Triangulation method in administration studies: generating conversations between paradigms or mere “convergent” validations?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Administração Pública |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/7082 |
Resumo: | The aim of this paper is to answer the following question: the triangulation method has been used in administration researchs from a multiparadigmatic perspective, generating conversations between paradigms? Or it has been used simply in order to perform a “convergent” validation between the methods? To answer this question, we used a database with 174 papers of three Annals of EnAnpad that used the triangulation. These papers were analyzed qualitatively to verify how the triangulation was conducted to investigate whether the combination was only at the method level, or if it reached at the paradigm level. The position adopted by the researchers in this paper is one that defends the importance of paradigmatic conversation for dealing with social phenomena that are characteristic in researchs in administration. The results showed that combination of methods has been adopted mainly in the purpose of convergent validation without discussions between different worldviews and different scientific knowledge views. What is noticed is its application mainly in studies which predominates, in epistemological terms, a positivist view and, in methodological terms, a nomothetic approach. |
id |
FGV-4_84e98b2406a5960607f75b28708d4690 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/7082 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-4 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Administração Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Triangulation method in administration studies: generating conversations between paradigms or mere “convergent” validations?Triangulação entre métodos na administração: gerando conversações paradigmáticas ou meras validações “convergentes”?triangulationmethodadministrationparadigmsconvergent validation.triangulaçãométodosadministraçãoparadigmasvalidação convergente.The aim of this paper is to answer the following question: the triangulation method has been used in administration researchs from a multiparadigmatic perspective, generating conversations between paradigms? Or it has been used simply in order to perform a “convergent” validation between the methods? To answer this question, we used a database with 174 papers of three Annals of EnAnpad that used the triangulation. These papers were analyzed qualitatively to verify how the triangulation was conducted to investigate whether the combination was only at the method level, or if it reached at the paradigm level. The position adopted by the researchers in this paper is one that defends the importance of paradigmatic conversation for dealing with social phenomena that are characteristic in researchs in administration. The results showed that combination of methods has been adopted mainly in the purpose of convergent validation without discussions between different worldviews and different scientific knowledge views. What is noticed is its application mainly in studies which predominates, in epistemological terms, a positivist view and, in methodological terms, a nomothetic approach.O objetivo deste artigo é buscar responder à seguinte questão: a triangulação como método tem sidoutilizada nas pesquisas em administração de uma perspectiva multiparadigmática, gerando conversaçõesentre paradigmas? Ou tem sido utilizada simplesmente no intuito de se realizar uma validação“convergente” entre os métodos na pesquisa? Para responder à questão, utilizou-se o banco de dadosreferente a 174 artigos que utilizaram a triangulação em três anais do EnAnpad. Esses artigos foramanalisados qualitativamente para verificar de que forma a triangulação foi conduzida, a fim de investigarse a combinação se ateve apenas no nível do método, ou se atingiu o âmbito paradigmático. O posicionamentoadotado pelos pesquisadores neste estudo é o de defender a importância da conversaçãoparadigmática para lidar com os fenômenos sociais característicos das pesquisas em administração. Osresultados demonstraram que a combinação de métodos tem sido adotada principalmente no intuito devalidação convergente, não implicando necessariamente conversações efetivas entre diferentes visõesde mundo e de conhecimento científico. O que se observa é sua aplicação principalmente em estudosnos quais predomina, em termos epistemológicos, uma visão positivista e, em termos metodológicos,uma postura nomotética.Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)2012-12-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/7082Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 46 No. 1 (2012); 191 a 220Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 46 Núm. 1 (2012); 191 a 220Revista de Administração Pública; v. 46 n. 1 (2012); 191 a 2201982-31340034-7612reponame:Revista de Administração Públicainstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/7082/5637Teixeira, Juliana CristinaNascimento, Marco César RibeiroCarrieri, Alexandre de Páduainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-11-17T20:46:54Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/7082Revistahttps://ebape.fgv.br/publicacoes/rapONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rap@fgv.br1982-31340034-7612opendoar:2021-11-17T20:46:54Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Triangulation method in administration studies: generating conversations between paradigms or mere “convergent” validations? Triangulação entre métodos na administração: gerando conversações paradigmáticas ou meras validações “convergentes”? |
title |
Triangulation method in administration studies: generating conversations between paradigms or mere “convergent” validations? |
spellingShingle |
Triangulation method in administration studies: generating conversations between paradigms or mere “convergent” validations? Teixeira, Juliana Cristina triangulation method administration paradigms convergent validation. triangulação métodos administração paradigmas validação convergente. |
title_short |
Triangulation method in administration studies: generating conversations between paradigms or mere “convergent” validations? |
title_full |
Triangulation method in administration studies: generating conversations between paradigms or mere “convergent” validations? |
title_fullStr |
Triangulation method in administration studies: generating conversations between paradigms or mere “convergent” validations? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Triangulation method in administration studies: generating conversations between paradigms or mere “convergent” validations? |
title_sort |
Triangulation method in administration studies: generating conversations between paradigms or mere “convergent” validations? |
author |
Teixeira, Juliana Cristina |
author_facet |
Teixeira, Juliana Cristina Nascimento, Marco César Ribeiro Carrieri, Alexandre de Pádua |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Nascimento, Marco César Ribeiro Carrieri, Alexandre de Pádua |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Teixeira, Juliana Cristina Nascimento, Marco César Ribeiro Carrieri, Alexandre de Pádua |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
triangulation method administration paradigms convergent validation. triangulação métodos administração paradigmas validação convergente. |
topic |
triangulation method administration paradigms convergent validation. triangulação métodos administração paradigmas validação convergente. |
description |
The aim of this paper is to answer the following question: the triangulation method has been used in administration researchs from a multiparadigmatic perspective, generating conversations between paradigms? Or it has been used simply in order to perform a “convergent” validation between the methods? To answer this question, we used a database with 174 papers of three Annals of EnAnpad that used the triangulation. These papers were analyzed qualitatively to verify how the triangulation was conducted to investigate whether the combination was only at the method level, or if it reached at the paradigm level. The position adopted by the researchers in this paper is one that defends the importance of paradigmatic conversation for dealing with social phenomena that are characteristic in researchs in administration. The results showed that combination of methods has been adopted mainly in the purpose of convergent validation without discussions between different worldviews and different scientific knowledge views. What is noticed is its application mainly in studies which predominates, in epistemological terms, a positivist view and, in methodological terms, a nomothetic approach. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-12-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/7082 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/7082 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/7082/5637 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 46 No. 1 (2012); 191 a 220 Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 46 Núm. 1 (2012); 191 a 220 Revista de Administração Pública; v. 46 n. 1 (2012); 191 a 220 1982-3134 0034-7612 reponame:Revista de Administração Pública instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Revista de Administração Pública |
collection |
Revista de Administração Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rap@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943765951414272 |