The effect of allocation function in budgeting to reduce income inequality in Brazil: an analysis of spending on education and health from 1995 to 2012

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa, Giovanni Pacelli Carvalho Lustosa da
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Gartner, Ivan Ricardo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Administração Pública
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/65606
Resumo: Income inequality is seen as a major problem of contemporary society. In order to reverse inequality the state can use allocative budget functions. This study sought to identify the impacts of allocative budget functions on income inequality for Brazilian states from 1995 to 2012. Spending on education and health was considered as an allocative function proxy, while the Gini coefficient, the Theil coefficient, was used as a proxy for income inequality. This found the ratio between the richest 10% and the poorest 40%, and the ratio between the richest 20% and poorest 20%. The functional relationship between the two sets of variables was explored in the analysis of panel data and Tobit regression. Considering aggregate expenditure on education and health of states and municipalities in the period, it was concluded that federative units that invested more in health have been better at reducing income inequality, with the opposite effect occurring for the cost of education. When spending on health and education are broken down into several sections, it can be seen that the federation units with higher volume of spending in the following sub-functions (2nd level of function) – primary care, hospital care, preventive support and outpatient care, and early childhood education – have made greater gains in reducing income inequality.
id FGV-4_a3d1bde10b5cd22f98251f43cb1e1848
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/65606
network_acronym_str FGV-4
network_name_str Revista de Administração Pública
repository_id_str
spelling The effect of allocation function in budgeting to reduce income inequality in Brazil: an analysis of spending on education and health from 1995 to 2012El efecto de la función asignativa en la reducción de la desigualdad de ingresos en Brasil: un análisis del gasto en educación y salud 1995-2012O efeito da função orçamentária alocativa na redução da desigualdade de renda no Brasil: uma análise dos gastos em educação e saúde no período de 1995 a 2012regional economyincome inequalitybudget allocative functionpublic spending on education and healtheconomia regionaldesigualdade de rendafunção orçamentária alocativagastos públicos com educação e saúdeIncome inequality is seen as a major problem of contemporary society. In order to reverse inequality the state can use allocative budget functions. This study sought to identify the impacts of allocative budget functions on income inequality for Brazilian states from 1995 to 2012. Spending on education and health was considered as an allocative function proxy, while the Gini coefficient, the Theil coefficient, was used as a proxy for income inequality. This found the ratio between the richest 10% and the poorest 40%, and the ratio between the richest 20% and poorest 20%. The functional relationship between the two sets of variables was explored in the analysis of panel data and Tobit regression. Considering aggregate expenditure on education and health of states and municipalities in the period, it was concluded that federative units that invested more in health have been better at reducing income inequality, with the opposite effect occurring for the cost of education. When spending on health and education are broken down into several sections, it can be seen that the federation units with higher volume of spending in the following sub-functions (2nd level of function) – primary care, hospital care, preventive support and outpatient care, and early childhood education – have made greater gains in reducing income inequality.La desigualdad de ingresos se ve como un problema importante de la sociedad contemporánea. Con el fin de revertir la situación desigual, el Estado puede actuar mediante la función asignativa de presupuesto. Este estudio trata de identificar los impactos de la función de la asignación de recursos del presupuesto en la desigualdad de ingresos para los estados de Brasil 1995 a 2012. Fueron considerados como un indicador de la función asignativa el gasto en educación y salud, mientras que se utilizaron como apoderado la desigualdad de ingresos el coeficiente de Gini, el coeficiente de Theil, la relación entre el 10% más rico y el 40% más pobre, y la relación entre el 20% más rico y el 20% más pobre. La relación funcional entre los dos conjuntos de variables se exploró a partir del análisis de datos de panel y el panel de regresión Tobit. Teniendo en cuenta los gastos agregados sobre la educación y la salud de los estados y municipios en el período, se concluyó que las Unidades de la Federación que han invertido más en salud han logrado reducir la desigualdad de ingresos con mayor intensidad, que se producen efecto contrario con el costo de la educación. Cuando el gasto en salud y educación ha sido dividido en varias secciones, se concluyó que las unidades de la federación con mayor volumen de gasto en la siguientes subfunciones (segundo nivel de función): atención primaria, atención hospitalaria, asistencia preventiva y la atención ambulatoria, y educación de la primera infancia han logrado reducir la desigualdad de ingresos con mayor intensidad.A desigualdade de renda é apontada como um dos grandes problemas da sociedade atual. A fim de reverter o cenário desigual, o Estado pode atuar utilizando a função orçamentária alocativa. Este estudo buscou identificar os impactos da função alocativa do orçamento sobre a desigualdade de renda, para as unidades federativas brasileiras no período de 1995 a 2012. Foram considerados como proxy da função alocativa os gastos com educação e saúde, enquanto foram utilizados como proxy da desigualdade de renda o coeficiente de Gini, o coeficiente de Theil, a proporção entre os 10% mais ricos e os 40% mais pobres, e a proporção entre os 20% mais ricos e os 20% mais pobres. A relação funcional entre os dois conjuntos de variáveis foi explorada a partir da análise de dados em painel e da regressão tobit em painel. Considerando-se os gastos agregados em educação e saúde de estados e municípios no período, concluiu-se que as unidades da federação que investiram mais em saúde conseguiram reduzir as desigualdades de renda com maior intensidade, ocorrendo efeito oposto com as despesas com ensino. Quando os gastos em saúde e ensino foram desagregados em várias rubricas, concluiu-se que as unidades da federação com maior volume de gastos nas seguintes subfunções (2° nível da função): atenção básica, assistência hospitalar, suporte profilático e ambulatorial, e educação infantil conseguiram reduzir as desigualdades de renda com maior intensidade.Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)2017-04-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/65606Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 51 No. 2 (2017); 264-293Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 51 Núm. 2 (2017); 264-293Revista de Administração Pública; v. 51 n. 2 (2017); 264-2931982-31340034-7612reponame:Revista de Administração Públicainstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporenghttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/65606/63380https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/65606/pdf_107Copyright (c) 2016 Revista de Administração Públicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCosta, Giovanni Pacelli Carvalho Lustosa daGartner, Ivan Ricardo2017-04-26T14:30:46Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/65606Revistahttps://ebape.fgv.br/publicacoes/rapONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rap@fgv.br1982-31340034-7612opendoar:2017-04-26T14:30:46Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The effect of allocation function in budgeting to reduce income inequality in Brazil: an analysis of spending on education and health from 1995 to 2012
El efecto de la función asignativa en la reducción de la desigualdad de ingresos en Brasil: un análisis del gasto en educación y salud 1995-2012
O efeito da função orçamentária alocativa na redução da desigualdade de renda no Brasil: uma análise dos gastos em educação e saúde no período de 1995 a 2012
title The effect of allocation function in budgeting to reduce income inequality in Brazil: an analysis of spending on education and health from 1995 to 2012
spellingShingle The effect of allocation function in budgeting to reduce income inequality in Brazil: an analysis of spending on education and health from 1995 to 2012
Costa, Giovanni Pacelli Carvalho Lustosa da
regional economy
income inequality
budget allocative function
public spending on education and health
economia regional
desigualdade de renda
função orçamentária alocativa
gastos públicos com educação e saúde
title_short The effect of allocation function in budgeting to reduce income inequality in Brazil: an analysis of spending on education and health from 1995 to 2012
title_full The effect of allocation function in budgeting to reduce income inequality in Brazil: an analysis of spending on education and health from 1995 to 2012
title_fullStr The effect of allocation function in budgeting to reduce income inequality in Brazil: an analysis of spending on education and health from 1995 to 2012
title_full_unstemmed The effect of allocation function in budgeting to reduce income inequality in Brazil: an analysis of spending on education and health from 1995 to 2012
title_sort The effect of allocation function in budgeting to reduce income inequality in Brazil: an analysis of spending on education and health from 1995 to 2012
author Costa, Giovanni Pacelli Carvalho Lustosa da
author_facet Costa, Giovanni Pacelli Carvalho Lustosa da
Gartner, Ivan Ricardo
author_role author
author2 Gartner, Ivan Ricardo
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa, Giovanni Pacelli Carvalho Lustosa da
Gartner, Ivan Ricardo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv regional economy
income inequality
budget allocative function
public spending on education and health
economia regional
desigualdade de renda
função orçamentária alocativa
gastos públicos com educação e saúde
topic regional economy
income inequality
budget allocative function
public spending on education and health
economia regional
desigualdade de renda
função orçamentária alocativa
gastos públicos com educação e saúde
description Income inequality is seen as a major problem of contemporary society. In order to reverse inequality the state can use allocative budget functions. This study sought to identify the impacts of allocative budget functions on income inequality for Brazilian states from 1995 to 2012. Spending on education and health was considered as an allocative function proxy, while the Gini coefficient, the Theil coefficient, was used as a proxy for income inequality. This found the ratio between the richest 10% and the poorest 40%, and the ratio between the richest 20% and poorest 20%. The functional relationship between the two sets of variables was explored in the analysis of panel data and Tobit regression. Considering aggregate expenditure on education and health of states and municipalities in the period, it was concluded that federative units that invested more in health have been better at reducing income inequality, with the opposite effect occurring for the cost of education. When spending on health and education are broken down into several sections, it can be seen that the federation units with higher volume of spending in the following sub-functions (2nd level of function) – primary care, hospital care, preventive support and outpatient care, and early childhood education – have made greater gains in reducing income inequality.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-04-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/65606
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/65606
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/65606/63380
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/65606/pdf_107
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Revista de Administração Pública
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Revista de Administração Pública
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 51 No. 2 (2017); 264-293
Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 51 Núm. 2 (2017); 264-293
Revista de Administração Pública; v. 51 n. 2 (2017); 264-293
1982-3134
0034-7612
reponame:Revista de Administração Pública
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Revista de Administração Pública
collection Revista de Administração Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rap@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943772479848448