Models of man and administrative theory

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ramos, Alberto Guerreiro
Data de Publicação: 1984
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Administração Pública
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/10559
Resumo: Administrative theory can no longer legitimize the functional rationality of the organization as it largely has done. The basic problem of an earlier time was to overcome the scarcity of material goods and elementary services. In that period a great amount of toil in work settings was technically and socially necessary and even inevitable, which is not true at present. What brings about the crises in today's organizations is the fact that by design and operation they still assume that old scarcities continue to be basic, while in fact contemporary man is aware of critical scarcities belonging to another order, i.e., related to needs beyond the level of simple survival. Thus, the Social Darwinism that has traditionally validated management theory and practice has become outdated by the force of circumstances. This article is an attempt to reassess the evolution of administrative theory. It takes models of man as its point of reference (namely, the operational man, the reactive man, and the parenthetical man).
id FGV-4_734a17a5a6ad32464daff4e42dc0b6b9
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/10559
network_acronym_str FGV-4
network_name_str Revista de Administração Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Models of man and administrative theoryModelos de hombre y de la teoría administrativaModelos de homem e teoria administrativa Administrative theory can no longer legitimize the functional rationality of the organization as it largely has done. The basic problem of an earlier time was to overcome the scarcity of material goods and elementary services. In that period a great amount of toil in work settings was technically and socially necessary and even inevitable, which is not true at present. What brings about the crises in today's organizations is the fact that by design and operation they still assume that old scarcities continue to be basic, while in fact contemporary man is aware of critical scarcities belonging to another order, i.e., related to needs beyond the level of simple survival. Thus, the Social Darwinism that has traditionally validated management theory and practice has become outdated by the force of circumstances. This article is an attempt to reassess the evolution of administrative theory. It takes models of man as its point of reference (namely, the operational man, the reactive man, and the parenthetical man). A partir do final do século XIX vem ocorrendo uma dramática mudança de orientação nas abordagens à organização e ao trabalho. Houve um tempo em que o sucesso nos negócios era corolário de talento e as doutrinas de Malthus, Darwin e Spencer encontraram condições ideais para florescer. Assim, o influente sociólogo William Graham Summer não hesitou em afirmar que não haveria maneira de integrar o interesse de empregadores e empregados. O antagonismo entre aqueles interesses foi legitimado pelas "práticas" e pela ciência social da época. O fato de que o critério decisivo de então teve sucesso é indicado pela popularidade de Elbert Hubbard em Message to Garcia, de Orison Swett Marden em Power of Will e de Dale Camegie em Como fazer amigos e influenciar pessoas, publicado em 1936 e do qual foram vendidos mais de 4 milhões de cópias. Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)1984-08-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/10559Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 18 No. 2 (1984); 3 a 12Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 18 Núm. 2 (1984); 3 a 12Revista de Administração Pública; v. 18 n. 2 (1984); 3 a 121982-31340034-7612reponame:Revista de Administração Públicainstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/10559/9557Ramos, Alberto Guerreiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2013-08-22T20:19:30Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/10559Revistahttps://ebape.fgv.br/publicacoes/rapONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rap@fgv.br1982-31340034-7612opendoar:2013-08-22T20:19:30Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Models of man and administrative theory
Modelos de hombre y de la teoría administrativa
Modelos de homem e teoria administrativa
title Models of man and administrative theory
spellingShingle Models of man and administrative theory
Ramos, Alberto Guerreiro
title_short Models of man and administrative theory
title_full Models of man and administrative theory
title_fullStr Models of man and administrative theory
title_full_unstemmed Models of man and administrative theory
title_sort Models of man and administrative theory
author Ramos, Alberto Guerreiro
author_facet Ramos, Alberto Guerreiro
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ramos, Alberto Guerreiro
description Administrative theory can no longer legitimize the functional rationality of the organization as it largely has done. The basic problem of an earlier time was to overcome the scarcity of material goods and elementary services. In that period a great amount of toil in work settings was technically and socially necessary and even inevitable, which is not true at present. What brings about the crises in today's organizations is the fact that by design and operation they still assume that old scarcities continue to be basic, while in fact contemporary man is aware of critical scarcities belonging to another order, i.e., related to needs beyond the level of simple survival. Thus, the Social Darwinism that has traditionally validated management theory and practice has become outdated by the force of circumstances. This article is an attempt to reassess the evolution of administrative theory. It takes models of man as its point of reference (namely, the operational man, the reactive man, and the parenthetical man).
publishDate 1984
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 1984-08-22
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/10559
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/10559
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/10559/9557
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 18 No. 2 (1984); 3 a 12
Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 18 Núm. 2 (1984); 3 a 12
Revista de Administração Pública; v. 18 n. 2 (1984); 3 a 12
1982-3134
0034-7612
reponame:Revista de Administração Pública
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Revista de Administração Pública
collection Revista de Administração Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rap@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943770839875584