How to take the Supremo Tribunal Federal (brazilian Federal Supreme Court) seriously: on the suspension of advance claim rights’ concession n.91

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Chueiri, Vera Karam de
Data de Publicação: 2009
Outros Autores: Sampaio, Joanna Maria de Araújo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Direito GV
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24372
Resumo: This article aims at analyzing the suspension by Brazilian Federal Supreme Court of the suspension of advance claim rights' concession n.91 under the perspective of Ronald Dworkin’s theory, concerning the understanding that it is necessary for judiciary power to have a critical and constructive (political) attitude in order to decide, especially for constitutional courts. In this sense, every decision rendered by the court in favor of a fundamental right must prevail, once it is founded on arguments of principle and it is coherent with the constitutional system.  There, it follows the idea that there are right answers in law and that these are better than those offered by legal conventionalism or legal pragmatism. Then, it also follows the question about the legitimacy of the court, that is, does the Supremo Tribunal Federal should have the last word on decisions of the executive and legislative powers, especially concerning their public policies?
id FGV-2_713ea0ae17e754e6bf919f4f891fd8ef
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/24372
network_acronym_str FGV-2
network_name_str Revista Direito GV
repository_id_str
spelling How to take the Supremo Tribunal Federal (brazilian Federal Supreme Court) seriously: on the suspension of advance claim rights’ concession n.91Como levar o Supremo Tribunal Federal a sério: sobre a suspensão de tutela antecipada n.91dworkinlawconstitutiondemocracylegitimacyDWORKINDIREITOCONSTITUIÇÃODEMOCRACIALEGITIMIDADEThis article aims at analyzing the suspension by Brazilian Federal Supreme Court of the suspension of advance claim rights' concession n.91 under the perspective of Ronald Dworkin’s theory, concerning the understanding that it is necessary for judiciary power to have a critical and constructive (political) attitude in order to decide, especially for constitutional courts. In this sense, every decision rendered by the court in favor of a fundamental right must prevail, once it is founded on arguments of principle and it is coherent with the constitutional system.  There, it follows the idea that there are right answers in law and that these are better than those offered by legal conventionalism or legal pragmatism. Then, it also follows the question about the legitimacy of the court, that is, does the Supremo Tribunal Federal should have the last word on decisions of the executive and legislative powers, especially concerning their public policies?O PRESENTE ARTIGO ANALISA A SUSPENSÃO DA TUTELA ANTECIPADA N. 91 PELO SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL, SOB A PERSPECTIVA DA TEORIA DE RONALD DWORKIN, RELATIVAMENTE À COMPREENSÃO DA NECESSÁRIA ADOÇÃO DE UMA POSTURA CRÍTICO-CONSTRUTIVA (POLÍTICA) PELO PODER JUDICIÁRIO, ESPECIALMENTE PELA JURISDIÇÃO CONSTITUCIONAL. NESTE SENTIDO, TODA DECISÃO PROFERIDA PELA CORTE EM FAVOR DE UM DIREITO FUNDAMENTAL DEVE PREVALECER, DESDE QUE FUNDAMENTADA EM ARGUMENTOS DE PRINCÍPIO E QUE SEJA COERENTE COM O SISTEMA CONSTITUCIONAL. DAÍ A IDÉIA DE QUE EXISTEM RESPOSTAS CERTAS NO DIREITO E QUE ESTAS SÃO MELHORES DO QUE AS QUE OFERECE TANTO O CONVENCIONALISMO JURÍDICO, QUANTO O PRAGMATISMO JURÍDICO. A QUESTÃO QUE SE COLOCA É ACERCA DA LEGITIMIDADE DA CORTE, LEIA-SE DO SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL, PARA TER A ÚLTIMA PALAVRA SOBRE AS DECISÕES (POLÍTICAS) DO EXECUTIVO E DO LEGISLATIVO, ESPECIALMENTE EM RELAÇÃO ÀS POLÍTICAS PÚBLICAS DE GOVERNO POR ELES PROMOVIDAS.Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas2009-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24372Revista Direito GV; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2009): Jan.-June (9); 045-066Revista Direito GV; Vol. 5 Núm. 1 (2009): jan.-jun.(9); 045-066Revista Direito GV; v. 5 n. 1 (2009): jan.