Hindrances to open government in Brazilian Federal Justice

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sabo, Isabela Cristina
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Kurtz, Lahis Pasquali, Reginaldo, Paula Adão, Santos, Paloma Maria, Rover, Aires José
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Direito GV
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/81690
Resumo: Promising more agility and transparency to lawsuit procedures, Judicial Branch, in a context of open government and access to justice, through the last decade, has been implementing electronic case filing to enhance its management activities. Aiming to analyze to what extent this is effective in practice, we sought to verify, by means of a case study on Brazilian Federal Justice scope, the hindrances to obtain access to judicial process data and information. This analysis considered: agility in returning solicitations; diversity of internal organs requested; degree of informatization of electronic case filing; transparency in returning requests; and bureaucracy involved on handling requests. The difficulties in accessing data of judicial files, to the application of Access to Information Act, as well as the slow and chaotic informatization show that there is still considerable distance between courts reality and regulation advances.
id FGV-2_ebe45a41d3256c2ca3a853485910f81e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/81690
network_acronym_str FGV-2
network_name_str Revista Direito GV
repository_id_str
spelling Hindrances to open government in Brazilian Federal JusticeEntraves ao governo aberto na Justiça Federal brasileiraOpen governmentAccess to justiceAccess to Information ActElectronic case filingBrazilian Federal JusticeGoverno abertoAcesso à JustiçaLei de Acesso à InformaçãoProcesso judicial eletrônicoJustiça Federal brasileiraPromising more agility and transparency to lawsuit procedures, Judicial Branch, in a context of open government and access to justice, through the last decade, has been implementing electronic case filing to enhance its management activities. Aiming to analyze to what extent this is effective in practice, we sought to verify, by means of a case study on Brazilian Federal Justice scope, the hindrances to obtain access to judicial process data and information. This analysis considered: agility in returning solicitations; diversity of internal organs requested; degree of informatization of electronic case filing; transparency in returning requests; and bureaucracy involved on handling requests. The difficulties in accessing data of judicial files, to the application of Access to Information Act, as well as the slow and chaotic informatization show that there is still considerable distance between courts reality and regulation advances.Com a promessa de dar mais agilidade e transparência aos trâmites processuais, o Poder Judiciário, no contexto de governo aberto e acesso à Justiça, vem implementando, ao longo da última década, o processo judicial eletrônico para aprimorar o desenvolvimento de suas atividades administrativas. Tendo em vista analisar até que ponto isso se efetiva na prática, buscou-se verificar, por meio de um estudo de caso estruturado no âmbito da Justiça Federal brasileira, os entraves ao acesso de dados e a disponibilização de informações processuais. Tal verificação considerou: a agilidade no retorno das solicitações; a diversidade de órgãos internos acionados; o grau de informatização dos processos judiciais eletrônicos; a transparência no retorno das solicitações; e a burocracia envolvida no manejo das solicitações. As dificuldades no acesso aos dados processuais, à aplicação da Lei de Acesso à Informação, bem como a lenta e desordenada informatização demonstram que ainda há uma distância considerável entre a realidade forense e os avanços legislativos.Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas2020-06-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/81690Revista Direito GV; Vol. 16 No. 1 (2020): jan-abr. (35); e1950Revista Direito GV; Vol. 16 Núm. 1 (2020): jan-abr. (35); e1950Revista Direito GV; v. 16 n. 1 (2020): jan-abr. (35); e19502317-6172reponame:Revista Direito GVinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/81690/77911Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Direito GVinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSabo, Isabela CristinaKurtz, Lahis PasqualiReginaldo, Paula AdãoSantos, Paloma MariaRover, Aires José2020-06-09T13:17:23Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/81690Revistahttps://direitosp.fgv.br/publicacoes/revista/revista-direito-gvPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br2317-61721808-2432opendoar:2020-06-09T13:17:23Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Hindrances to open government in Brazilian Federal Justice
Entraves ao governo aberto na Justiça Federal brasileira
title Hindrances to open government in Brazilian Federal Justice
spellingShingle Hindrances to open government in Brazilian Federal Justice
Sabo, Isabela Cristina
Open government
Access to justice
Access to Information Act
Electronic case filing
Brazilian Federal Justice
Governo aberto
Acesso à Justiça
Lei de Acesso à Informação
Processo judicial eletrônico
Justiça Federal brasileira
title_short Hindrances to open government in Brazilian Federal Justice
title_full Hindrances to open government in Brazilian Federal Justice
title_fullStr Hindrances to open government in Brazilian Federal Justice
title_full_unstemmed Hindrances to open government in Brazilian Federal Justice
title_sort Hindrances to open government in Brazilian Federal Justice
author Sabo, Isabela Cristina
author_facet Sabo, Isabela Cristina
Kurtz, Lahis Pasquali
Reginaldo, Paula Adão
Santos, Paloma Maria
Rover, Aires José
author_role author
author2 Kurtz, Lahis Pasquali
Reginaldo, Paula Adão
Santos, Paloma Maria
Rover, Aires José
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sabo, Isabela Cristina
Kurtz, Lahis Pasquali
Reginaldo, Paula Adão
Santos, Paloma Maria
Rover, Aires José
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Open government
Access to justice
Access to Information Act
Electronic case filing
Brazilian Federal Justice
Governo aberto
Acesso à Justiça
Lei de Acesso à Informação
Processo judicial eletrônico
Justiça Federal brasileira
topic Open government
Access to justice
Access to Information Act
Electronic case filing
Brazilian Federal Justice
Governo aberto
Acesso à Justiça
Lei de Acesso à Informação
Processo judicial eletrônico
Justiça Federal brasileira
description Promising more agility and transparency to lawsuit procedures, Judicial Branch, in a context of open government and access to justice, through the last decade, has been implementing electronic case filing to enhance its management activities. Aiming to analyze to what extent this is effective in practice, we sought to verify, by means of a case study on Brazilian Federal Justice scope, the hindrances to obtain access to judicial process data and information. This analysis considered: agility in returning solicitations; diversity of internal organs requested; degree of informatization of electronic case filing; transparency in returning requests; and bureaucracy involved on handling requests. The difficulties in accessing data of judicial files, to the application of Access to Information Act, as well as the slow and chaotic informatization show that there is still considerable distance between courts reality and regulation advances.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-06-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/81690
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/81690
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/81690/77911
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Direito GV
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Direito GV
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Direito GV; Vol. 16 No. 1 (2020): jan-abr. (35); e1950
Revista Direito GV; Vol. 16 Núm. 1 (2020): jan-abr. (35); e1950
Revista Direito GV; v. 16 n. 1 (2020): jan-abr. (35); e1950
2317-6172
reponame:Revista Direito GV
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Revista Direito GV
collection Revista Direito GV
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943710335991808

Registros relacionados