The issue of homosexual unions in the Federal Supreme Court in light of the debate Honneth-Fraser

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bunchaft, Maria Eugenia
Data de Publicação: 2012
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Direito GV
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/23990
Resumo: THE HOMOSEXUAL UNION RIGHTS ARE DEBATED AS ONE OF THE MOST CONTROVERSIAL TOPICS OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. IT IS KNOWN THAT THE HOMOSEXUAL UNION WAS NOT EXPLICITLY RECOGNIZED BY THE ARTICLE 226 § 3ºFROM FC, AS THERE IS NO SPECIFIC REGULATION FOR THIS SUBJECT. THIS PAPER INTENDS TO INVESTIGATE STF MINISTERS’ POSITION IN RELATION TO HOMOSEXUAL UNION ACCORDING TO AXEL HONNETH AND NANCY FRASER PHILOSOPHIES OF RECOGNITION. IN THIS SENSE, THE PHILOSOPHICAL BASIS FROM RECOGNITION THEORIES MAY BE A THEORETICAL INSTRUMENT TO COMPREHEND SOME FORMS OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM WHICH AIMS ARE TO PROTECT STIGMATIZED MINORITIES WHOSE REGULATORY INTENTIONS ARE DISREGARDED BY THE POLITICAL PROCESS. WE INTEND TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE HONNETH’S PARADIGM OF ACHIEVEMENT IS IMPRECISE AND CAN’T LEGITIMATE FORMS OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM AIMED TO PROTECT THE RIGHTS OF HOMOSEXUAL UNIONS
id FGV-2_edf2d55046c086e3bd1f72bb820d1873
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/23990
network_acronym_str FGV-2
network_name_str Revista Direito GV
repository_id_str
spelling The issue of homosexual unions in the Federal Supreme Court in light of the debate Honneth-FraserA temática das uniões homoafetivas no Supremo Tribunal Federal à luz do debate Honneth-FraserRECOGNITIONIDENTITYGAY MINORITIESHONNETHFRASERRECONHECIMENTOIDENTIDADEMINORIAS GAYSHONNETHFRASERTHE HOMOSEXUAL UNION RIGHTS ARE DEBATED AS ONE OF THE MOST CONTROVERSIAL TOPICS OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. IT IS KNOWN THAT THE HOMOSEXUAL UNION WAS NOT EXPLICITLY RECOGNIZED BY THE ARTICLE 226 § 3ºFROM FC, AS THERE IS NO SPECIFIC REGULATION FOR THIS SUBJECT. THIS PAPER INTENDS TO INVESTIGATE STF MINISTERS’ POSITION IN RELATION TO HOMOSEXUAL UNION ACCORDING TO AXEL HONNETH AND NANCY FRASER PHILOSOPHIES OF RECOGNITION. IN THIS SENSE, THE PHILOSOPHICAL BASIS FROM RECOGNITION THEORIES MAY BE A THEORETICAL INSTRUMENT TO COMPREHEND SOME FORMS OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM WHICH AIMS ARE TO PROTECT STIGMATIZED MINORITIES WHOSE REGULATORY INTENTIONS ARE DISREGARDED BY THE POLITICAL PROCESS. WE INTEND TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE HONNETH’S PARADIGM OF ACHIEVEMENT IS IMPRECISE AND CAN’T LEGITIMATE FORMS OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM AIMED TO PROTECT THE RIGHTS OF HOMOSEXUAL UNIONSO DEBATE SOBRE OS DIREITOS DAS UNIÕES HOMOAFETIVAS CONSTITUI UM DOS TÓPICOS MAIS CONTROVERSOS DO DIREITO CONSTITUCIONAL. COMO SE SABE, A UNIÃO HOMOAFETIVA NÃO FOI RECONHECIDA EXPRESSAMENTE NO § 3º DO ARTIGO 226 DA CF, INEXISTINDO NORMA ESPECÍFICA. O PRESENTE ARTIGO PRETENDE INVESTIGAR A POSIÇÃO DE MINISTROS DO STF EM RELAÇÃO AO TEMA DAS UNIÕES HOMOAFETIVAS, EM CONEXÃO COM AS FILOSOFIAS DO RECONHECIMENTO PROPOSTAS POR AXEL HONNETH E NANCY FRASER. NESSE SENTIDO, OS FUNDAMENTOS FILOSÓFICOS DAS TEORIAS DO RECONHECIMENTO PODEM SER UM INSTRUMENTAL TEÓRICO FUNDAMENTAL PARA A COMPREENSÃO DE DETERMINADAS FORMAS DE ATIVISMO JUDICIAL QUE OBJETIVAM A PROTEÇÃO DE MINORIAS ESTIGMATIZADAS CUJAS PRETENSÕES NORMATIVAS SÃO DESCONSIDERADAS PELO PROCESSO POLÍTICO. PRETENDEMOS DEMONSTRAR QUE O PARADIGMA DA AUTORREALIZAÇÃO PROPOSTO POR HONNETH É IMPRECISO E INCAPAZ DE LEGITIMAR FORMAS DE ATIVISMO JUDICIAL VOLTADAS PARA A PROTEÇÃO DOS DIREITOS DAS UNIÕES HOMOAFETIVASEscola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas2012-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/23990Revista Direito GV; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2012): Jan.