Activism or Guarantee in the Colombian Administrative Contentious Process
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | spa |
Título da fonte: | Revista Direito GV |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/90055 |
Resumo: | In procedural law, the role that the judge must play in the trial is discussed. On the one hand, an active judge; on the other, a guarantor judge who leaves the leading role to the parties, considering that in this way equality and impartiality materialize. For this reason, it was formulated as a research problem: What is the procedural system and the concept of purpose of the process that defines the role of the judge in the Colombian contentious-administrative process? It is proposed to analyze, from within the procedural institutions, the charges and duties of the judge and the parties, based on the hypothesis that there are no boundaries that allow the precise definition of the nature of the procedural system and the concept of purpose of the process to which the judge must attend to exercise his function. To this end, an exploratory-analytical study of the applicable standards was carried out. The result of such analysis is that the role of the judge in the contentious-administrative process is not defined by the procedural system or the concepts of the purpose of the process, but is due to the legal nature of the claim or means of control. |
id |
FGV-2_66b274fe147c9d2709b83b1a375757ae |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/90055 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Direito GV |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Activism or Guarantee in the Colombian Administrative Contentious ProcessActivismo o garantismo en el proceso contencioso administrativo colombianoAtivismo ou garantismo no processo contencioso administrativo colombianoProcedural systempurpose of the processcontentious administrative jurisdictionclaimmeans of controlSistema procesalfinalidad del procesojurisdicción contenciosa administrativapretensiónmedio de controlSistema processualfinalidade do processojurisdição contencioso-administrativareclamaçãomeios de controleIn procedural law, the role that the judge must play in the trial is discussed. On the one hand, an active judge; on the other, a guarantor judge who leaves the leading role to the parties, considering that in this way equality and impartiality materialize. For this reason, it was formulated as a research problem: What is the procedural system and the concept of purpose of the process that defines the role of the judge in the Colombian contentious-administrative process? It is proposed to analyze, from within the procedural institutions, the charges and duties of the judge and the parties, based on the hypothesis that there are no boundaries that allow the precise definition of the nature of the procedural system and the concept of purpose of the process to which the judge must attend to exercise his function. To this end, an exploratory-analytical study of the applicable standards was carried out. The result of such analysis is that the role of the judge in the contentious-administrative process is not defined by the procedural system or the concepts of the purpose of the process, but is due to the legal nature of the claim or means of control.En el derecho procesal se discute sobre el rol que debe desempeñar el juez dentro del juicio. Por una parte, un juez activo; por otra, un juez garantista que deja el protagonismo a las partes, considerando que de esa forma se materializa la igualdad y la imparcialidad. Por esta razón, se formuló como problema de investigación: ¿Cuál es el sistema procesal y el concepto de finalidad del proceso que define el rol del juez en el proceso contencioso administrativo colombiano? Se propone analizar, desde el interior de las instituciones procesales, las cargas y deberes del juez y de las partes, partiendo de la hipótesis de que no existen linderos que permitan definir con precisión la naturaleza del sistema procesal y el concepto de finalidad de proceso al que debe acudir el juez para el ejercicio de su función. Para ello se adelantó un estudio exploratorioanalítico de las normas aplicables. El resultado de tal análisis es que el rol del juez en el proceso contencioso administrativo no lo define ni el sistema procesal ni los conceptos de la finalidad del proceso, sino que se debe a la naturaleza jurídica de la pretensión o medio del control.No direito processual, discute-se o papel que o juiz deve desempenhar no julgamento. De um lado, um juiz ativo; de outro, um juiz garantista que deixa o protagonismo às partes, considerando que assim se materializam a igualdade e a imparcialidade. Por isso, formulou-se como problema de pesquisa: qual é o sistema processual e o conceito de finalidade do processo que definem o papel do juiz no processo contencioso- administrativo colombiano? Propõe-se analisar, a partir das instituições processuais, os encargos e os deveres do juiz e das partes, partindo da hipótese de que não há limites que permitam definir com precisão a natureza do sistema processual e o conceito de finalidade do processo aos quais o juiz deve atender para exercer a sua função. Para tanto, foi realizado um estudo exploratório-analítico das normas aplicáveis. O resultado de tal análise é que o papel do juiz no processo contencioso-administrativo não é definido pelo sistema processual ou pelos conceitos da finalidade do processo, mas, sim, pela natureza jurídica do pedido ou meio de controle.Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas2023-09-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/90055Revista Direito GV; Vol. 19 (2023): 2023; e2328Revista Direito GV; Vol. 19 (2023): 2023; e2328Revista Direito GV; v. 19 (2023): 2023; e23282317-6172reponame:Revista Direito GVinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVspahttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/90055/84526Martínez Ureña, FernandoAgudelo Mejía, Dimaro Alexisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-09-27T12:39:14Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/90055Revistahttps://direitosp.fgv.br/publicacoes/revista/revista-direito-gvPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br2317-61721808-2432opendoar:2023-09-27T12:39:14Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Activism or Guarantee in the Colombian Administrative Contentious Process Activismo o garantismo en el proceso contencioso administrativo colombiano Ativismo ou garantismo no processo contencioso administrativo colombiano |
title |
Activism or Guarantee in the Colombian Administrative Contentious Process |
spellingShingle |
Activism or Guarantee in the Colombian Administrative Contentious Process Martínez Ureña, Fernando Procedural system purpose of the process contentious administrative jurisdiction claim means of control Sistema procesal finalidad del proceso jurisdicción contenciosa administrativa pretensión medio de control Sistema processual finalidade do processo jurisdição contencioso-administrativa reclamação meios de controle |
title_short |
Activism or Guarantee in the Colombian Administrative Contentious Process |
title_full |
Activism or Guarantee in the Colombian Administrative Contentious Process |
title_fullStr |
Activism or Guarantee in the Colombian Administrative Contentious Process |
title_full_unstemmed |
Activism or Guarantee in the Colombian Administrative Contentious Process |
title_sort |
Activism or Guarantee in the Colombian Administrative Contentious Process |
author |
Martínez Ureña, Fernando |
author_facet |
Martínez Ureña, Fernando Agudelo Mejía, Dimaro Alexis |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Agudelo Mejía, Dimaro Alexis |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Martínez Ureña, Fernando Agudelo Mejía, Dimaro Alexis |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Procedural system purpose of the process contentious administrative jurisdiction claim means of control Sistema procesal finalidad del proceso jurisdicción contenciosa administrativa pretensión medio de control Sistema processual finalidade do processo jurisdição contencioso-administrativa reclamação meios de controle |
topic |
Procedural system purpose of the process contentious administrative jurisdiction claim means of control Sistema procesal finalidad del proceso jurisdicción contenciosa administrativa pretensión medio de control Sistema processual finalidade do processo jurisdição contencioso-administrativa reclamação meios de controle |
description |
In procedural law, the role that the judge must play in the trial is discussed. On the one hand, an active judge; on the other, a guarantor judge who leaves the leading role to the parties, considering that in this way equality and impartiality materialize. For this reason, it was formulated as a research problem: What is the procedural system and the concept of purpose of the process that defines the role of the judge in the Colombian contentious-administrative process? It is proposed to analyze, from within the procedural institutions, the charges and duties of the judge and the parties, based on the hypothesis that there are no boundaries that allow the precise definition of the nature of the procedural system and the concept of purpose of the process to which the judge must attend to exercise his function. To this end, an exploratory-analytical study of the applicable standards was carried out. The result of such analysis is that the role of the judge in the contentious-administrative process is not defined by the procedural system or the concepts of the purpose of the process, but is due to the legal nature of the claim or means of control. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-09-04 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/90055 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/90055 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/90055/84526 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito GV; Vol. 19 (2023): 2023; e2328 Revista Direito GV; Vol. 19 (2023): 2023; e2328 Revista Direito GV; v. 19 (2023): 2023; e2328 2317-6172 reponame:Revista Direito GV instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Revista Direito GV |
collection |
Revista Direito GV |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943711197921280 |