How to take the Supremo Tribunal Federal (brazilian Federal Supreme Court) seriously: on the suspension of advance claim rights’ concession n.91
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Direito GV |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24372 |
Resumo: | This article aims at analyzing the suspension by Brazilian Federal Supreme Court of the suspension of advance claim rights' concession n.91 under the perspective of Ronald Dworkin’s theory, concerning the understanding that it is necessary for judiciary power to have a critical and constructive (political) attitude in order to decide, especially for constitutional courts. In this sense, every decision rendered by the court in favor of a fundamental right must prevail, once it is founded on arguments of principle and it is coherent with the constitutional system. There, it follows the idea that there are right answers in law and that these are better than those offered by legal conventionalism or legal pragmatism. Then, it also follows the question about the legitimacy of the court, that is, does the Supremo Tribunal Federal should have the last word on decisions of the executive and legislative powers, especially concerning their public policies? |
id |
FGV-2_713ea0ae17e754e6bf919f4f891fd8ef |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/24372 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Direito GV |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
How to take the Supremo Tribunal Federal (brazilian Federal Supreme Court) seriously: on the suspension of advance claim rights’ concession n.91Como levar o Supremo Tribunal Federal a sério: sobre a suspensão de tutela antecipada n.91dworkinlawconstitutiondemocracylegitimacyDWORKINDIREITOCONSTITUIÇÃODEMOCRACIALEGITIMIDADEThis article aims at analyzing the suspension by Brazilian Federal Supreme Court of the suspension of advance claim rights' concession n.91 under the perspective of Ronald Dworkin’s theory, concerning the understanding that it is necessary for judiciary power to have a critical and constructive (political) attitude in order to decide, especially for constitutional courts. In this sense, every decision rendered by the court in favor of a fundamental right must prevail, once it is founded on arguments of principle and it is coherent with the constitutional system. There, it follows the idea that there are right answers in law and that these are better than those offered by legal conventionalism or legal pragmatism. Then, it also follows the question about the legitimacy of the court, that is, does the Supremo Tribunal Federal should have the last word on decisions of the executive and legislative powers, especially concerning their public policies?O PRESENTE ARTIGO ANALISA A SUSPENSÃO DA TUTELA ANTECIPADA N. 91 PELO SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL, SOB A PERSPECTIVA DA TEORIA DE RONALD DWORKIN, RELATIVAMENTE À COMPREENSÃO DA NECESSÁRIA ADOÇÃO DE UMA POSTURA CRÍTICO-CONSTRUTIVA (POLÍTICA) PELO PODER JUDICIÁRIO, ESPECIALMENTE PELA JURISDIÇÃO CONSTITUCIONAL. NESTE SENTIDO, TODA DECISÃO PROFERIDA PELA CORTE EM FAVOR DE UM DIREITO FUNDAMENTAL DEVE PREVALECER, DESDE QUE FUNDAMENTADA EM ARGUMENTOS DE PRINCÍPIO E QUE SEJA COERENTE COM O SISTEMA CONSTITUCIONAL. DAÍ A IDÉIA DE QUE EXISTEM RESPOSTAS CERTAS NO DIREITO E QUE ESTAS SÃO MELHORES DO QUE AS QUE OFERECE TANTO O CONVENCIONALISMO JURÍDICO, QUANTO O PRAGMATISMO JURÍDICO. A QUESTÃO QUE SE COLOCA É ACERCA DA LEGITIMIDADE DA CORTE, LEIA-SE DO SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL, PARA TER A ÚLTIMA PALAVRA SOBRE AS DECISÕES (POLÍTICAS) DO EXECUTIVO E DO LEGISLATIVO, ESPECIALMENTE EM RELAÇÃO ÀS POLÍTICAS PÚBLICAS DE GOVERNO POR ELES PROMOVIDAS.Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas2009-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24372Revista Direito GV; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2009): Jan.-June (9); 045-066Revista Direito GV; Vol. 5 Núm. 1 (2009): jan.-jun.(9); 045-066Revista Direito GV; v. 5 n. 1 (2009): jan.-jun.(9); 045-0662317-6172reponame:Revista Direito GVinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24372/23152Chueiri, Vera Karam deSampaio, Joanna Maria de Araújoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-11-07T14:55:45Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/24372Revistahttps://direitosp.fgv.br/publicacoes/revista/revista-direito-gvPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br2317-61721808-2432opendoar:2019-11-07T14:55:45Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
How to take the Supremo Tribunal Federal (brazilian Federal Supreme Court) seriously: on the suspension of advance claim rights’ concession n.91 Como levar o Supremo Tribunal Federal a sério: sobre a suspensão de tutela antecipada n.91 |
title |
How to take the Supremo Tribunal Federal (brazilian Federal Supreme Court) seriously: on the suspension of advance claim rights’ concession n.91 |
spellingShingle |
How to take the Supremo Tribunal Federal (brazilian Federal Supreme Court) seriously: on the suspension of advance claim rights’ concession n.91 Chueiri, Vera Karam de dworkin law constitution democracy legitimacy DWORKIN DIREITO CONSTITUIÇÃO DEMOCRACIA LEGITIMIDADE |
title_short |
How to take the Supremo Tribunal Federal (brazilian Federal Supreme Court) seriously: on the suspension of advance claim rights’ concession n.91 |
title_full |
How to take the Supremo Tribunal Federal (brazilian Federal Supreme Court) seriously: on the suspension of advance claim rights’ concession n.91 |
title_fullStr |
How to take the Supremo Tribunal Federal (brazilian Federal Supreme Court) seriously: on the suspension of advance claim rights’ concession n.91 |
title_full_unstemmed |
How to take the Supremo Tribunal Federal (brazilian Federal Supreme Court) seriously: on the suspension of advance claim rights’ concession n.91 |
title_sort |
How to take the Supremo Tribunal Federal (brazilian Federal Supreme Court) seriously: on the suspension of advance claim rights’ concession n.91 |
author |
Chueiri, Vera Karam de |
author_facet |
Chueiri, Vera Karam de Sampaio, Joanna Maria de Araújo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sampaio, Joanna Maria de Araújo |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Chueiri, Vera Karam de Sampaio, Joanna Maria de Araújo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
dworkin law constitution democracy legitimacy DWORKIN DIREITO CONSTITUIÇÃO DEMOCRACIA LEGITIMIDADE |
topic |
dworkin law constitution democracy legitimacy DWORKIN DIREITO CONSTITUIÇÃO DEMOCRACIA LEGITIMIDADE |
description |
This article aims at analyzing the suspension by Brazilian Federal Supreme Court of the suspension of advance claim rights' concession n.91 under the perspective of Ronald Dworkin’s theory, concerning the understanding that it is necessary for judiciary power to have a critical and constructive (political) attitude in order to decide, especially for constitutional courts. In this sense, every decision rendered by the court in favor of a fundamental right must prevail, once it is founded on arguments of principle and it is coherent with the constitutional system. There, it follows the idea that there are right answers in law and that these are better than those offered by legal conventionalism or legal pragmatism. Then, it also follows the question about the legitimacy of the court, that is, does the Supremo Tribunal Federal should have the last word on decisions of the executive and legislative powers, especially concerning their public policies? |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24372 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24372 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24372/23152 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito GV; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2009): Jan.-June (9); 045-066 Revista Direito GV; Vol. 5 Núm. 1 (2009): jan.-jun.(9); 045-066 Revista Direito GV; v. 5 n. 1 (2009): jan.-jun.(9); 045-066 2317-6172 reponame:Revista Direito GV instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Revista Direito GV |
collection |
Revista Direito GV |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943708833382400 |