Jurisprudential Overview of Obstetric Violence and Discursive Analysis of the Court Decisions in Southern Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Schiocchet, Taysa
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Mattos de Aragão, Suéllyn
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Direito GV
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/89829
Resumo: Obstetric violence is the appropriation of women’s bodies and reproductive processes by health professionals. It is expressed in dehumanized treatment, abuse of medicalization, and pathologization of natural birth events. The objective of this research is to map the national jurisprudence on obstetric violence in order to analyze in depth the judicial decisions of southern Brazil, in order to identify how “persuasive definitions” and “normative stereotypes” are mobilized in the discourses used to support the sentences. It is qualitative, exploratory, inductive research, using the documentary technique. The study analyzed 12 judgments in their entirety. As main results, normative stereotypes referring to four axes were identified in the speeches: “specialized literature”, “expert evidence”, “obligation of means” and “expertise, medical records and witnesses” and persuasive definitions related to two axes: “medicine” and “Pregnant”. In addition, silences have been identified about bioethical principles and fundamental rights, which are little explored in the judgments. From the results, the research infers that the rationality and legal argumentation of the decisions involving violence against the pregnant women analyzed here has a lack of specificity, meta foundation, and sin by not allowing control over the decision-making provisions, making it difficult to contrast them, finally, the dialogical characteristic of the right and the guarantee of the health law.
id FGV-2_a3ec192b9e3e7b17bd2c4434c46e6498
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/89829
network_acronym_str FGV-2
network_name_str Revista Direito GV
repository_id_str
spelling Jurisprudential Overview of Obstetric Violence and Discursive Analysis of the Court Decisions in Southern BrazilPanorama jurisprudencial da violência obstétrica e análise discursiva das decisões judiciais do sul do BrasilGender violenceobstetric violencejurisprudencehealth lawwomen’s rightsViolência de gêneroviolência obstétricajurisprudênciadireito à saúdedireitos da mulherObstetric violence is the appropriation of women’s bodies and reproductive processes by health professionals. It is expressed in dehumanized treatment, abuse of medicalization, and pathologization of natural birth events. The objective of this research is to map the national jurisprudence on obstetric violence in order to analyze in depth the judicial decisions of southern Brazil, in order to identify how “persuasive definitions” and “normative stereotypes” are mobilized in the discourses used to support the sentences. It is qualitative, exploratory, inductive research, using the documentary technique. The study analyzed 12 judgments in their entirety. As main results, normative stereotypes referring to four axes were identified in the speeches: “specialized literature”, “expert evidence”, “obligation of means” and “expertise, medical records and witnesses” and persuasive definitions related to two axes: “medicine” and “Pregnant”. In addition, silences have been identified about bioethical principles and fundamental rights, which are little explored in the judgments. From the results, the research infers that the rationality and legal argumentation of the decisions involving violence against the pregnant women analyzed here has a lack of specificity, meta foundation, and sin by not allowing control over the decision-making provisions, making it difficult to contrast them, finally, the dialogical characteristic of the right and the guarantee of the health law.A violência obstétrica é a apropriação do corpo e dos processos reprodutivos das mulheres por profissionais de saúde. Expressa-se por meio do tratamento desumanizado, do abuso da medicalização e da patologização dos eventos do parto. O objetivo da presente pesquisa é mapear a jurisprudência nacional sobre violência obstétrica para, então, analisar em profundidade as decisões judiciais do sul do Brasil, de modo a identificar como são mobilizadas as “definições persuasivas” e os “estereótipos normativos” nos discursos das sentenças. Trata-se de pesquisa qualitativa, exploratória, indutiva, com utilização de técnica documental. O estudo analisou 12 julgados em seu inteiro teor. Como resultados, foram identificados nos discursos “estereótipos normativos” referentes a quatro eixos: “literatura especializada”, “prova pericial”, “obrigação de meio” e “perícia, prontuário e testemunhas”, e “definições persuasivas” relativas a dois eixos: “medicina” e “gestante”. Além disso, foram identificados silêncios quanto a princípios bioéticos e direitos fundamentais. A partir dos resultados, a pesquisa infere que a racionalidade e a argumentação jurídica das decisões que envolvem violência contra a mulher gestante aqui analisadas carecem de especificidade, de metafundamentação e pecam ao não permitir controle sobre os provimentos decisórios, dificultando o seu contraste, maculando, por fim, a característica dialógica do Direito e a garantia do direito à saúde.Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas2023-07-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/89829Revista Direito GV; Vol. 19 (2023): 2023; e2321Revista Direito GV; Vol. 19 (2023): 2023; e2321Revista Direito GV; v. 19 (2023): 2023; e23212317-6172reponame:Revista Direito GVinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/89829/84307Schiocchet, TaysaMattos de Aragão, Suéllyninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-09-27T12:39:14Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/89829Revistahttps://direitosp.fgv.br/publicacoes/revista/revista-direito-gvPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br2317-61721808-2432opendoar:2023-09-27T12:39:14Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Jurisprudential Overview of Obstetric Violence and Discursive Analysis of the Court Decisions in Southern Brazil
Panorama jurisprudencial da violência obstétrica e análise discursiva das decisões judiciais do sul do Brasil
title Jurisprudential Overview of Obstetric Violence and Discursive Analysis of the Court Decisions in Southern Brazil
spellingShingle Jurisprudential Overview of Obstetric Violence and Discursive Analysis of the Court Decisions in Southern Brazil
Schiocchet, Taysa
Gender violence
obstetric violence
jurisprudence
health law
women’s rights
Violência de gênero
violência obstétrica
jurisprudência
direito à saúde
direitos da mulher
title_short Jurisprudential Overview of Obstetric Violence and Discursive Analysis of the Court Decisions in Southern Brazil
title_full Jurisprudential Overview of Obstetric Violence and Discursive Analysis of the Court Decisions in Southern Brazil
title_fullStr Jurisprudential Overview of Obstetric Violence and Discursive Analysis of the Court Decisions in Southern Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Jurisprudential Overview of Obstetric Violence and Discursive Analysis of the Court Decisions in Southern Brazil
title_sort Jurisprudential Overview of Obstetric Violence and Discursive Analysis of the Court Decisions in Southern Brazil
author Schiocchet, Taysa
author_facet Schiocchet, Taysa
Mattos de Aragão, Suéllyn
author_role author
author2 Mattos de Aragão, Suéllyn
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Schiocchet, Taysa
Mattos de Aragão, Suéllyn
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Gender violence
obstetric violence
jurisprudence
health law
women’s rights
Violência de gênero
violência obstétrica
jurisprudência
direito à saúde
direitos da mulher
topic Gender violence
obstetric violence
jurisprudence
health law
women’s rights
Violência de gênero
violência obstétrica
jurisprudência
direito à saúde
direitos da mulher
description Obstetric violence is the appropriation of women’s bodies and reproductive processes by health professionals. It is expressed in dehumanized treatment, abuse of medicalization, and pathologization of natural birth events. The objective of this research is to map the national jurisprudence on obstetric violence in order to analyze in depth the judicial decisions of southern Brazil, in order to identify how “persuasive definitions” and “normative stereotypes” are mobilized in the discourses used to support the sentences. It is qualitative, exploratory, inductive research, using the documentary technique. The study analyzed 12 judgments in their entirety. As main results, normative stereotypes referring to four axes were identified in the speeches: “specialized literature”, “expert evidence”, “obligation of means” and “expertise, medical records and witnesses” and persuasive definitions related to two axes: “medicine” and “Pregnant”. In addition, silences have been identified about bioethical principles and fundamental rights, which are little explored in the judgments. From the results, the research infers that the rationality and legal argumentation of the decisions involving violence against the pregnant women analyzed here has a lack of specificity, meta foundation, and sin by not allowing control over the decision-making provisions, making it difficult to contrast them, finally, the dialogical characteristic of the right and the guarantee of the health law.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-07-24
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/89829
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/89829
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/89829/84307
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Direito GV; Vol. 19 (2023): 2023; e2321
Revista Direito GV; Vol. 19 (2023): 2023; e2321
Revista Direito GV; v. 19 (2023): 2023; e2321
2317-6172
reponame:Revista Direito GV
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Revista Direito GV
collection Revista Direito GV
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943711181144064