On unfair State acts in international trade in accordance to the WTO law: the ambivalence of its discipline and its justifications
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Direito GV |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/70817 |
Resumo: | The competition for world market shares involves not only companies, but also States. In fact, public policies are adopted in order to aid domestic enterprises to increase their share in the world market. For this reason, it is often questioned whether some State acts can be considered unfair acts, since they prevent a competition on a “level playing field”. The WTO law responds this question affirmatively, because it allows its members to react against dumping and subsidies. This authorization aims to protect domestic companies from unfair competition. However, this authorization does not mean that antidumping and countervailing measures are always good trade policies and free from economic costs. Therefore, the use of these trade policies instruments should be submitted to additional debate. |
id |
FGV-2_e6d4085cd2751032e0bf0d93eb3b290d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/70817 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Direito GV |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
On unfair State acts in international trade in accordance to the WTO law: the ambivalence of its discipline and its justificationsSobre a proteção contra a conduta desleal dos Estados no comércio internacional: as ambiguidades de sua disciplina jurídica e de seus fundamentos no direito da OMCWorld tradeUnfair trade practicesWTO lawDumpingSubsidiesComércio internacionalConcorrência deslealDireito da OMCDumpingSubsídiosThe competition for world market shares involves not only companies, but also States. In fact, public policies are adopted in order to aid domestic enterprises to increase their share in the world market. For this reason, it is often questioned whether some State acts can be considered unfair acts, since they prevent a competition on a “level playing field”. The WTO law responds this question affirmatively, because it allows its members to react against dumping and subsidies. This authorization aims to protect domestic companies from unfair competition. However, this authorization does not mean that antidumping and countervailing measures are always good trade policies and free from economic costs. Therefore, the use of these trade policies instruments should be submitted to additional debate.A competição pelo mercado internacional mobiliza não apenas empresas, mas igualmente Estados. Com efeito, políticas públicas são adotadas com vistas a aumentar a participação de empresas domésticas no mercado internacional. Por esses motivos, surge o seguinte questionamento: determinadas condutas estatais podem ser consideradas desleais pelas normas do sistema multilateral do comércio, ao desequilibrarem o jogo da concorrência internacional em favor das empresas nacionais? O direito da OMC responde afirmativamente a essa questão, ao autorizar os seus membros a reagirem ao dumping e aos subsídios por meio de instrumentos de defesa comercial. Tal autorização fundamenta-se na finalidade de assegurar uma certa isonomia entre os atores do comércio internacional. Isso, porém, não significa dizer que as medidas antidumping e contra os subsídios sejam sempre benéficas e isentas de custos econômicos. Convém, assim, aprofundar o debate sobre o uso desses instrumentos de defesa comercial.Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas2017-07-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/70817Revista Direito GV; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2017): mai-ago. (27); 428-456Revista Direito GV; Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2017): mai-ago. (27); 428-456Revista Direito GV; v. 13 n. 2 (2017): mai-ago. (27); 428-4562317-6172reponame:Revista Direito GVinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/70817/68261Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Direito GVinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBorges, Daniel Damásio2019-08-23T13:51:53Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/70817Revistahttps://direitosp.fgv.br/publicacoes/revista/revista-direito-gvPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br2317-61721808-2432opendoar:2019-08-23T13:51:53Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
On unfair State acts in international trade in accordance to the WTO law: the ambivalence of its discipline and its justifications Sobre a proteção contra a conduta desleal dos Estados no comércio internacional: as ambiguidades de sua disciplina jurídica e de seus fundamentos no direito da OMC |
title |
On unfair State acts in international trade in accordance to the WTO law: the ambivalence of its discipline and its justifications |
spellingShingle |
On unfair State acts in international trade in accordance to the WTO law: the ambivalence of its discipline and its justifications Borges, Daniel Damásio World trade Unfair trade practices WTO law Dumping Subsidies Comércio internacional Concorrência desleal Direito da OMC Dumping Subsídios |
title_short |
On unfair State acts in international trade in accordance to the WTO law: the ambivalence of its discipline and its justifications |
title_full |
On unfair State acts in international trade in accordance to the WTO law: the ambivalence of its discipline and its justifications |
title_fullStr |
On unfair State acts in international trade in accordance to the WTO law: the ambivalence of its discipline and its justifications |
title_full_unstemmed |
On unfair State acts in international trade in accordance to the WTO law: the ambivalence of its discipline and its justifications |
title_sort |
On unfair State acts in international trade in accordance to the WTO law: the ambivalence of its discipline and its justifications |
author |
Borges, Daniel Damásio |
author_facet |
Borges, Daniel Damásio |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Borges, Daniel Damásio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
World trade Unfair trade practices WTO law Dumping Subsidies Comércio internacional Concorrência desleal Direito da OMC Dumping Subsídios |
topic |
World trade Unfair trade practices WTO law Dumping Subsidies Comércio internacional Concorrência desleal Direito da OMC Dumping Subsídios |
description |
The competition for world market shares involves not only companies, but also States. In fact, public policies are adopted in order to aid domestic enterprises to increase their share in the world market. For this reason, it is often questioned whether some State acts can be considered unfair acts, since they prevent a competition on a “level playing field”. The WTO law responds this question affirmatively, because it allows its members to react against dumping and subsidies. This authorization aims to protect domestic companies from unfair competition. However, this authorization does not mean that antidumping and countervailing measures are always good trade policies and free from economic costs. Therefore, the use of these trade policies instruments should be submitted to additional debate. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-07-28 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/70817 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/70817 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/70817/68261 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Direito GV info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Direito GV |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito GV; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2017): mai-ago. (27); 428-456 Revista Direito GV; Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2017): mai-ago. (27); 428-456 Revista Direito GV; v. 13 n. 2 (2017): mai-ago. (27); 428-456 2317-6172 reponame:Revista Direito GV instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Revista Direito GV |
collection |
Revista Direito GV |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943709810655232 |