map |
title_full_unstemmed |
Judicialization of politics in context(s): new elements for a theoretical map |
title_sort |
Judicialization of politics in context(s): new elements for a theoretical map |
author |
Ribeiro, Leandro Molhano |
author_facet |
Ribeiro, Leandro Molhano Arguelhes, Diego Werneck |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Arguelhes, Diego Werneck |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ribeiro, Leandro Molhano Arguelhes, Diego Werneck |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Judicialization of politics political decision-making process judicial decision-making process constitutional review Judicialização da política processo político decisório processo decisório judicial controle de constitucionalidade |
topic |
Judicialization of politics political decision-making process judicial decision-making process constitutional review Judicialização da política processo político decisório processo decisório judicial controle de constitucionalidade |
description |
This paper has two goals. First, in dialogue with scholarly efforts to explain variations in the intensity of the Brazilian Supreme Court’s role in the political process, we propose a theoretical map that can account, in a more systematic fashion, for the different ways and mechanisms by which judicialization can take place. Second, we offer a typology of varieties of judicialization of politics that combines different mechanisms for accessing the court’s jurisdiction, and features of the court’s internal decision-making process. At one side of the spectrum, judicialization as a phenomenon would result from a combination of two collective decisions – a collective actor (such as a political party) triggering a collective decision by the STF. At the other side, it would result from a combination of two sets of individual decisions – an individual politician, for example, obtaining a favorable ruling or injunction by a single STF justice. Within this framework, we exemplify and discuss four understudied dimensions of the judicialization of politics: mechanisms of access to the STF beyond abstract review lawsuits (ADIs); appeals to the STF by individual politicians; appeals to the STF by members of the ruling coalition, which highlight the relevance of contingent political dynamics in judicialization strategies; the individual judicial powers and their implications for the political process. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-09-26 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/80277 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/80277 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/80277/76713 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Direito GV info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Direito GV |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito GV; Vol. 15 No. 2 (2019): maio-ago. (33); e1921 Revista Direito GV; Vol. 15 Núm. 2 (2019): maio-ago. (33); e1921 Revista Direito GV; v. 15 n. 2 (2019): maio-ago. (33); e1921 2317-6172 reponame:Revista Direito GV instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Revista Direito GV |
collection |
Revista Direito GV |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943710270980096 |