-jun.(9); 045-0662317-6172reponame:Revista Direito GVinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24372/23152Chueiri, Vera Karam deSampaio, Joanna Maria de Araújoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-11-07T14:55:45Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/24372Revistahttps://direitosp.fgv.br/publicacoes/revista/revista-direito-gvPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br2317-61721808-2432opendoar:2019-11-07T14:55:45Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv How to take the Supremo Tribunal Federal (brazilian Federal Supreme Court) seriously: on the suspension of advance claim rights’ concession n.91
Como levar o Supremo Tribunal Federal a sério: sobre a suspensão de tutela antecipada n.91
title How to take the Supremo Tribunal Federal (brazilian Federal Supreme Court) seriously: on the suspension of advance claim rights’ concession n.91
spellingShingle How to take the Supremo Tribunal Federal (brazilian Federal Supreme Court) seriously: on the suspension of advance claim rights’ concession n.91
Chueiri, Vera Karam de
dworkin
law
constitution
democracy
legitimacy
DWORKIN
DIREITO
CONSTITUIÇÃO
DEMOCRACIA
LEGITIMIDADE
title_short How to take the Supremo Tribunal Federal (brazilian Federal Supreme Court) seriously: on the suspension of advance claim rights’ concession n.91
title_full How to take the Supremo Tribunal Federal (brazilian Federal Supreme Court) seriously: on the suspension of advance claim rights’ concession n.91
title_fullStr How to take the Supremo Tribunal Federal (brazilian Federal Supreme Court) seriously: on the suspension of advance claim rights’ concession n.91
title_full_unstemmed How to take the Supremo Tribunal Federal (brazilian Federal Supreme Court) seriously: on the suspension of advance claim rights’ concession n.91
title_sort How to take the Supremo Tribunal Federal (brazilian Federal Supreme Court) seriously: on the suspension of advance claim rights’ concession n.91
author Chueiri, Vera Karam de
author_facet Chueiri, Vera Karam de
Sampaio, Joanna Maria de Araújo
author_role author
author2 Sampaio, Joanna Maria de Araújo
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Chueiri, Vera Karam de
Sampaio, Joanna Maria de Araújo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv dworkin
law
constitution
democracy
legitimacy
DWORKIN
DIREITO
CONSTITUIÇÃO
DEMOCRACIA
LEGITIMIDADE
topic dworkin
law
constitution
democracy
legitimacy
DWORKIN
DIREITO
CONSTITUIÇÃO
DEMOCRACIA
LEGITIMIDADE
description This article aims at analyzing the suspension by Brazilian Federal Supreme Court of the suspension of advance claim rights' concession n.91 under the perspective of Ronald Dworkin’s theory, concerning the understanding that it is necessary for judiciary power to have a critical and constructive (political) attitude in order to decide, especially for constitutional courts. In this sense, every decision rendered by the court in favor of a fundamental right must prevail, once it is founded on arguments of principle and it is coherent with the constitutional system.  There, it follows the idea that there are right answers in law and that these are better than those offered by legal conventionalism or legal pragmatism. Then, it also follows the question about the legitimacy of the court, that is, does the Supremo Tribunal Federal should have the last word on decisions of the executive and legislative powers, especially concerning their public policies?
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24372
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24372
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24372/23152
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Direito GV; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2009): Jan.-June (9); 045-066
Revista Direito GV; Vol. 5 Núm. 1 (2009): jan.-jun.(9); 045-066
Revista Direito GV; v. 5 n. 1 (2009): jan.-jun.(9); 045-066
2317-6172
reponame:Revista Direito GV
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Revista Direito GV
collection Revista Direito GV
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943708833382400