Public Defense: Paths and Gaps in Access to Justice
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Direito GV |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/89241 |
Resumo: | This research paper aims to analyze how Public Defenses have been trying to expand the use of extrajudicial conflict resolution methods. Through qualitative research, secondary sources are used to describe the national scenario regarding access to justice, forms of conflict resolution and the constitution of Public Defense in Brazil, while questionnaires sent to Defenses and interviews to outline a case study of the Public Defense of Minas Gerais (DPMG) complemented the methodological procedures. The research findings point out that the studied Defense’s offices recognize the importance of expanding their extrajudicial action, but that is not a priority. Furthermore, it points out that the DPMG seeks to strengthen its management instruments to expand the scope of its activities. It is concluded that such institutions are still unable to promote access to justice in its broad sense, since their efforts are primarily focused on acting within judicial processes. The article contributes in theoretical terms to fill the gap in the few studies on the work of Defenders in the country, while the empirical contribution reinforces the need to strengthen the strategic role of these institutions in a country with strong inequality in access to justice. |
id |
FGV-2_e5968a6306a1559fa2b5f32fe0d45971 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/89241 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Direito GV |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Public Defense: Paths and Gaps in Access to JusticeDefensorias Públicas: caminhos e lacunas no acesso à justiçaPublic Defenseextrajudicial actionaccess to justiceconflict resolutionPublic Defense of Minas GeraisDefensorias Públicasatuação extrajudicialacesso à justiçameios de solução de conflitosDefensoria Pública do Estado de Minas GeraisThis research paper aims to analyze how Public Defenses have been trying to expand the use of extrajudicial conflict resolution methods. Through qualitative research, secondary sources are used to describe the national scenario regarding access to justice, forms of conflict resolution and the constitution of Public Defense in Brazil, while questionnaires sent to Defenses and interviews to outline a case study of the Public Defense of Minas Gerais (DPMG) complemented the methodological procedures. The research findings point out that the studied Defense’s offices recognize the importance of expanding their extrajudicial action, but that is not a priority. Furthermore, it points out that the DPMG seeks to strengthen its management instruments to expand the scope of its activities. It is concluded that such institutions are still unable to promote access to justice in its broad sense, since their efforts are primarily focused on acting within judicial processes. The article contributes in theoretical terms to fill the gap in the few studies on the work of Defenders in the country, while the empirical contribution reinforces the need to strengthen the strategic role of these institutions in a country with strong inequality in access to justice.O artigo visa analisar como as Defensorias Públicas têm buscado ampliar a utilização de métodos extrajudiciais de solução de conflitos. Por meio de pesquisa qualitativa, utilizam-se fontes secundárias para descrever o cenário nacional quanto ao acesso à justiça, as formas de solução de conflitos e a constituição das Defensorias Públicas no Brasil, enquanto questionários enviados às Defensorias e entrevistas para delinear um estudo de caso junto à Defensoria Pública do Estado de Minas Gerais (DPMG) complementaram os procedimentos metodológicos. Os achados de pesquisa apontam que as Defensorias reconhecem a importância da ampliação de sua atuação extrajudicial, mas não como atuação prioritária. Ademais, indicam que a DPMG procura fortalecer seus instrumentos de gestão para ampliar o escopo de sua atuação. Conclui-se que tais instituições ainda não conseguem promover o acesso à justiça em seu sentido amplo, uma vez que seus esforços estão voltados primordialmente à atuação dentro dos processos judiciais. O artigo contribui em termos teóricos para preencher lacuna nos poucos estudos sobre a atuação das Defensorias no país, enquanto a contribuição empírica reforça a necessidade de fortalecimento do papel estratégico dessas instituições em um país de expressiva desigualdade no acesso à justiça.Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas2023-04-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/89241Revista Direito GV; Vol. 19 (2023): 2023; e2314Revista Direito GV; Vol. 19 (2023): 2023; e2314Revista Direito GV; v. 19 (2023): 2023; e23142317-6172reponame:Revista Direito GVinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/89241/83815Faustino, Marcella RaphaellaCerqueira Batitucci, EduardoGonçalves da Cruz, Marcus Viníciusinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-09-27T12:39:14Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/89241Revistahttps://direitosp.fgv.br/publicacoes/revista/revista-direito-gvPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br2317-61721808-2432opendoar:2023-09-27T12:39:14Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Public Defense: Paths and Gaps in Access to Justice Defensorias Públicas: caminhos e lacunas no acesso à justiça |
title |
Public Defense: Paths and Gaps in Access to Justice |
spellingShingle |
Public Defense: Paths and Gaps in Access to Justice Faustino, Marcella Raphaella Public Defense extrajudicial action access to justice conflict resolution Public Defense of Minas Gerais Defensorias Públicas atuação extrajudicial acesso à justiça meios de solução de conflitos Defensoria Pública do Estado de Minas Gerais |
title_short |
Public Defense: Paths and Gaps in Access to Justice |
title_full |
Public Defense: Paths and Gaps in Access to Justice |
title_fullStr |
Public Defense: Paths and Gaps in Access to Justice |
title_full_unstemmed |
Public Defense: Paths and Gaps in Access to Justice |
title_sort |
Public Defense: Paths and Gaps in Access to Justice |
author |
Faustino, Marcella Raphaella |
author_facet |
Faustino, Marcella Raphaella Cerqueira Batitucci, Eduardo Gonçalves da Cruz, Marcus Vinícius |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cerqueira Batitucci, Eduardo Gonçalves da Cruz, Marcus Vinícius |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Faustino, Marcella Raphaella Cerqueira Batitucci, Eduardo Gonçalves da Cruz, Marcus Vinícius |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Public Defense extrajudicial action access to justice conflict resolution Public Defense of Minas Gerais Defensorias Públicas atuação extrajudicial acesso à justiça meios de solução de conflitos Defensoria Pública do Estado de Minas Gerais |
topic |
Public Defense extrajudicial action access to justice conflict resolution Public Defense of Minas Gerais Defensorias Públicas atuação extrajudicial acesso à justiça meios de solução de conflitos Defensoria Pública do Estado de Minas Gerais |
description |
This research paper aims to analyze how Public Defenses have been trying to expand the use of extrajudicial conflict resolution methods. Through qualitative research, secondary sources are used to describe the national scenario regarding access to justice, forms of conflict resolution and the constitution of Public Defense in Brazil, while questionnaires sent to Defenses and interviews to outline a case study of the Public Defense of Minas Gerais (DPMG) complemented the methodological procedures. The research findings point out that the studied Defense’s offices recognize the importance of expanding their extrajudicial action, but that is not a priority. Furthermore, it points out that the DPMG seeks to strengthen its management instruments to expand the scope of its activities. It is concluded that such institutions are still unable to promote access to justice in its broad sense, since their efforts are primarily focused on acting within judicial processes. The article contributes in theoretical terms to fill the gap in the few studies on the work of Defenders in the country, while the empirical contribution reinforces the need to strengthen the strategic role of these institutions in a country with strong inequality in access to justice. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-04-19 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/89241 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/89241 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/89241/83815 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito GV; Vol. 19 (2023): 2023; e2314 Revista Direito GV; Vol. 19 (2023): 2023; e2314 Revista Direito GV; v. 19 (2023): 2023; e2314 2317-6172 reponame:Revista Direito GV instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Revista Direito GV |
collection |
Revista Direito GV |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943711166464000 |