Participating in river basin management: the case of the Lake Guaíba Committee

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Flores, Rafael Kruter
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Misoczky, Maria Ceci
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Administração Pública
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6627
Resumo: Management models for water resources have been under transformation in many countries, becoming steadily more complex. The system adopted by the Brazilian law is characterized by decentralization, planning by basin, use of economic and regulatory instruments, and by social participation. This case study analyzes the participatory process of the Lake Guaíba Committee (Comitê Lago Guaíba), part of the Rio Grande do Sul State System of Water Resources (Sistema Estadual de Recursos Hídricos do Rio Grande do Sul). The study focuses on the roles of players with different interests in the basin planning. As methodological procedure, minutes from 2001/2002 Committee meetings, concepts, typologies, and factors associated with participation success, as suggested by many authors, were all analyzed. Based on attendance participation levels and during the meeting, the study indicated neglectful and active members, besides characterizing the influence of society and the role of the state government. The effective participation of civil society groups and organizations, as well as water consumers, in the committee¿s decisions was a positive point in the case study, although the state government did not participate in the committee¿s process.
id FGV-4_66407f4f40bdd084c02a616a42cdf236
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/6627
network_acronym_str FGV-4
network_name_str Revista de Administração Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Participating in river basin management: the case of the Lake Guaíba CommitteeParticipação no gerenciamento de bacia hidrográfica: o caso do Comitê Lago Guaíbawater resourcesparticipationcivil society.recursos hídricosparticipaçãosociedade civil.Management models for water resources have been under transformation in many countries, becoming steadily more complex. The system adopted by the Brazilian law is characterized by decentralization, planning by basin, use of economic and regulatory instruments, and by social participation. This case study analyzes the participatory process of the Lake Guaíba Committee (Comitê Lago Guaíba), part of the Rio Grande do Sul State System of Water Resources (Sistema Estadual de Recursos Hídricos do Rio Grande do Sul). The study focuses on the roles of players with different interests in the basin planning. As methodological procedure, minutes from 2001/2002 Committee meetings, concepts, typologies, and factors associated with participation success, as suggested by many authors, were all analyzed. Based on attendance participation levels and during the meeting, the study indicated neglectful and active members, besides characterizing the influence of society and the role of the state government. The effective participation of civil society groups and organizations, as well as water consumers, in the committee¿s decisions was a positive point in the case study, although the state government did not participate in the committee¿s process.Os modelos de gestão de recursos hídricos têm sofrido transformações em vários países, tornando-se cada vez mais complexos. O sistema adotado pela legislação brasileira é caracterizado por descentralização, planejamento por bacias, utilização de instrumentos normativos e econômicos, e participação da sociedade. Assumindo como situação problemática a participação de atores com interesses distintos no planejamento da bacia, este artigo analisa o processo participativo no Comitê Lago Guaíba como parte integrante do Sistema Estadual de Recursos Hídricos do Rio Grande do Sul. Como procedimento metodológico, analisaram-se as atas de reuniões do comitê na gestão 2001/02 e os conceitos, tipologias e fatores condicionantes do sucesso da participação sugeridos por diversos autores. A partir de índices de presença e contribuições na plenária identificaram-se membros omissos e atuantes e caracterizou-se a influência da sociedade e a atuação do governo do estado. Uma efetiva participação de grupos e organizações da sociedade civil, bem como dos usuários da água nas decisões do comitê, foi um ponto positivo no caso estudado. Entretanto, o artigo revela que governo do estado não participa no processo do comitê.Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)2008-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6627Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 42 No. 1 (2008); 109 a 132Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 42 Núm. 1 (2008); 109 a 132Revista de Administração Pública; v. 42 n. 1 (2008); 109 a 1321982-31340034-7612reponame:Revista de Administração Públicainstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6627/5211Flores, Rafael KruterMisoczky, Maria Ceciinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-11-17T20:53:43Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/6627Revistahttps://ebape.fgv.br/publicacoes/rapONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rap@fgv.br1982-31340034-7612opendoar:2021-11-17T20:53:43Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Participating in river basin management: the case of the Lake Guaíba Committee
Participação no gerenciamento de bacia hidrográfica: o caso do Comitê Lago Guaíba
title Participating in river basin management: the case of the Lake Guaíba Committee
spellingShingle Participating in river basin management: the case of the Lake Guaíba Committee
Flores, Rafael Kruter
water resources
participation
civil society.
recursos hídricos
participação
sociedade civil.
title_short Participating in river basin management: the case of the Lake Guaíba Committee
title_full Participating in river basin management: the case of the Lake Guaíba Committee
title_fullStr Participating in river basin management: the case of the Lake Guaíba Committee
title_full_unstemmed Participating in river basin management: the case of the Lake Guaíba Committee
title_sort Participating in river basin management: the case of the Lake Guaíba Committee
author Flores, Rafael Kruter
author_facet Flores, Rafael Kruter
Misoczky, Maria Ceci
author_role author
author2 Misoczky, Maria Ceci
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Flores, Rafael Kruter
Misoczky, Maria Ceci
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv water resources
participation
civil society.
recursos hídricos
participação
sociedade civil.
topic water resources
participation
civil society.
recursos hídricos
participação
sociedade civil.
description Management models for water resources have been under transformation in many countries, becoming steadily more complex. The system adopted by the Brazilian law is characterized by decentralization, planning by basin, use of economic and regulatory instruments, and by social participation. This case study analyzes the participatory process of the Lake Guaíba Committee (Comitê Lago Guaíba), part of the Rio Grande do Sul State System of Water Resources (Sistema Estadual de Recursos Hídricos do Rio Grande do Sul). The study focuses on the roles of players with different interests in the basin planning. As methodological procedure, minutes from 2001/2002 Committee meetings, concepts, typologies, and factors associated with participation success, as suggested by many authors, were all analyzed. Based on attendance participation levels and during the meeting, the study indicated neglectful and active members, besides characterizing the influence of society and the role of the state government. The effective participation of civil society groups and organizations, as well as water consumers, in the committee¿s decisions was a positive point in the case study, although the state government did not participate in the committee¿s process.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6627
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6627
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6627/5211
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 42 No. 1 (2008); 109 a 132
Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 42 Núm. 1 (2008); 109 a 132
Revista de Administração Pública; v. 42 n. 1 (2008); 109 a 132
1982-3134
0034-7612
reponame:Revista de Administração Pública
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Revista de Administração Pública
collection Revista de Administração Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rap@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943763984285696