Judicial Precedents: A Jurimetric Analysis in The Court of Justice of Ceará
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Direito GV |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/88490 |
Resumo: | The article aims to investigate the current operation of the Brazilian judicial precedents model, consolidated by the Civil Procedure Code of 2015, especially if the mechanism of vertical judgment through repetitive cases in higher courts has been effectively producing greater coherence and agility to the judicial system. The study involves the application of qualitative and quantitative methodologies in the investigation of privileged spaces of observation in the Court of Justice of Ceará (TJCE): the System of the Precedent Management Center (SISNUGEP) and in the observation of the work of application of this model of precedents by the judges. Based on a jurimetric study, an analysis is made of the cases in progress related to themes 766 and 1038, of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ). It is concluded from the analysis of the sample extracted by the Brazilian Association of Jurimetrics that, within the scope of the TJCE, the vertical establishment of theses by the STJ is not necessarily having repercussions on the existing local proceedings on the same theme, whether in relation to the order of national suspension or in actual judgments. It is proposed, consequently, a reflection on this hierarchical model of precedents and its effective results in the reality of the functioning of the Judiciary. |
id |
FGV-2_6124d099e4c7a9e5df5345deee3448a6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/88490 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Direito GV |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Judicial Precedents: A Jurimetric Analysis in The Court of Justice of CearáPrecedentes judiciais: uma análise jurimétrica no Tribunal de Justiça do CearáPrecedentscoherencebinding forceBrazilian modeljurimetricsPrecedentescoerênciavinculaçãomodelo brasileirojurimetriaThe article aims to investigate the current operation of the Brazilian judicial precedents model, consolidated by the Civil Procedure Code of 2015, especially if the mechanism of vertical judgment through repetitive cases in higher courts has been effectively producing greater coherence and agility to the judicial system. The study involves the application of qualitative and quantitative methodologies in the investigation of privileged spaces of observation in the Court of Justice of Ceará (TJCE): the System of the Precedent Management Center (SISNUGEP) and in the observation of the work of application of this model of precedents by the judges. Based on a jurimetric study, an analysis is made of the cases in progress related to themes 766 and 1038, of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ). It is concluded from the analysis of the sample extracted by the Brazilian Association of Jurimetrics that, within the scope of the TJCE, the vertical establishment of theses by the STJ is not necessarily having repercussions on the existing local proceedings on the same theme, whether in relation to the order of national suspension or in actual judgments. It is proposed, consequently, a reflection on this hierarchical model of precedents and its effective results in the reality of the functioning of the Judiciary.O artigo tem por objetivo investigar o atual funcionamento do modelo de precedentes brasileiro, consolidado pelo Código de Processo Civil de 2015, principalmente se o mecanismo de julgamento vertical por meio de processos repetitivos nos tribunais superiores vem, efetivamente, produzindo maior coerência e agilidade ao sistema judicial. O estudo envolve a aplicação de metodologias qualitativa e quantitativa na investigação de espaços privilegiados de observação no Tribunal de Justiça do Ceará (TJCE): o Sistema do Núcleo de Gerenciamento de Precedentes (Sisnugep) e a observação do trabalho de aplicação desse modelo de precedentes pelos magistrados. Baseado em um estudo jurimétrico, faz-se uma análise dos processos em trâmite relativos aos temas 766 e 1038 do Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ). Conclui-se, com a análise da amostra extraída pela Associação Brasileira de Jurimetria, que, no âmbito do TJCE, a fixação vertical de teses pelo STJ não está repercutindo necessariamente nos processos locais existentes sobre a mesma temática, seja em relação à ordem de sobrestamento nacional, seja nos efetivos julgamentos. Propõe-se, consequentemente, uma reflexão sobre esse modelo hierarquizado de precedentes e seus efetivos resultados na realidade do funcionamento do Poder Judiciário.Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas2022-11-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/88490Revista Direito GV; Vol. 18 No. 3 (2022): set.-dez. (43); e2233Revista Direito GV; Vol. 18 Núm. 3 (2022): set.-dez. (43); e2233Revista Direito GV; v. 18 n. 3 (2022): set.-dez. (43); e22332317-6172reponame:Revista Direito GVinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/88490/83236Santos Bezerra Sá, AlexandreRaposo Pereira Feitosa, GustavoCaminha, Uinieinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-12-06T18:17:03Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/88490Revistahttps://direitosp.fgv.br/publicacoes/revista/revista-direito-gvPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br2317-61721808-2432opendoar:2022-12-06T18:17:03Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Judicial Precedents: A Jurimetric Analysis in The Court of Justice of Ceará Precedentes judiciais: uma análise jurimétrica no Tribunal de Justiça do Ceará |
title |
Judicial Precedents: A Jurimetric Analysis in The Court of Justice of Ceará |
spellingShingle |
Judicial Precedents: A Jurimetric Analysis in The Court of Justice of Ceará Santos Bezerra Sá, Alexandre Precedents coherence binding force Brazilian model jurimetrics Precedentes coerência vinculação modelo brasileiro jurimetria |
title_short |
Judicial Precedents: A Jurimetric Analysis in The Court of Justice of Ceará |
title_full |
Judicial Precedents: A Jurimetric Analysis in The Court of Justice of Ceará |
title_fullStr |
Judicial Precedents: A Jurimetric Analysis in The Court of Justice of Ceará |
title_full_unstemmed |
Judicial Precedents: A Jurimetric Analysis in The Court of Justice of Ceará |
title_sort |
Judicial Precedents: A Jurimetric Analysis in The Court of Justice of Ceará |
author |
Santos Bezerra Sá, Alexandre |
author_facet |
Santos Bezerra Sá, Alexandre Raposo Pereira Feitosa, Gustavo Caminha, Uinie |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Raposo Pereira Feitosa, Gustavo Caminha, Uinie |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos Bezerra Sá, Alexandre Raposo Pereira Feitosa, Gustavo Caminha, Uinie |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Precedents coherence binding force Brazilian model jurimetrics Precedentes coerência vinculação modelo brasileiro jurimetria |
topic |
Precedents coherence binding force Brazilian model jurimetrics Precedentes coerência vinculação modelo brasileiro jurimetria |
description |
The article aims to investigate the current operation of the Brazilian judicial precedents model, consolidated by the Civil Procedure Code of 2015, especially if the mechanism of vertical judgment through repetitive cases in higher courts has been effectively producing greater coherence and agility to the judicial system. The study involves the application of qualitative and quantitative methodologies in the investigation of privileged spaces of observation in the Court of Justice of Ceará (TJCE): the System of the Precedent Management Center (SISNUGEP) and in the observation of the work of application of this model of precedents by the judges. Based on a jurimetric study, an analysis is made of the cases in progress related to themes 766 and 1038, of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ). It is concluded from the analysis of the sample extracted by the Brazilian Association of Jurimetrics that, within the scope of the TJCE, the vertical establishment of theses by the STJ is not necessarily having repercussions on the existing local proceedings on the same theme, whether in relation to the order of national suspension or in actual judgments. It is proposed, consequently, a reflection on this hierarchical model of precedents and its effective results in the reality of the functioning of the Judiciary. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-11-24 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/88490 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/88490 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/88490/83236 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito GV; Vol. 18 No. 3 (2022): set.-dez. (43); e2233 Revista Direito GV; Vol. 18 Núm. 3 (2022): set.-dez. (43); e2233 Revista Direito GV; v. 18 n. 3 (2022): set.-dez. (43); e2233 2317-6172 reponame:Revista Direito GV instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Revista Direito GV |
collection |
Revista Direito GV |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943711116132352 |