Segregate or include? Advocacy coalitions, ideas, and changes in special education in Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Administração Pública |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/85023 |
Resumo: | This article examines the changes in education for people with disabilities (PwD) in Brazil, arising from the dissemination of ideas and government actions that introduced the perspective of inclusion. Based on the advocacy coalition framework, we analyzed the national special education subsystem (SES), the advocacy coalitions that integrate the SES, the beliefs in dispute, and the factors that explain the changes observed in the sector. This case study included historical reconstruction, document analysis, literature review and secondary data collection. The results identified the existence of two coalitions in the subsystem: specialized and exclusive care (coalition 1) and inclusive education (coalition 2). The first was dominant between 1973 and 2002, and the second emerged in the 2000s, becoming hegemonic in 2008 with the promulgation of the National Policy for Special Education from the Perspective of Inclusive Education. It was also found that coalition 1 is guided by the separation of students according to types of disability and learning abilities, emphasizing the importance of specialized clinical care and special schools. On the other hand, coalition 2 conceives that everyone is capable of learning, especially when inserted in standard classes of regular schools, within inclusive systems. As explanatory factors of the changes in the SES, exogenous variables stood out, particularly the changes in the Brazilian federal government in 2003, the worldwide dissemination of the inclusive education conceptions – reaching the education subsystems, and the feedback of public policies from the SES and other sectors. |
id |
FGV-4_157e27badf125ccb0aa11c88a88da407 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/85023 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-4 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Administração Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Segregate or include? Advocacy coalitions, ideas, and changes in special education in Brazil¿Segregar o incluir? Coaliciones de defensa, ideas y cambios en la educación especial en BrasilSegregar ou incluir? Coalizões de defesa, ideias e mudanças na educação especial do BrasilThis article examines the changes in education for people with disabilities (PwD) in Brazil, arising from the dissemination of ideas and government actions that introduced the perspective of inclusion. Based on the advocacy coalition framework, we analyzed the national special education subsystem (SES), the advocacy coalitions that integrate the SES, the beliefs in dispute, and the factors that explain the changes observed in the sector. This case study included historical reconstruction, document analysis, literature review and secondary data collection. The results identified the existence of two coalitions in the subsystem: specialized and exclusive care (coalition 1) and inclusive education (coalition 2). The first was dominant between 1973 and 2002, and the second emerged in the 2000s, becoming hegemonic in 2008 with the promulgation of the National Policy for Special Education from the Perspective of Inclusive Education. It was also found that coalition 1 is guided by the separation of students according to types of disability and learning abilities, emphasizing the importance of specialized clinical care and special schools. On the other hand, coalition 2 conceives that everyone is capable of learning, especially when inserted in standard classes of regular schools, within inclusive systems. As explanatory factors of the changes in the SES, exogenous variables stood out, particularly the changes in the Brazilian federal government in 2003, the worldwide dissemination of the inclusive education conceptions – reaching the education subsystems, and the feedback of public policies from the SES and other sectors.El artículo examina los cambios en la educación de las personas con discapacidad (PwD) en Brasil, derivados de la difusión de ideas y acciones gubernamentales que introdujeron la perspectiva de la inclusión en la educación especial. Con base en la teoría de coaliciones de defensa, se analizó el subsistema nacional de educación especial (SEE), las coaliciones de defensa que lo integran y las creencias en disputa, además de los factores que explican los cambios observados en el sector. Se trata de un estudio de caso que incluyó reconstrucción histórica, análisis documental, revisión de literatura y recolección de datos secundarios. Entre los resultados se identificó la existencia de dos coaliciones en el subsistema: atención exclusiva (coalición 1) y educación inclusiva (coalición 2). La primera fue dominante entre 1973 y 2002 y la segunda surgió en la década de 2000, volviéndose hegemónica en 2008, con la promulgación de la Política Nacional de Educación Especial desde la Perspectiva de la Educación Inclusiva. También se encontró que la coalición 1 se guía por la separación de los estudiantes según los tipos de discapacidad y habilidades de aprendizaje, enfatizando la importancia de la atención clínica especializada y de las escuelas especiales. Por otro lado, la coalición 2 concibe que todos son capaces de aprender, especialmente cuando se insertan en clases comunes de escuelas regulares, dentro de sistemas inclusivos. Como factores explicativos de los cambios en el SEE, se destacaron las variables exógenas, principalmente: el cambio en el gobierno federal en 2003, la difusión mundial y en los subsistemas de concepciones sobre educación inclusiva, además del feedback de las políticas públicas del SEE y de otros sectores.O artigo examina as mudanças na escolarização das pessoas com deficiência (PcD) no Brasil, advindas da difusão de ideias e ações governamentais que introduziram a perspectiva da inclusão na educação especial. Com base na teoria das coalizões de defesa, analisaram-se o subsistema nacional de educação especial (SEE), as coalizões de defesa que o integram e as crenças em disputa, além dos fatores elucidativos das