-June (15); 133-156Revista Direito GV; Vol. 8 Núm. 1 (2012): jan.-jun. (15); 133-156Revista Direito GV; v. 8 n. 1 (2012): jan.-jun. (15); 133-1562317-6172reponame:Revista Direito GVinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/23990/22747Bunchaft, Maria Eugeniainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-09-06T12:47:23Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/23990Revistahttps://direitosp.fgv.br/publicacoes/revista/revista-direito-gvPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br2317-61721808-2432opendoar:2019-09-06T12:47:23Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The issue of homosexual unions in the Federal Supreme Court in light of the debate Honneth-Fraser
A temática das uniões homoafetivas no Supremo Tribunal Federal à luz do debate Honneth-Fraser
title The issue of homosexual unions in the Federal Supreme Court in light of the debate Honneth-Fraser
spellingShingle The issue of homosexual unions in the Federal Supreme Court in light of the debate Honneth-Fraser
Bunchaft, Maria Eugenia
RECOGNITION
IDENTITY
GAY MINORITIES
HONNETH
FRASER
RECONHECIMENTO
IDENTIDADE
MINORIAS GAYS
HONNETH
FRASER
title_short The issue of homosexual unions in the Federal Supreme Court in light of the debate Honneth-Fraser
title_full The issue of homosexual unions in the Federal Supreme Court in light of the debate Honneth-Fraser
title_fullStr The issue of homosexual unions in the Federal Supreme Court in light of the debate Honneth-Fraser
title_full_unstemmed The issue of homosexual unions in the Federal Supreme Court in light of the debate Honneth-Fraser
title_sort The issue of homosexual unions in the Federal Supreme Court in light of the debate Honneth-Fraser
author Bunchaft, Maria Eugenia
author_facet Bunchaft, Maria Eugenia
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bunchaft, Maria Eugenia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv RECOGNITION
IDENTITY
GAY MINORITIES
HONNETH
FRASER
RECONHECIMENTO
IDENTIDADE
MINORIAS GAYS
HONNETH
FRASER
topic RECOGNITION
IDENTITY
GAY MINORITIES
HONNETH
FRASER
RECONHECIMENTO
IDENTIDADE
MINORIAS GAYS
HONNETH
FRASER
description THE HOMOSEXUAL UNION RIGHTS ARE DEBATED AS ONE OF THE MOST CONTROVERSIAL TOPICS OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. IT IS KNOWN THAT THE HOMOSEXUAL UNION WAS NOT EXPLICITLY RECOGNIZED BY THE ARTICLE 226 § 3ºFROM FC, AS THERE IS NO SPECIFIC REGULATION FOR THIS SUBJECT. THIS PAPER INTENDS TO INVESTIGATE STF MINISTERS’ POSITION IN RELATION TO HOMOSEXUAL UNION ACCORDING TO AXEL HONNETH AND NANCY FRASER PHILOSOPHIES OF RECOGNITION. IN THIS SENSE, THE PHILOSOPHICAL BASIS FROM RECOGNITION THEORIES MAY BE A THEORETICAL INSTRUMENT TO COMPREHEND SOME FORMS OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM WHICH AIMS ARE TO PROTECT STIGMATIZED MINORITIES WHOSE REGULATORY INTENTIONS ARE DISREGARDED BY THE POLITICAL PROCESS. WE INTEND TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE HONNETH’S PARADIGM OF ACHIEVEMENT IS IMPRECISE AND CAN’T LEGITIMATE FORMS OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM AIMED TO PROTECT THE RIGHTS OF HOMOSEXUAL UNIONS
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/23990
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/23990
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/23990/22747
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Direito GV; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2012): Jan.-June (15); 133-156
Revista Direito GV; Vol. 8 Núm. 1 (2012): jan.-jun. (15); 133-156
Revista Direito GV; v. 8 n. 1 (2012): jan.-jun. (15); 133-156
2317-6172
reponame:Revista Direito GV
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Revista Direito GV
collection Revista Direito GV
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943708410806272

Registros relacionados