Participating in river basin management: the case of the Lake Guaíba Committee
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2008 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Administração Pública |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6627 |
Resumo: | Management models for water resources have been under transformation in many countries, becoming steadily more complex. The system adopted by the Brazilian law is characterized by decentralization, planning by basin, use of economic and regulatory instruments, and by social participation. This case study analyzes the participatory process of the Lake Guaíba Committee (Comitê Lago Guaíba), part of the Rio Grande do Sul State System of Water Resources (Sistema Estadual de Recursos Hídricos do Rio Grande do Sul). The study focuses on the roles of players with different interests in the basin planning. As methodological procedure, minutes from 2001/2002 Committee meetings, concepts, typologies, and factors associated with participation success, as suggested by many authors, were all analyzed. Based on attendance participation levels and during the meeting, the study indicated neglectful and active members, besides characterizing the influence of society and the role of the state government. The effective participation of civil society groups and organizations, as well as water consumers, in the committee¿s decisions was a positive point in the case study, although the state government did not participate in the committee¿s process. |
id |
FGV-4_66407f4f40bdd084c02a616a42cdf236 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/6627 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-4 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Administração Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Participating in river basin management: the case of the Lake Guaíba CommitteeParticipação no gerenciamento de bacia hidrográfica: o caso do Comitê Lago Guaíbawater resourcesparticipationcivil society.recursos hídricosparticipaçãosociedade civil.Management models for water resources have been under transformation in many countries, becoming steadily more complex. The system adopted by the Brazilian law is characterized by decentralization, planning by basin, use of economic and regulatory instruments, and by social participation. This case study analyzes the participatory process of the Lake Guaíba Committee (Comitê Lago Guaíba), part of the Rio Grande do Sul State System of Water Resources (Sistema Estadual de Recursos Hídricos do Rio Grande do Sul). The study focuses on the roles of players with different interests in the basin planning. As methodological procedure, minutes from 2001/2002 Committee meetings, concepts, typologies, and factors associated with participation success, as suggested by many authors, were all analyzed. Based on attendance participation levels and during the meeting, the study indicated neglectful and active members, besides characterizing the influence of society and the role of the state government. The effective participation of civil society groups and organizations, as well as water consumers, in the committee¿s decisions was a positive point in the case study, although the state government did not participate in the committee¿s process.Os modelos de gestão de recursos hídricos têm sofrido transformações em vários países, tornando-se cada vez mais complexos. O sistema adotado pela legislação brasileira é caracterizado por descentralização, planejamento por bacias, utilização de instrumentos normativos e econômicos, e participação da sociedade. Assumindo como situação problemática a participação de atores com interesses distintos no planejamento da bacia, este artigo analisa o processo participativo no Comitê Lago Guaíba como parte integrante do Sistema Estadual de Recursos Hídricos do Rio Grande do Sul. Como procedimento metodológico, analisaram-se as atas de reuniões do comitê na gestão 2001/02 e os conceitos, tipologias e fatores condicionantes do sucesso da participação sugeridos por diversos autores. A partir de índices de presença e contribuições na plenária identificaram-se membros omissos e atuantes e caracterizou-se a influência da sociedade e a atuação do governo do estado. Uma efetiva participação de grupos e organizações da sociedade civil, bem como dos usuários da água nas decisões do comitê, foi um ponto positivo no caso estudado. Entretanto, o artigo revela que governo do estado não participa no processo do comitê.Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)2008-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6627Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 42 No. 1 (2008); 109 a 132Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 42 Núm. 1 (2008); 109 a 132Revista de Administração Pública; v. 42 n. 1 (2008); 109 a 1321982-31340034-7612reponame:Revista de Administração Públicainstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6627/5211Flores, Rafael KruterMisoczky, Maria Ceciinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-11-17T20:53:43Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/6627Revistahttps://ebape.fgv.br/publicacoes/rapONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rap@fgv.br1982-31340034-7612opendoar:2021-11-17T20:53:43Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Participating in river basin management: the case of the Lake Guaíba Committee Participação no gerenciamento de bacia hidrográfica: o caso do Comitê Lago Guaíba |
title |
Participating in river basin management: the case of the Lake Guaíba Committee |
spellingShingle |
Participating in river basin management: the case of the Lake Guaíba Committee Flores, Rafael Kruter water resources participation civil society. recursos hídricos participação sociedade civil. |
title_short |
Participating in river basin management: the case of the Lake Guaíba Committee |
title_full |
Participating in river basin management: the case of the Lake Guaíba Committee |
title_fullStr |
Participating in river basin management: the case of the Lake Guaíba Committee |
title_full_unstemmed |
Participating in river basin management: the case of the Lake Guaíba Committee |
title_sort |
Participating in river basin management: the case of the Lake Guaíba Committee |
author |
Flores, Rafael Kruter |
author_facet |
Flores, Rafael Kruter Misoczky, Maria Ceci |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Misoczky, Maria Ceci |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Flores, Rafael Kruter Misoczky, Maria Ceci |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
water resources participation civil society. recursos hídricos participação sociedade civil. |
topic |
water resources participation civil society. recursos hídricos participação sociedade civil. |
description |
Management models for water resources have been under transformation in many countries, becoming steadily more complex. The system adopted by the Brazilian law is characterized by decentralization, planning by basin, use of economic and regulatory instruments, and by social participation. This case study analyzes the participatory process of the Lake Guaíba Committee (Comitê Lago Guaíba), part of the Rio Grande do Sul State System of Water Resources (Sistema Estadual de Recursos Hídricos do Rio Grande do Sul). The study focuses on the roles of players with different interests in the basin planning. As methodological procedure, minutes from 2001/2002 Committee meetings, concepts, typologies, and factors associated with participation success, as suggested by many authors, were all analyzed. Based on attendance participation levels and during the meeting, the study indicated neglectful and active members, besides characterizing the influence of society and the role of the state government. The effective participation of civil society groups and organizations, as well as water consumers, in the committee¿s decisions was a positive point in the case study, although the state government did not participate in the committee¿s process. |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6627 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6627 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6627/5211 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 42 No. 1 (2008); 109 a 132 Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 42 Núm. 1 (2008); 109 a 132 Revista de Administração Pública; v. 42 n. 1 (2008); 109 a 132 1982-3134 0034-7612 reponame:Revista de Administração Pública instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Revista de Administração Pública |
collection |
Revista de Administração Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rap@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943763984285696 |