modificações observadas no setor. Trata-se de um estudo de caso que abrangeu reconstrução histórica, análise documental, revisão bibliográfica e levantamento de dados secundários. Entre os resultados, identificaram-se duas coalizões no subsistema: a do atendimento exclusivo (coalizão 1) e a da educação inclusiva (coalizão 2). A primeira foi dominante entre 1973 e 2002, e a segunda surgiu na década de 2000, tornando-se hegemônica em 2008, com a promulgação da Política Nacional de Educação Especial na Perspectiva da Educação Inclusiva. Também se verificou que a coalizão 1 se pauta na separação dos estudantes conforme os tipos de deficiência e capacidades de aprendizagem, enfatizando a importância do atendimento clínico especializado e das escolas especiais. Em contrapartida, a coalizão 2 concebe que todos são capazes de aprender, sobretudo quando inseridos em classes comuns de escolas regulares, dentro de sistemas inclusivos. Como fatores explicativos das mudanças no SEE, sobressaíram as variáveis exógenas, principalmente a mudança do governo federal em 2003, a disseminação mundial e nos subsistemas de concepções sobre educação inclusiva, além do feedback de políticas públicas do SEE e de outros setores.Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)2021-12-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/8502310.1590/0034-761220210034Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 55 No. 6 (2021); 1312-1332Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 55 Núm. 6 (2021); 1312-1332Revista de Administração Pública; v. 55 n. 6 (2021); 1312-13321982-31340034-7612reponame:Revista de Administração Públicainstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporenghttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/85023/80369https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/85023/80370Schabbach, Letícia MariaRosa, Júlia Gabriele Lima dainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-12-22T14:20:46Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/85023Revistahttps://ebape.fgv.br/publicacoes/rapONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rap@fgv.br1982-31340034-7612opendoar:2021-12-22T14:20:46Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Segregate or include? Advocacy coalitions, ideas, and changes in special education in Brazil ¿Segregar o incluir? Coaliciones de defensa, ideas y cambios en la educación especial en Brasil Segregar ou incluir? Coalizões de defesa, ideias e mudanças na educação especial do Brasil |
title |
Segregate or include? Advocacy coalitions, ideas, and changes in special education in Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Segregate or include? Advocacy coalitions, ideas, and changes in special education in Brazil Schabbach, Letícia Maria |
title_short |
Segregate or include? Advocacy coalitions, ideas, and changes in special education in Brazil |
title_full |
Segregate or include? Advocacy coalitions, ideas, and changes in special education in Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Segregate or include? Advocacy coalitions, ideas, and changes in special education in Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Segregate or include? Advocacy coalitions, ideas, and changes in special education in Brazil |
title_sort |
Segregate or include? Advocacy coalitions, ideas, and changes in special education in Brazil |
author |
Schabbach, Letícia Maria |
author_facet |
Schabbach, Letícia Maria Rosa, Júlia Gabriele Lima da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rosa, Júlia Gabriele Lima da |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Schabbach, Letícia Maria Rosa, Júlia Gabriele Lima da |
description |
This article examines the changes in education for people with disabilities (PwD) in Brazil, arising from the dissemination of ideas and government actions that introduced the perspective of inclusion. Based on the advocacy coalition framework, we analyzed the national special education subsystem (SES), the advocacy coalitions that integrate the SES, the beliefs in dispute, and the factors that explain the changes observed in the sector. This case study included historical reconstruction, document analysis, literature review and secondary data collection. The results identified the existence of two coalitions in the subsystem: specialized and exclusive care (coalition 1) and inclusive education (coalition 2). The first was dominant between 1973 and 2002, and the second emerged in the 2000s, becoming hegemonic in 2008 with the promulgation of the National Policy for Special Education from the Perspective of Inclusive Education. It was also found that coalition 1 is guided by the separation of students according to types of disability and learning abilities, emphasizing the importance of specialized clinical care and special schools. On the other hand, coalition 2 conceives that everyone is capable of learning, especially when inserted in standard classes of regular schools, within inclusive systems. As explanatory factors of the changes in the SES, exogenous variables stood out, particularly the changes in the Brazilian federal government in 2003, the worldwide dissemination of the inclusive education conceptions – reaching the education subsystems, and the feedback of public policies from the SES and other sectors. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/85023 10.1590/0034-761220210034 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/85023 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/0034-761220210034 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/85023/80369 https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/85023/80370 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 55 No. 6 (2021); 1312-1332 Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 55 Núm. 6 (2021); 1312-1332 Revista de Administração Pública; v. 55 n. 6 (2021); 1312-1332 1982-3134 0034-7612 reponame:Revista de Administração Pública instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Revista de Administração Pública |
collection |
Revista de Administração Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rap@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943774757355520 |