Lack of Communication Can Be Trouble: Brazilian Federal Supreme Court Decision-Making Behavior and Self-Promotion Strategies

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Magalhães, Rebecca
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Carvalho, Ernani
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Revista Direito GV
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/89828
Resumo: The post-1988 period in Brazil has brought as a consequence a greater role for the Judiciary in the political game, a fact that can be derived either from institutional arrangements or from strategies undertaken by its agents. Focusing on the second approach, the article explores whether exists a communication strategy between the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court (STF) and the public. According to the literature, in spite of the fact that the Judiciary differs from other political actors because it does not rely on the electorate, it is similar in terms of the need to provide transparency in its decisions, in order to achieve institutional legitimacy. In the Brazilian case, there is a constant externalization of messages directed at symbols of justice, objectivity, and impartiality and, since mid-2000’s, there has been an increase in the institution’s transparency, with emphasis on the televised transmission of its plenary sessions and a detailed institutional web page containing news and complete content of rulings. Considering that, from a comparative perspective, the constitutional court has become extremely exposed, one wonders: is there institutional selectivity in relation to its decisions? In order to answer this question, press releases from the Federal Supreme Court and judicial decisions were examined, over a 16-year time frame, from 2000 to 2016. The research utilized mixed methods: textual data mining techniques and statistics. The findings suggest that there is an intention, consistent throughout the time period studied, to transmit an image of an activist court.
id FGV-2_aadf61514aa297ac876cbc4bd1ed9146
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/89828
network_acronym_str FGV-2
network_name_str Revista Direito GV
repository_id_str
spelling Lack of Communication Can Be Trouble: Brazilian Federal Supreme Court Decision-Making Behavior and Self-Promotion Strategies“Quem não se comunica se trumbica”: comportamento decisório e estratégias de autopromoção do Supremo Tribunal FederalJudicial behaviorJudiciary and politicsBrazilian Federal Supreme Courtcommunicationinstitutional legitimacyComportamento judicialJudiciário e políticaSupremo Tribunal Federalcomunicaçãolegitimidade institucionalThe post-1988 period in Brazil has brought as a consequence a greater role for the Judiciary in the political game, a fact that can be derived either from institutional arrangements or from strategies undertaken by its agents. Focusing on the second approach, the article explores whether exists a communication strategy between the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court (STF) and the public. According to the literature, in spite of the fact that the Judiciary differs from other political actors because it does not rely on the electorate, it is similar in terms of the need to provide transparency in its decisions, in order to achieve institutional legitimacy. In the Brazilian case, there is a constant externalization of messages directed at symbols of justice, objectivity, and impartiality and, since mid-2000’s, there has been an increase in the institution’s transparency, with emphasis on the televised transmission of its plenary sessions and a detailed institutional web page containing news and complete content of rulings. Considering that, from a comparative perspective, the constitutional court has become extremely exposed, one wonders: is there institutional selectivity in relation to its decisions? In order to answer this question, press releases from the Federal Supreme Court and judicial decisions were examined, over a 16-year time frame, from 2000 to 2016. The research utilized mixed methods: textual data mining techniques and statistics. The findings suggest that there is an intention, consistent throughout the time period studied, to transmit an image of an activist court.O pós-1988 trouxe maior protagonismo do Judiciário no jogo político, fato que pode derivar tanto de arranjos institucionais quanto de estratégias de seus agentes. Focando na segunda abordagem, discute-se se há uma estratégia de comunicação do Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) com o público. De acordo com a literatura, embora o Judiciário se diferencie de outros atores políticos por não necessitar do eleitorado, assemelha-se quanto à necessidade de proporcionar transparência às suas decisões, de modo a alcançar legitimidade institucional. No caso brasileiro, há constantemente uma exteriorização de mensagens direcionadas a símbolos de justiça, objetividade e imparcialidade, e houve, desde meados dos anos 2000, um recrudescimento da visibilidade daquela instituição, destacando-se a transmissão televisionada de suas sessões plenárias e uma detalhada página institucional que contém notícias e inteiro teor de julgados. Considerando que, em perspectiva comparada, a corte constitucional tornou-se extremamente exposta, questiona-se: há seletividade institucional em relação às decisões promovidas? Para responder a essa pergunta, foram observados comunicados de imprensa do STF e decisões judiciais, em um recorte temporal de 2000 a 2016. A pesquisa utilizou métodos mistos: técnica de mineração de dados textuais e estatística. Os resultados encontrados sugerem que há uma intenção, constante ao longo da série temporal, de enfatizar a imagem de tribunal ativista.Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas2023-07-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/89828Revista Direito GV; Vol. 19 (2023): 2023; e2319 (PT) e e2320 (IN)Revista Direito GV; Vol. 19 (2023): 2023; e2319 (PT) e e2320 (IN)Revista Direito GV; v. 19 (2023): 2023; e2319 (PT) e e2320 (IN)2317-6172reponame:Revista Direito GVinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporenghttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/89828/84305https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/89828/84306Magalhães, RebeccaCarvalho, Ernaniinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-09-27T12:39:14Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/89828Revistahttps://direitosp.fgv.br/publicacoes/revista/revista-direito-gvPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br2317-61721808-2432opendoar:2023-09-27T12:39:14Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Lack of Communication Can Be Trouble: Brazilian Federal Supreme Court Decision-Making Behavior and Self-Promotion Strategies
“Quem não se comunica se trumbica”: comportamento decisório e estratégias de autopromoção do Supremo Tribunal Federal
title Lack of Communication Can Be Trouble: Brazilian Federal Supreme Court Decision-Making Behavior and Self-Promotion Strategies
spellingShingle Lack of Communication Can Be Trouble: Brazilian Federal Supreme Court Decision-Making Behavior and Self-Promotion Strategies
Magalhães, Rebecca
Judicial behavior
Judiciary and politics
Brazilian Federal Supreme Court
communication
institutional legitimacy
Comportamento judicial
Judiciário e política
Supremo Tribunal Federal
comunicação
legitimidade institucional
title_short Lack of Communication Can Be Trouble: Brazilian Federal Supreme Court Decision-Making Behavior and Self-Promotion Strategies
title_full Lack of Communication Can Be Trouble: Brazilian Federal Supreme Court Decision-Making Behavior and Self-Promotion Strategies
title_fullStr Lack of Communication Can Be Trouble: Brazilian Federal Supreme Court Decision-Making Behavior and Self-Promotion Strategies
title_full_unstemmed Lack of Communication Can Be Trouble: Brazilian Federal Supreme Court Decision-Making Behavior and Self-Promotion Strategies
title_sort Lack of Communication Can Be Trouble: Brazilian Federal Supreme Court Decision-Making Behavior and Self-Promotion Strategies
author Magalhães, Rebecca
author_facet Magalhães, Rebecca
Carvalho, Ernani
author_role author
author2 Carvalho, Ernani
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Magalhães, Rebecca
Carvalho, Ernani
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Judicial behavior
Judiciary and politics
Brazilian Federal Supreme Court
communication
institutional legitimacy
Comportamento judicial
Judiciário e política
Supremo Tribunal Federal
comunicação
legitimidade institucional
topic Judicial behavior
Judiciary and politics
Brazilian Federal Supreme Court
communication
institutional legitimacy
Comportamento judicial
Judiciário e política
Supremo Tribunal Federal
comunicação
legitimidade institucional
description The post-1988 period in Brazil has brought as a consequence a greater role for the Judiciary in the political game, a fact that can be derived either from institutional arrangements or from strategies undertaken by its agents. Focusing on the second approach, the article explores whether exists a communication strategy between the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court (STF) and the public. According to the literature, in spite of the fact that the Judiciary differs from other political actors because it does not rely on the electorate, it is similar in terms of the need to provide transparency in its decisions, in order to achieve institutional legitimacy. In the Brazilian case, there is a constant externalization of messages directed at symbols of justice, objectivity, and impartiality and, since mid-2000’s, there has been an increase in the institution’s transparency, with emphasis on the televised transmission of its plenary sessions and a detailed institutional web page containing news and complete content of rulings. Considering that, from a comparative perspective, the constitutional court has become extremely exposed, one wonders: is there institutional selectivity in relation to its decisions? In order to answer this question, press releases from the Federal Supreme Court and judicial decisions were examined, over a 16-year time frame, from 2000 to 2016. The research utilized mixed methods: textual data mining techniques and statistics. The findings suggest that there is an intention, consistent throughout the time period studied, to transmit an image of an activist court.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-07-24
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/89828
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/89828
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/89828/84305
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/89828/84306
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Direito GV; Vol. 19 (2023): 2023; e2319 (PT) e e2320 (IN)
Revista Direito GV; Vol. 19 (2023): 2023; e2319 (PT) e e2320 (IN)
Revista Direito GV; v. 19 (2023): 2023; e2319 (PT) e e2320 (IN)
2317-6172
reponame:Revista Direito GV
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Revista Direito GV
collection Revista Direito GV
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943711177998336